₦airaland Forum

This move by Ghana is opening the eyes of many.

An African American woman strongly defended Ghana in a heated exchange with a group of protesters demonstrating against President John Dramani Mahama’s proposal for a UN resolution to recognize transatlantic slavery as the “gravest crime against humanity.”

During the verbal… pic.twitter.com/nVn3QRLbBW

— SIKAOFFICIAL🦍 (@SIKAOFFICIAL1) March 27, 2026

I don't know if these kind of videos get traction on social media and it's the reason why so many blacks are making them. But I see a lot of it and it's a good thing

She's been a Democrat for nearly 50 years.

She voted Democrat.

Raised her children Democrat.

But right before the 2024 election she started to research the candidates.

And you know what happens next.
pic.twitter.com/lWnTIjYbLX

— Mila Joy (@Milajoy) March 26, 2026

To our resident racist defenders, see your people’s stance below.

bayelsaowei:
To our resident racist defenders, see your people’s stance below.

Slavery is the worst thing that happened to humanity, so why limit it to trans Atlantic, why not just every form of slavery whether Trans Saharan, within Africa, Ottoman, Asian slavery

In Short, every form of slavery should be condemned equally they are terrible

Today we still have slavery going on in many places especially in the middle east, There should be more effort to condemn and eradicate that

The U.S. voted against a U.N. resolution to formally recognize the trans-Atlantic slave trade as the “gravest crime against humanity.” The U.S., Israel and Argentina were the only nations to vote against the resolution, which was adopted. Read more: https://nyti.ms/4mduz4d

Because black people are not human to them.

benalvino3:
I don't know if these kind of videos get traction on social media and it's the reason why so many blacks are making them. But I see a lot of it and it's a good thing

I asked a Naija guy that why do you support the Democratic party, what exactly about their policies do you agree with that makes you support them

He said "I just support them" . He couldnt list what policies of the left he personally aligns with

bayelsaowei:
To our resident racist defenders, see your people’s stance below.

Mind you there was no objection in recognizing how inhumane the holocaust was.

No brainwashed ignoramuses were asking “what about other genocides?”

bayelsaowei:
To our resident racist defenders, see your people’s stance below.

Which nonsense do you not buy?

Now you are spreading Propaganda and lies.

The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution on March 25, 2026, declaring the trafficking of enslaved Africans and the racialized chattel enslavement of Africans (via the transatlantic slave trade) as "the gravest crime against humanity."

You know this is nonsense because it exclude the people who are more guilty of this act especially the ghanians.

raumdeuter:
Slavery is the worst thing that happened to humanity, so why limit it to trans Atlantic, why not just every form of slavery whether Trans Saharan, within Africa, Ottoman, Asian slavery

In Short, every form of slavery should be condemned equally they are terrible

Today we still have slavery going on in many places especially in the middle east, There should be more effort to condemn and eradicate that

Once again, he is not reasoning.

No white man made a black man a slave, they bought them. So he should educate himself on the history of slavery, the role black people played and ask himself who is more guilty.

People who make slaves and sold them are blaming the people who bought the product. What a shame

Slavery going on today in big 2026 in Middle East

Did you hear about Al-Abeed, or "The Slave Neighborhood," in Gaza?

The name of this small, impoverished area reflects the deep-seated racism towards Black Palestinians in the region, as "Abeed" is an Arabic word that means "slaves" and is often used as a derogatory term for… pic.twitter.com/FuoJD08cxH

— David Saranga (@DavidSaranga) August 19, 2024

raumdeuter:
I asked a Naija guy that why do you support the Democratic party, what exactly about their policies do you agree with that makes you support them

He said "I just support them" . He couldnt list what policies of the left he personally aligns with

Hive mentality

benalvino3:
Once again, he is not reasoning.

No white man made a black man a slave, they bought them. So he should educate himself on the history of slavery, the role black people played and ask himself who is more guilty.

People who make slaves and sold them are blaming the people who bought the product. What a shame

Do you know how many times you have said the part in bold about bayelsaowei?

So why is it that he isn't always reasoning. Its either


1. He does not have the ability to reason
2. He knows what is right he can reason but being deliberately mischievious

Which of the two is worse?

bayelsaowei:
To our resident racist defenders, see your people’s stance below.

Let's get some facts straight.
Arabs were mostly the ones who traded slaves.They were the caravan owners .

The top five destinations for enslaved people were often colonial regions rather than modern-day independent countries at the time. Based on data from the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, the primary destinations by volume were:
Top 5 Destinations for Enslaved Africans
Brazil (Portuguese Colony/Empire): Approximately 4.9 million people. Brazil received more enslaved Africans than any other single destination, accounting for nearly 40% of the total trade.
British Caribbean: Approximately 2.3 million people. This includes major sugar-producing islands like Jamaica and Barbados.
French Caribbean: Approximately 1.1 million people. The most significant destination was Saint-Domingue (modern-day Haiti).
Spanish Americas: Approximately 1.3 million people (disembarking in various regions including Cuba, Puerto Rico, and mainland South/Central America).
Dutch Americas: Approximately 500,000 people, primarily to Surinam and the Dutch Antilles

Contrary to common perception, only about 388,000 (roughly 3.6%) of the 10.7 million survivors were transported directly from Africa to North America (the United States).
.

The British and French should be made to pay dearly .
Arab speaking countries on the other hand generally castrated their slaves to prevent their population increasing , they received well over 15 million slaves estimated.
Methinks the role of the Arabs in slave trade should be a separate resolution.
They also captured millions of Europeans as slaves during their wars in Europe.

basilico:
Let's get some facts straight.
Arabs were mostly the ones who traded slaves.They were the caravan owners .

The top five destinations for enslaved people were often colonial regions rather than modern-day independent countries at the time. Based on data from the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, the primary destinations by volume were:
Top 5 Destinations for Enslaved Africans
Brazil (Portuguese Colony/Empire): Approximately 4.9 million people. Brazil received more enslaved Africans than any other single destination, accounting for nearly 40% of the total trade.
British Caribbean: Approximately 2.3 million people. This includes major sugar-producing islands like Jamaica and Barbados.
French Caribbean: Approximately 1.1 million people. The most significant destination was Saint-Domingue (modern-day Haiti).
Spanish Americas: Approximately 1.3 million people (disembarking in various regions including Cuba, Puerto Rico, and mainland South/Central America).
Dutch Americas: Approximately 500,000 people, primarily to Surinam and the Dutch Antilles

Contrary to common perception, only about 388,000 (roughly 3.6%) of the 10.7 million survivors were transported directly from Africa to North America (the United States).
.

The British and French should be made to pay dearly .
Arab speaking countries on the other hand generally castrated their slaves to prevent their population increasing , they received well over 15 million slaves estimated.
Methinks the role of the Arabs in slave trade should be a separate resolution.
They also captured millions of Europeans as slaves during their wars in Europe.

All these are not as grave as the slave trade

Mongol Conquests (13th century): ~40–60+ million deaths (estimates vary; some say up to 10–15% of world population at the time). Involved mass slaughter, city destructions, and empire-building through terror.
European colonization of the Americas (post-1492): Often cited with 50–100+ million deaths, largely from introduced diseases (smallpox, etc.) plus violence, displacement, and enslavement of Indigenous peoples. This devastated entire civilizations and reshaped global demographics.
World War II (1939–1945): 70–85 million deaths (~3% of world population), including the Holocaust (~6 million Jews systematically murdered in an industrialized genocide, plus millions of others: Roma, disabled, Slavs, etc.). Featured deliberate extermination camps, total war, and atomic bombings.
Maoist China (Great Leap Forward + Cultural Revolution): 40–80+ million deaths from famine, purges, and violence.
Other massive events: Taiping Rebellion (~20–70 million), An Lushan Rebellion (~13–36 million in 8th-century China), World War I (~15–20 million direct + indirect), Stalin's purges and Holodomor, the Armenian Genocide, Cambodian Killing Fields, Rwandan Genocide, etc. Ancient and medieval conquests, plagues exacerbated by war, and other slave trades (e.g., Arab/Islamic slave trade over centuries, with high mortality) add layers.57c89f

raumdeuter:
Do you know how many times you have said the part in bold about bayelsaowei?

So why is it that he isn't always reasoning. Its either


1. He does not have the ability to reason
2. He knows what is right he can reason but being deliberately mischievious

Which of the two is worse?

No. 2 is true

benalvino3:
No. 2 is true

who do you think is more dangerous number 1 or 2

I think 2. Number 1 can be given the benefit of doubt that he doesn't know and once he knows he can have change of mind

Number 2 knows but he denies it

Like you have malaria.
Number 1. You go meet a barber who doesnt know about the sickness and argues its evil spirit,
Number 2 you go meet a Doctor who knows its malaria but deliberately lies to you that its something else

raumdeuter:
who do you think is more dangerous number 1 or 2

I think 2. Number 1 can be given the benefit of doubt that he doesn't know and once he knows he can have change of mind

Number 2 knows but he denies it

Like you have malaria.
Number 1. You go meet a barber who doesnt know about the sickness and argues its evil spirit,
Number 2 you go meet a Doctor who knows its malaria but deliberately lies to you that its something else

There is no dangerous here. Some people can be mischievious on certain things, like arguing on a forum but are different in person.

Take budaatum for example who will lie, shift goalposts or strawman someone just not to be in the wrong of a debate.

benalvino3:
There is no dangerous here. Some people can be mischievious on certain things, like arguing on a forum but are different in person.

Take budaatum for example who will lie, shift goalposts or strawman someone just not to be in the wrong of a debate.

They can be dangerous when they say men can play in women sport, stay in women prison, but Rahm Emanuel/Seth Moulton says he wont want his daughter to play with boys in the same sport but are Okay with others doing that.

They can be dangerous like when the comedian in NYC that was arguing in favor of radical Islam while one was climbing on his shoulders to try and kill OTHER people

Like when they claimed its racist to block illegal immigration but when they ship the immigrant into Marthas vineyard they get rid of them but they are okay dumping these illegals in Black neighborhoods

When you support dangerous policies on the basis that it will not affect you but only others, then that is dangerous

Ramdeter: We are on stolen land, Mob take over basilcol stolen land
Bemeruca: Good so Ramdeter when will you return your own stolen land
Ramdeuter: Hey mob, No I am not talking about my own stolen land, I am talkng about basilso stolen land

Even if they build the structures, who will maintain them?

Right now, we are suffering from lack of electricity. There is no light in many parts of Port Harcourt. This had improved about a year or two ago. Instead of maintaining and continuously developing the grid through upgrades based on load levels, they let it collapse.


We are not asking for money directly. Thieves everywhere

“We are not looking for money, it goes against our conscience, but we are looking at courses and return of artifacts”

-Ghana Foreign Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa pic.twitter.com/AAIHAjEQTc

— Ghana Chronicles (@_GhChronicles) March 26, 2026

benalvino3:
Even if they build the structures, who will maintain them?

Right now, we are suffering from lack of electricity. There is no light in many parts of Port Harcourt. This had improved about a year or two ago. Instead of maintaining and continuously developing the grid through upgrades based on load levels, they let it collapse.


We are not asking for money directly. Thieves everywhere

“We are not looking for money, it goes against our conscience, but we are looking at courses and return of artifacts”

-Ghana Foreign Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa pic.twitter.com/AAIHAjEQTc

— Ghana Chronicles (@_GhChronicles) March 26, 2026

Any time slavery is mentioned there is always money or rather reparations from failed leadership.

Bayelsaowei she is a racist defender for using common sense too?

Reparations request DENIED?‼️🤔#Ghana pic.twitter.com/TDJ6kWIKbg

— SoulFood66 (@BlackAndNative1) March 26, 2026

basilico:
Any time slavery is mentioned there is always money or rather reparations from failed leadership.

Go and see what China is doing in Africa right now. They close their mouths because one or two roads are built

raumdeuter:
They can be dangerous when they say men can play in women sport, stay in women prison, but Rahm Emanuel/Seth Moulton says he wont want his daughter to play with boys in the same sport but are Okay with others doing that.

They can be dangerous like when the comedian in NYC that was arguing in favor of radical Islam while one was climbing on his shoulders to try and kill OTHER people

Like when they claimed its racist to block illegal immigration but when they ship the immigrant into Marthas vineyard they get rid of them but they are okay dumping these illegals in Black neighborhoods

When you support dangerous policies on the basis that it will not affect you but only others, then that is dangerous

Ramdeter: We are on stolen land, Mob take over basilcol stolen land
Bemeruca: Good so Ramdeter when will you return your own stolen land
Ramdeuter: Hey mob, No I am not talking about my own stolen land, I am talkng about basilso stolen land

I get your point. Ideas can be dangerous.

Cruelty from everywhere but Africans want to point fingers at others from what they did

This is what a female slave dungeon looks like in Ghana 🇬🇭 before they were shipped to the western hemisphere by Sunjohn Nwose. pic.twitter.com/pkl3rERHuK

— Typical African (@Joe__Bassey) March 26, 2026

FBA family pulled up to the Black burial grounds in NYC, making it clear the Government of Ghana will NOT be receiving our justice claims. pic.twitter.com/65Wlbe5b58

— 𝔖𝔢𝔵𝔶 𝔖𝔬𝔲𝔩𝔞𝔞𝔫 🔱 (@ifuckedbeyonce_) March 25, 2026

raumdeuter:
They can be dangerous when they say men can play

She tried it he didn't work out.

She said she will take racism in America than to live in Ghana.

It is why people will be shouting America racist yet they want to kill themselves to live there.

This woman moved to Ghana because of “racism in America,” now she’s desperate to go back saying she would rather deal with the “racism” as she describes experience in Ghana.

pic.twitter.com/RMy48Ms9Yz

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) April 29, 2025

cococandy:
Because black people are not human to them.

I can't even be shocked anymore.
Is not a one off.

Two very real stories by the very same person.
Just shows how much the media sane-washed Trump and how they are still sane-washing him.

ono:
Hmmm. That's an eye opener of sorts. Are you a muslim, if I may ask?

buda is an atheist who knows gods are created by humans who write stories about gods.

benalvino3:
Which nonsense do you not buy?

Now you are spreading Propaganda and lies.

The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution on March 25, 2026, declaring the trafficking of enslaved Africans and the racialized chattel enslavement of Africans (via the transatlantic slave trade) as "the gravest crime against humanity."

You know this is nonsense because it exclude the people who are more guilty of this act especially the ghanians.

Mr lover of white racists.. how are you doing?

😀

Keep up with your cheer leading work.

ono:
I have read the book in the link you shared. I have the book in my book shelve. My daughter read the book. Thankfully, we didn't get our minds fried and turn rebellious against God simply by reading some man made up fables and stories.

Yet you let you mind be fried by the god book you read that was very clearly written by some men who made up fables and stories.

Get wisdom, ono, by seeking understanding: forget it not; neither decline from the words of my mouth (except you have no access to that mouth and must understand what "my mouth" might be).

ono:
buda lies a lot.

Bearing false witness against buda is lying, ono.

And supporting the known liar ben is despicable.