₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,980 members, 8,428,890 topics. Date: Thursday, 18 June 2026 at 07:32 AM

Toggle theme

How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsHow 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results (15672 Views)

1 2 3 4 Reply (Go Down)

How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Islie(op): 7:11am On Feb 09
2027: How 3 southern senators scuttled real-time e-transmission of election results — Sources


Fresh facts have emerged on how the Senate rejected a proposal to make real-time electronic transmission of election results mandatory, ahead of the 2027 general election.

The proposal formed part of the Electoral Act, 2022 (Repeal and Enactment) Bill, 2026 (SB. 903), specifically an amendment to Clause 60(3), which sought to compel presiding officers of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to upload polling unit results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal, IReV, in real time.

The recommendation, which also triggered wider reforms on election timelines, penalties for electoral offences and voting technology, was voted down by the 10th Senate under the leadership of Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio.

At the centre of the controversy is Section 60(3) of the bill, dealing with the transmission of polling unit results. The provision was recommended by the Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, chaired by Senator Simon Lalong (APC, Plateau South).

Sources told Vanguard that during clause-by-clause consideration of the committee’s report, the Senate initially worked on a version that retained real-time electronic transmission.

However, after hours of deliberations and as plenary dragged late into the evening, the final version passed by the Senate was altered at the last minute to expunge the provision.

This, sources said, was even though the Senate had earlier approved electronic transmission overwhelmingly during a closed session.

An ad-hoc committee, chaired by Senator Niyi Adegbonmire, APC (Ondo Central), had also endorsed it after more than one year of consultations.

The Adegbonmire committee engaged INEC, civil society organisations and stakeholders through joint sessions and zonal public hearings, where consensus was reportedly reached that electronic transmission must be explicitly legalised to avoid the legal controversies that trailed the 2023 general elections.

Page 45 of the report of the Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Clause 60(3) provided: “The Presiding Officer shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the IREV portal in real time and such transmission shall be done after the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the Presiding Officer and/or countersigned by the candidates or polling agents available at the polling unit.”

A source said that when senators got to the clause, many assumed it would pass smoothly, given prior resolutions.

“That was when the unexpected happened,” the source said, adding that three ranking Southern senators allegedly intervened.

According to the source, the senators approached the Senate President and urged him to retain the provision of the 2022 Electoral Act.

Akpabio was said to have upheld the existing law, which allows electronic transmission only after votes are counted and publicly announced at polling units.

Instead of “transmission,” the word “transfer” was adopted, in line with the 2022 Act, even though no fresh debate was conducted on the floor.

The rejected amendment would have mandated real-time upload of results to IReV immediately after completion of Form EC8A.

The adopted provision states: “The Presiding Officer shall transfer the results, including the total number of accredited voters and the results of the ballot, in a manner as prescribed by the commission.”

Senate bows to pressure, to hold emergency sitting tomorrow, instead of Feb 24

However, following the widespread criticisms that have trailed its rejection of a proposed amendment to Clause 60, Subsection 3, of the bill, which sought to make the real time electronic transmission of election results mandatory, the Senate has been forced to reconvene an emergency plenary sitting tomorrow, February 10, 2026, at 12:00 noon.

It had on Wednesday, adjourned plenary till February 24.

The new development to reconvene tomorrow was formally contained in an official notice dated February 8, 2026, signed by the Clerk of the Senate, Emmanuel Odo, on the directive of the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio.

The notice to the senators, sighted yesterday, read: “I am directed by President of the Senate, Distinguished Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio, to inform all senators of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that an emergency sitting of the Senate has been scheduled to hold as follows: Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2026. Time: 12:00 Noon.

“Venue: Senate Chamber. Senators are kindly requested to note this emergency sitting date and attend. All inconveniences this will cause to senators are highly regretted.”

Although the official notice did not state the reason for the emergency session, the timing strongly suggests a connection to the intense national controversy trailing the Senate’s handling of key provisions in the Electoral Act amendment, particularly Section 60(3).

The Senate had adjourned plenary last week after the passage of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2026, to allow lawmakers participate in ongoing budget defence sessions by ministries, departments and agencies, MDAs, ahead of the final consideration of the ¦ 58.47 trillion 2026 Appropriation Bill, scheduled for March 17.

Recall that during the clause-by-clause consideration of the Electoral bill, the Senate, presided over by Akpabio, adopted a motion moved by Senate Chief Whip Tahir Monguno, APC, Borno North and seconded by the Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin, APC, Kano North, to reject the proposed Section 60(3).

The rejected amendment sought to make real-time electronic transmission of election results from polling units to the INEC Result Viewing (IReV) portal mandatory. It proposed that:

“The presiding officer shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the IReV portal in real time, and such transmission shall be done after the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the presiding officer and/or countersigned by candidates or polling unit agents, where available.”

Instead, the Senate retained Section 60(5) of the Electoral Act, 2022, which states.

Parliamentary sources said the Senate must reconvene to approve the votes and proceedings to validate the decisions taken.

This, they argued, would clarify whether “transfer” or “electronic transmission” was adopted by senators and enable the conference committee to function.

Without approval of the votes and proceedings, the conference committee constituted by Akpabio to harmonise the bill with the House of Representatives cannot effectively commence work.

Members of the conference committee include Senator Simon Lalong (Chairman); Senators Niyi Adegbonmire, APC, Ondo Central; Tahir Monguno, APC, Borno North; Adamu Aliero, APC, Kebbi Central; Orji Uzor Kalu, APC, Abia North; Abba Moro, PDP, Benue South; Asuquo Ekpenyong, APC, Cross River South; Aminu Iya Abbas, Adamawa; and Tokunbo Abiru, APC, Lagos East.

Beyond electronic transmission, the Senate also made sweeping changes to other provisions of the bill.

It dropped stiffer penalties for buying and selling of voter cards, which proposed fines ranging from N500,000 to N5 million and a 10-year ban from contesting elections.

The Senate reduced the period for INEC’s notice of election from 360 days to 180 days under amended Clause 28.

It also cut the timeline for political parties to submit candidates’ lists from 180 days to 90 days under Clause 29.

Under Clause 47, the Senate replaced smart card readers with the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System, BVAS, but rejected electronically generated voter identification, retaining the Permanent Voter Card, PVC, as the sole mode of identification at polling units.

Clause 142, which sought to ease proof of non-compliance in election petitions by relying on documentary evidence, was also struck out following concerns that it could clog the courts.


Delay may not derail 2027 polls—NBA

Meanwhile, the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, has expressed concern over the Senate’s delay in concluding work on the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.

NBA President, Mr Afam Osigwe, SAN, said while the Bar was worried about the pace of the National Assembly, the delay would not necessarily derail the 2027 general elections if INEC and stakeholders worked with the existing legal framework.

“The process itself has not really started. But if those amendments can be brought in, and they improve credibility, it will be better,” Osigwe told Vanguard.

He advised INEC to continue preparations under the subsisting law, noting that technological issues, such as result transmission, only come into play on election day.

“You can pass the best laws, and if the judicial interpretation is anything but progressive, we have still not achieved anything,” he said, citing how courts interpreted provisions of the 2022 Electoral Act.

Also reacting, civil society leader, Mr Clement Nwankwo, urged INEC to immediately issue the notice for the 2027 elections under the existing Electoral Act, which requires 360 days’ notice.

“What I am saying is that INEC should use our current Electoral Act and go ahead and announce the notice for elections in 2027,” he said.

Nwankwo, Executive Director of the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre, PLAC, accused the Senate of undermining national consensus by allegedly altering the agreed version of the bill.

“The Electoral Act is not the personal property of anybody; it is a national property,” he said on Channels Television, warning that secrecy around executive sessions had resulted in what he described as a “legislative ambush.”

He disclosed that a joint committee involving the Senate, House of Representatives, INEC and judicial experts had agreed that results must be transmitted electronically in real time to IReV.

“Nigeria’s elections are among the most expensive in the world. You can’t spend billions on BVAS and then short-change Nigerians on its use,” Nwankwo said, warning that continued manipulation of legislative outcomes could erode public trust and fuel unrest.


NLC threatens mass boycott, mass action over electoral ambiguity

Meanwhile, the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, has threatened mass action and a possible nationwide boycott of future elections over what it described as confusion and contradictions surrounding the Senate’s amendment of the 2022 Electoral Act, particularly on the real-time electronic transmission of election results.

Raising concerns over the credibility of the 2027 general elections, the NLC accused the Senate of undermining public trust in the electoral process and warned that failure to clearly mandate real-time electronic transmission of results could plunge the nation into another electoral crisis.

NLC in a statement by the President, Joe Ajaero, said: “NLC expresses deep concern over the confusion and contradictory narratives emerging from the Senate regarding the amendment to the 2022 Electoral Act, particularly on electronic transmission of results.

‘’This lack of clarity undermines public trust and is deeply troubling for our democracy. The Nigerian people deserve a transparent electoral process where their votes are not only counted but seen to be counted.

‘’We urge the Senate to provide an immediate, official and unambiguous account of its proceedings and final decisions. Public records suggest the proposed amendment to mandate INEC to transmit results electronically in real-time was not adopted, with the existing discretionary provision retained.

‘’This has generated nationwide apprehension, and subsequent explanations have only added to the confusion. At a critical juncture, following the 2023 elections, such legislative ambiguity risks institutionalising doubt at the heart of our electoral integrity and echoes past controversies that have caused national distress.

Therefore, NLC demands immediate clarity and transparency. The Senate must issue a definitive statement on the exact provisions passed, clarifying the final wording and rationale.

‘’The National Assembly leadership must also ensure the harmonisation process produces a final bill with crystal-clear provisions. Any ambiguity in the transmission and collation of results is a disservice to our democracy.


“We call on the Senate to restore legislative credibility by ensuring its processes are transparent and its outcomes clear. The amended Act must provide an unambiguous mandate for INEC to transmit and collate results from polling units in real-time electronically. The path to the 2027 elections must be built on certainty, not confusion.

“Nigerian workers and citizens are watching closely. The NLC is working within its networks to advocate clarity and integrity. We will not stand by while the trust of Nigerians is betrayed again and the clarity of our electoral laws is compromised.

‘’Failure to add electronic transmission real-time will lead to mass action before, during and after the election or total boycott of the election.

‘’Our nation must choose the path of clarity and integrity. We need to avoid the same confusion that trailed the 2023 elections. A people united can never be defeated! Workers united can never be defeated!”
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/02/2027-how-3-southern-senators-scuttled-real-time-e-transmission-of-election-results-sources/

Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Macphenson: 7:27am On Feb 09
Weak laws breed weak institutions and weak institutions bread strong criminals.
Akpabio just weakened the INEC..
They signed 30 governors and counting, yet they are afraid of free fair and credible elections. If electronic transmission of results is made mandatory by law, Tinubu will be beaten blue black before 12 no9n on election day.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by tonesky(m): 7:41am On Feb 09
Orji Kalu cannever support electronic transmission. You know why?
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by princeade86(m): 7:43am On Feb 09
Just to favour themselves. Also, they should pls make Abuja election clear to the masses, to know how many percent candidates can win to declare him or her the winner or is not compulsory to win Abuja before they can declare u the winner. Let constitution be clear, so the case will be simple to argue in court, not the case that will require highest bider to win.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by chicfarmer: 7:43am On Feb 09
These newspapers sef. So who are the three southern senators huh
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by donleo92(m): 7:44am On Feb 09
This people with lamba will never change.

Choi!!!!

APC una too much with lamba!!!
Anyway, currently we got no opposition, but BOY SCOUTS.

OBI AND ATIKU WITH NASIRU EL RUFIA SHOULD COME OUT AND PROTEST THIS ELECTORAL BILL
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by AntiChristian: 7:46am On Feb 09
We are still not ripe for this transmission. It can't even work fully in Ogun state not to talk of all those far inland northern rural areas!

There are still many places in Ogun state still on "two days on" and "one day off" electricity! And those "on" days are not 247!

Make we no waste our time on impracticable things. And network still dey there!
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by fineboynl(m):
My take is that inect officials should announce the result at the poly uniit in presence of the crude and poly agent. And the agent and people should be allowed to video the calling of results as evidence of the results. Place one result on the wall of the poly center.

Transmit the results to inect server in real time. The people in that poly unit can verify if the result is same as the one announced in
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Lanruze:
I listened to Edmund Obilo's podcast through the weekend on his 21 series Edition of the events and outcomes of the January 15, 1966 coup led by young military officers.

There are historical similiarities playing out sequencially in Nigeria today.

Nigerian politicians seem to be bad students of History, power & politics.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Btruth:
An independent website can be created to counter the INEC fraud before that day. Let every party agent on ground report live via that web page.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by kaludestiny10(m): 7:48am On Feb 09
A clear conscience fears no fall.
The political class especially those in power know that with a free and fare election in 2027, that they are goners due to their lack of good representation starting from the president to the law makers.
Bunch of corrupt leaders.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by badoh(m): 7:48am On Feb 09
Who are the three high ranking southern senators? If this report cannot tell us their names, then this is a shabby report and was only trying to gain traffic by peddling lies and rumour. Name them and let's see if they won't sue you.
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Ofunaofu: 7:49am On Feb 09
Page 45 of the report of the Senate Committee on Electoral Matters, Clause 60(3) provided: “The Presiding Officer shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the IREV portal in real time and such transmission shall be done after the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the Presiding Officer and/or countersigned by the candidates or polling agents available at the polling unit.”
Anybody who has a problem with this is, quite obviously, an enemy of this country and a threat to democracy
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by PulaPower: 7:50am On Feb 09
Macphenson:
Weak laws breed weak institutions and weak institutions bread strong criminals.
Akpabio just weakened the INEC..
They signed 30 governors and counting, yet they are afraid of free fair and credible elections. If electronic transmission of results is made mandatory by law, Tinubu will be beaten blue black before 12 no9n on election day.
If nah me be Tinubu, nah Obasanjo way I go use run ham..
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Holdup247: 7:51am On Feb 09
Peter obi wan ring election through the back door... E no go work for ram...
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Naustine(m): 7:52am On Feb 09
AntiChristian:
We are still not ripe for this transmission. It can't even work fully in Ogun state not to talk of all those far inland northern rural areas!

There are still many places in Ogun state still on "two days on" and "one day off" electricity! And those "on" days are not 247!

Make we no waste our time on impracticable things. And network still dey there!
Pathetic take from you . Very very
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Basic123: 7:53am On Feb 09
Macphenson:
Weak laws breed weak institutions and weak institutions bread strong criminals.
Akpabio just weakened the INEC..
They signed 30 governors and counting, yet they are afraid of free fair and credible elections. If electronic transmission of results is made mandatory by law, Tinubu will be beaten blue black before 12 no9n on election day.
So,what was the position of PDP, LP and ADC senators on the floor
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by adioolayi(m): 7:53am On Feb 09
Nigerians sef..

What if the President fails to sign and give the excuse Late President Buhari gave back then that it's close to General elections and will affect INEC's preparationshuh

Wetin Una go dohuh
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Naustine(m): 7:53am On Feb 09
Holdup247:
Peter obi wan ring election through the back door... E no go work for ram...
What's the meaning of ring?
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Bendeco02: 7:54am On Feb 09
Elefansamuel:
is there any good network in Nigeria

Stop comparing Nigeria to USA
Alaye keep Shut

But people in those towns you claimed have no Network have mobile phones and make use of it daily.

Let assume No network in some place. Can't they fix it before February 2027.

Why could't they fix the network issue since 2023?

People in those towns make use of their mobile phones daily by using the network available in the area.

So all networks will suddenly have issue the same time interval that day?
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by helinues: 7:54am On Feb 09
Any casualties please. Make una update us
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by ezekins: 7:54am On Feb 09
Apc is only interested in means to manipulate the outcome of the 2027 elections
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Racoon(m): 7:55am On Feb 09
Godswill Akpabio will forever go down in infamy
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by Holdup247: 7:55am On Feb 09
Naustine:
What's the meaning of ring?
if you don't know what I mean then GTFOH
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by teeji9: 7:58am On Feb 09
There they go again trying to throw the south under the bus for a generally planned and accepted outcome shame!! 🙂‍↔️

Islie:
2027: How 3 southern senators scuttled real-time e-transmission of election results — Sources





https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/02/2027-how-3-southern-senators-scuttled-real-time-e-transmission-of-election-results-sources/
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by CJStarz: 7:59am On Feb 09
tonesky:
Orji Kalu cannever support electronic transmission. You know why?
Because he gave wooden benches to schools in his constituency
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by oz4real83(m): 8:00am On Feb 09
May God bless premiumtimesng, gazette, signal, cable and others who are always bold to mention the names of such evil senators embarassed
Re: How 3 Southern Senators Scuttled Real-time E-transmission Of Election Results by SmartPolician: 8:01am On Feb 09
AntiChristian:
We are still not ripe for this transmission. It can't even work fully in Ogun state not to talk of all those far inland northern rural areas!

There are still many places in Ogun state still on "two days on" and "one day off" electricity! And those "on" days are not 247!

Make we no waste our time on impracticable things. And network still dey there!
Agbadorians should stop making this statement to support this madness. If elections are conducted in areas that have no network, the INEC official should go to an area with reception and transmit the result. APC won't take Nigeria back to Egypt.
1 2 3 4 Reply

Southern Senators Revive Forum, Appoint Abiru As ChairmanWhy Did The Southern Senators In The House Allow Them Pass The PIB?Crypto Ban: Northern Senators Support CBN, Southern Senators Oppose234

Bob Izua (a Benin High Chief) Has Been Kidnapped!Tinubu In Tears As He Speaks From France With Channels TV Correspondent (video)Peter Obi Comments About Road Accidents In Kogi And Enugu