₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,087 members, 8,429,304 topics. Date: Thursday, 18 June 2026 at 05:08 PM

Toggle theme

No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsNo Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision (24333 Views)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11 Reply (Go Down)

No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by ogododo(op): 4:31pm On Feb 08
'No network in 9 states’ – Akpabio justifies Senate decision on electronic transmission


Ahead of the 2027 election in Nigeria, Senate President Godswill Akpabio has justified the removal of mandatory electronic transmission of results from the amended Electoral Act.

DAILY POST reports that the Senate had last week removed mandatory e-transmission of election results from the legislation.

The Senate’s decision sparked controversy across the country with Nigerians, including opposition parties and the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, urging the lawmakers to reverse the decision.

Responding to the controversy during the launch of a book by former senator, Effiong Bob, titled ‘The Burdens of Legislators in Nigeria’, Akpabio blasted the critics, noting that it is the responsibility of the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC, to determine the modality of elections.

While justifying the decision of the Senate, Akpabio noted that there is no network in nine states among the 36 states in Nigeria, due to insecurity.

He further asked Nigerians to direct their grievance to INEC, stating that the agency is responsible for deployment of technology.

Akpabio said, “Real-time transmission means that in over nine states where networks are not working because of insecurity, there will be no election results. Nationally, it means that if the national grid collapses and no network is working, no election results will be valid.

“But you see them talking. We even have a young man from Akwa Ibom who is publicity secretary to one of the parties. When you see him talking you will think he knows it all.

“He doesn’t know anything about lawmaking, and he would talk and talk and talk. But what can I say? I can’t answer. The Senate does not conduct elections, we don’t deploy technology, we only make laws. And INEC must apply the law.

“The timing scoop and modality rests with INEC, acting within the framework of the law enacted by the parliament and interpreted by the Supreme Court.”
https://dailypost.ng/2026/02/08/no-network-in-9-states-akpabio-justifies-senate-decision-on-electronic-transmission/

Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by press9jatv(m): 4:33pm On Feb 08
His justification is highly wrong here. The network in the 9 states can be fix. We are in the digital world.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Zionmdde:
But there are banks there

I forgot, those banks use ledger and post office to deliver debit and credit mails


Upon tinubu is the candidate all Nigerians are vying for, they are still afraid to conduct a simple free and fair election
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by immaculatesense(m): 4:43pm On Feb 08
press9jatv:
His justification is highly wrong here. The network in the 9 states can be fix. We are in the digital world.
Why hasn't it been fix since all these years from PDP administration when insecurity started?
Or
Why hasn't our National Grid been fix since all these years from PDP administration when it started collapsing?

What has not been fixed in almost 30 years should now be fixed in one year because one tribe has never been elected president and you want it badly either by hook or by crook.
Go fix am na.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by iwaeda: 4:48pm On Feb 08
Akpabio is exposing the lies of APC, because everywhere has been built by Tinubu. At least the remaining 27 states have networks. E- transmission is mandatory. grin grin grin grin grin
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by immaculatesense(m): 4:49pm On Feb 08
Zionmdde:
But their are banks there

I forgot, those banks use ledger and post office to deliver debit and credit mails


Upon tinubu is the candidate all Nigerians are vying for, they are still afraid to conduct a simple free and fair election
I thought NYSC should have exposed some of you beyond your states and local government na.
Oh sorry, not all of your graduated from school or had opportunity to serve.
I served in Ebonyi state in Ezza North to be precise just a little less than 10 years ago and I can say authoritatively that there was no single bank in the whole of Ezza North at the time. We had to go to Abaliki before we could make withdrawals. I knew how many kilometers we had to trek just to make a call, we couldn't even receive calls because there were no network. How will REAL TIME transmission of results work in those areas? Or election should not hold in those areas abi?
So, if them ask you no, you go answer say banks dey all local government in Nigeria abi? Dey there.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Burob: 4:49pm On Feb 08
press9jatv:
His justification is highly wrong here. The network in the 9 states can be fix. We are in the digital world.
Go & use your money to fix it, who is holding u back?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by immaculatesense(m): 4:50pm On Feb 08
iwaeda:
Akpabio is exposing the lies of APC, because everywhere has been built by Tinubu. At least the remaining 27 states have networks. E- transmission is mandatory. grin grin grin grin grin
Go pass the law na. Mr Nairaland Lawmaker/Senator.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Burob: 4:50pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
I thought NYSC should have exposed some of you beyond your states and local government na.
Oh sorry, not all of your graduated from school or had opportunity to serve.
I served in Ebonyi state in Ezza North to be precise just a little less than 10 years ago and I can say authoritatively that there was no single bank in the who of Ezza North at the time. We had to go to Abaliki before we could make withdrawals. I knew how many kilometers we had to trek just to make a call, we couldn't even receive calls because there were no network. How will REAL TIME transmission of results walk in those areas? Or election should not hold in those areas abi?
So, if them ask you no, you go answer say banks dey all local government in Nigeria abi? Dey there.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Don’t mind those cho cho insatiable wailers.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Burob: 4:51pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
Go pass the law na. Mr Nairaland Lawmaker/Senator.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Exactly 👍.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by immaculatesense(m): 4:57pm On Feb 08
Burob:
Don’t mind those cho cho insatiable wailers.
Them wan manufacture E- uploads to reflect outrageous numbers that won't align with numbers accredited by BIVAS. If INEC come cancel those vote, them go use propaganda talk say INEC reduced their vote. They did the same in the last election, you will think Obi has won with their over 2 million votes they manufactured for him in Plateau if not for BIVAS, though they successfully got away with it in the South East has data of the election has shown.
Them think say them wise. We wise pass them.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by franchasng: 4:57pm On Feb 08
This Akpabio has ridiculed his family name just to please Tinubu. Funny enough in highest 10 years from now this same Akpabio will become old and out of power and will be secretly regretting his useless actions of today.


Starlink network is available all over the world even in war torn countries. Even in Iran where Iranian government has been making every effort to jam starlink network, it's still accessible to millions of Iranians, including in Ukraine where Russia have used their highest level of missiles to bombard and destroy all network systems, starlink still work there talk more of Nigeria.



That massive rigging you evil people in APC plan to do in 2027 using manual election result collation so as to return this failed government of a known kleptomaniac tax master will definitely fail angry
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Zionmdde: 4:58pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
I thought NYSC should have exposed some of you beyond your states and local government na.
Oh sorry, not all of your graduated from school or had opportunity to serve.
I served in Ebonyi state in Ezza North to be precise just a little less than 10 years ago and I can say authoritatively that there was no single bank in the whole of Ezza North at the time. We had to go to Abaliki before we could make withdrawals. I knew how many kilometers we had to trek just to make a call, we couldn't even receive calls because there were no network . How will REAL TIME transmission of results work in those areas? Or election should not hold in those areas abi?
So, if them ask you no, you go answer say banks dey all local government in Nigeria abi? Dey there.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
I have travelled Over 33 states in this country, so kindly sharrap. If government is committed to live transmission of results, they can effectively and efficiently achieve it

See the kind of grammar the so called graduate is releasing

Which school did you even graduate from?

10 years ago abi, why not go back there and find out the progress of communication networks.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Burob: 5:00pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
Them wan manufacture E- uploads to reflect outrageous numbers that won't align with numbers accredited by BIVAS. If INEC come cancel those vote, them go use propaganda talk say INEC reduced their vote. They did the same in the last election, you will think Obi has won with their over 2 million votes they manufactured for him in Plateau if not for BIVAS, though they successfully got away with it in the South East has data of the election has shown.
Them think say them wise. We wise pass them.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Bros na ojuju be that o, who no fear Obidients, no fear Eyeneck be that.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by immaculatesense(m): 5:07pm On Feb 08
Zionmdde:
I have travelled Over 33 states in this country, so kindly sharrap. If government is committed to live transmission of results, they can effectively and efficiently achieve it

See the kind of grammar the so called graduate is releasing

Which school did you even graduate from?

10 years ago abi, why not go back there and find out the progress of communication networks.
It shows that you are immature by pointing out a minor typographic error 'you' turned 'your'.
If I were to pick yours out, you didn't use punctuation (period/full stop) where necessary in both first and second paragraphs of the response to mine. Should I also capitulate on that to conclude that you never graduated? Come off it boy. It's unnecessary.
Back to the point.
Let me oblige without conceding that the environment has developed positively. What about other environments that are worse that are worse than that? Should we neglect those ones too?

No Be Juju Be Dat?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by ogododo(op): 5:15pm On Feb 08
Nawa Nlfpmod, but pipu dey make calls, use Internet. APC be serious curse.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by brain54(m): 5:16pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
I thought NYSC should have exposed some of you beyond your states and local government na.
Oh sorry, not all of your graduated from school or had opportunity to serve.
I served in Ebonyi state in Ezza North to be precise just a little less than 10 years ago and I can say authoritatively that there was no single bank in the whole of Ezza North at the time. We had to go to Abaliki before we could make withdrawals. I knew how many kilometers we had to trek just to make a call, we couldn't even receive calls because there were no network. How will REAL TIME transmission of results work in those areas? Or election should not hold in those areas abi?
So, if them ask you no, you go answer say banks dey all local government in Nigeria abi? Dey there.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
You have never heard of star link network before...


The excuse Akpabio is giving is not permissible. If results can be transmitted in 90% or at least 80% of the country then it should be given a trial and improved upon with time. It's not compulsory it covers 100%. Laws are supposed to be adaptive to personalized conditions. And room can be made for contingencies.


Akpabio's Senate is just making excuses or just doesn't have the will power to do the electronic transmission thing.

No be juju be that?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Ofunaofu: 5:17pm On Feb 08
Akpabio is a mæd man

So he’s telling us that electronic transmission can’t be made mandatory because networks might fail, insecurity exists, or the national grid could collapse.

By that reasoning, Nigeria should also suspend banking, aviation, and telecoms since all of them rely on technology too. Somehow, they function with backups, redundancies, and contingency plans.
Only elections must remain permanently analogue.

The argument that 'if some states have no network, then no results should be valid anywhere' is especially revealing. Instead of fixing gaps, the solution is to legally preserve opacity nationwide.

In fact, Akpabio has further indicted the Tinubu-led APC government himself, by claiming that insecurity has cut off nine states from the national grid and telecom services. That alone raises far bigger questions than electronic transmission ever could.

Then comes the familiar escape line, 'The Senate does not conduct elections; we only make laws.'

And that’s the point he seems to forget while asking Nigerians to direct their grievances to INEC. INEC can only act within the law. If the law makes electronic transmission mandatory, INEC is legally bound to implement it.

Why is this being framed as something new? Results were uploaded on IReV in 2023, and it worked. It only became “a problem” after a mysterious glitch, no explanation from INEC, and a court ruling that said electronic transmission was not mandatory under the Electoral Act.

Nigerians are now simply asking that it be made mandatory.

So, Akpabio, this isn’t a technical problem.
It’s a political one.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by press9jatv(m): 5:21pm On Feb 08
Burob:
Go & use your money to fix it, who is holding u back?
stop displaying your ignorance here. The network can be fix.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by iwaeda:
Akpabio has said it all, insecurity still persists, tens of people are killed daily in Kwara. Those that claimed served less than 10 years ago as corpers are kids who never saw goods of Nigeria under PDP. Today Akpabio has concluded APC is a failure, they can't secure NIGERIA, since MTN , GLO, Airltel, 9mobile are everywhere, but 9 states. grin grin grin grin grin
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Ofunaofu: 5:23pm On Feb 08
Burob:
Don’t mind those cho cho insatiable wailers.
Burob, I want to ask: what is your problem with mandatory electronic transmission of election results from polling units?

Why are you vehemently against it?
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Hedonisco: 5:24pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
Why hasn't it been fix since all these years from PDP administration when insecurity started?
Or
Why hasn't our National Grid been fix since all these years from PDP administration when it started collapsing?

What has not been fixed in almost 30 years should now be fixed in one year because one tribe has never been elected president and you want it badly either by hook or by crook.
Go fix am na.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
How brain damaned do you have to be to talk about the PDP that left power 11 years ago? You people are despicable.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by press9jatv(m): 5:25pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
Why hasn't it been fix since all these years from PDP administration when insecurity started?
Or
Why hasn't our National Grid been fix since all these years from PDP administration when it started collapsing?

What has not been fixed in almost 30 years should now be fixed in one year because one tribe has never been elected president and you want it badly either by hook or by crook.
Go fix am na.

No Be Juju Be Dat?
network can be fix before we enters 2027 election. Talk with wisdom here. You are just displaying your ignorance and hypocrisy here.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Zionmdde: 5:31pm On Feb 08
immaculatesense:
It shows that you are immature by pointing out a minor typographic error 'you' turned 'your'.
If I were to pick yours out, you didn't use punctuation (period/full stop) where necessary in both first and second paragraphs of the response to mine. Should I also capitulate on that to conclude that you never graduated? Come off it boy. It's unnecessary.
Back to the point.
Let me oblige without conceding that the environment has developed positively. What about other environments that are worse that are worse than that? Should we neglect those ones too?

No Be Juju Be Dat?
You were the immature person here, talking about graduating and service. When if I ask you now, you obviously have not touched up to 10 states .

I have told you before, if government is committed to a live transmission of results, they will achieve it. Where there is no network Nigerians who voted in that polling unit will obviously know the closest place network can be accessed and will be willing to escort the electoral officer to that place, which obviously won't even be up to 2km

So according to a graduate like you, we rather continue with failure than to seek a major change.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Gajagojo: 5:31pm On Feb 08
Ofunaofu:
Burob, I want to ask: what is your problem with mandatory electronic transmission of election results from polling units?

Why are you vehemently against it?
The question is if we legislate for it and they come and say glitch
Do we cancel the election
I hope we can get a yes or no answer
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by MemphitzDgreat1(m): 5:32pm On Feb 08
RTIFN:

React Tinubu Is Finishing Nigeria.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Putindbutt(m): 5:34pm On Feb 08
No peace for Bitter people and Election losers...

Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Alex80s(m): 5:37pm On Feb 08
Zionmdde:
But their are banks there

I forgot, those banks use ledger and post office to deliver debit and credit mails


Upon tinubu is the candidate all Nigerians are vying for, they are still afraid to conduct a simple free and fair election
They are afraid of conducting free and election ,yet they claim that Obi can't win election
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by johnmartus(m): 5:49pm On Feb 08
Lol baseless excuse. Although I'm not agree for electronic transmission. Nigeria haven't mature to that level it will definitely misused and caused another civil war.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Ofunaofu: 5:52pm On Feb 08
Gajagojo:
The question is if we legislate for it and they come and say glitch
Do we cancel the election
I hope we can get a yes or no answer
Leave that for INEC to determine
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Ekpeitut:
This is just intellectual laziness.
A simple research will show that Elon Musk's starlink satelite services and others are able to provide a stable Internet connection even in the most remote locations.

Well Nigerians pay you lots to bring solutions so you better justify your jombo salaries.

Electronic transmission is hybrid by design, not absolute. The law can mandate immediate electronic upload where connectivity exists, and offline capture with delayed sync and time stamps where it doesn’t. This is exactly how BVAS already works today.

INEC already transmits data electronically. Accreditation data is uploaded from polling units using existing telecom networks. If those same networks are “too unreliable” for results, then by that logic they are also too unreliable for accreditation, yet the Senate had no problem approving BVAS. You cannot logically accept electronic accreditation and reject electronic results using the same infrastructure.
Re: No Network In 9 States’ – Akpabio Justifies Senate Decision by Gajagojo: 5:57pm On Feb 08
Ofunaofu:
Leave that for INEC to determine
No that is a constitutional question


You cannot avoid reality

INEC. dies not make laws

The question is
What should the law be

We don't want to wait till after election to hear

Show me the law
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11 Reply

I Oppose Senate’s Decision To Combine Electronic And Manual Transmission — AtikuE-Transmission Of Results: Senate’s Decision Is Self Serving - AfenifereFlooding: FG Warns 9 States To Prepare For Heavy Floods From September 6234

Presidency 2019: There Is Vacancy In Aso RockNigeria Customs Release Statement Over Guns Intercepted In LagosNigeria Leads South Africa In Foreign Reserves