₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Most of us Brits, white or black, do not like Reform. But I guess you'd need to wait till w general election to find this out.

And please do save this till then so you can say you told buda so.

Most of us brits? If you don't like them why are they sweeping the country? Am I missing something here?

Most brits, White and black don't like Labour party. This election shows exactly that.

benalvino3:
Most of us brits? If you don't like them why are they sweeping the country? Am I missing something here?

Most brits, White and black don't like Labour party. This election shows exactly that.

You don't know what "sweeping the country" is. And I doubt you know what local government elections are and how it differs to a general election.

Elections held in exactly 181 of the 317 councils in England, and most of those where elections were held were Labour seats. So hardly "Most brits", nor sweep.

benalvino3:
The fact that you guys are attacking him for being a republican alone shows why black people are under represented in the Republican Party.

The tweet you posted does not make sense

We are attacking him for the nonsense he said. And of course you can "not make sense" of what I posted. You hardly ever do.

budaatum:
We are attacking him for the nonsense he said. And of course you can "not make sense" of what I posted. You hardly ever do.

If he is a democrat and says nonsense, you won't be attacking him.

What nonsense he say specifically?
Because all he said makes a lot of sense

This is the problem with you people
https://x.com/vrpounds2/status/2053262794884051022?s=20

You guys don't even believe in Martin Luther King. Y'all would spit on his face if he tried to talk about color blindness today.

budaatum:
You don't know what "sweeping the country" is. And I doubt you know what local government elections are and how it differs to a general election.

Elections held in exactly 181 of the 317 councils in England, and most of those where elections were held were Labour seats. So hardly "Most brits", nor sweep.

Your argument cuts both ways

And

You are making my point for me. If local elections are not enough for me to say Reform is sweeping the country, then they are also not enough for you to confidently say most Brits, white or black, do not like Reform.

Reform has the momentum, it has been the case for a long time and I called your attention about it.

budaatum:
Hmm.

Because the blacks dont vote republican. Ms Winsome Sears an exceptional black woman contested and 80% of blacks voted for the white woman

Update on Don Tzu's Middle East strategies.

Muted US response to Iranian attacks deepens Gulf fears about cease-fire

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-us-ceasefire-deal-gulf-countries-9402cac4

By Sune Engel Rasmussen and Summer Said

The Trump administration’s attempts to shrug off exchanges of fire with Iran this week deepened concerns among Arab Gulf states that any deal to end the war will expose them to future conflict with a vengeful Iran.

Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, dismissed the attacks by Iran on ships in the Strait of Hormuz this week as “low harassing fire.” On Thursday, President Trump said Iran “trifled with us.”

The efforts to play down the attacks came as the Trump administration tried to protect a fragile cease-fire and keep peace talks moving forward. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. expected a response by Friday to its one-page memorandum of understanding that would declare an end to the two-monthslong war, while warning the Iranians would be “blown up” if they attacked the U.S. and its allies.

But for Gulf states that host major U.S. military installations and have long counted on defense ties with America as a hedge against Iran, the attacks by Iran represented another humbling moment in a conflict that has badly damaged their security and economies.

They are now worried, senior Gulf officials say, that the deal to end it will focus on Washington’s main concern—Iran’s nuclear program—while leaving intact what they see as the main threats to their security: the regime’s conventional missiles and its allied militias.

“Having an angry, injured Iran that is cornered is bad for Gulf countries, because it isn’t containable in the way it was before the war.” said Dania Thafer, executive director of the Gulf International Forum, a Washington-based think tank.

The war has also undermined a diplomatic process initiated by Trump to normalize Gulf relations with Israel, raising questions about the U.S. security guarantees underpinning it, and revealing more clearly Israel’s military might and ambition, senior Gulf officials say.

The six Arab monarchies bordering the Persian Gulf, dubbed the Gulf Coopertion Council, for years maintained their security by keeping an open line of communication with Tehran while deepening defense ties with Washington. They now are reassessing their dependence on Washington, realizing that they have little sway over U.S. military actions and that American bases on their soil didn’t deter Iran from attacking them, senior Gulf officials say.

“When the U.S. launched their attack, they did not take into consideration the GCC’s security concerns,” said Mohammed Baharoon, director general of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, a private Emirati think tank. “We were not part of that assessment.”

Perhaps to assuage fears among Gulf allies, Rubio this week approved arms sales worth $25.8 billion to Middle East partners, tripling the amount announced by the administration last week.

Iran retaliated for Israel’s killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by attacking Gulf countries directly, an unprecedented step, and learned that it could impose significant costs on the global economy at a low cost and effort.

The six Gulf monarchies are now internally divided over how to approach Iran, as well as the U.S. and Israel, in the future. They disagree partly because Iranian attacks didn’t hurt them equally.

The bulk of Iranian attacks targeted the United Arab Emirates, including the crucial Fujairah port, oil facilities and other infrastructure. Kuwait was heavily targeted due to the presence of U.S. bases. Saudi Arabia was hit repeatedly but suffered relatively contained damage, and intercepted many missiles. Oman, long a mediator in the Middle East, evaded major direct strikes.

That calibration of attacks was deliberate by Iran, and has forced its Arab neighbors to focus on individual, sometimes competing security interests, rather than present a unified front, Thafer said. “The problem is the Gulf states don’t see the Iranian threat equally,” she said.

During his first term, Trump brokered diplomatic agreements known as the Abraham Accords to normalize relations between Israel and various Gulf states, and they are widely considered a significant foreign policy achievement.

The war in Gaza dealt the initial blow to the normalization process, making it politically untenable for some Arab leaders to nurture diplomatic ties to Israel. The Iran war then sharpened divisions among Gulf states and exposed the limits of U.S. protection, further undermining the accords, Gulf officials say.

One position uniting the Gulf states is a refusal to let Israel exercise strategic dominance over the region. They unanimously think Israel poses as great a danger to regional stability as Iran, Gulf officials say, and that it is trying to drag them into the war.

Even so, the U.A.E. is looking to firm up its relationship with Israel, as is Bahrain, partly as a hedge against Iranian threats. Israel sent its Iron Dome battery and dozens of troops to the U.A.E. in March. And in another sign that it is increasingly going it alone, the U.A.E. last month announced it would leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

“The U.A.E. is signaling that regardless of how the war ends, they have lost faith in the value of regional cooperation,” said Sam Worby, managing director of Global Repute, a geopolitical advisory firm.

Worst case for the Arab monarchies would be if their competition while navigating the U.S.-Iran standoff prompts a new Gulf rift, which could spill beyond the Middle East, Worby said. Rivalry between the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia has in the past pitted the two powerful monarchies on opposing sides of civil wars in Sudan and Yemen.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar are increasingly looking to other world powers for support. Pakistan last month sent warplanes to Riyadh after signing a security pact with the kingdom in September. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the U.A.E. are turning to South Korean missile-defense systems and Ukrainian drones. China, Russia and Turkey increasingly pursue security interests in the region, too.

Oman has emerged as the most critical voice opposing Israel. Its mediating role and back-channel negotiations with Iran helped Gulf states reopen flight corridors within days after the war started. Omani officials continue to try to convince Gulf neighbors to maintain diplomacy with Iran, and recognize that dealing with the Iranian military, given their inability to neither predict nor sway Trump, is inevitable.

Gulf states have for years hosted U.S. bases on the assumption that the bases would grant them security. The bases were controversial among Arab populations, and became liabilities when Iranian retaliatory attacks targeted them. Qatar, in particular, has begun questioning the policy. However, abandoning military partnerships with the U.S. is complicated, as Gulf defense systems are intertwined with American equipment, maintenance and training.

Gulf decision makers also debate whether to build a strong military alliance among themselves, but some doubt they would be able to build a self-sustaining military industry capable of deterring Iran, several senior Gulf officials said.

There is no easy way for Gulf states to deter future Iranian attacks, said Dina Esfandiary, Middle East analyst and author of “New Order in the Gulf: The Rise of the UAE.”

“The only way you rebuild deterrence is through a combination of containment and engagement. And you build ties with the Iranians so they don’t resort to airstrikes against your territory. But I don’t think that’s how the Gulf Arab states all see it,” she said.

Write to Sune Engel Rasmussen at sune.rasmussen@wsj.com and Summer Said at summer.said@wsj.com

Pics
1. Smoke rising from the direction of an energy installation in Fujairah, U.A.E., in March.
© AFP/Getty Images
2.President Trump speaking at the White House on Friday.
© Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg News
3. Smoke rises from a fire at Kuwait's international airport in April, following a reported Iranian drone strike.
© AFP/Getty Images
4. OPEC headquarters in Vienna.
© Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg News

Democrats would declare a national holiday of celebrations if Iranians sunk an aircraft carrier because Trump would be forced to resign .
That's how pathetic democrat are.

BreakingNews21:
Update on Don Tzu's Middle East strategies.

Muted US response to Iranian attacks deepens Gulf fears about cease-fire

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-us-ceasefire-deal-gulf-countries-9402cac4

By Sune Engel Rasmussen and Summer Said

The Trump administration’s attempts to shrug off exchanges of fire with Iran this week deepened concerns among Arab Gulf states that any deal to end the war will expose them to future conflict with a vengeful Iran.

Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, dismissed the attacks by Iran on ships in the Strait of Hormuz this week as “low harassing fire.” On Thursday, President Trump said Iran “trifled with us.”

The efforts to play down the attacks came as the Trump administration tried to protect a fragile cease-fire and keep peace talks moving forward. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. expected a response by Friday to its one-page memorandum of understanding that would declare an end to the two-monthslong war, while warning the Iranians would be “blown up” if they attacked the U.S. and its allies.

But for Gulf states that host major U.S. military installations and have long counted on defense ties with America as a hedge against Iran, the attacks by Iran represented another humbling moment in a conflict that has badly damaged their security and economies.

They are now worried, senior Gulf officials say, that the deal to end it will focus on Washington’s main concern—Iran’s nuclear program—while leaving intact what they see as the main threats to their security: the regime’s conventional missiles and its allied militias.

“Having an angry, injured Iran that is cornered is bad for Gulf countries, because it isn’t containable in the way it was before the war.” said Dania Thafer, executive director of the Gulf International Forum, a Washington-based think tank.

The war has also undermined a diplomatic process initiated by Trump to normalize Gulf relations with Israel, raising questions about the U.S. security guarantees underpinning it, and revealing more clearly Israel’s military might and ambition, senior Gulf officials say.

The six Arab monarchies bordering the Persian Gulf, dubbed the Gulf Coopertion Council, for years maintained their security by keeping an open line of communication with Tehran while deepening defense ties with Washington. They now are reassessing their dependence on Washington, realizing that they have little sway over U.S. military actions and that American bases on their soil didn’t deter Iran from attacking them, senior Gulf officials say.

“When the U.S. launched their attack, they did not take into consideration the GCC’s security concerns,” said Mohammed Baharoon, director general of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, a private Emirati think tank. “We were not part of that assessment.”

Perhaps to assuage fears among Gulf allies, Rubio this week approved arms sales worth $25.8 billion to Middle East partners, tripling the amount announced by the administration last week.

Iran retaliated for Israel’s killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by attacking Gulf countries directly, an unprecedented step, and learned that it could impose significant costs on the global economy at a low cost and effort.

The six Gulf monarchies are now internally divided over how to approach Iran, as well as the U.S. and Israel, in the future. They disagree partly because Iranian attacks didn’t hurt them equally.

The bulk of Iranian attacks targeted the United Arab Emirates, including the crucial Fujairah port, oil facilities and other infrastructure. Kuwait was heavily targeted due to the presence of U.S. bases. Saudi Arabia was hit repeatedly but suffered relatively contained damage, and intercepted many missiles. Oman, long a mediator in the Middle East, evaded major direct strikes.

That calibration of attacks was deliberate by Iran, and has forced its Arab neighbors to focus on individual, sometimes competing security interests, rather than present a unified front, Thafer said. “The problem is the Gulf states don’t see the Iranian threat equally,” she said.

During his first term, Trump brokered diplomatic agreements known as the Abraham Accords to normalize relations between Israel and various Gulf states, and they are widely considered a significant foreign policy achievement.

The war in Gaza dealt the initial blow to the normalization process, making it politically untenable for some Arab leaders to nurture diplomatic ties to Israel. The Iran war then sharpened divisions among Gulf states and exposed the limits of U.S. protection, further undermining the accords, Gulf officials say.

One position uniting the Gulf states is a refusal to let Israel exercise strategic dominance over the region. They unanimously think Israel poses as great a danger to regional stability as Iran, Gulf officials say, and that it is trying to drag them into the war.

Even so, the U.A.E. is looking to firm up its relationship with Israel, as is Bahrain, partly as a hedge against Iranian threats. Israel sent its Iron Dome battery and dozens of troops to the U.A.E. in March. And in another sign that it is increasingly going it alone, the U.A.E. last month announced it would leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

“The U.A.E. is signaling that regardless of how the war ends, they have lost faith in the value of regional cooperation,” said Sam Worby, managing director of Global Repute, a geopolitical advisory firm.

Worst case for the Arab monarchies would be if their competition while navigating the U.S.-Iran standoff prompts a new Gulf rift, which could spill beyond the Middle East, Worby said. Rivalry between the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia has in the past pitted the two powerful monarchies on opposing sides of civil wars in Sudan and Yemen.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar are increasingly looking to other world powers for support. Pakistan last month sent warplanes to Riyadh after signing a security pact with the kingdom in September. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the U.A.E. are turning to South Korean missile-defense systems and Ukrainian drones. China, Russia and Turkey increasingly pursue security interests in the region, too.

Oman has emerged as the most critical voice opposing Israel. Its mediating role and back-channel negotiations with Iran helped Gulf states reopen flight corridors within days after the war started. Omani officials continue to try to convince Gulf neighbors to maintain diplomacy with Iran, and recognize that dealing with the Iranian military, given their inability to neither predict nor sway Trump, is inevitable.

Gulf states have for years hosted U.S. bases on the assumption that the bases would grant them security. The bases were controversial among Arab populations, and became liabilities when Iranian retaliatory attacks targeted them. Qatar, in particular, has begun questioning the policy. However, abandoning military partnerships with the U.S. is complicated, as Gulf defense systems are intertwined with American equipment, maintenance and training.

Gulf decision makers also debate whether to build a strong military alliance among themselves, but some doubt they would be able to build a self-sustaining military industry capable of deterring Iran, several senior Gulf officials said.

There is no easy way for Gulf states to deter future Iranian attacks, said Dina Esfandiary, Middle East analyst and author of “New Order in the Gulf: The Rise of the UAE.”

“The only way you rebuild deterrence is through a combination of containment and engagement. And you build ties with the Iranians so they don’t resort to airstrikes against your territory. But I don’t think that’s how the Gulf Arab states all see it,” she said.

Write to Sune Engel Rasmussen at sune.rasmussen@wsj.com and Summer Said at summer.said@wsj.com

Pics
1. Smoke rising from the direction of an energy installation in Fujairah, U.A.E., in March.
© AFP/Getty Images
2.President Trump speaking at the White House on Friday.
© Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg News
3. Smoke rises from a fire at Kuwait's international airport in April, following a reported Iranian drone strike.
© AFP/Getty Images
4. OPEC headquarters in Vienna.
© Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg News

The kind of talk deepsight, budaatum, IjeBos and GracieX3 don't like to hear.

“I am not oppressed, and I am not a victim… racism in America would, by and large, be dead today if it were not for certain people and institutions keeping it on life support.”

This guy don’t miss 🔊🔥 pic.twitter.com/Iq0vYmWfNJ

— 🔥🇺🇸 KC 🇺🇸🔥 (@KCPayTreeIt) May 9, 2026

basilico:
Democrats would declare a national holiday of celebrations if Iranians sunk an aircraft carrier because Trump would be forced to resign .
That's how pathetic democrat are.

Oga Bas, if you've been following the events the Iranians have been targeting military hardware and strategic sites and not the wholesale slaughtering of human beings. Never forget Don and his sidekick Benjamin target civilians and school children.

Great Britain is a disgrace.

I'll keep selling non-halal food. Arrest me as many times as you can. pic.twitter.com/uZYNDbzHIb

— Harman Singh Kapoor (@kingkapoor72) May 9, 2026

COMPLETED:

California: +5 Dems
Utah: +1 Dems
Texas: +5 GOP
Florida: +4 GOP
North Carolina: +1 GOP
Missouri: +1 GOP
Ohio: +2 GOP
Tennessee: +1 GOP
TOTAL COMPLETED: +6 Dems, +14 GOP

PENDING:

Alabama: +1 GOP (80% Happening)
Louisiana: +2 GOP (90% Happening)
Mississippi: +1 GOP (30% Happening)
Virginia: +4 Dems (Probably Will be Overturned by VA Supreme Court)

MOST LIKELY OUTCOME: +17 GOP, +6 Dems → NET GAIN OF +11 SEATS FOR THE REPUBLICANS!


Initially a house seat was set at one representative for 30,000 people. After census held every 10 years maps would be redrawn.
Long term impractical , at today's population the house would have 11000 seats. In 1921 or so the number of seats was fixed to 435. After census the states that gained and lost population would lose of gain seats.

Why you lie so much. Western armies Russia included don't target civilians. That's propaganda pushed by muslim and amplified by western hating media.
Muslim armies are the last remaining evolutionaries ( don't know if such word exists) who specifically target civilians.
Choose your side. Evolved or primitive.

BreakingNews21:
Oga Bas, if you've been following the events the Iranians have been targeting military hardware and strategic sites and not the wholesale slaughtering of human beings. Never forget Don and his sidekick Benjamin target civilians and school children.

Seun, can we just have a discussion in peace without your bots deleting everything? What's happening. You are making me defend ijebos. He said nothing insulting or offensive.

This is why Nigeria is the way it is. We have been complaining about your bots and it's getting worse.

benalvino3:
The kind of talk deepsight, budaatum, IjeBos and GracieX3 don't like to hear.

“I am not oppressed, and I am not a victim… racism in America would, by and large, be dead today if it were not for certain people and institutions keeping it on life support.”

This guy don’t miss 🔊🔥 pic.twitter.com/Iq0vYmWfNJ

— 🔥🇺🇸 KC 🇺🇸🔥 (@KCPayTreeIt) May 9, 2026

Some random black guy said something and some random white people clapped... Amazing
Gosh golly, I've did my learning for the day. I guess me no need all those researches and studies from all those experts with all those letters behind there names. /s

Reading this nonsense Bemeruca thinks makes him look smart makes me thankful for the mind I was blessed with and the education I received.
Can't imagine going through life with partially functioning brain cells like BemerucaGPT.

Ijebosc:
Some random black guy said something and some random white people clapped... Amazing
Gosh golly, I've did my learning for the day. I guess me no need all those researches and studies from all those experts with all those letters behind there names. /s

Reading this nonsense Bemeruca thinks makes him look smart makes me thankful for the mind I was blessed with and the education I received.
Can't imagine going through life with partially functioning brain cells like BemerucaGPT.

I don't know what you are on about 😂
You have nothing to say, you could have just kept quiet and make more sense. What did you just post 😂😂

Here it is:

The chairman of the Intelligence Advisory Board, Devin Nunes,

CONFIRMS: that Barack Obama ordered the raid on Mar-a-Lago because he was ‘looking for this’—the ICA the falsified Intelligence Community Assessment used to frame Donald Trump in 2016 an effort to… pic.twitter.com/jFT7O5WNMy

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) May 9, 2026

Obama was running Biden administration.
If this is true the rock of his life has no alternative than to divorce him.

Susan Rice, Obama National Security Advisor became Biden Director of Domestic Policy Council. She left in 2023, the Mar a Lago raid was on 2022. Susan Rice is Obama most trusted advisor after Iranian Valerie Jarrett.

benalvino3:
Many, a lot of them

Okay, what have you been given just because you are a black man that you didn't qualify for?

Any reasonable person knows why

Here’s a U.S. State Department official admitting that mass immigration is designed to change the demographics of the United States. pic.twitter.com/yCHP10sKtf

— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) May 9, 2026

Who gave liberals the right and prerogative of changing demographics .

basilico:
Any reasonable person knows why

Here’s a U.S. State Department official admitting that mass immigration is designed to change the demographics of the United States. pic.twitter.com/yCHP10sKtf

— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) May 9, 2026

Who gave liberals the right and prerogative of changing demographics .

Why do you care? Were you put on earth to protect whiteness? I’ve never seen this level of shameless rimming before 😳

What concern of yours is it if America’s demographic changes and we are no longer majority white as a country. Then what? Tell us how that affects your life personally.

Explains why anti Trump sentiments are all the rage. If you think democrats do this to stimulate economic growth ,you so wrong. It's all about rigging the vote.
I'll laugh at Britons. By 2063 they will be 49% of the population.By 2100 they will be 33% .
That's what you mean by population replacement, which the left calls a conspiracy theory.

You also hate the white people and want them to be a minority?

cococandy:
Why do you care? Were you put on earth to protect whiteness? I’ve never seen this level of shameless rimming before 😳

What concern of yours is it if America’s demographic changes and we are no longer majority white as a country. Then what? Tell us how that affects your life personally.

BreakingNews21:
Oga Bas, if you've been following the events the Iranians have been targeting military hardware and strategic sites and not the wholesale slaughtering of human beings. Never forget Don and his sidekick Benjamin target civilians and school children.

The said basilico is one of the most unreasonable posters you can come across on this matter.

Cococandy
I support this.

Rep. Nancy Mace
@RepNancyMace
•
13h
There is no place on this earth for those who rape children.
We introduced the Death Penalty for Child Rapists Act to make sure those who prey on our most vulnerable face the harshest consequence we can deliver.
Child rapists don't get second chances. They get the death

I doubt the very evil democrats will support this bill. I'll watch Huw it goes.

Institutional racism happens when one race is favoured over another by law. That's the bedrock of racial gerrymandering.
When a voting district is specially caved out for a particular race and made in such a way that other races can't compete.
This is systemic and institutional racism.
It's unhealthy for blacks and for the entire country.

BreakingNews21:
Oga Bas, if you've been following the events the Iranians have been targeting military hardware and strategic sites and not the wholesale slaughtering of human beings. Never forget Don and his sidekick Benjamin target civilians and school children.

You must be out of your mind.
What military hardware is in an oil depot. In a hotel. At an airport . Oil tankers transiting the Straits . Merchant ships .
Over 90% or more of their drones and missiles have been stopped.
Their cluster munitions ballistic missiles that splits into 60 20Kg munitions targeting civilians.
They sponsor Hezbollah and Hamas which fire rockets and missiles at civilians.
Damage to many Israel residential apartments has been gleefully posted here.
The Israel civilian casualties are minimal because their govt developed an early warning system and built bunkers.
If Israel didn't have bunkers how many of them would have died.

Since 2001, Palestinian militants in Gaza have fired over 50,000 rockets and mortars.
Pre-2005 Gaza Withdrawal (2001–2005): ~2,000 rockets.
2008-2009 Gaza War (Operation Cast Lead): ~1,000 rockets.
2012 Operation Pillar of Defense: ~1,500 rockets.
2014 Operation Protective Edge: ~4,800 rockets.
2021 Operation Guardian of the Walls: ~4,400 rockets.
Oct 2023–Present (Operation Swords of Iron): ~19,000+ rockets from Gaza.
2006 Second Lebanon War (Hezbollah): ~4,200 rockets.
Oct 2023–Early 2026 (Hezbollah): ~12,000+ rockets and drones.
March 2026 Escalation (Hezbollah): ~5,000+ rockets.

There goes the FBI.Hiding their crimes .

Judicial Watch uncovered the existence of as many as 1.9 million secret anti-Trump and other lawfare records hidden in an FBI room by the Biden gang. @TomFitton pic.twitter.com/WrPSCVPKfm

— Judicial Watch ⚖️ (@JudicialWatch) May 10, 2026

Any sane person should never support what the left did and is doing to Trump.

basilico:
Explains why anti Trump sentiments are all the rage. If you think democrats do this to stimulate economic growth ,you so wrong. It's all about rigging the vote.
I'll laugh at Britons. By 2063 they will be 49% of the population.By 2100 they will be 33% .
That's what you mean by population replacement, which the left calls a conspiracy theory.

You also hate the white people and want them to be a minority?

@bold no idc. I’m indifferent what race is the majority. Life will shift and move as it does. Historically it’s happened that way. Especially in America. They left from Europe to America and took over someone else’s land. That was hundreds of years ago. And in hundreds of years, life will correct that.

My question to you is why do you care?
You’re laughing at the Britons. Why? Do you think your kind is a disease and curse? And Therefore a bad thing?

Do you look in the mirror and think you’re somehow a scourge because of your skin color and people deserve to be laughed at if you move to be among them? Are you okay? I want to understand how you see yourself in all these and why it’s your business.

My purpose here is to expose the left and their uncountable lies lest you forgot that.
Their greed for power knows no bounds.

cococandy:
@bold no idc. I’m indifferent what race is the majority. Life will shift and move as it does. Historically it’s happened that way. Especially in America. They left from Europe to America and took over someone else’s land. That was hundreds of years ago. And in hundreds of years, life will correct that.

My question to you is why do you care?
You’re laughing at the Britons. Why? Do you think your kind is a disease and curse? And Therefore a bad thing?

Do you look in the mirror and think you’re somehow a scourge because of your skin color and people deserve to be laughed at if you move to be among them? Are you okay? I want to understand how you see yourself in all these and why it’s your business.

If you support this you won’t support Trump. Save your fake support because in the face of evidence you’ll say it doesn’t exist. Even if you walk in on the him abusing the child, you’ll keep asking for evidence.

You saw now redacted pictures of him in disgusting settings with kids, heard the testimonies of the people he abused and saw decades of documented dealings between him and a child trafficker but it didn’t in convince you. Because nothing will ever ever convince you. Not even if he says it himself. You’ll say he’s jesting and trying to troll the libs.

You guys’ disingenuousness is nauseating and frankly insulting. Find someone else to insult with this pathetic attempt at pretending you care.

basilico:
Cococandy
I support this.

Rep. Nancy Mace
@RepNancyMace
•
13h
There is no place on this earth for those who rape children.
We introduced the Death Penalty for Child Rapists Act to make sure those who prey on our most vulnerable face the harshest consequence we can deliver.
Child rapists don't get second chances. They get the death

I doubt the very evil democrats will support this bill. I'll watch Huw it goes.