₦airaland Forum

DeepSight:
God have mercy. Had their TPS ended when Trump was lying about them eating cats and dogs and whipping up crowds against them?

bemeruca:
What does eating cat and dogs has to do with what we are talking?

If they have temporary protected status and Trump decides not to renew it, it still does not prove anti immigration.

DeepSight:
It's hopeless.

bemeruca:
Yes, there is no hope that you can conjure a reasonable argument from that.

If your argument is “Trump used ugly rhetoric about Haitians,” say that.

If your argument is “Trump has no legal right to end TPS,” prove that.

If your argument is “Trump ended TPS because of race,” prove the racial motive.

But TPS people were legal at the time does not change the fact that TPS is temporary by law.

Temporary means it can end.

Dogs and cats are not proof.

You are hardly a reasonable person because of bias wrapped in hatred.

DeepSight:
Why are you like this, why are you trying to mangle what I said

DeepSight:
Its tiresome how you dont realize the irrelevance of TPS being temporary. The issue is its legality because the original question was whether its only illegals he had an issue with. The Haitians were not illegals but he still had an issue with them.

Anyway, no point talking to stone.

bemeruca:
If they are a community that draws attention, crimes, welfare issues, housing, etc. and other things like high rate of car accidents... It can draw attention.

The question is not “were Haitians illegal?” No, many were not.
The question is: does Trump having an issue with TPS or Haitian TPS holders prove he is against legal migrants because of race? That still does not automatically follow.

DeepSight:
There is much evidence that his issue is not about legal immigration but the immigration of non-whites generally. I only cited the cats and dogs case as one example, even at that, just look at how you have gotten your knickers in a twist trying to defend the indefensible.

bemeruca:
You have not provided any. All you said and have been saying is cats and dogs.

That's not a proof. Do better.

DeepSight:
Enjoy.

GracieX3:
What rubbish are you saying? You are comparing two different cases.

1. Kyle Rittenhouse brought a gun to a charged protest. That alone suggests intent to kill. Kyle eventually killed two people. The court deemed it as self defence. It could have been manslaughter.

2. As for the central park 5, NOTHING LINKED THEM TO THE CRIME. NOTHING. Trump is a racist for claiming their guilt without any evidence

young people, skip the easy money traps like OnlyFans. Build real skills and character instead—your future self will thank you. pic.twitter.com/5OTXvMQ5Ib

— Ava (@Ava_AM12ff) May 3, 2026

tctrills:
My dear friend DeepSight, are you prepared to apply your rule and call this beautiful lady a racist for accusing Kyle Rittenhouse of the intent to kill even after the jury found him completely innocent?

Are you brave enough to tell a fellow leftist on this platform that she is a racist or would you accept everything that comes from the left.

Do you worship the left and blindly follow everyone and everything from the left?

What use is it criticizing Trump who would never hear what you say when you could correct and help a sister on this platform recover from racism.

This is where you are needed the most.

bemeruca:
If they are a community that draws attention, crimes, welfare issues, housing, etc. and other things like high rate of car accidents... It can draw attention.

The question is not “were Haitians illegal?” No, many were not.
The question is: does Trump having an issue with TPS or Haitian TPS holders prove he is against legal migrants because of race? That still does not automatically follow.

IjeBos:
1.) US juries don't find people innocent, they find them Not Guilty, or Guilty. Not understanding that key distinction means you really have 0 clue about US jury trials or the US legal system which clearly doesn't stop you run from running your mouth.

2.) Kyle was found Non Guilty because of how 1.) The judge ran the trial (limited information, showed preference) and 2.) The way the self defense law was interpreted at that trial. (basically, whoever is alive can claim self-defense). Even more, whomever he pointed the gun at could have shot Rittenhouse and claimed self-defense as well.

3.) Ryteenhouse was a POS. He illegally carried a gun to a place he had no business being. He even spoke about shooting people 15 days before the trial. You have a thing where you like to defend POSs like Trump.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kyle-rittenhouse-hit-call-arrest-100041992.html

4.) There are too many people in this thread who post about things they have 0 idea about maybe because they think they sound smart doing so. This thread is filled with so much basic misinformation.

tctrills:
My dear friend DeepSight, are you prepared to apply your rule and call this beautiful lady a racist for accusing Kyle Rittenhouse of the intent to kill even after the jury found him completely innocent?

Are you brave enough to tell a fellow leftist on this platform that she is a racist or would you accept everything that comes from the left.

Do you worship the left and blindly follow everyone and everything from the left?

What use is it criticizing Trump who would never hear what you say when you could correct and help a sister on this platform recover from racism.

This is where you are needed the most.

tctrills:
My dear friend DeepSight, are you prepared to apply your rule and call this beautiful lady a racist for accusing Kyle Rittenhouse of the intent to kill even after the jury found him completely innocent?

Are you brave enough to tell a fellow leftist on this platform that she is a racist or would you accept everything that comes from the left.

Do you worship the left and blindly follow everyone and everything from the left?

What use is it criticizing Trump who would never hear what you say when you could correct and help a sister on this platform recover from racism.

This is where you are needed the most.

tctrills:
Sorry, I don't read from you, take heart ❤️

DeepSight:
Enjoy.

tctrills:
Guy, why are you refusing to call out a racist here. Is it because she is on the left?
@ GracieX3.

You accuse me of not being able to call out Trump. Now it's up to you to lead by example.

tctrills:
And while you are bringing up new issues, remember you have refused to answer my question on abortion. Please do well to respond.

Here it is in case you forgot.

Back to the abortion issue.
Am I right to summarise your take like this,
It's up to the individual to decide when abortion becomes killing a human being.
It is only when the mother decides that it is a human being in her womb that it becomes a human being. Until she decides, it is whatever she says it is.

DeepSight:
It will be arbitrary for me to place a specific number of days or weeks to it, but I have said that once it has taken on the human form, I feel queasy about it.

To divert tangentially spiritually, several schools of thought also believe that the spirit incarnates into the body at a specific time during pregnancy. Some say this is around the middle of pregnancy but for me, the time would be around when it has form and begins to exhibit consciousness. I dont know about the timing for sure but it resonates with me. I just cant see what appears to be for all purposes something like a tiny cell as a human being. No, for me, at the early stages it is not a human being. It is only a potential.

IjeBos:
1.) US juries don't find people innocent, they find them Not Guilty, or Guilty. Not understanding that key distinction means you really have 0 clue about US jury trials or the US legal system which clearly doesn't stop you run from running your mouth.

2.) Kyle was found Non Guilty because of how 1.) The judge ran the trial (limited information, showed preference) and 2.) The way the self defense law was interpreted at that trial. (basically, whoever is alive can claim self-defense). Even more, whomever he pointed the gun at could have shot Rittenhouse and claimed self-defense as well.

3.) Ryteenhouse was a POS. He illegally carried a gun to a place he had no business being. He even spoke about shooting people 15 days before the trial. You have a thing where you like to defend POSs like Trump.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kyle-rittenhouse-hit-call-arrest-100041992.html

4.) There are too many people in this thread who post about things they have 0 idea about maybe because they think they sound smart doing so. This thread is filled with so much basic misinformation.

tctrills:
Sorry, I don't read from you, take heart ❤️

tctrills:
Guy, why are you refusing to call out a racist here. Is it because she is on the left?
@ GracieX3.

You accuse me of not being able to call out Trump. Now it's up to you to lead by example.

IjeBos:
If you don't think you're bright enough to write posts without AI writing the post (and I'm not talking about helping you with spell check), don't you think it's a hint that maybe you shouldn't be trying to write a post on a topic you're not smart enough to understand?

You are a less than educated guy who can barely form a coherent English sentence without AI.
Embrace the fullness of who you are.

bemeruca:
Yes, there is no hope that you can conjure a reasonable argument from that.

If your argument is “Trump used ugly rhetoric about Haitians,” say that.

If your argument is “Trump has no legal right to end TPS,” prove that.

If your argument is “Trump ended TPS because of race,” prove the racial motive.

But TPS people were legal at the time does not change the fact that TPS is temporary by law.

Temporary means it can end.

Dogs and cats are not proof.

You are hardly a reasonable person because of bias wrapped in hatred.

DeepSight:
I have answered these questions already in a post to basilico.

Obrigardo:
Show us the data that you called him out, even with all the crypto scams and financial dealings by his family, insider trading etc.
That should be easy for you right?


Or you need to see the data on that?