₦airaland Forum

DeepSight:
The dolt desperately needs it.

i have blocked him and imho you should too.

there is nothing to be gained from engaging him. i cannot be sure if he is a troll or a completely brainless dolt whose mind has been fried by alt right websites

the only purpose people like him serve is a hard reminder to curate your children's internet use before they get sucked into a rabbit hole

you are wasting your time and burning out your brain cells engaging him and his bizarre bad faith recycled stormfront bs

DeepSight:
This kind of absolute generalization that does not permit of the existence of even a single such case is enough to die the matter. There is no point reasoning with anyone who says this.

Think about this for a minute,
When every other women in black America is a murderer guilty of infanticide, what kind of mothers would they end up becoming?
What kind of society are they capable of creating.
The black American future is lost.

And we can't blame the whites for this

Hate Charlie all you want but these are the things he dedicated his life fighting against

tctrills:
Oga I use data and stats and you are allowed to fact check me
But let me give it to you that 1% of all abortions are because the mom can't take care of the child, that still tends to zero.

So instead of arguing about that one percent, let's talk about the 99%. There is so much more value in that than the elusive 1%

I said rest, you will not rest. Okay.

Listen. You just speak so broadly and generally as though the humans you are discussing are robots. When we say economic reasons for example you assume it must be resolved by the existence of willing adopters. In this you presume that everyone is either desirous of, or in a position to afford being pregnant for nine months. Not everyone is either. This simple pointer is enough to knock off your generalisation. And I don't want to enter a discussion in which I will be forced to explain the obvious like this to anyone.

Overall, abortion as we all know is a controversial matter. But starting from the economy, we are talking about the entire social situation of the mothers in the first place. Their education, their living circumstances, their access to quality health care, their social security, their access to a career and the truth remains that the black community falls within that poorer demographic where a more substantial amount of people are vulnerable in all these things and all of these things affect the amount of people who will find themselves in this kind of scenario.

It's almost similar to the question about performance at schools. Some ignorant shallow people simply say, oh, white kids perform better because they are smarter. The truth is that a kid from a comfortable home, a secure home, who is not hungry and who has all the learning tools he needs is by orders of magnitude better placed to perform better than a hungry kid from a scattered and deprived home. It's not a question of inherent smarts.

The point is that there is such a huge socio economic backstory to all of these things that it is shallow to simply say, oh, the white kid is smarter, just as it is shallow to simply say, oh, there are available adopters. It didn't even occur to you that there will be some people who simply don't want to give out their children to strangers.

All of this is beside the fact that there are still many other reasons for adoption, choice being one. Health being another. The circumstances being a third (age, rape, marriage, all sorts).

And again beyond all of this there isn't agreement on the nature of abortion. Some people like you see it as murder. Others don't agree that a foetus is a human being. I for one am okay with abortion in the early weeks but get queasy about it when the foetus begins to take on real form. It varies and is a sensitive matter of perspective and faith for many. It is also a matter of freedom and simple liberty of choice, control over ones own body and future for many.

Look, you have forced me to write. I don't wish to discuss these things because the angle you are coming from is too rigid and shallow and you don't give it depth of thought. Look at the economic scenarios for example. You will probably just say it's excuses and victim mentality and leave it at that without trying to make any synapses connect in ya head.

GloriousGbola:
i have blocked him and imho you should too.

there is nothing to be gained from engaging him. i cannot be sure if he is a troll or a completely brainless dolt whose mind has been fried by alt right websites

the only purpose people like him serve is a hard reminder to curate your children's internet use before they get sucked into a rabbit hole

you are wasting your time and burning out your brain cells engaging him and his bizarre bad faith recycled stormfront bs

Very well said.

tctrills:
Yes you have quoted me. A culture that kills its own people 7x more than the whites. A culture that aborts it's babies at a higher rate than any other group. A culture of irresponsible fathers.

It is clear you don't know these things. But if you want, I will send you data and stats to educate you on the matter

Erm what is black culture?

Or are you mixing it up with glamorised gang culture in hiphop

GracieX3:
Erm what is black culture?

Or are you mixing it up with glamorised gang culture in hiphop

What is culture in the first place?
We can oversimplify it by saying it is a set of acceptable behaviours among a society.

I once had a comedian tell a joke (he was black so don't call him racist). He said if the police is chasing a guy and he makes the mistake of running into a white neighborhood, everyone would assist the police in catching him. But if he is lucky to run into a black hood, everyone assists him in getting away from the police.

That's culture.
One culture accepts crime the other accepts law enforcement.

If black women are performing more than a third of all abortions that's culture and we should examine it from that lens

GracieX3:
Erm what is black culture?

Or are you mixing it up with glamorised gang culture in hiphop

Obviously.

tctrills:
What is culture in the first place?
We can oversimplify it by saying it is a set of acceptable behaviours among a society.

I once had a comedian tell a joke (he was black so don't call him racist). He said if the police is chasing a guy and he makes the mistake of running into a white neighborhood, everyone would assist the police in catching him. But if he is lucky to run into a black hood, everyone assists him in getting away from the police.

That's culture.
One culture accepts crime the other accepts law enforcement.

If black women are performing more than a third of all abortions that's culture and we should examine it from that lens

Ah. Men. The shallowness of thought here!
Let me leave it.

DeepSight:
I said rest, you will not rest. Okay.

Listen. You just speak so broadly and generally as though the humans you are discussing are robots. When we say economic reasons for example you assume it must be resolved by the existence of willing adopters. In this you presume that everyone is either desirous of, or in a position to afford being pregnant for nine months. Not everyone is either. This simple pointer is enough to knock off your generalisation. And I don't want to enter a discussion in which I will be forced to explain the obvious like this to anyone.

Overall, abortion as we all know is a controversial matter. But starting from the economy, we are talking about the entire social situation of the mothers in the first place. Their education, their living circumstances, their access to quality health care, their social security, their access to a career and the truth remains that the black community falls within that poorer demographic where a more substantial amount of people are vulnerable in all these things and all of these things affect the amount of people who will find themselves in this kind of scenario.

It's almost similar to the question about performance at schools. Some ignorant shallow people simply say, oh, white kids perform better because they are smarter. The truth is that a kid from a comfortable home, a secure home, who is not hungry and who has all the learning tools he needs is by orders of magnitude better placed to perform better than a hungry kid from a scattered and deprived home. It's not a question of inherent smarts.

The point is that there is such a huge socio economic backstory to all of these things that it is shallow to simply say, oh, the white kid is smarter, just as it is shallow to simply say, oh, there are available adopters. It didn't even occur to you that there will be some people who simply don't want to give out their children to strangers.

All of this is beside the fact that there are still many other reasons for adoption, choice being one. Health being another. The circumstances being a third (age, rape, marriage, all sorts).

And again beyond all of this there isn't agreement on the nature of abortion. Some people like you see it as murder. Others don't agree that a foetus is a human being. I for one am okay with abortion in the early weeks but get queasy about it when the foetus begins to take on real form. It varies and is a sensitive matter of perspective and faith for many. It is also a matter of freedom and simple liberty of choice, control over ones own body and future for many.

Look, you have forced me to write. I don't wish to discuss these things because the angle you are coming from is too rigid and shallow and you don't give it depth of thought. Look at the economic scenarios for example. You will probably just say it's excuses and victim mentality and leave it at that without trying to make any synapses connect in ya head.

Let's simplify what you wrote.
You defended your economics and you went ahead to say that some women may not have the financial power to go through the 9 months of pregnancy.

First, in the US as a country there are so many provisions for such women. Also, there are more than enough non government organisations ready to support these women during their pregnancy.
Just Google it and you will discover hundreds of organisations begging these women.

To you second point, we are allowed to kill depending on when we think the unborn becomes a human. That's the law of wild animals.It makes no sense.
What if I decide that my 6 months after birth baby is not yet a human?

For you, the early stage of pregnancy is not human so when exactly does the baby become human to you?
When exactly does it become murder to you?

DeepSight:
Ah. Men. The shallowness of thought here!
Let me leave it.

Lol
My thoughts are only deep when I agree with your bad ideas
Have you noticed that the leftists are the most uncomfortable when presented with counter arguments?
We conservatives are always open to speech and even when we know your ideas are foolish, we tell you why and teach you.
You leftist are just a different breed.

And yes, I oversimplified the meaning of culture so that anyone on this page will get it. My goal is to make it simple for all

tctrills:
What is culture in the first place?
We can oversimplify it by saying it is a set of acceptable behaviours among a society.

I once had a comedian tell a joke (he was black so don't call him racist). He said if the police is chasing a guy and he makes the mistake of running into a white neighborhood, everyone would assist the police in catching him. But if he is lucky to run into a black hood, everyone assists him in getting away from the police.

That's culture.
One culture accepts crime the other accepts law enforcement.

If black women are performing more than a third of all abortions that's culture and we should examine it from that lens

That is an assumption. A stereotype. Who told you black people will not assist the police in stopping a criminal?

Abortions are a factor of finance and environment....not race

DeepSight:
I said rest, you will not rest. Okay.

Listen. You just speak so broadly and generally as though the humans you are discussing are robots. When we say economic reasons for example you assume it must be resolved by the existence of willing adopters. In this you presume that everyone is either desirous of, or in a position to afford being pregnant for nine months. Not everyone is either. This simple pointer is enough to knock off your generalisation. And I don't want to enter a discussion in which I will be forced to explain the obvious like this to anyone.

Overall, abortion as we all know is a controversial matter. But starting from the economy, we are talking about the entire social situation of the mothers in the first place. Their education, their living circumstances, their access to quality health care, their social security, their access to a career and the truth remains that the black community falls within that poorer demographic where a more substantial amount of people are vulnerable in all these things and all of these things affect the amount of people who will find themselves in this kind of scenario.

It's almost similar to the question about performance at schools. Some ignorant shallow people simply say, oh, white kids perform better because they are smarter. The truth is that a kid from a comfortable home, a secure home, who is not hungry and who has all the learning tools he needs is by orders of magnitude better placed to perform better than a hungry kid from a scattered and deprived home. It's not a question of inherent smarts.

The point is that there is such a huge socio economic backstory to all of these things that it is shallow to simply say, oh, the white kid is smarter, just as it is shallow to simply say, oh, there are available adopters. It didn't even occur to you that there will be some people who simply don't want to give out their children to strangers.

All of this is beside the fact that there are still many other reasons for adoption, choice being one. Health being another. The circumstances being a third (age, rape, marriage, all sorts).

And again beyond all of this there isn't agreement on the nature of abortion. Some people like you see it as murder. Others don't agree that a foetus is a human being. I for one am okay with abortion in the early weeks but get queasy about it when the foetus begins to take on real form. It varies and is a sensitive matter of perspective and faith for many. It is also a matter of freedom and simple liberty of choice, control over ones own body and future for many.

Look, you have forced me to write. I don't wish to discuss these things because the angle you are coming from is too rigid and shallow and you don't give it depth of thought. Look at the economic scenarios for example. You will probably just say it's excuses and victim mentality and leave it at that without trying to make any synapses connect in ya head.

You are saying that it should be up to everyone to decide what is murder or what constitutes murder. But that's just the definition of a messed up society.
Whatever your mind tells you is murder is what you operate by. That's a leftist utopia and a mad society

GracieX3:
That is an assumption. A stereotype. Who told you black people will not assist the police in stopping a criminal?

Abortions are a factor of finance and environment....not race

Didn't you read were I stated that it was a joke from a comedian?
It was my oversimplified way of explaining culture

GracieX3:
That is an assumption. A stereotype. Who told you black people will not assist the police in stopping a criminal?

Abortions are a factor of finance and environment....not race

You are wrong about abortion. In the 60s the blacks were much poorer but they had less abortions. Abortions are a factor of a murderous society that is not ready to bear discomfort or the responsibility of child care.
These days in the US, women celebrate abortions on social media. How is that not culture

DeepSight:
Obviously.

the big irony is that 90% of gangsta rap is demonstrably theater

rappers started out as being socially conscious but after the success of NWA, record executives started pushing gangsta rap as the dominant genre

the biggest irony is that the truly hardcore gangsta among all of them was a person everyone mocked for being a dancer - MC hammer

dr dre and the rest of them - its all posturing and kayfaybe - ice cube one of the fathers of gangsta rap read architectural drafting in uni. today the guy is in family movies. mobb deep dey sing only the strong survive when one of them had sickle cell

easy e said it best - they are studio gangstas

a guy who is writing rhymes in a notebook is not a gangster - that's a nerd

everyone dey form hard man but women dey fold all of them.
the whole gangsta rap genre was deconstructed in the comedy movies in CB4 and fear of a black hat


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tr0XHu2ynw

multiple genres of music, and multiple genres of rap - but some clowns jump on gangsta rap as if it is the sole music that blacks listen to


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67MhBooUVfY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLYu4jT5Ez4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkF8GmqWwQk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VCdJyOAQYM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anFD_aYi5GQ

playing my mellow rap playlist right now.

but some dull conservatives without any grain of actual gray matter just talk like the ignorant clowns they are

pretty white for a black guy

GracieX3:
That is an assumption. A stereotype. Who told you black people will not assist the police in stopping a criminal?

Abortions are a factor of finance and environment....not race

There is no moral difference between a woman who aborts her baby and a man who abandoned his kids and wife.

Sorry, actually, there is. The woman killed, she is a murderer

GracieX3:
That is an assumption. A stereotype. Who told you black people will not assist the police in stopping a criminal?

Abortions are a factor of finance and environment....not race

If abortion is caused by finances, how come none of the 10 poorest states in the US are among the top 10 in abortion rates
New York
New Jersey
Maryland
Florida
Illinois
California
The top 6 above

The idea that when you are poor, you should kill your baby is unacceptable

GloriousGbola:
the big irony is that 90% of gangsta rap is demonstrably theater

rappers started out as being socially conscious but after the success of NWA, record executives started pushing gangsta rap as the dominant genre

the biggest irony is that the truly hardcore gangsta among all of them was a person everyone mocked for being a dancer - MC hammer

dr dre and the rest of them - its all posturing and kayfaybe - ice cube one of the fathers of gangsta rap read architectural drafting in uni. today the guy is in family movies. mobb deep dey sing only the strong survive when one of them had sickle cell

easy e said it best - they are studio gangstas

a guy who is writing rhymes in a notebook is not a gangster - that's a nerd

everyone dey form hard man but women dey fold all of them.
the whole gangsta rap genre was deconstructed in the comedy movies in CB4 and fear of a black hat


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tr0XHu2ynw

multiple genres of music, and multiple genres of rap - but some clowns jump on gangsta rap as if it is the sole music that blacks listen to


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67MhBooUVfY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLYu4jT5Ez4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkF8GmqWwQk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VCdJyOAQYM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anFD_aYi5GQ

playing my mellow rap playlist right now.

but some dull conservatives without any grain of actual gray matter just talk like the ignorant clowns they are

pretty white for a black guy

Bless you. So very rich and expansive. This -

multiple genres of music, and multiple genres of rap - but some clowns jump on gangsta rap as if it is the sole music that blacks listen to

- mirrors my thoughts exactly!
For the group who gave the world Jazz and much R & B and Soul music, it s pitiful for people to look at a sub set of entertainment projection and define the entirety of African American culture with it.

But with the way the so called conservatives on this thread have gone about things, I have no doubt that beyond culture they would even say that no African American has ever contributed anything to the development and progress of the United States. That is how far gone they are in their self hatred and their acceptance of a narrative that seeks to demean their race.

tctrills:
Sorry, actually, there is. The woman killed, she is a murderer

Opinions are free. People have different views of it. But murder is legally defined, so you will have to tie it to the definition of murder under the law. And abortion does not meet that definition.

You will have to also ask how far you want to push back the murder definition. Because if you insist on it, then we can also say that each time a man ejaculates outside a woman, he has committed murder. This line of thinking can easily be stretched to the absurd. It can mean that condoms are weapons of murder. It can mean that morning after pills are weapons of murder. It can convert many forms of contraception to murder.

DeepSight:
Opinions are free. People have different views of it. But murder is legally defined, so you will have to tie it to the definition of murder under the law. And abortion does not meet that definition.

You will have to also ask how far you want to push back the murder definition. Because if you insist on it, then we can also say that each time a man ejaculates outside a woman, he has committed murder. This line of thinking can easily be stretched to the absurd. It can mean that condoms are weapons of murder. It can mean that morning after pills are weapons of murder. It can convert many forms of contraception to murder.

😅😅😅

DeepSight:
Opinions are free. People have different views of it. But murder is legally defined, so you will have to tie it to the definition of murder under the law. And abortion does not meet that definition.

You will have to also ask how far you want to push back the murder definition. Because if you insist on it, then we can also say that each time a man ejaculates outside a woman, he has committed murder. This line of thinking can easily be stretched to the absurd. It can mean that condoms are weapons of murder. It can mean that morning after pills are weapons of murder. It can convert many forms of contraception to murder.

A sperm is not a human and yes we can very scientifically calculate how far back we can go.
Each human being has a specific DNA. So it is only right to say that when a new DNA different from that of the parents is formed a human is created.
In what argument will a sperm qualify as a human being?
A sperm cell is just one specialized cell from a male body.
It has half the DNA and cannot grow into a human on its own. It only has one job: deliver genetic material.
A fetus (starting from a fertilized egg) is different.
At fertilization, a new cell forms with a complete human DNA set.
This new organism begins self-directed development (it grows, divides, and organizes itself).
Sperm = part of a body (a cell)
Fetus = a developing human organism

Do you get it now?

DeepSight:
Opinions are free. People have different views of it. But murder is legally defined, so you will have to tie it to the definition of murder under the law. And abortion does not meet that definition.

You will have to also ask how far you want to push back the murder definition. Because if you insist on it, then we can also say that each time a man ejaculates outside a woman, he has committed murder. This line of thinking can easily be stretched to the absurd. It can mean that condoms are weapons of murder. It can mean that morning after pills are weapons of murder. It can convert many forms of contraception to murder.

But you are right about murder, society and culture defines murder. Do you now see why abortions are cultural?
A human being is killed but a culture can decide it's nothing just like another culture dignifies head hunting. Yet we both can tell that it is evil to hunt another man's head no matter what the culture or law of such people prescribe

tctrills:
A sperm is not a human and yes we can very scientifically calculate how far back we can go.
Each human being has a specific DNA. So it is only right to say that when a new DNA different from that of the parents is formed a human is created.
In what argument will a sperm qualify as a human being?
A sperm cell is just one specialized cell from a male body.
It has half the DNA and cannot grow into a human on its own. It only has one job: deliver genetic material.
A fetus (starting from a fertilized egg) is different.
At fertilization, a new cell forms with a complete human DNA set.
This new organism begins self-directed development (it grows, divides, and organizes itself).
Sperm = part of a body (a cell)
Fetus = a developing human organism

Do you get it now?

Its just a warning about how far back you can go. I may not do so, but someone can come and tell you that each sperm is a potential person in development.

Personally, I cannot see a mere fertilized egg as a person on day 1 or even within a few weeks.

DeepSight:
Its just a warning about how far back you can go. I may not do so, but someone can come and tell you that each sperm is a potential person in development.

Personally, I cannot see a mere fertilized egg as a person on day 1 or even within a few weeks.

So when does it become a person to you? When dies abortion become murder to you and why?

Any later point is subjective
Conception is the only clear, objective starting point of human life.

DeepSight:
Its just a warning about how far back you can go. I may not do so, but someone can come and tell you that each sperm is a potential person in development.

Personally, I cannot see a mere fertilized egg as a person on day 1 or even within a few weeks.

At the moment of conception, a sperm and egg combine to form a zygote.
That zygote has unique human DNA different from the mother and father.
From that point, it begins continuous development into a baby, child, and adult.

There is no clear scientific point after conception where you can suddenly say, “now it becomes human.

But I am interested in your thoughts, when is that point that you decide it's a human being. And what scientific methods lead to your decision

DeepSight:
Has it ever occurred to you that people see more of who you are here than everyday people in your real life may see. Because here, there is no physical appearance or setting or social placement to coat who you are. Its your mind on display.
Think on that.

Because I swear, if you had a clue how you come across.

He is not aware he is showing his spirit for what it is.

Sec. of State Marco Rubio's political buddy David Rivera was just convicted and is awaiting sentencing.
I don't think the news article is behind a paywall. Happy reading friends.

SOUTH FLORIDA From Congress to prison: David Rivera is convicted in case tied to Venezuela By Jay Weaver Updated May 1, 2026 6:30 PM

"Rubio meetings in D.C. The previous year, Rivera and others met twice with Rubio in Washington, court records show. In the first meeting, Rivera and Rubio met at the senator’s residence in Washington on July 9, 2017. They discussed how Gorrín could broker Maduro’s exit. Rivera and Rubio were longtime allies, having been roommates when they served in the Florida Legislature. Rubio was the speaker of the Florida House from 2006 to 2008."

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article315589751.html#storylink=cpy



Former South Florida Congressman David Rivera speaks to the media outside the James Lawrence King Federal Justice building on March 24, 2026, in Miami. Joe Raedle Getty Images

basilico:
Impeach Trump

Your shame is still on the way. Don't you worry.

bemeruca:
Don't waste your time with Obrigardo aka EnlightenedUFO.

What does this black man hater have to say?

basilico and co maga cultists would be so proud 🤡

77 million people voted for this deranged buffoon pic.twitter.com/EvEAWlu8zy

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) May 1, 2026