₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
Which I did but you can't.

No, you used the wrong scripture. The scripture you quoted didn't place God anywhere.

I am not here to argue God's meeting place with you. I am just telling you that you wrongly quoted a scripture that didn't relate.

I didn't ask you to explain anything I asked you to say yes or no to a simple question you said you said no which will translate to to "no, evil is necessary to enjoy evil in heaven". If evil is not necessary to enjoy good in heaven then you are just dribbling your own shadow and hiding behind your finger.

Intelligent human beings don't need to see N and O before they see a No. If you ask to see yes or no, the person's explained position should tell you where they stand. It's when you want to shut people up in order to gain ascendancy over them that you tell them to answer a question in one syllable. Meanwhile, the question itself was asked in many words. Every Yes or No has an explanation behind it.

The conditions in heaven are not the same as earth. Heaven and hearth don't have the same outcomes for every action. In fact, if you throw something up here, it must come down. That's not the same outcome you'll get if you did the same thing in the moon. It is wrong for you to apply earth to heaven because they're on different frequencies. How many times do I have to say this?

FxMasterz:
No, you used the wrong scripture. The scripture you quoted didn't place God anywhere.

I am not here to argue God's meeting place with you. I am just telling you that you wrongly quoted a scripture that didn't relate.



Intelligent human beings don't need to see N and O before they see a No. If you ask to see yes or no, the person's explained position should tell you where they stand. It's when you want to shut people up in order to gain ascendancy over them that you tell them to answer a question in one syllable. Meanwhile, the question itself was asked in many words. Every Yes or No has an explanation behind it.

The conditions in heaven are not the same as earth. Heaven and hearth don't have the same outcomes for every action. In fact, if you throw something up here, it must come down. That's not the same outcome you'll get if you did the same thing in the moon. It is wrong for you to apply earth to heaven because they're on different frequencies. How many times do I have to say this?

You didn't need to say it in the first place because this is not the answer to the question I asked. You are dodging answering the question because you know it will skewer you but that's ok, I think I am satisfied at this point. LoLz.

LordReed:
You didn't need to say it in the first place because this is not the answer to the question I asked. You are dodging answering the question because you know it will skewer you but that's ok, I think I am satisfied at this point. LoLz.

+
Since skewered. Tey tey.

LordReed:
You didn't need to say it in the first place because this is not the answer to the question I asked. You are dodging answering the question because you know it will skewer you but that's ok, I think I am satisfied at this point. LoLz.

But I answered your question with explanations which you said you didn't ask for. I did that several times and still added a No at one point.

FxMasterz:
But I answered your question with explanations which you said you didn't ask for. I did that several times and still added a No at one point.

You didn't answer the question and even when you said no it completely contradicts what you are saying so abeg it have do, I don belleful. LoLz.

DeepSight:
+
Since skewered. Tey tey.

He knew it hence the rigmarole. I just wanted to give him the opportunity to be truthful to himself but it seems Antarctica will melt completely first. LoLz.

LordReed:
You didn't answer the question and even when you said no it completely contradicts what you are saying so abeg it have do, I don belleful. LoLz.

Everything looks contradictory until you understand some fundamentals.

You know,when you tell a P3 pupil that 3-4. = -1, he'll say it's contradictory because he was taught that the answet is 'impossible'.

FxMasterz:
Offpoint.

The reason you know spider man is not real is because you know absolutely what's real in New York. The same logic does not apply to the universe where you know absolutely nothing about what exists out there.

Wtf are you saying? What do you mean I know what's real in NY but I don't know what's existing out there?
Can you make this gibberish make sense

FxMasterz:
All these are not necessary my friend. The point is that vehicles are imperfect. That does not mean they have no creator. And the fact that they have killed people does not stop the creators from continuing creating them. Simple!

But, as I have always said, you've never been sincere and honest even with yourself in conversations. The only atheist I respect on this forum is lordreed. Very honest and civil.

We're discussing with you that you have 0 knowledge of the universe and therefore cannot make any conclusions until you know all that's out there. Lordreed in all honesty agreed that investigations still continue, while you're here talking offpoint and arguing aimlessly.

I wouldn't respond to you anymore. What I know is that you cannot talk in absolutes concerning what is and what is not in a universe you have 0 knowledge of.

I'm gonna ask you this question til you answer it. This is the 4th time, DO YOU BELIEVE INVISIBLE UNICORNS EXIST?
Even if you keep dodging it,I'll continue to pester it til you answer

FxMasterz:
The rule applies to earth alone. It doesn't apply to the entire universe.

So u pick and choose where rules apply. U just love fallacious statements

FxMasterz:
No. He didn't.


+

So that you can appreciate the sacrifice.


So that you can know that you were accepted of the Father.


It does, because He literally took the place of the sinner and took his sins upon Himself. He claimed He was the One who did everything you did.



Yes, that's the law. Then Jesus came to reap your sins for you because you cannot actually do any better. You have no such powers.

Isaiah 45:7
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil : I the LORD do all these things

For some reasons,Christians lie and lie whenever they see this passage. Someone boldly claims he creates evil and a minion somewhere is saying he's lying. Una no dey tire?

FxMasterz:
Evil itself is a byproduct of sin. Since the world has become a sinful world, it had to be balanced by good. And good is only enjoyable because of evil in a sinful world.


God didn't want zombies. He didn't want robots. He wanted humans who can choose their actions and be responsible for it. Only that condition validated love and loyalty, without which the world wound be boring. So, everything was good until man choose to obey a different master.



He created evil for the purpose of judgement because now there was sin I. The world. That is still different from the evil that arises as a byproduct of sin.

When yhwh created the universe and he is a good god,where did sin/evil enter from?
Please try to answer without the gymnastics. At this point we should be enrolling you into the Verbal Olympics

FxMasterz:
No, he doesn't go to heaven.



No, it does. I don't know what you said I conceded.

Job 1:6-12 NLT
One day the members of the heavenly court came to present themselves before the LORD, and the Accuser, Satan, came with them . “Where have you come from?” the LORD asked Satan. Satan answered the LORD, “I have been patrolling the earth, watching everything that’s going on.”

It's interesting atheists are the ones explaining the bible to a self acclaimed pastor,not even an ordinary Christian
Yhwh is just shaking his head at you,in shame

LordReed:
The mental atilogun dance is ramping up. LoLz.

I have enrolled him in the Verbal Gymnastics

FxMasterz:
Can you answer that question yourself and show us where the Bible claims God holds His council?




I've answered you so much so that I'm beginning to think I probably didn't get your question well. You might please come again.

So please tell us where god holds his council? We are all ears
...

FxMasterz:
This scripture does not say that the council holds in heaven. It talks about the heavenly beings. Not the heavenly place. Then, it talks about the council of the holy ones without mentioning the place of the council.

Then, your Job allusion does not actually fit because even if satan appears in heaven for a meeting, that does not mean he dwells there. You cannot say there's evil in heaven just because satan visits. You cannot say I have a cat in my house just because Mr, Donald visits me with his cat.



Now, I understand you. This is not what I agreed. This is what I inferred. I told you that the conditions in heaven are different to that of earth. That means, heaven does not necessarily have to be enjoyed by the same principle that applies to the earth.

So finally u agree Satan visits heaven. Thank you Jesus

LordReed:
Where else would heavenly beings hold their council? Can YOU give us any scripture that says they hold council elsewhere?




Dude this is the thing with you, we have had this kind of discussion where you refuse to give a simple yes or no even though you demand same. Please answer the question with a simple yes or no.

Welcome to the world of FxMasterz, the master dribbler

LordReed:
LoLz. Why do you do this to yourself?

FxMasterz:
I am not arguing about the location of God's council.

You feel it's excspisy because you still don't understand my angle of argument.

I am not even saying God's council is not in heaven. I am saying the dude's reference scripture was wrong. That's my point.

God can meet anywhere, but that's not what I'm arguing about.

Stop lying,u were arguing about gods council

LordReed:
You didn't answer the question and even when you said no it completely contradicts what you are saying so abeg it have do, I don belleful. LoLz.

I asked him a question if he believes in invisible unicorn since days. Dude hasn't answered it. Asked up to 4 times

jaephoenix:
Welcome to the world of FxMasterz, the master dribbler

The way he can't answer simple yes or no question is so mind boggling, yet he will come and demand yes or no answer from you and expect you to answer.

LordReed:
The way he can't answer simple yes or no question is so mind boggling, yet he will come and demand yes or no answer from you and expect you to answer.

+
For me the challenge is just the same ol "X does not mean X" kinda worrisome syndrome.

DeepSight:
+
For me the challenge is just the same ol "X does not mean X" kinda worrisome syndrome.

It makes my skin crawl.

LordReed:
The way he can't answer simple yes or no question is so mind boggling, yet he will come and demand yes or no answer from you and expect you to answer.

Is this the first time you have engaged him? I have been engaging him for at least a yr now. I think my first time of interfacing him was my thread about bible contradictions. Dude cannot answer one single question. And the worse is he'll be contradicting himself and denying it. I had to screenshot all his comments to reveal to him his errors. I got tired

jaephoenix:
Is this the first time you have engaged him? I have been engaging him for at least a yr now. I think my first time of interfacing him was my thread about bible contradictions. Dude cannot answer one single question. And the worse is he'll be contradicting himself and denying it. I had to screenshot all his comments to reveal to him his errors. I got tired

It isn't but it never ceases to fascinate me.

Religion chai