₦airaland Forum

Obrigardo:
At the end of this thing, you'll be the one to shamefully deactivate or silently slither into the cave. I don't give a damn anymore; all i know is that there is no good end for the tyrant predator.

Maeve7:
They have gone too deep down the rabbit hole to admit that they have been supporting a total failure. Losers supporting a loser.

IjeBos:
This is a great example of your same puddle level depth you employ in everything you write in this thread.

Someone like you hears someone made 70% more profit and someone else made 3% more profit and says, yes I'd take the 70% more profit.
Someone like me asks 70% and 3% of what initial numbers.

That's the reason most of your posts are incoherent ramblings.
To slow to even know what questions you should be asking.

raumdeuter:
So you ask the initial numbers to know who multiplied their wealth more in office? Trump multiplied his 3 times, Obama multiplied his 70 times

BreakingNews21:
Using up my posting quota for today in this thread.

ELON GOES TO MARS


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f22rZji0Nw

Thomas Massie was on ABC this morning and they had to announce a disclaimer saying “Trump has not been accused of any crimes”.

At what point do Trump and the four men he doxed sue him?

They know what massie is trying to do here and they do not want to get sued by Trump again.… pic.twitter.com/3lNwuWFKl7

— Jacktron (@jacktronprime) February 15, 2026

benalvino3:
Do you make AI videos because all your post are AI videos. You are spamming this thread with your yeye ads to your videos.

benalvino3:
Basilico look at Massie throwing out accusations and ABC of all organization had to defend Trump with a disclaimer.

Thomas Massie was on ABC this morning and they had to announce a disclaimer saying “Trump has not been accused of any crimes”.

At what point do Trump and the four men he doxed sue him?

They know what massie is trying to do here and they do not want to get sued by Trump again.… pic.twitter.com/3lNwuWFKl7

— Jacktron (@jacktronprime) February 15, 2026

basilico:
U

Wow, Something has changed. Media used to accept every anti Trump accusation .

benalvino3:
They know there is no basis, and they are being sued left and right for the lies they spread about him.

basilico:
Benalvino3.
AI data centres gobbling up storage , GPUs and memory.
They are also exerting huge demands on the power grid ,though they were given the ahead to install their own power generation stations be they nuclear, gas or coal.

benalvino3:
The price of this stuff is gonna go up, but seriously, why are they using magnetic storage devices?

basilico:
I think it's a cost issue.. if Colossus runs on 200,000 GPUs every other component scales up
Nine of these AIs have returned s profit they are just throwing massive amounts if $$ on the infrastructure with no clear plan when they will be profitable.

benalvino3:
If they apply IjeBos' maths they are profitable. You know, in a world where 3% is greater than 70%

bayelsaowei:
Which is greater:

A. 3 x 1,000,000 =

Vs

B. 70 x 1000 =

I WAN KNOW wether you don forget arithmetic...

benalvino3:
Lmao,

Which is greater, 3% or 70%
How are you going to argue this?
I believe you know accounting.

From arithmetical to calculus, 3% increment is always less than 70%

Percentages tell you efficiency / relative performance how good was the return compared to what you started with this is the point. If you are presenting a report in accounting or performance metrics to your bossed or stakeholders, that is the language you are going to be using, something they can easily understand.

Absolute dollars tell you raw scale or actual money added, it does not tell you the performance metrics, growth or efficiency.

You are smarter than the guy that said 3% > 70% don't do this to yourself.

He said he would take 3% increment over 70% 😂

IjeBos:
Ha..
This is emblematic of Bemeruca's overall reasoning.
Like someone who has no clue what they are talking about trying to sound smart with the help of AI.

Gotta love the "From arithmetical". Almost as if he's never heard the word or seen it written

benalvino3:
Stop complaining and attack the argument i made. Useless AI making typos

If Trump, with 3B and a 3% growth, is going against Obama with 1M and a 70% growth, if you maintain this percentage growth, how long before Obama overtakes Trump in wealth?

How did Alphabet (Google), 25B in 2005 vs Microsoft with 300B at the same time, manage to overtake microsoft in 2026, if 3% is better than 70%?

This is common sense

ijebosb:
The crazy thing is that "arithmetical" isn't even that commonly used to be a spell check error.
Dude really thought it was "arithmetical".

I can't.
It was one thing that when you could barely conjugate a verb, so you started using AI to write your posts (who does that), now you're trying to run your mouth about math but have never seen the word arithmetic spelled?

Whatever those schools were that failed you should give you your tuition back.

ijebosb:
The crazy thing is that "arithmetical" isn't even that commonly used to be a spell check error.
Dude really thought it was "arithmetical".

I can't.
It was one thing that when you could barely conjugate a verb, so you started using AI to write your posts (who does that), now you're trying to run your mouth about math but have never seen the word arithmetic spelled?

Whatever those schools were that failed you should give you your tuition back.

benalvino3:
Lmao,

Which is greater, 3% or 70%
How are you going to argue this?
I believe you know accounting.

From arithmetical to calculus, 3% increment is always less than 70%

Percentages tell you efficiency / relative performance how good was the return compared to what you started with this is the point. If you are presenting a report in accounting or performance metrics to your bossed or stakeholders, that is the language you are going to be using, something they can easily understand.

Absolute dollars tell you raw scale or actual money added, it does not tell you the performance metrics, growth or efficiency.

You are smarter than the guy that said 3% > 70% don't do this to yourself.

He said he would take 3% increment over 70% 😂

basilico:
THE OBAMA-EPSTEIN VORTEX
Obama keeps a tight inner circle of confidantes, those who do his dirty work (think Russia Collusion and Election Interference), and some in Obama's Circle were tightly associated with Jeffrey Epstein. Here are three that we currently know about:

(1) Kathy Ruemmler. One of the most powerful lawyers in the country you never heard about until recently. For most of her career, though, Ruemmler was as much consigliore as lawyer, one of the best "fixers" you could hire, IF you could hire her. Because back then, Ruemmler had a small and very select elite clientele of powerful people that included Jeffrey Epstein with whom she had a years-long professional and social relationship, including years after his 2008 p*dophiIe conviction. And Barack Obama persuaded Ruemmler to be his White House Counsel where she acted as one of his closest advisers and friends. So why does Obama have a close friend and advisor who is also the close friend of a convicted chiId rapist?

(2) Harvey Weinstein. Hollywood's elite power broker, Weinstein was also a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein, including long after the 2008 conviction. And when he came into office, President Obama sought and developed a close friendship with Weinstein. That relationship ended only when #MeToo publicly exposed Weinstein and his worst-kept-secret-in-Hollywood habit of assaulting women.
** Obama first daughter Gsp Year internship ~ 5 months was at Harvey Weinstein Company **

(3) Larry Summers. Ivy League guru Summers also had a close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, and one that was publicly known when Obama picked him as his top Economic Adviser and eventual friend. Summers is also the correspondent with Epstein in the now-famous February 2017 email in which Epstein is dishing dirt on Trump. But look at this timing: This email exchange is just days after Trump's first inauguration when the Democrat Party - still controlled by Barack Obama and still reeling from losing the election - has pledged to resist and undermine Trump's presidency. And what is happening? Obama's close friend/adviser Summers is soliciting dirt on Trump from Summers’ other close friend Epstein. See how that works? See the value of having such intersecting associations?

Why is all this important? At that extreme level of power held by President Obama, you cautiously pick your friends and confidantes, and you are highly cognizant of the value each brings to the table. So why did Obama's small circle include at least three major players also in Epstein's small circle? Each of these three were extremely powerful and influential within their specialties. Each had enormous influence. It defies credibility to think this was all accidental or coincidental.

Many commentators have observed that Epstein's world revolved as much around power-brokering as trafficking. Obama was far too shrewd to have any direct relationship with Epstein, yet his small inner circle intersected deeply with Epstein's small inner circle. That wasn’t serendipitous. To what purpose then? Did Epstein provide dirt on powerful people that Obama used to leverage his own power? Is that why Epstein spent the entire eight years of the Obama presidency operating unmoIested despite his Federal conviction just months before Obama took office, only to be arrested and charged once Trump took office? There's a LOT we don't know yet. But one thing is certain - there are no "coincidences" at this high level.

raumdeuter:
Do you now understand why 3X is less than 70X? Or you are still struggling

Trump did a 300% increase, Obama did a 7000% increase