₦airaland Forum

DeepSight:
+
Nothing can ever redeem you from the all time low of saying that a video depicting black people as apes is not racist. Nothing.
Uncle Rukus for life.

The shame will attach forever.

Is Joe Biden a black man?
Are you mentally stable?
You cannot argue against a single point I made, all you will do is cry.

In Django, a movie, a white man called Jamie Foxx used the N word, slave etc.

Is that man a racist in real life for using the N word and calling Black men slaves?

benalvino3:
Is Joe Biden a black man?
Are you mentally stable?
You cannot argue against a single point I made, all you will do is cry.

In Django, a movie, a white man called Jamie Foxx used the N word, slave etc.

Is that man a racist in real life for using the N word and calling Black men slaves?

Why did Trump delete the posts?

Did he become woke suddenly and deleted the post? If he was doing the right thing like you’re here defending, why did he delete the post?

We should even be worried for a start, that a president would depict fellow Americans as animals. That should worry you and make you ask yourself if what you are trying to support is normal.

bayelsaowei:
Why did Trump delete the posts?

Did he become woke suddenly and deleted the post? If he was doing the right thing like you’re here defending, why did he delete the post?

We are talking about the actual video, not the election video about voting machine. We can discuss what happened there as well and why he deleted the video which is the right thing.

But the video we are discussing here is a political satire, a caricature. You folks are saying that video is racist.

It is not. Not even close.

What's racists in this video?

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

IjeBos:
Senators: You don't have to follow illegal orders just as you were trained not to.

tctrills: 😡😡😡 derp derp
Raumdeuter: 😡😡😡 derp derp derp

If you have a problem with that statement, I guarantee you the problem is you.

Ok

IjeBos:
Senators: You don't have to follow illegal orders just as you were trained not to.

tctrills: 😡😡😡 derp derp
Ramdeuter: 😡😡😡 derp derp derp

If you have a problem with that statement, I guarantee you the problem is you.

The Brain rot in the post above..

Member states are not paying. If American money is not in it then it will fail.

According to UN officials, the United Nations is on the brink of complete financial collapse due to "non-payment of dues by member states".

"We face a real danger of running out of money." pic.twitter.com/6koARrekQg

— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) March 18, 2026

Deepsight what is a woman?

Bill Maher: "I don't think most liberals are insane, but neither do they make it clear they disapprove of the ones who are, and they're cowardice in not marginalizing their own crazies has been their downfall."pic.twitter.com/vlpLO5aRwA

— Joe Rogan Podcast News (@joeroganhq) March 17, 2026

benalvino3:
Is Joe Biden a black man?
Are you mentally stable?
You cannot argue against a single point I made, all you will do is cry.

In Django, a movie, a white man called Jamie Foxx used the N word, slave etc.

Is that man a racist in real life for using the N word and calling Black men slaves?

+
No argument can change the facts and you can never live this shame down. Of course I don't expect you to understand the elements of association as per the bold or the elements of context as per the red. In short, I dont expect you to understand anything. You and I know very well that you would defend Trump even if he called your child an ape to your face. I have no duty whatsoever to reduce myself by arguing with one such as you, for every word that proceeds from you is invariably not worth the while of any civilized, self respecting or educated person.

benalvino3:
Deepsight what is a woman?

Bill Maher: "I don't think most liberals are insane, but neither do they make it clear they disapprove of the ones who are, and they're cowardice in not marginalizing their own crazies has been their downfall."pic.twitter.com/vlpLO5aRwA

— Joe Rogan Podcast News (@joeroganhq) March 17, 2026

+
Lol. Like your challenged side-kick you seem to still think I have any duty to answer you.

You must kneel for it.

Cower, plead, tremble.

DeepSight:
+
No argument can change the facts and you can never live this shame down. Of course I don't expect you to understand the elements of association as per the bold or the elements of context as per the red. In short, I dont expect you to understand anything. You and I know very well that you would defend Trump even if he called your child an ape to your face. I have no duty whatsoever to reduce myself by arguing with one such as you, for every word that proceeds from you is invariably not worth the while of any civilized, self respecting or educated person.

You are talking about context when for a movie but won't give context to a political satire that shows both Biden and Obama as primates.

You are not a serious person.

I am not talking about Trump oga,
See what I am talking about

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

raumdeuter:
The Brain rot in the post above..

I'm glad you finally see it.
For someone to have a problem with saying "You don't have to follow illegal orders" is a deep level of brain rot.

Also, deepsight, even if Trump intentionally calls Obama an app, that won't be enough to make him a racist.
At best he is being a racist to Obama to spite or insult him. That's it.

benalvino3:
We are talking about the actual video, not the election video about voting machine. We can discuss what happened there as well and why he deleted the video which is the right thing.

But the video we are discussing here is a political satire, a caricature. You folks are saying that video is racist.

It is not. Not even close.

What's racists in this video?

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

I am talking about this supposed Sattire (which you have chosen to define it as per Trumps PR officer) that he posted or retweeted. He deleted his own post.

Why did he delete his own post?

DeepSight:
+
Can you imagine black men who say that a video depicting the Obamas as apes is not not racist?
Black men can say that?

My word.

I don't need to imagine what I can see with my own eyes. What I can't imagine is me letting such low self worth black men consuming my time by me considering whatever they have to say, because, if they can not value their own black selves, they sure wouldn't value black me.

*Edit
I see you noted in subsequent posts.

bayelsaowei:
I am talking about this supposed Sattire (which you have chosen to define it as per Trumps PR officer) Abi what that he posted or retweeted. He deleted his own post.

Why did he delete his own post?

Before we move forward, are you in agreement this video is not racist but a political satire?

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

benalvino3:
You are talking about context when for a movie but won't give context to a political satire that shows both Biden and Obama as primates.

You are not a serious person.

I am not talking about Trump oga,
See what I am talking about

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

Trump decided to put Obama and Michelle in a black ape covering, and a black man like you is trying so hard to deflect that Trumps embarrassing post wasn’t racist?

Even a black Republican politician if I remember, condemned the post as shameful.

May your conscience help you sha.

DeepSight:
+
Sadly, there is no doubt that many of them would do so.
+
It is more than scary bro.
Can you imagine black men who say that a video depicting the Obamas as apes is not not racist?
Black men can say that?
My word.

I can't imagine it.
It's levels of brokenness.

They see themselves and their blackness as inferior.
A lot of self hate.
Look at Bemeruca/Benalvino.
He wants to be white adjacent so bad, he once argued that Black people were better off enslaved because they are now in the US.
It sounds like he just wanted to be in America.
So, instead of being enslaved (he would have probably jumped onto a slave boat and put himself in chains if he could), to achieve that he now just pretends to live in the US.
Even his language, he feels so inferior he can't speak proper English he now has AI write his posts.

You are talking to people with levels of deep inferiority.

Whilst GOP senators were outraged about the senseless post by Trump, our own very black non Americans are here trying to do unsolicited PR for their god and personal savior.. Tufiakwa.

DEMS SNSWER THIS QUESTION



WAT HAPENS TO THE PETROL DOLLARS IF PEOPLE TRADE OIL WITHOUT DOLLARS?




SURE EPSTEIN IS ALL IN YOUR BRAIN NOTHING ELSE

LIBS BRAIN FUL OF DEAD EOSTEIN



TUFIAKWA

bayelsaowei:
Trump decided to put Obama and Michelle in a black ape covering, and a black man like you is trying so hard to deflect that Trumps embarrassing post wasn’t racist?

Even a black Republican politician if I remember, condemned the post as shameful.

May your conscience help you sha.

That's why they deleted it. But if Trump really wanted to call Obama an ape, he would have done it verbally instead of placing it at the end of a minute-long video of screen recording of election fraud on social media. And a one-second clip of the in the jungle video showing Obama as ape. He could have used a photo instead. So that clip is a reel that got in and we all know how Facebook or Instagram reel works. When one ends another random stuff plays.

So it's good they deleted it. A one second video like that at the end of that unrelated election video is weird, lacks context, and is controversial.

But even if Trump calls Obama an ape, he would be racist to Obama, it would be racist or derogatory to Obama in isolation, an insult or spite for Obama. It does not mean Trump himself is a racist or holds racist views toward black people.

bayelsaowei:
Trump decided to put Obama and Michelle in a black ape covering, and a black man like you is trying so hard to deflect that Trump's embarrassing post wasn’t racist?

Even a black Republican politician if I remember, condemned the post as shameful.

May your conscience help you sha.

I think we are talking past each other. As usual.

FBI whistleblower in Mueller Inquisition Team exposes the shenanigans of the probe.Its mission was to stop Trump only.

https://nypost.com/2026/03/16/us-news/mueller-probe-cut-corners-broke-rules-to-get-trump-whistleblower-claims/

benalvino3:
You are talking about context when for a movie but won't give context to a political satire that shows both Biden and Obama as primates.

You are not a serious person.

I am not talking about Trump oga,
See what I am talking about

The video mocks every major Dem as a jungle animal. Only the Obama monkey clip gets called “the most racist thing in history.” If it were Biden-as-monkey, left would call it satire.pic.twitter.com/RLMoynAK8j

— MAG🔫1775🇺🇸 (@realMAG1775) February 6, 2026

+
Predictably you could not understand my simple words

I am not minded to break it down for you.
Except you kneel, plead, trembling, and cowering.

benalvino3:
But even if Trump calls Obama an ape, he would be racist to Obama, it would be racist or derogatory to Obama in isolation, an insult or spite for Obama. It does not mean Trump himself is a racist or holds racist views toward black people.

+
And this finally justifies me.
Nothing more need be said.

Engaging would have been a total waste of time.
Has anyone ever read such incongruous balderdash?

cc: Ijebos/ cococandy.

DeepSight:
+
And this finally justifies me.
Nothing more need be said.

Engaging would have been a total waste of time.
Has anyone ever read such incongruous balderdash?

cc: Ijebos/ cococandy.

Trump can call Obama an ape.
I don't mind. I also know it is Obama he is insulting or being racist to.

They have issues, they fight, but it does not mean that's Trump's view of black people.

At best, he is insulting or using a derogatory racial slur on Obama in isolation.

If you think that's how Trump thinks of black people then you will have to show us Examples.

ENTITLEMENT MENTALITY



DEMS REMIND ME ALOT ABOUT NIGERIANS





THEY WONT PUT IN THE WORK WEN IT MATTERS BUT STILL EXPECT TO WIN EVEN IF THEY SHAMELESSLY CHEAT




Y WOULD DEG STILL WANT TO GO TO WORLD CUP? Y PORTRAY NEGATIVE IMAGE TO CONGO RATHER THAN A GOOD SPORTS MAN



THST IS WAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, THE INABILITY TO REASON

benalvino3:
Also, deepsight, even if Trump intentionally calls Obama an app, that won't be enough to make him a racist.
At best he is being a racist to Obama to spite or insult him. That's it.

+
This is nothing but desperation.

So I did something. Let AI evaluate I and deepsight for grok, gemini and chatgpt. Part 1

Grok
I inserted the prompt:

Benalvino3 :
But even if Trump calls Obama an ape, he would be racist to Obama, it would be racist or derogatory to Obama in isolation, an insult or spite for Obama. It does not mean Trump himself is a racist or holds racist views toward black people.

Deepsight response:
And this finally justifies me.

Nothing more need be said.

Engaging would have been a total waste of time. Has anyone ever read such incongruous balderdash?

Response from grok:
Yes, Benalvino3's point is valid and aligns with how racism can function at an interpersonal level.
An act can be racist (involving racial prejudice, a slur, trope, or dehumanization based on race) toward one specific person in isolation — driven by personal spite, anger, rivalry, or a desire to insult/humiliate that individual — without the perpetrator necessarily holding generalized racist beliefs about the entire racial group, or being "a racist" in a broader, consistent sense.
This is a common nuance in discussions of racism:
The behavior itself relies on racial elements (e.g., invoking a historically loaded trope like ape/monkey imagery, which has been weaponized against Black people for centuries to dehumanize them).
The motive might be personal/targeted (e.g., to spite Obama specifically due to political enmity, past conflicts, or just to "own" him), rather than a deep-seated conviction that all Black people are inferior.
Someone could do this once (or rarely) and still treat other Black people neutrally, positively, or without bias in other contexts — meaning it doesn't define them as broadly "racist" toward Black people as a group.
Examples include:
Using a racial slur in a one-off heated argument to hurt someone personally, without believing the stereotype applies broadly.
Selecting racially charged imagery to mock a specific rival (e.g., a political opponent), where the race is incidental to the grudge but the choice amplifies the insult via cultural baggage.
That said, the act remains racist because:
It draws power from racial history and stereotypes — even if the intent is "just" personal spite, the tool chosen carries racist weight.
Impact matters: The targeted person (and many observers) experiences it as racial degradation, regardless of the doer's inner beliefs.
In public figures like Trump, patterns (past comments, birtherism claims about Obama, etc.) make isolation harder to argue, but in principle, a single targeted racist act doesn't require blanket racism.
Deepsight calling it "incongruous balderdash" dismisses this distinction without engaging it. The point isn't to excuse the act — it's to separate isolated/spite-driven racism from generalized bigotry. Both can coexist, and recognizing the difference avoids binary "racist or not" traps that shut down discussion.
If the goal is honest debate, this nuance explains why some defend "not racist overall" while still condemning the specific imagery — it's not always all-or-nothing.

https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_f5bb3157-864e-4f93-9e27-80ea2696fc67