₦airaland Forum

Kimo21:
Masturbation fc don show ….same you would be embarrassed if a cat walked you and saw you doing that embarrassing act…shey you feel more like a man after committing the act Abi? Continue.

You would have rather I feel more like a man when you see my picture on the news saying I rape someone or a child

udder:
Even masturbation is not safe.

Once got thick semen stuck at the base of my urethra. I was unaware for 2 days until I started having difficulty urinating.
Instead of masturbating again, I started forcing it out gradually with several urinations not knowing I was irritating my urethra.

The burning pain started the following day. If I was sexually active, I would have concluded I had an infection - the only difference was there was no discharge.

The irritation disappeared after a week without treatment.

Moral of the story is - No enjoyment without risk. Life is short and something must kill a man. STDs are overrated and usually treatable.

That happens most times even without masturbating..


Drink a lot of water, then urinate almost immediately.. you're good to go..

udder:
Saw it with my 2 eyes when it came out. it was 100% cum.

Now, that's strange.

wonder233:
Pure lies! Women lack the most self control, they are only good at covering up and pretending., that is what people are mistaking for self control. Men are more open about it, so that is why it seems they are the randy ones, but you see women! They get so turned on and can't stay one place and must have that sex with that person they fancy and nobody will know.- why because the guy don't mind being a silent side piece, but a side chick will later cast the man. That's the difference, let's stop this lie that women are more restrained. They are not

smile smile smile smile smile smile

You can talk.... Wow..... But you can still see in a situation were the lady is stronging to resist the man sometimes the man will overpower the woman maybe because he's a spec smile smile smile smile

Kalulu44:
You would have rather I feel more like a man when you see my picture on the news saying I rape someone or a child

Oga I’ve said you can continue now did I stop you

Kimo21:
Oga I’ve said you can continue now did I stop you

Thank you

wonder233:
Pure lies! Women lack the most self control, they are only good at covering up and pretending., that is what people are mistaking for self control. Men are more open about it, so that is why it seems they are the randy ones, but you see women! They get so turned on and can't stay one place and must have that sex with that person they fancy and nobody will know.- why because the guy don't mind being a silent side piece, but a side chick will later cast the man. That's the difference, let's stop this lie that women are more restrained. They are not

Ok, man is a mammal, right? How come among all animal mammals it is males after the females for sex. Are you saying humans are the exception? Or are you saying female animals are also pretending?

DeepSight:
+
There is a lot here that I have not disputed and even expressly said I agree with but you are way too "black and white" in your approach to understand what I am saying. I think we should agree to disagree.

As for the bold, I will only advise you to be wary of assumptions. Aside from that, you yourself claimed women are always paid one way or the other, be it in cash or in kind. So what then are you on about here.

Your experience is simply too binary and limited. For you, men are like this and women are like that. Whilst no one denies that men and women are built differently, you seem unable to understand certain commonalities exist which do not make themselves obvious only on account of the history of power dynamics and the resultant cultural nuances. I tried to walk you down this path briefly but it was utterly lost on you. Any man who does not know that women also have an aggressive sexual side which is not ievid to love does not know anything about women.

You shouldn't dispute any of it because it is NOT my opinion, it is scientific fact. Women need a good man to be there and be a father to her few kids thus ensuring the kids' survival and passing on of her genes. The man, on the other hand, ensures survival of his genes by sleeping with many new women of child-bearing age. Hence most (MOST) men are more turned on by a new woman and are NOT as turned on by women past childbearing age!

As for female aggressive sexual side, most (MOST) women are are NOT governed by any aggressive sexual side. Purely by instinct (not that they sit down and think about it) their sexuality and sexual turn-on are governed by considerations beyond the immediate sexual pleasure (unlike men). They play chess - purely by instinct, not that there is any deliberate calculation!
Of course there are also born hookers, but those are outliers.

As for getting paid, there's a huge difference between doing it with as many men as possible and getting paid (hooker), and getting "paid" for sex by basically only one man

DiarisGodoo:
You shouldn't dispute any of it because it is NOT my opinion, it is scientific fact. Women need a good man to be there and be a father to her few kids thus ensuring the kids' survival and passing on of her genes. The man, on the other hand, ensures survival of his genes by sleeping with many new women of child-bearing age. Hence most (MOST) men are more turned on by a new woman and are NOT as turned on by women past childbearing age!

As for female aggressive sexual side, most (MOST) women are are NOT governed by any aggressive sexual side. Purely by instinct (not that they sit down and think about it) their sexuality and sexual turn-on are governed by considerations beyond the immediate sexual pleasure (unlike men). They play chess - purely by instinct, not that there is any deliberate calculation!

+
Ok oh. Good morning. How bodi.

DeepSight:
+
Ok oh. Good morning. How bodi.

We dey manage. How your side?
I added this:

Of course there are also born hookers, but those are outliers.
As for getting paid, there's a huge difference between doing it with as many men as possible and getting paid (hooker), and getting "paid" for sex by basically only one man

oxygenlove:
God said… go yee into the world .. be fruitful and multiply…..

That statement is hormonal in nature for human body functions .. (The testosterone and estrogen) playing vital role in sexual health can’t be underrated....

If you don’t have sex for a long time .. you will be f^cked upp….

F^ck and have rest of mind…. Before konji kee you…

nah lie you dey talk abeg! If an individual hasn't indulge in sex for a long time, such individual WON'T BE F*CKED UP! Stop the misleading assertion.

Rather than being f*cked up, such a person would be of sound mind, look healthy, and be free from being exposed to STDs.

ThePureDiamond:
nah lie you dey talk abeg! If an individual hasn't indulge in sex for a long time, such individual WON'T BE F*CKED UP! Stop the misleading assertion.

Rather than being f*cked up, such a person would be of sound mind, look healthy, and be free from being exposed to STDs.

Do you agree that, all things being equal, humans need (and it is healthier for them) to have a sexual outlet?

DiarisGodoo:
We dey manage. How your side?

Small small. As Naija men we dont quit our hustle.

I added this:

Of course there are also born hookers, but those are outliers.
As for getting paid, there's a huge difference between doing it with as many men as possible and getting paid (hooker), and getting "paid" for sex by basically only one man

+
I get you. I just think you greatly underestimate the sexual lives of women - not even hookers. Proper classy women.

DiarisGodoo:
Do you agree that, all things being equal, humans need (and it is healthier for them) to have a sexual outlet?

+
Maybe the chap doesnt know that if you dont do it your body will do it for you via wet dreams or some other way.

DeepSight:
Small small. As Naija men we dont quit our hustle.


+
I get you. I just think you greatly underestimate the sexual lives of women - not even hookers. Proper classy women.

A proper classy woman will never be out trying to bed as many men as possible as a man would.
Purely by instinct MOST women are actuallly depressed by multiple sexual partners that then move on.

It's amazing how we are governed by instincts just like animals. How can't we see we gain nothing by sleeping with different, different women??! Yet that is one thing that makes a man feel so happy and fulfilled. WHY??!!

DiarisGodoo:
A proper classy woman will never be out trying to bed as many men as possible as a man would.
Purely by instinct MOST women are actuallly depressed by multiple sexual partners that then move on.

+
This is why I think your exposure to women is somewhat limited. We can agree to disagree on this.
And oh, it doesnt have to be the bold.

I also hope you are not conflating morality with class.

It's amazing how we are governed by instincts just like animals. How can't we see we gain nothing by sleeping with different, different women??! Yet that is one thing that makes a man feel so happy and fulfilled. WHY??!!

+
Not sure that it leads to happiness and fulfillment. Also for those men who have played around exhaustively in their youth, the drive for sleeping around tends to mellow with age and maturity.

DiarisGodoo:
Do you agree that, all things being equal, humans need (and it is healthier for them) to have a sexual outlet?

Having sex is healthy if it's done in moderation and in a safe way. There's nothing healthy about having sex everytime. Such individual won't even be productive.

Buhh I believe humans doesn't need to have a sexual outlet. It isn't a necessity. There are people, infact many people, who are doing very fine and healthy, without any form of sexual outlet.

Although on health grounds, it is valid to have a sexual outlet, so as to expel semen which could be carcinogenic, in order to prevent prostate cancer.
With this, I'm not making a point that - all semen contains carcinogens. Some men, have the build up of carcinogens in their semen, probably due to lifestyle or genetic factor, and for such men, having a sexual outlet is appropriate and healthy - for them to get rid of the carcinogen - containing semen.

Having multiple sexual partners, visiting brothels, masturbation - aren't healthy choices of sexual outlets though.

DeepSight:
+
This is why I think your exposure to women is somewhat limited. We can agree to disagree on this.
And oh, it doesnt have to be the bold.

I also hope you are not conflating morality with class.

Which is why (with due respect) your exposure to women has to be hookers. That's the only way you can't see that most (MOST) women don't want multiple sexual partners that move on after having sex with them.

Not sure that it leads to happiness and fulfillment. Also for those men who have played around exhaustively in their youth, the drive for sleeping around tends to mellow with age and maturity.

Not telling you what it leads to or what happens in old age. I'm telling you how it makes them feel in the moment. Few things make a man (most men) feel ias happy and fufilled as having sex with a new woman. It's as if he gained something. But with most women it's the opposite - with every new partner it's as if she lost something!

ThePureDiamond:
Having sex is healthy if it's done in moderation and in a safe way. There's nothing healthy about having sex everytime. Such individual won't even be productive.

Buhh I believe humans doesn't need to have a sexual outlet. It isn't a necessity. There are people, infact many people, who are doing very fine and healthy, without any form of sexual outlet.

Although on health grounds, it is valid to have a sexual outlet, so as to expel semen which could be carcinogenic, in order to prevent prostate cancer.
With this, I'm not making a point that - all semen contains carcinogens. Some men, have the build up of carcinogens in their semen, probably due to lifestyle or genetic factor, and for such men, having a sexual outlet is appropriate and healthy - for them to get rid of the carcinogen - containing semen.

Having multiple sexual partners, visiting brothels, masturbation - aren't healthy choices of sexual outlets though.

Few things make most men feel as happy and fulfilled as a new sexual comquest. Likewise, few things make a woman feel as happy and fulfilled as being pursued by a man she desires, and finally being "conquered"!

There is a lower rate of prostate cancer among celibate priests than among general public. Explain that one

DeepSight:
+
Maybe the chap doesnt know that if you dont do it your body will do it for you via wet dreams or some other way.

Thank you!

Cc: ThePureDiamond

DiarisGodoo:
Which is why (with due respect) your exposure to women has to be hookers. That's the only way you can't see that most (MOST) women don't want multiple sexual partners that move on after having sex with them.

+
Please leave this hookers thing, it makes me laugh each time you say it.

Not telling you what it leads to or what happens in old age. I'm telling you how it makes them feel in the moment. Few things make a man (most men) feel ias happy and fufilled as having sex with a new woman. It's as if he gained something. But with most women it's the opposite - with every new partner it's as if she lost something!

+
You are gravely gravely very gravely wrong on this.

udder:
You can give it your own definition but it's not a thing.
By your logic there is also everything like singing abuse because you can sing at will without spending and it can strain your voice.
Abuse can be added to any action word but it doesn't make it a thing. You only abuse something or someone that is not you.

See who I day follow argue abeg. ......so drug abuse is a wrong usage of words as well or what are you trying to say here?. .

Using things beyond their natural capacity, doing things more than needed, doing things till the point where they pose some sort of harm to u one way or another et al can be regarded as abuse.

I repeat again.....you can't blame masturbation for the handwork of indiscipline but hypocritical persons like yourself can keep on with the self deceit.

DiarisGodoo:
Few things make most men feel as happy and fulfilled as a new sexual comquest. Likewise, few things make a woman feel as happy and fulfilled as being pursued by a man she desires, and finally being "conquered"!

There is a lower rate of prostate cancer among celibate priests than among general public. Explain that one

Their lifestyles, simple! What they eat; what they drink. Their deliberate choice NOT TO SMOKE; the environment they choose to keep themselves in. And it's so glaring.

I don't believe I want to engage in too wordy explanations today.

"New sexual conquest"?!
"Being conquered"?!

Well, judging by what I see, you're perhaps right with the above. Buhh both aren't worth being freaky about. On personal grounds, "new sexual conquest" isn't even in my list of priorities, talkless of being fazed by it.

DeepSight:
+
Maybe the chap doesnt know that if you dont do it your body will do it for you via wet dreams or some other way.

DiarisGodoo:
Thank you!

Cc: ThePureDiamond

I have been celibate all my life. Infact, presently, despite the abundance of opportunities to explore "sexual conquest", I still make the deliberate choice - not to indulge in things sexual, for now.

Even though my membrum virile is throbbing as I'm typing these, still, I know I won't make any move to do sex.
And, being like this all my life, I don't remember the last time I have wet dreams.

I don't have wet dreams despite not being sexually active, by volition.

[quote author=DeepSight post=137856473]+

Please leave this hookers thing, it makes me laugh each time you say it.

How else would someone be arguing with a straight face that, like men, women don't want relationships but multiple brief sex partners?!!

You are gravely gravely very gravely wrong on this.

Take it to the bank, few things make most men feel as happy and fulfilled as a new sexual conquest. BTW, likewise, few things make a woman feel as happy and fulfilled as being pursued by a man she desires, and finally being "conquered"! Women are NOT fulfilled by a parade of men bleeping them and leaving!

ThePureDiamond:
I have been celibate all my life. Infact, presently, despite the abundance of opportunities to explore "sexual conquest", I still make the deliberate choice - not to indulge in things sexual, for now.

Even though my membrum virile is throbbing as I'm typing these, still, I know I won't make any move to do sex.
And, being like this all my life, I don't remember the last time I have wet dreams.

I don't have wet dreams despite not being sexually active, by volition.

+
Bros abeg no vex can I ask how old you are. You can give a range.

As per the bold, I almost fell off my bed with laugh.

DiarisGodoo:
How else would someone be arguing with a straight face that, like men, women don't want relationships but multiple brief sex partners?!!

+
Jesus is Lord in heaven above to the glory of God the Father, Amen.

Bisimilahi Rahman Raheem.

When on Earth have I ever said the bold?

Please be careful, one thing I don't like is being deliberately misrepresented.

DeepSight:
+
Bros abeg no vex can I ask how old you are. You can give a range.

As per the bold, I almost fell off my bed with laugh.

lol, 28 - 33

I had to include the bolded deliberately, so you people won't think my intentional celibacy is due to erectile dysfunctionality.

ThePureDiamond:
lol, 28 - 33

Look let me tell you, what you are doing is extremely unhealthy in many ways. First and foremost it is biologically unhealthy. I trust you know that an active sex life ensures longevity of the prostate gland, better cardiovascular health, stress relief and better mental health as well as a stronger immune system.

Secondly it is bad for your overall mental development as a man. As you age, later in life you are vastly more likely to start engaging in things which you should have done and gotten over in your youth.

Mattswaggz:
See who I day follow argue abeg. ......so drug abuse is a wrong usage of words as well or what are you trying to say here?. .

Using things beyond their natural capacity, doing things more than needed, doing things till the point where they pose some sort of harm to u one way or another et al can be regarded as abuse.

I repeat again.....you can't blame masturbation for the handwork of indiscipline but hypocritical persons like yourself can keep on with the self deceit.

I don’t think you get my argument.
I can no longer make sense of your posts.

udder:
I don’t think you get my argument.
I can no longer make sense of your posts.

That's why you're meant to clarify it.....you made mention of "choice of words" and I presented another scenario to indicate that there is nothing wrong with the choice of words.......if you believe you're right or have been misunderstood then it's left for you to explain and clarify your position.

DeepSight:
Look let me tell you, what you are doing is extremely unhealthy in many ways. First and foremost it is biologically unhealthy. I trust you know that an active sex life ensures longevity of the prostate gland, better cardiovascular health, stress relief and better mental health as well as a stronger immune system.

Secondly it is bad for your overall mental development as a man. As you age, later in life you are vastly more likely to start engaging in things which you should have done and gotten over in your youth.

so in short, I should start having sex, and it doesn't matter if I'm single or married?!

what you're saying seems misleading. I've seen worse persecution of celibacy, and I'm sure yours won't move a strand of hair on my body, because I know what I'm doing.

To set things straight, active sex doesn't ensure the longevity of prostate gland. It doesn't even guarantee that - such a sexually active person won't be diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Researches made, have established the fact that - even those who are very active sexually, ends up having prostate cancer eventually.

"Lifestyle" and "genetic factors" are what really determines whether or not an individual would be diagnosed with prostate cancer. Both influences the presence and buildup of carcinogens in the semen.
And to be precise, the presence and accumulation of carcinogens in semen - are what induces carcinogenesis which causes prostate cancer.

Those reverend fathers who don't have an active sex life, are doing fine, and their prostate health is superb.
Even if an individual doesn't have sex, inasmuch as such person lives healthily, I mean - doesn't eat carcinogenic foods, stays away from alcohol, doesn't smoke, doesn't expose himself to toxic pollutants, exercises regularly, then, everything about such person would be fine and excellent, including his prostate health.

Sex isn't the only guaranteed way to have stress relief. Why will I risk exposing myself to STDs, especially HIV, when there are other proven ways of achieving stress relief?! What happened to exploring the rich option of utilizing diet and physical exercise to achieve an all around impeccable cardiovascular health rather than risk absorbing traumas, battles and evil spirits through sex?!

Man, I don't wanna get wordy today, so I won't be able to dissect the points properly. It's weekend, I wanna rest.