Test For Delusion - Christianity Etc (2) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › Test For Delusion (3366 Views)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Test For Delusion by Wotowotoman: 1:21am On Jan 25 |
Kobojunkie:We thank God for chat GPT 🙌🙏 |
| Re: Test For Delusion by TenQ: 5:36am On Jan 25 |
Boomark:Answer my questions, then your errors will be made glaring far all to see. But fear will not allow you. If your argument are based on false premises, how can the arguments stand? Whenever you overcome your fright, answer the questions 1. Can anyone see God? 2. Can God be in Heaven and on Earth concurrently? Your God is not different from the God of the Muslims. 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 5:38pm On Jan 25 |
Kobojunkie:Kobojunkie, what you’re doing here is theological cherry picking dressed up as scholarship, and it’s embarrassing to watch someone with access to the full Bible pretend half of it doesn’t exist. You’ve frozen Jesus at Matthew 15:24 like someone pausing a film mid-scene and then writing a review based on that single frame. Yes, Jesus said he was sent to the lost sheep of Israel. Nobody disputes that. What you’re doing is pretending the rest of the passage doesn’t count. Same chapter. Same interaction. The Canaanite woman persists. Her daughter is healed. Jesus publicly praises her faith. If “crumbs” were the ceiling, the miracle would not have happened. End of story. But context destroys your position, which is why you avoid it. Jesus didn’t make a one-off exception and then revert to ethnic exclusivity. He consistently broke covenant boundaries throughout his ministry. He heals a Roman centurion’s servant and says he hasn’t found faith like that in Israel. He reveals his messiahship to a Samaritan woman. He makes a Samaritan the moral hero of a parable. He says many will come from east and west to sit with Abraham. That’s not accidental. That’s the design. Then comes the resurrection, where your argument really collapses. Matthew 28:19: “Go and make disciples of all nations.” Not Israel plus exceptions. All nations. Acts reinforces this explicitly. Peter receives a vision telling him not to call unclean what God has made clean, specifically in reference to Gentiles. Paul’s entire ministry exists because the covenant expanded, not because Gentiles were begging for scraps. Galatians 3:28: neither Jew nor Greek, all one in Christ. Romans 10:12: no difference between Jew and Gentile. Romans 9 pre empts your bloodline fixation entirely: “not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.” What you’re actually doing is Old Covenant literalism while ignoring the New Covenant altogether, which is ironic given that you’re quoting Jesus, who is the hinge between the two. That’s not Bible study. That’s identity cosplay with scripture as the costume. The correct framing, which the entire New Testament builds toward, is simple: Jesus’ earthly ministry began with Israel because covenant history begins there. The gospel’s trajectory is outward expansion, not ethnic lockdown. You can’t have it both ways. Either you accept the full counsel of scripture, or you admit you’re mining verses to support a pre existing agenda. And yes, before you try the usual deflection I’m an atheist. This isn’t faith. It’s literacy. 2 Likes |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 6:02pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ:Make it glaring by yourself. Are you waiting for my approval before you do or are you just afraid. If you make any mistake I won't wait for you before I destroy the error you post. I told you to ask me the question in another place. You want to derail this thread with your questions. Everyone is afraid of what I wrote. Go and oppose the things I wrote let me see. By the way, are you a Christian? |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 6:12pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:See the arrogance and narcissistic attitude of Nigerian men? Assuming people want their approval? No wonder you all lie over something as petty as weddings. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 6:17pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ:What proof have any of you got that any god exists? You are all wrong until you can prove it to the entire world all at the same time, if your gods are real and all powerful what is the excuse for hiding? |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 6:27pm On Jan 25*. Modified: 6:48pm On Jan 25 |
tctrills:Yes you acted delusional because it made you to refused to read and understand. The first scripture I posted gave reason for the delusion. I tried to correct you but the delusion was strong that you can't even see that the posts has nothing to do with anybody refusing to agree with me. This is your problem. Alright. You don't quote random verses from the bible and ask me to agree without understanding the context. Make whatever you want to present as a standard truth. I used about 3 or more scriptures to support my claim. If I present something contradictory, then it means that your understanding of your verses is deluded. Please go ahead lets start. And I hope you don't run away from questions because most deluded Trinitarians are like that. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 6:43pm On Jan 25 |
LordReed:Your words and observations are very useless in deciding who is deluded or not. Only God the Father decides that. Thank you for agreeing that you can't oppose any of the things I wrote. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 6:46pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:Chai! Nigerian men have suffered. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by DeepSight(m): 7:06pm On Jan 25 |
LordReed:+ How can one be testing delusions with delusions. 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 8:12pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:No, Nigerian men cause the suffering, not women. One in four girls under 18 in Nigeria experience sexual violence. One in ten boys. That's UNICEF and Nigerian data, and those are only reported cases. The real numbers are higher because most victims never report due to stigma, fear, or zero faith in the system actually doing anything. So the question stands, are children raping themselves? Human rights violations happen daily in Nigerian families. Not some families, not a few bad apples, this is systemic. Families block marriages unless people submit to their demands, hiding behind "tradition is mandatory" when tradition gives you no legal or moral authority over adult lives. You have no say, you just act like you do and everyone pretends that's normal. Lives get ruined constantly. Daughters, sisters, cousins, all in the name of traditions and culture that half the people enforcing them don't even practice themselves. And the women aren't the ones doing this, they have no control over the country, no structural power to enforce any of it. Then there's marital rape. Under the Criminal Code and Penal Code that still govern most of Nigeria, marital rape isn't a crime. The law defines unlawful sexual intercourse as happening outside of marriage, meaning by legal definition a husband cannot rape his wife. The Violence Against Persons Prohibition Act from 2015 changed this, but only in the handful of states that actually adopted it. For most of the country the old codes still apply and spousal rape remains legal. Most Nigerian men justify this with bride price logic, "I paid for you so you owe me submission," then turn around and complain when women speak up because providing a basic lifestyle apparently deserves constant praise and worship. So again, who's violating human rights in this country? Is it the women with no structural power? Or is it the fathers, uncles, brothers, and male cousins who control the families, the laws, and the enforcement of both? |
| Re: Test For Delusion by TenQ: 8:37pm On Jan 25 |
Normally, I shouldn't respond to your question but I feel led to answer you without using scripture. Fenrir:1. You are the number one proof of God's existence. You exist and you are an intelligent and rational creature. A Building is the evidence of a Builder. A painting is the evidence of a Painter! 2. There is a scientific evidence that the universe had not being for ever, it has an age of about 13.6billion years old 3. There is a scientific evidence that time, space and matter appeared simultaneously at the origin of the universe expansion 4. There exist a scientific law of entropy that prevents you to self assemble from nothing 5. Because of entropy we know that the universe had not always existed. 6. There is a scientific law of cause and effect operating in the universe 7. Based on this, the Universe is the effect of a cause. 8. The cause must have happened before the universe, meaning that the cause CANNOT operate on any physical or chemical laws. 9. This Primary Cause is what for now we call the Uncaused-First-Cause of Everything . 10. This Cause must be Spaceless, Timeless, Matterless and Intelligent because every law of physics and chemistry came into being only after the universe came into being. This Uncaused-First-Cause of Everything is what we Christians call God. He cannot be Seen, not touched because He operates in a Far much Higher DIMENSIONS than the physical dimensions. We call His Dimension the Spiritual Dimension. A Human beings is a Biological Organism with a SOFTWARE called the SOUL. He also has a Kernel Software called the SPIRIT. With his Spirit, he knows that God exists and has given him a Conscience for good and bad/right and wrong. God has chosen some men to act as intermediaries between Him and us humans all through the earth history. He backs them up with His power and we know them as Prophets, they tell us more about God so that each one of us can have our SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE with Him. From them we know that Humans are Spiritually Dead and are subject to decay just as the Universe is slowly dying. So, if you are looking for God, you cannot see Him not experience Him from your physical dimension. You have to tune into your conscience. Inside God we all exist including both the physical realm and the heavenly realms Have you read the Book Flat Land I ask you to read it: Flatland: It is A Romance of Many Dimensions and a satirical novella written by Edwin A. Abbott Summary of note: A person in a 2D world will argue till tomorrow that the 3D world doesn't exist. Miracle exist in the 2D world when someone in the 3D space changes something in the 2D space. My Questions: 1. If you think there is nothing like the Uncaused-First-Cause of Everything , bring your evidence as It is scientifically impossible to have an infinite regress of Cause and Effect 2. The DNA is a compendium or Library of Data, Information and Instructions. Tell me if it is possible for a computer program to write itself given an infinite time to juggle alphanumeric characters to form the codes. *Don't forget that a simultaneous existence of the information code and information decoder must also exist at the machine level. I leave you to your conscience. God loves you and He wants you saved! God is NOT the sky-daddy you think, You are INSIDE Him. You Live in Him. It's like a fish saying it water and air doesn't exist. 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 8:42pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ:None of that is evidence its belief and no more |
| Re: Test For Delusion by TenQ: 8:46pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:You didn't even read this! These are logical and scientific evidences that you can easily falsify or admit it validity. SMH! When Emptiness is masked by loud Noises! But have it on record that you despised the knowledge that would have saved you. Have a nice day! 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 9:00pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ:The Scandi atheist deconstruction........ Let’s take this apart calmly, without insults, and see whether the argument actually holds up. First problem: “A building proves a builder, therefore the universe proves God.” This is a category error. We know buildings have builders because we already have independent evidence that builders exist and that buildings are human-made. That logic cannot be universally applied to everything that looks complex. Nature produces complex, structured systems all the time without conscious design. Snowflakes, crystals, hurricanes, galaxies, river deltas. Complexity alone is not evidence of intention. To argue design, you must first demonstrate a reliable method for distinguishing designed systems from undesigned ones, then show the universe falls into the “designed” category. Simply pointing at complexity and declaring “builder” is not a proof. Also, using AI as proof of God backfires. AI demonstrates that apparently intelligent, rational behavior can arise from non-spiritual mechanisms like computation, statistics, and training data. If anything, it weakens the claim that intelligence requires a soul. Second problem: “The universe is about 13.6 billion years old, therefore it had a beginning, therefore God.” The Big Bang describes an early hot, dense state of the universe. It does not automatically mean creation from absolute nothing. Cosmology currently traces the universe back to a limit of our models. Beyond that point, physics is incomplete, not “proven God territory.” “We don’t know yet” is not evidence for a specific metaphysical explanation, let alone Christianity. Ignorance is not a bridge to theology. Third problem: “Time, space, and matter appeared simultaneously.” Even if time emerges with the universe, that creates a problem for the argument, not a solution. Cause and effect as we understand them are temporal concepts. They rely on sequence. Before and after. If time does not exist “before” the universe, then saying “the cause happened before the universe” is incoherent. You cannot rely on causation as a law and then apply it outside the domain where causation has meaning. That is internally inconsistent. Fourth problem: Entropy is misunderstood. Entropy does not say “complexity cannot arise.” It says total entropy in an isolated system increases. Local order can and does increase all the time, as long as entropy increases elsewhere. That is why stars form, crystals grow, and life exists. Claiming entropy prevents self-assembly is simply incorrect physics. Entropy allows local complexity in energy-flowing systems. Also, “from nothing” is a philosophical claim, not a settled scientific conclusion. Fifth problem: “Entropy proves the universe could not have always existed.” This depends on specific assumptions about the universe as an isolated system with fixed thermodynamic rules across all time. Many cosmological models challenge or modify those assumptions. Entropy arguments are not universal proofs of a beginning. And even if they were, they would only suggest a boundary condition, not a personal God, and certainly not Christianity. Sixth problem: “There is a scientific law that everything has a cause.” There is no such scientific law. Causation is a metaphysical principle, not a universal empirical rule. Some interpretations of quantum mechanics even treat certain events as fundamentally probabilistic, not classically caused. Science does not hand you “everything that exists must have a cause.” Seventh problem: “The universe is an effect of a cause.” This conclusion assumes three things that are not proven: That the universe truly began to exist in the absolute sense That everything that begins must have a cause That causation applies outside time and space All three are asserted, not demonstrated. Eighth problem: “The cause must be outside physical laws.” This is special pleading. You remove the laws that define causation and then keep the word “cause” anyway. That’s not an explanation, it’s a label for mystery. You cannot say “causation requires no laws, no time, no structure” and still claim to understand what happened. Ninth problem: “Uncaused First Cause.” If everything needs a cause, then God needs a cause. If God does not need a cause, then not everything needs a cause. In that case, the universe itself could be the uncaused brute fact. You don’t get to invent a universal rule and then exempt your preferred entity. Tenth problem: “The cause must be spaceless, timeless, matterless, and intelligent.” This is pure assertion. Intelligence involves processing, selecting, deciding, and intending. Those are changes of state. Change implies sequence. Sequence implies time. A timeless intelligence is conceptually undefined unless carefully explained, which it never is. A timeless being cannot “decide” to create at a moment, because moments require time. Now the questions. On infinite regress: It is not scientifically proven that an infinite regress of causes is impossible. It is a philosophical debate. Even if infinite regress were impossible, that does not logically lead to a personal God. It could lead to a necessary physical principle, a boundary condition, or a brute fact. The claim “you can’t traverse infinity to reach now” misunderstands infinity. The number line has no first negative number, yet zero exists just fine. An infinite past does not require starting somewhere and walking forward. On DNA and information: DNA is not a “library” in the sense of a book written by an author. It is a chemical sequence that participates in self-replication via biochemistry. Information in the technical sense does not require a mind. Tree rings contain information about climate. Snow layers contain information about snowfall. No author required. Evolution is not random typing. It is random variation plus non-random selection. That selection acts as an information ratchet, preserving functional structures over time. The claim that a decoder must exist fully formed at the same time is false. Biology allows gradual, overlapping, imperfect systems. Early life models include molecules that both store information and catalyze reactions. There is no requirement for a complete modern decoding system to appear all at once. Even in computing, self-modifying code, evolutionary algorithms, and program-generating programs already exist. Finally, even if you granted a “first cause” or a “designer,” none of this gets you to Christianity. It does not get you prophets, salvation, souls, spirits, or your specific theology. That leap is asserted, not argued. Flatland is a useful metaphor for intellectual humility, not religious certainty. If anything, it should make us less confident in declaring that we already know the ultimate nature of reality. In short: the argument relies on metaphors, misunderstandings of physics, and repeated special pleading. Naming a mystery “God” does not explain it. If God exists, He deserves better arguments than this. TenQ check mate and you claim i didn't read your passive aggressive nonsense 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 9:05pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ: |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 9:18pm On Jan 25 |
TenQ:Paid NOT free AI detector results And Here are the specific signs that this is an AI generated response: The "Listicle" Structure AI models love numbered lists. When asked to "defend God's existence" or "provide scientific proof," an AI will almost always default to a 1-10 list format. While humans do this too, the AI’s version is perfectly balanced, with each point roughly the same length and following a logical progression (Cosmology \rightarrow Biology \rightarrow Consciousness \rightarrow Theology). "Polished but Generic" Phrasing Notice the specific vocabulary: "Uncaused First Cause": This is a classic "textbook" term that AI pulls from its training on philosophy. "Biological Organism with a SOFTWARE called the SOUL": AI often uses technological metaphors (software, kernel, hardware) to explain abstract concepts because it has been trained on a vast amount of tech-related data. "Subjective experience": A very common AI "filler" phrase. Lack of "Forum Flavor" Nairaland is famous for its very specific Nigerian slang, "Naija" English, and a certain combative or highly emotive energy. This post has zero typos, zero local slang, and a very "clinical" or "Western academic" tone. It reads like an essay or a blog post rather than a forum comment. The "Flatland" Metaphor The use of Flatland is a very common "pre packaged" analogy found in AI training data. When an AI is asked to explain "higher dimensions" or "miracles" in a rational way, it almost invariably references Flatland because it's the most famous literary example of that concept. Perfect Grammar and Pacing Humans especially in heated online debates usually have "bursty" writing. They use fragments, multiple exclamation marks, or run-on sentences. This text has perfect punctuation and a very steady, rhythmic pacing. It is "too clean" for a spontaneous forum argument. The "Non Scriptural" Prompting The opening line, "I feel led to answer you without using scripture," is a common way users prompt AI: "Give me an argument for God but don't use the Bible." The AI then generates exactly what it was told a series of "scientific ish" sounding points. 1 Like
|
| Re: Test For Delusion by DeepSight(m): 9:45pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:+ I dont think what he wrote was AI generated. If we are to go by the so called terms and phrases pointed out, many of us had been using them long long long before anything like AI. I am sure you can find many of my own posts well over 15 years ago that your AI assessment would also assume was AI generated. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 9:53pm On Jan 25 |
DeepSight:PAID AI DETECTOR What part of that cant you read? An AI detector that choss checks all other PAID AI detectors and I told steadygo how to get it step by step so none of you can call me a liar. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by tctrills: 9:54pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:So first, I understand and agree with all the verses you quoted, so even by your standard, I am not deluded. So, according to our bible, Jesus Christ is God, and you will be deluded not to accept it. Let's read the verses. John 1.1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. Hebrew 1. 8-9 8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. 9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. Now, who is the Savior? In the Old Testament, we learn that God is the Only Savior. Isaiah 43:11 — “I, even I, am the LORD, and besides me there is no savior.” Isaiah 45:21 — “There is no God besides Me, a righteous God and a Savior.” Hosea 13:4 — “You know no God but Me, and besides Me there is no savior.” So we know that there is only one Savoir and He is God, right? Now, in the New Testament, we know who God is in the Old Testament Luke 2:11 — “For unto you is born… a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.” Acts 5:31 — “God exalted Him… as Leader and Savior.” Titus 2:13 — “Our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.” In the Old Testament, we also know that God alone is the First and Last / Beginning and End. Only one person can be the first, right? From the New Testament, we know who that God is. Revelation 1:17–18 — “I am the First and the Last… I was dead, and behold I am alive.” Revelation 22:13 — “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” Isaiah 41:4 — “I, the LORD, am the first, and with the last; I am He.” Revelation 22:13 — “I am the Alpha and the Omega…” Again, we have only one creator and He is God. Isaiah 44:24 — “I, the LORD, made all things, stretching out the heavens alone.” He said He did it alone, no help. From the New Testament, we learn that Jesus Christ is the same God who created the earth John 1:3 — “All things were made through Him.” Colossians 1:16 — “By Him all things were created.” Again, we learn from the Old Testament that it will be God who will judge the earth. In the New Testament, we discovered who God is. Genesis 18:25 — “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? Psalm 96:13 — “He comes to judge the earth. John 5:22 — “The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son. 2 Timothy 4:1 — “Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead. Do you agree with the bible that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament? The same God that the Old Testament says will judge the world, is the creator, is the only Savior, and is the first and the last? If you don't agree with the Bible, then you are deluded. Hope you noticed that I used multiple scriptures to back up my points, so you just have to accept them. 1 Like |
| Re: Test For Delusion by DeepSight(m): 10:01pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:+ Maybe I am confused. Anyway, not my business. All I am saying is that what I read from TenQ does not look AI to me, just pretty normal stuff. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by DeepSight(m): 10:03pm On Jan 25 |
tctrills:+ Surely you know that there are even more explicit verses saying Jesus is not and cannot ever be God? |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 10:05pm On Jan 25 |
DeepSight:Thats the problem with Nigerian men even evidence is denied and accusations with no evidence are believed |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 10:15pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:Once anyone pays bride price, they are married. Simple and short. I Corinthians 7:9 NKJV [9] but if they cannot exercise self-control, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion. I am still coming to this part in my teachings. Any church doctrine or conditions that will prolong or cause any to loose self control is not supported by the scripture. They do it not knowing they are making people to stumble and fall into sin. This is only for those who feel they need to meet up with all the church and kinsmen requirements. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 10:21pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:No, thats not the law thats culture See, how much you lie about this crap! |
| Re: Test For Delusion by LordReed(m): 10:41pm On Jan 25 |
DeepSight:I tire o! |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Boomark(op): 10:43pm On Jan 25 |
tctrills:Please bro I will reply you tomorrow. My battery is just 1% now. I agree Jesus is a God. I disagree that he is the God of the old testament. Tomorrow I will show you proof and how things are scriptures. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by LordReed(m): 10:43pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:It's not my words, it is REALITY. Your god isn't real so it can't be used to do any testing. Just say you don't understand the difference between can't and didn't. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 11:00pm On Jan 25 |
Boomark:Read this carefully and hopefully it will educate and remove dark ages myth, you see even Nigeria has human rights. LEGAL REALITY OF MARRIAGE, BRIDE PRICE, FAMILY AUTHORITY, AND ADULT AUTONOMY IN NIGERIA This is a statement of law, not culture, not religion, and not opinion. This post addresses the recurring false claims that: Families have legal authority over adult marriages Bride price creates or validates marriage Cultural rites such as introduction are compulsory Adults must plead or negotiate for family approval All four claims are legally false in Nigeria. This applies equally to Nigerians and foreigners. PART 1 SUPREMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended is the supreme law. Section 1(3) Any law, custom, or practice inconsistent with the Constitution is void. No tradition, family rule, or cultural expectation has legal force where it conflicts with constitutional rights. PART 2 MARRIAGE IS A FUNDAMENTAL PERSONAL RIGHT Section 34(1) Right to dignity of the human person. Every adult has the right to bodily autonomy, personal choice, and freedom from humiliation or coercion. This includes the right to reject any marriage condition, ritual, or demand imposed by family or community. Section 35(1) Right to personal liberty. Liberty includes freedom of movement and freedom to choose personal relationships. No family, elder, or husband has lawful authority to decide whether an adult may marry, stay married, or leave a home. Language such as “allow her to leave” has no legal meaning. Section 37 Right to private and family life. Marriage decisions are private matters between consenting adults. Family intrusion, cultural enforcement, or community pressure has no constitutional basis. Section 38(1) Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. Adults may freely choose to marry under statutory law, customary law, religious law, a combination, or none. They may also freely reject any rite, belief, or cultural process including bride price, introduction, or family approval. Section 42(1) Freedom from discrimination. No adult may be subjected to additional marriage conditions based on gender, tribe, culture, religion, or nationality. PART 3 THE COUPLE MAY REJECT FAMILY CONSENT, BRIDE PRICE, AND INTRODUCTION This point is absolute under Nigerian law. A couple may lawfully reject: • family consent • family approval • bride price • family introduction • traditional rites • elder negotiations None of these are legal requirements for marriage. Families have no legal veto power. Courtesy is optional. Consent is not transferable. PART 4 THE MARRIAGE ACT IS CLEAR AND EXHAUSTIVE Marriage Act Cap M6 LFN 2004 governs statutory marriages. Section 7 Marriage begins when the couple gives notice to the registrar. No family involvement is required. Section 11 The registrar issues a certificate once satisfied that both parties are of full age and have freely consented. Free consent of the couple is the only legal requirement. Section 34 A marriage celebrated under the Act is valid for all purposes throughout Nigeria. Section 41 Any person who attempts to prevent a marriage by pretending that their consent is required by law commits an offence. This includes families, elders, or community members who claim that: • bride price is mandatory • introduction is compulsory • family approval is required • permission must be granted Such conduct is criminal under Nigerian law. PART 5 CUSTOMARY LAW IS OPTIONAL AND LIMITED Customary marriage exists only when voluntarily chosen. Evidence Act 2011 Section 18(3) Any custom that is repugnant to natural justice, equity, and good conscience is unenforceable. Customs that: • force compliance • restrict exit • degrade dignity • treat adults as property are void. Case law confirms this: Osamwonyi v Osamwonyi 1972 Consent is fundamental to all marriages. Agbeja v Agbeja 1985 Customary marriage must be voluntary. Meribe v Egwu 1976 Ritual form does not override consent. Mojekwu v Mojekwu 1997 Oppressive or discriminatory customs are unconstitutional. Obi v Bosah 2019 Bride price and handing over define customary marriage only when the couple chooses that system. PART 6 BRIDE PRICE HAS NO LEGAL FORCE Bride price is cultural only. It does not: • create marriage • validate marriage • transfer authority • remove autonomy • restrict exit Failure to pay bride price does not invalidate a statutory marriage. Refund of bride price has no effect on statutory marriage. PART 7 RITUALS AND INTRODUCTIONS ARE NEVER COMPULSORY Even where a couple voluntarily chooses a traditional marriage: • no introduction is compulsory • no ritual is mandatory • no prostration is enforceable • no kneeling is compulsory • no symbolic submission can be imposed Refusal of any ritual does not invalidate a marriage. PART 8 INTERNATIONAL LAW BINDS NIGERIA African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Cap A9 LFN 2004 Article 2 Equality without discrimination. Article 6 Right to liberty and security. Article 18(3) Protection of family rights without discrimination. These protections apply to all persons in Nigeria. PART 9 LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR FAMILY INTERFERENCE Families or community members who: • attempt to stop a lawful marriage • demand bride price as a condition • insist on introductions or rites • claim authority over adult consent • restrict movement or exit are violating the Constitution and the Marriage Act. Such actions expose them to: • criminal liability under Section 41 of the Marriage Act • civil liability for rights violations • court injunctions restraining interference Culture is not a defence. PART 10 LANGUAGE THAT EXPOSES ILLEGAL THINKING Statements such as: “He should allow her to leave” “Without us there is no marriage” “You must beg us” “You should be grateful we reduced demands” have no basis in law. They reflect control logic, not legal authority. PART 11 FINAL LEGAL POSITION Under Nigerian law: Marriage is voluntary. Consent is personal. Family consent is optional. Bride price is optional. Introduction is optional. Culture is optional. Exit cannot be blocked. Autonomy cannot be transferred. Any claim to the contrary is legally false. This is not disrespect to tradition. It is obedience to the Constitution. |
| Re: Test For Delusion by Fenrir(m): 11:01pm On Jan 25 |
Fenrir:And I didn't write this |
Test For Delusion 2 • Another Jehovah's Witnesses's Delusion • Religion: The Greatest Delusion Of All Time • 2 • 3 • 4
To Nairaland Atheist. • I Gave Oyedepo The Powers He Is Using- (rejoinder) • Amazing Facts About Earth That Can't Happen By Chance But Just Right For Life.