₦airaland Forum

Obrigardo:
I wonder how you gonna survive here when the tyrant child sexual predator passes away. We may never see you again.

This was short but still I didn't have time for it.

Obrigardo:
Guys, is it today?
The tyrant is close to the kaput, but I have a feeling it might just be today.
He's living on borrowed time

Don't you think so tctrills

Explain better please

Obrigardo:
Guys look at those plates, huge plates at at pedo-lar-go.
basilico will be using all his baby oils when he sees this one
This is gonna thrill tctrills down there

These maga cultists come here and start lecturing us on piety and other gobnobby stuffs when we should be checking their hard drives and browser history.

I am sure someone out there understands you.

GracieX3:
For what reason are you calling me a racist, Uncle Ruckus?

My dear, I am only using your rules.
You just accused an innocent white kid of a crime years after he was found innocent.
Sorry, not one crime, but two.
He was exonerated of manslaughter yet you claim he could have been guilty of it. How can an innocent man be guilty of manslaughter.
And then you said he carried a gun with the intent to kill.
By the standards set by you, why are you not a racist?
Secondly,
Did Kyle Rittenhouse commit manslaughter or carry a gun with the intent to kill?

tctrills:
This is not the answer to my question in any sense. What you did here is give me your spiritual opinion. I respect it but the question is, since we all don't want to kill a human being, how do we decide what is human?
You already explained your method which is not very accurate.
Is it only the person carrying the baby that can tell when her baby becomes human?
So if for example, a woman tells you that her 8 months old pregnancy is not human, would you accept that?

I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It may border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

O

DeepSight:
I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It ay border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

I understand your personal opinion but I am talking of the standard not just your opinion.
For example why is it acceptable to kill a baby in the second trimester.
When do we decide that this is killing it human being.
If you insist that it is up to the mother to decide how does the mother truly know when what she is carrying is now human.
It takes 6 weeks to get a heartbeat but you still think it isn't Barbaric to kill a 6 weeks unborn?
Also do you agree with the law that killing a pregnant woman should be counted as a double homicide, if you do then clearly it is hypocrisy to say that the baby within her is not human

DeepSight:
I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It may border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

I think that those who support termination of the pregnancy even up to the 9th month have a more intelligent and compelling arguments than you at least they have a standard that is measurable, you don't.
So so someone like you would be okay to abort a baby a week or two before the third trimester. What changed in 7 days?

tctrills:
O
I understand your personal opinion but I am talking of the standard not just your opinion.
For example why is it acceptable to kill a baby in the second trimester.
When do we decide that this is killing it human being.
If you insist that it is up to the mother to decide how does the mother truly know when what she is carrying is now human.
It takes 6 weeks to get a heartbeat but you still think it isn't Barbaric to kill a 6 weeks unborn?
Also do you agree with the law that killing a pregnant woman should be counted as a double homicide, if you do then clearly it is hypocrisy to say that the baby within her is not human

It is obviously a complicated matter and I dont have all the answers. All I can say is that once it has taken on human form and consciousness is detected, I would be queasy. The mother is in the best position to take the decisions, together with the father where possible, and also with medical advice. In no event do I really think the government should come into it.

tctrills:
So so someone like you would be okay to abort a baby a week or two before the third trimester. What changed in 7 days?

I never said this.

[quote author=DeepSight post=139294493]I never said this.[/quote so the most important question to you should be when does conception become human?
If you can't answer that question which it seems you can't, then the only safe and responsible thing to do is to abolish abortion.
We don't want to mistakenly or ignorantly be killing millions of people or millions of humans just because we couldn't tell they are humans.

It is Carlos and genocidal to continue practicing abortion even when we can't tell if we are killing a human being.

Do you agree with this?
It is too big a risk to continue abortions when we can't tell with complete accuracy if humans are being killed. This is child sacrifice.

DeepSight:
It is obviously a complicated matter and I dont have all the answers. All I can say is that once it has taken on human form and consciousness is detected, I would be queasy. The mother is in the best position to take the decisions, together with the father where possible, and also with medical advice. In no event do I really think the government should come into it.

What makes the mother or the father in the best position to take the decision?
Does the mother or father have a special way of telling if it is human or not?
You said in no events you the government coming on it so you're saying that the government should not have the right to decide when a fetus becomes human you're saying that the parents somehow have greater knowledge or they know something that the rest of us don't know and so only the parents can make such decision.
For a baby that has been given birth to, the government can decide but you are saying government should have no power to legislate killing of humans before birth?
Don't you think it is a failure on government if they can't defend human life before birth.
Why should government only be able to protect you after you are born?

DeepSight:
It is obviously a complicated matter and I dont have all the answers. All I can say is that once it has taken on human form and consciousness is detected, I would be queasy. The mother is in the best position to take the decisions, together with the father where possible, and also with medical advice. In no event do I really think the government should come into it.

This is actually serious. You claim that the mother is in the best position to decide when her baby becomes human?

My question is, what puts her in this position?
Does having a baby in your womb automatically give you the science and knowledge to tell when it becomes human?

tctrills:
My dear, I am only using your rules.
You just accused an innocent white kid of a crime years after he was found innocent.
Sorry, not one crime, but two.
He was exonerated of manslaughter yet you claim he could have been guilty of it. How can an innocent man be guilty of manslaughter.
And then you said he carried a gun with the intent to kill.
By the standards set by you, why are you not a racist?
Secondly,
Did Kyle Rittenhouse commit manslaughter or carry a gun with the intent to kill?

Even with all my explanations, you are still repeating the same lies.

At this point either you are paid shills with no conscience or you are cult zombie.

This is literally the opinion of everyone in the world.

They try to make a case that no one is making and then try to get you to defend a position you don’t hold.

Has any of them ever seen a woman who intentionally carried a pregnancy to the late stage and decided she’s suddenly tired and doesn’t want to anymore?.

DeepSight:
I don't support the termination of advanced pregnancies except where the mother's life is in danger or for some other VERY compelling reason. Anything in the third trimester will be very hard for me to accept. It may border on the barbaric. Like I said, save for exceptional circumstances.

tctrills:
This is actually serious. You claim that the mother is in the best position to decide when her baby becomes human?

My question is, what puts her in this position?
Does having a baby in your womb automatically give you the science and knowledge to tell when it becomes human?

Yes

cococandy:
This is literally the opinion of everyone in the world.

They try to make a case that no one is making and then try to get you to defend a position you don’t hold.

Has any of them ever seen a woman who intentionally carrie a pregnancy to the late stage and decided she’s suddenly tired and doesn’t want to anymore?.

E tire me oh. You people who have coped with the people on this particular thread for years are strong oh. These people are something else. I would have said they are not for real save that we all know their kind in real life, dont we?

cococandy:
Party of godliness 🤡🤡

They’d refer to disabled people as welfare kings and queens..

tctrills:
This is actually serious. You claim that the mother is in the best position to decide when her baby becomes human?

My question is, what puts her in this position?
Does having a baby in your womb automatically give you the science and knowledge to tell when it becomes human?

The mother is best positioned to be most sensitive to its development. In many ways, she alone will feel its movements, jerks, kicks. Aside from this there is a certain mystical aspect to the whole experience which involves her intuition and spiritual perception and no one else can know like she can.

Guys, I need y'all to understand when you argue with maga cultists about abortion and sexuality, you are not arguing with people who have good intentions.
These maga cultists are the worst of the worst. Everytime, they are the sickest depraved people ever.

I don't even want to hear any drivel they copy and paste, I just want to check their hard drives and browser history.

GracieX3:
Even with all my explanations, you are still repeating the same lies.

At this point either you are paid shills with no conscience or you are cult zombie.

Your explanation only put you in hotter water and points to more racism.
Part of your explanation was accusing Kyle of the very serious crime of carrying a gun with the intent to kill

cococandy:
Party of godliness 🤡🤡

basilico and tctrills will have something to back this wickedness up. They won't let go so easily, when they should have let go.

DeepSight:
The mother is best positioned to be most sensitive to its development. In many ways, she alone will feel its movements, jerks, kicks. Aside from this there is a certain mystical aspect to the whole experience which involves her intuition and spiritual perception and no one else can know like she can.

So, feeling movements, jerks and kicks is how to tell what is human?
This is sounding more like voodoo than science

Maybe 5 kicks show you are human, 2 kicks and you can be killed

benalvino3:
Ijebos doing the usual ijebos thing: mixing legal language with emotional proopery

juries return guilty or not guilty, not unnocent. But that does not help your proopery the way he thinks it does.

A defendant is presumed innocent unless the prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

So after an acquittal, legal result is that the state failed to overcome the presumption of innocence.

Rittenhouse case specifically, he was acquitted on all remaining charges, and the misdemeanor gun possession charge was dismissed by the judge before deliberation. Why?

Also, self-defense law is not whoever is alive can claim self-defense. That is a gray-proopery summary. The actual issue was whether the prosecution could disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_lgp-WXLELSsU8wpwrXA9yqROtYgRuVnAE

Did they? We all watched the event that night.
👇
What the jury saw is that Rittenhouse was chased, attacked, and in one instance faced a man who admitted he had point a handgun toward him. That is why the sefdefense claim mattered - so cry us a river.

the judge limited information, is this new? Really? judges limit evidence in trials all the time. Where have you been?

Evidence excluded if it is prejudicial, irrelevant, or etc.

You can dislike Rittenhouse all you want but he was not convicted, the gun charge was dismissed, and the jury found him not guilty because the prosecution did not defeat self defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

presumptions of innocent is literally one of the basic principles of the criminal system. But Grayy-Lord proopery knows better

God, this sloppy written AI post. You use AI and ur post still sounds ill-,litt.ate.
How does one even manage that?

Like this gem of section:

"The actual issue was whether the prosecution could disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt"

My gosh. Wow. That is the basics of a US jury trial.
But do.mb-a*S you thinks he wrote something profound.
Real talk, I read what you write and am startled. - there is such a gap in writing an intellect between 11th grade me and fully grown adult you.
How did someone like you graduate highschool?

I'm not going into the concept of presumption of innocent with a guy who can barely conjugate basic English verbs.
So, I'l let AI respond to AI.

You use AI to try to pretend you are smarter that you are,
You lie about where you where you live to pretend you are American.
Dude, just be the dude that can barely speak English who doesn't live in the US because at the end of the day that is who you will always be.

I wonder, don't you feel shame at how much you embarrass yourself?
It's guess that you use AI now to write your posts is a tacit acknowlegemnt that you must feel shame and that you know your limitations.

Pax.

tctrills:
So, feeling movements, jerks and kicks is how to tell what is human?
This is sounding more like voodoo than science

Maybe 5 kicks show you are human, 2 kicks and you can be killed

We are talking about the first signs of consciousness for heavens sake, What would you rely on?
Oh I forgot. Your religion.
Is that science?

tctrills:
I am sure someone out there understands you.

Everyone knows.
The more pious you are trying to be
The more depraved you are. No one who worships the tyrant trump is a good person. I wish I could see what's on your drives and browser history.

tctrills:
Please go back, read and be updated. The entire discussion is here.

You don't have TDS yet right?
I mean tyrant "trump disappointment syndrome". I heard it's the disease flowing through the maga world right now.
Isn't it time for you to jump ship so you can at least enjoy here before it happens? It'll be so miserable for you when the time comes and he is dead and gone.

DeepSight:
We are talking about the first signs of consciousness for heavens sake, What would you rely on?
Oh I forgot. Your religion.
Is that science?

I have never mentioned religion so why do decide for me?
In this entire abortion discussion, have I mentioned religion.
Please do not distract.
In fact your replies have been far more religious than anything I have said on the subject.
Also, if you must depend on the kicks the mother receives, then you will be completely wrong to claim that third trimester abortion is Barbaric since only the mother can and should tell.

tctrills:
What makes the mother or the father in the best position to take the decision?
Does the mother or father have a special way of telling if it is human or not?
You said in no events you the government coming on it so you're saying that the government should not have the right to decide when a fetus becomes human you're saying that the parents somehow have greater knowledge or they know something that the rest of us don't know and so only the parents can make such decision.
For a baby that has been given birth to, the government can decide but you are saying government should have no power to legislate killing of humans before birth?
Don't you think it is a failure on government if they can't defend human life before birth.
Why should government only be able to protect you after you are born?

You have not yet come into the world, simple.

tctrills:
I have never mentioned religion so why do decide for me?
In this entire abortion discussion, have I mentioned religion.
Please do not distract.
In fact your replies have been far more religious than anything I have said on the subject.
Also, if you must depend on the kicks the mother receives, then you will be completely wrong to claim that third trimester abortion is Barbaric since only the mother can and should tell.

Read my words carefully you may see that I interject the word "may" in some places.

IjeBos:
How did someone like you graduate highschool?

Why are you presuming he graduated high school. I doubt it.

tctrills:
Maybe 5 kicks show you are human, 2 kicks and you can be killed

I have to admit this really cracked me up./

DeepSight:
Read my words carefully you may see that I interject the word "may" in some places.

That's not the point. I never injected religion into this matter so let's not divert. Let's not make killing of humans a religious matter.

You don't need to be religious to agree that the genocide of babies is evil.