₦airaland Forum

basilico:
I strongly disapprove this message .
It's callous.

Everyone happy?

basilico:
I strongly disapprove this message .
It's callous.

Everyone happy?

feedthenation:
---Felon 47 is a deplorable person---without an ounce of humanity or decency in his life---yet you have accepted / supported him blindly with his other TruthSocial posts being nasty to others---

bayelsaowei:
When you call out Trumps insanity, they say its TDS..

Take a look at his cabinet members..all insane individuals who have completely lost their souls - blindly following a vile unhinged man.

MTG has left the man to his derangement. Others should do while they still have time.. its worthless supporting a person like Trump.

feedthenation:
---Felon 47 is a deplorable person---without an ounce of humanity or decency in his life---yet you have accepted / supported him blindly with his other TruthSocial posts being nasty to others---

Evilthoughts:
You wrote all those long epistles for nothing because your country proved to be a hypocrite and the haters I told everybody about. Why are you chasing your Palestinians friends away ,is because they are not white?. Your government is turning away their planes after claiming friendship With the terrorist place. You people are jokers.

bayelsaowei:
this unhinged wereyy of a man has been doing this forever. Uncouth and vile.. are you tired of his highhandedness? Has he started staining your white?

folks like you have always assumed that he is either joking, being real, not being politically correct when he behaves like a child. Some persons here have openly said that the US doesnt need a role model but a solid leader just to support Trumps bad character. This madness of Trump is what drove millions of persons to vote for him.. can those millions of people take a look at the mental patient they've been supporting? Karoline Leavitt will defend this insanity later today.

Trump has insulted reporters calling them unprintable names, insulted immigrants calling them garbage or even worse names.

He works like a raving mad man, but folks say thats what america needs..

TRUMP would do worse than this and many fellow unhinged persons like him would still support him.

Basilico change your ways..

Evilthoughts:
I hate it too. I was listening to some black Americans who live here in South Africa explaining the nonsense on TV and getting the support of these hateful locals here just because those children of slaves supported these people here in discriminating against Chidimma. Both blacks are the most wicked ,inferior and racist people you can ever meet. They don't like whites, they don't like Indian, they don't like fellow blacks. I don't understand people who discriminate and insult their fellow only these two type of black people cause such disunity . In Nigeria we welcome everybody who is black to be Nigerian. There is nothing special about those foundational blacks they are like us and should be building with us. But the laziness and envy won't allow them. They are both busy mocking Somalis for being abused by Trump instead of forming black unity against him.

basilico:
Now that you brought it out, which candidate would you propose I support , and for what reasons?

Lionessza6:
FBAs built identity, institutions, and civil rights under extreme historical constraints.

Black South Africans fought one of the most brutal modern racial systems and and later built strong institutions (courts, media, civil society)with strong constitutional protections.

Unity cannot be built on bitterness toward those who survived and organized effectively....and that's how I view this toxic pan-Africanism you believe in. You are trying to project your self hate and disappoint onto black SA and Americans. You refuse to be accountable for the institutional failures of where you come from. We own ours here and you run-off to be moral police of other societies .

Success is not betrayal.A toxic idea has crept into pan-Africanism.....“If you succeed, you owe everyone else indefinitely.”

This logic is dangerous and creates suspicion,resentment and divisions .FBAs asserting their identity is not anti-African.
Black South Africans prioritizing their poor citizens is not anti-African.Nation-building and group self-preservation are not colonial behavior.No people on Earth are told that having boundaries equals betrayal.....except these two groups and we are sick of the fake moral shaming by people who believe in individual success and hustle culture than challenging and transforming institutions to serve all so that everyone can feel a sense of national belonging.

FBAs are attacked for defining their lineage.Black South Africans are attacked for enforcing borders.

Meanwhile,Corrupt African elites escape scrutiny. Failed governance is excused.Accountability is redirected outward.This is moral displacement....
Instead of fixing internal problems, frustration is projected onto groups that appear more stable or organized.That’s not justice.....that’s avoidance.

Identity is not exclusion.Pan-Africanists deliberately misunderstand this.FBAs saying “we are a distinct people” = “we reject Africa”
Black South Africans saying “citizens come first” = “we reject Africans”

Every African ethnic group asserts identity.Every nation prioritizes citizens.Yet only these two are shamed for it.Equality means everyone gets the same right to self-definition and we both have every right to assert our identities without being morally blackshamed by those who failed themselves.
In South Africa we believe in Africa states should have ;
Mutual respect
Voluntary cooperation
Accountability at home
Solidarity without coercion

We hate:
unity without reciprocity
rights without duties
solidarity without shared sacrifice.


Unity cannot be forced by shame and Envy destroys solidarity.

Evilthoughts:
Long epistles again that mean nothing.

South Africa is in Africa and South Africa owes Africa for it's liberation and survival, if not the whole of Africa you people would be dead . Your black American friends are well represented by Nigerians in most professions over there because we are smarter and more hardworking .

Borders were brought here by colonialist not your father's and no African can claim borders against others . Africans can live any where they want within Africa, that's not for you people to decide. South africa belongs to every African just like Nigeria.

You are jealous of our hustling nature because we succeed and make it anywhere we are. And you are locals who can never survive in the West like Nigerians have. You are a sovereign nation with your white master but you don't want Nigerians to be South Africans ,that'd why you attacked Chidimma but cannot wait to call your Boer masters South Africans. Embarrassing. The difference between you and us is that we are hustlers and you are envious and local . Nigerians are the most influential and educated blacks and you envy this . Make piss that we are boss of blackness.

Evilthoughts:
Long epistles again that mean nothing.

South Africa is in Africa and South Africa owes Africa for it's liberation and survival, if not the whole of Africa you people would be dead . Your black American friends are well represented by Nigerians in most professions over there because we are smarter and more hardworking .

Borders were brought here by colonialist not your father's and no African can claim borders against others . Africans can live any where they want within Africa, that's not for you people to decide. South africa belongs to every African just like Nigeria.

You are jealous of our hustling nature because we succeed and make it anywhere we are. And you are locals who can never survive in the West like Nigerians have. You are a sovereign nation with your white master but you don't want Nigerians to be South Africans ,that'd why you attacked Chidimma but cannot wait to call your Boer masters South Africans. Embarrassing. The difference between you and us is that we are hustlers and you are envious and local . Nigerians are the most influential and educated blacks and you envy this . Make piss that we are boss of blackness.

Lionessza6:
4.Whether our ancestors drew them or not, today those borders define our sovereignty. South Africa isn't an empty field ,it's a country with a lot to protect from people to infrastructure, from institutions to law and order. Enforcing borders isn’t about who built them; it’s about protecting what is within and what makes our lives easier.

So yes, borders weren’t built by Africans( even though we had symbolic borders of our own), but neither was freedom handed to us on a silver platter. And just like you wouldn’t let a guest eat your last plate of jollof without asking, we won’t let anyone stroll in without respecting the country that our identity is tied to

Lionessza6:
If you were not an irredeemable illiterate you would know that Pan-Africanism and the One Africa movement promotes :
1. Black unity
2. Political and Economic Liberation
3.Cultural Renaissance and Reclamation
4. Social Justice and Equality
5. Economic Independence
6.Decolonization of the Mind
7. Reparations for African People
And others. But blind hate and arrogance will not make you South Africans see how this benefit you because you think living close to white people makes you better Africans.

The same bores who left for America? Another joke. The same ones living in Orania because they hate you ? You have self-esteem issues.











1. Ah yes, mainstream Pan-Africanism .... where accountability is cancelled, but apartheid debt has an eternal subscription plan.

Apparently, South Africa is required to wake up every morning, apologise, pay, host, absorb, share, and shut up forever. Governance? Borders? Domestic priorities? No no, those are counter-revolutionary😅😅.

Apartheid debt is no longer a historical issue to be resolved; it’s a moral credit card some people keep swiping whenever their own states fail. Electricity collapsed? Apartheid debt. Currency in free fall? Apartheid debt. Elites looted the treasury? Clearly South Africa’s fault.

This isn’t solidarity... it’s a pull-him-down conference call. A gathering of professional victims who demand open wallets but reject open books. No audits, no reforms, no consequences ... just vibes, slogans, and guilt-tripping.

And notice the pattern: Pan-Africanism only gets loud when a Black country builds institutions, enforces borders, or refuses to be emotionally extorted. Suddenly it’s “betrayal,” “neoliberalism,” or “you forgot where you came from.”

South Africa’s real crime isn’t apartheid or history ....t’s refusing to fail quietly so others can feel better about collapsing loudly.

If this is Pan-Africanism, then it’s not a liberation ideology. It’s a guilt economy .. powered by apartheid debt, managed by unaccountable elites, and paid for by citizens who are told that self-respect is selfish.


2.This “Black unity” you preach is rental solidarity. You activate it when you need cover(anti-racism, access, legitimacy,and drop it the moment competition starts)

It’s always: “Protect me from white systems,” but also “Let me dominate Black space.”

You’re mad because Black Americans and Black South Africans built institutions, culture, and influence...that work better than what you built at home. That ruins the fantasy that numbers, hustle, and loudness equal leadership.

You confuse migration with superiority and visibility with ownership. Being everywhere isn’t the same as building something that lasts.

Hustle culture survives by finding hosts. Institutional cultures survive by building systems. That’s the difference....and guilt-tripping won’t close it. 😅

3. Look, the Boers are part of South Africa’s foundation.... our history, our DNA...something we cannot deny or escape ...thats why they are part of the first nationsof what later made the Republic that attracted you . Just like Black Americans( and the white settlers there ofcourse)in the U.S....born into the story, building institutions, shaping the country. You and your entitled crew? Are immigrants, guests trying to claim overnight what generations built. There’s a difference between being part of a nation and just showing up. The history of SA is incomplete without the Boere identity and story. Make peace with this clearly upsetting reality.

Lionessza6:
4.Whether our ancestors drew them or not, today those borders define our sovereignty. South Africa isn't an empty field ,it's a country with a lot to protect from people to infrastructure, from institutions to law and order. Enforcing borders isn’t about who built them; it’s about protecting what is within and what makes our lives easier.

So yes, borders weren’t built by Africans( even though we had symbolic borders of our own), but neither was freedom handed to us on a silver platter. And just like you wouldn’t let a guest eat your last plate of jollof without asking, we won’t let anyone stroll in without respecting the country that our identity is tied to

Lionessza6:
1. Ah yes, mainstream Pan-Africanism .... where accountability is cancelled, but apartheid debt has an eternal subscription plan.

Apparently, South Africa is required to wake up every morning, apologise, pay, host, absorb, share, and shut up forever. Governance? Borders? Domestic priorities? No no, those are counter-revolutionary😅😅.

Apartheid debt is no longer a historical issue to be resolved; it’s a moral credit card some people keep swiping whenever their own states fail. Electricity collapsed? Apartheid debt. Currency in free fall? Apartheid debt. Elites looted the treasury? Clearly South Africa’s fault.

This isn’t solidarity... it’s a pull-him-down conference call. A gathering of professional victims who demand open wallets but reject open books. No audits, no reforms, no consequences ... just vibes, slogans, and guilt-tripping.

And notice the pattern: Pan-Africanism only gets loud when a Black country builds institutions, enforces borders, or refuses to be emotionally extorted. Suddenly it’s “betrayal,” “neoliberalism,” or “you forgot where you came from.”

South Africa’s real crime isn’t apartheid or history ....t’s refusing to fail quietly so others can feel better about collapsing loudly.

If this is Pan-Africanism, then it’s not a liberation ideology. It’s a guilt economy .. powered by apartheid debt, managed by unaccountable elites, and paid for by citizens who are told that self-respect is selfish.


2.This “Black unity” you preach is rental solidarity. You activate it when you need cover(anti-racism, access, legitimacy,and drop it the moment competition starts)

It’s always: “Protect me from white systems,” but also “Let me dominate Black space.”

You’re mad because Black Americans and Black South Africans built institutions, culture, and influence...that work better than what you built at home. That ruins the fantasy that numbers, hustle, and loudness equal leadership.

You confuse migration with superiority and visibility with ownership. Being everywhere isn’t the same as building something that lasts.

Hustle culture survives by finding hosts. Institutional cultures survive by building systems. That’s the difference....and guilt-tripping won’t close it. 😅

3. Look, the Boers are part of South Africa’s foundation.... our history, our DNA...something we cannot deny or escape ...thats why they are part of the first nationsof what later made the Republic that attracted you . Just like Black Americans( and the white settlers there ofcourse)in the U.S....born into the story, building institutions, shaping the country. You and your entitled crew? Are immigrants, guests trying to claim overnight what generations built. There’s a difference between being part of a nation and just showing up. The history of SA is incomplete without the Boere identity and story. Make peace with this clearly upsetting reality.

bayelsaowei:
See country with citizens who have sense..

While In america a Handful of sycophants are supporting and even worshipping an orange vile rude man with links to a sex offender (Epstein).

Including some of my black nigerian brothers.. shameful!

basilico:
I strongly disapprove this message .
It's callous.

Everyone happy?

Ibime:
Owei knowledge of Bayelsa is better than his knowledge of USA, otherwise he won't be quoting Marjorie Taylor Greene here

armyofone:
May they rest on peace, amen.

He was too quick to tweet. He could take it down.

Their son did it and he has been arrested.

nateevs:
What's funny is that we are not surprised. We could have told you for free that this is normal Trump, 100%.

You should embrace it actually.

raumdeuter:
^^Many people on the right condemned it when Trump mocked about Reiner's death

Many on the left celebrated the mockery of Charlie Kirks death.

That is the key difference between both parties while the left will take out parties celebrating, The right will condemn it

benalvino3:
He is quick to post almost always.
As a supporter trump, calling out his comments on Rob Reiner (who, along with his wife Michele, was tragically stabbed to death on December 14) is me showing the principle I hold and I don't speak or react base on hatred.

Many of the same voices now blasting Trump as "vile" Eller bayelsaowei or "disrespectful" for suggesting Reiner's anti-Trump activism somehow contributed to his death (via "Trump derangement syndrome" were notably silent or even active when prominent Democrats and left-leaning figures continued criticizing Charlie Kirk's views and legacy right after his September 10, 2025, assassination. They supported comedians who were in hot water because they crap on kirk, look at what cococandy is saying now because we criticize trump, she is radiating moral acuity and righteousness when she was also dumping or kirk when he was killed. She had a lot to say that the bots started censoring her. Let's look further:

Rep. Ilhan Omar called Kirk's legacy one of "bigotry, hatred, and white supremacy" with "no legacy to honor," and she was among the 58 Democrats who voted against the House resolution honoring him (while still condemning the violence itself). I did not hear anyone call her vile. She did the same thing trump did.

Fringe online comments from the left celebrated or downplayed Kirk's death, tying it to his strong 2nd Amendment support (e.g., "no sympathy for gun absolutists" or "he reaped what he sowed" - I think coco was saying the same thing, and those often went unchecked by mainstream Democrats at the time.

Republicans hammered that as hypocrisy, leading to backlash like censure attempts and mass firings for critical posts. Now, with Trump's post politicizing Reiner's death (baselessly implying his Trump criticism angered someone into violence, despite the family suspect), conservatives are pushing back, calling it inappropriate and saying it undercuts the civility they demanded after Kirk.

You guys here are crying foul because of hatred not because of decorum or decency.

We didn't see you guys condemning politicians who cheer the attempted assassination of Trump.

If hatred is the only thing that is making people speak out then they are not speaking at all.

benalvino3:
Many of the same voices now blasting Trump as "vile" Eller bayelsaowei or "disrespectful" for suggesting Reiner's anti-Trump activism somehow contributed to his death (via "Trump derangement syndrome" were notably silent or even active when prominent Democrats and left-leaning figures continued criticizing Charlie Kirk's views and legacy right after his September 10, 2025, assassination. They supported comedians who were in hot water because they crap on kirk, look at what cococandy is saying now because we criticize trump, she is radiating moral acuity and righteousness when she was also dumping or kirk when he was killed. She had a lot to say that the bots started censoring her.

bayelsaowei:
isn't Trump a vile human being?

Your epistle doesnt change who Trump is.

You didnt approve of his childishness and obvious hate. Why dont you let it stay that way..?

Trump is gonna do more..So be ready to write more thesis to support him..you are free to.

benalvino3:
He is quick to post almost always.