₦airaland Forum

Remember I told you don’t have to respond just to have something to say? Because you trying (and failing) to make a distinction between Jan 6 criminals and other criminals makes no sense.

The reason the Jan 6 criminals are re-offending now is because Trump got them out of jail and pardoned them. If they stayed locked up, the people they assaulted after their release would’ve been safe. I don’t know how it makes sense for you to try and differentiate them from their fellow criminals.

basilico:
Those are people already convicted and jailed who received pardon.

The ones I'd be concerned about are where a prosecutors refuses to charge someone,judge frees him then he goes on to commit a crime .Child predators especially like the example I gave

Am ugly example , that Ukraine girl who was stabbed in a train for no reason by a psychopath who should have been in a mental institution. Multiple violent felonies but judges still let him free .
Democrats successfully petitioned for her mural to be removed last week by the way.

Lame.

bemeruca:
Whatever you want to call them, care worker is a universal term.

Become a billionaire and share your money. If you can't, why?

I am not a billionaire, I make my own cash, my charity begins from home. I still want to keep enough for myself knowing I am not a robot.

Try and make your own money as others are doing. Don't try to take their money.

cococandy:
Lame.

Its a simple thing. You have a house you sleep in some people don't, why not give it up?

You guys will preach but you don't believe what you preach.

cococandy:
What manner of a silly lie is this? This was you today. This was your post that got me responding to you.

You were speaking to bayelsa man and started mentioning me when I literally didn’t care if you’re existing today or not.

And you’re bold facedly saying I started attacking you? This lying of a thing has become second nature to you Trump people. You don’t even know when you’re doing it. Did you forget because you were using your other account 🤣

You call this an attack? You are short so I understand your temperament.

You hate billionaires is not an attack, it's a fact.

bemeruca:
Its a simple thing. You have a house you sleep in some people don't, why not give it up?

You guys will preach but you don't believe what you preach.

Omg. You’re so so dull.

bemeruca:
You call this an attack? You are short so I understand your temperament.

You hate billionaires is not an attack, it's a fact.

And my attack on you was saying you messed with a teenager? Something you bragged about here with your own words? I didn’t lie against you. You said it yourself.

Oh the attack was me saying I found it disgusting? Well I do find it disgusting. That’s not an attack. It’s a fact.

You’re the one crying . Cry more. While I go wash myself of this interaction. I find grown ups who mess with or lust after teens disgusting. Facts

Shoulda kept my name out your mouth. Now you’re sobbing. Remember next time to steer clear.

cococandy:
Omg. You’re so so dull.

Open your house to the homeless. If you can't shut up about others.

You pay your taxes the way billionaires do.

So open your house, some people don't have a roof over their head.

How does it feel that everything you’ve tried to use to insult me are things conjured up by your imagination?

Meanwhile I don’t even have to do any digging to find your verified character flaws that you openly brag about?

bemeruca:
Yes I did 😂

I was a teenager once. The difference between the teenager I messed with and you is that the teenager I messed with did not have multiple abortions as a teenager. You are the queen of abortions from a teenage age 😂

cococandy:
What manner of a silly lie is this? This was you today. This was your post that got me responding to you.

You were speaking to bayelsa man and started mentioning me when I literally didn’t care if you’re existing today or not.

And you’re bold facedly saying I started attacking you? This lying of a thing has become second nature to you Trump people. You don’t even know when you’re doing it. Did you forget because you were using your other account 🤣

You hate billionaires is an attack 😂

Well, just so you know, you hate billionaires.
It's not an attack, it's a fact.

benalvino3:
You hate billionaires is an attack 😂

Well, just so you know, you hate billionaires.
It's not an attack, it's a fact.

Lame and dull. I don’t remember having any interaction with you that didn’t end up like this. Dry & uninteresting.

This is why I usually either have you blocked or ignored.

cococandy:
How does it feel that everything you’ve tried to use to insult me are things conjured up by your imagination?

Meanwhile I don’t even have to do any digging to find your verified character flaws that you openly brag about?

Leave conjure talk. Tell us, how many did you abort as a teenager?

benalvino3:
Leave conjure talk. Tell us, how many did you abort as a teenager?

I know you think this is a gotcha. And I’m responding to you against my better judgment because I don’t discuss terminations with men on the internet. But seeing as we are talking about teenagers I’ll oblige you. I support terminations in many instances and one of them is in immature mothers. Aka all underage moms. The kinds you and your ilk like.

Statistically most underage moms have adult partners in their 20s and 30s. Such a travesty. Your baby mama should’ve gotten one (or several). Since we don’t know how many times you abused her.

bayelsaowei:
That’s what and how the billionaires (who they aren’t) have taught them to do or say. Belittle hard working humans.

And to know that these pathetic individuals aren’t billionaires themselves keeps me amazed all day.

They worship the fact that wealth is unevenly distributed in the greatest country in the world. A country with the highest amount of billionaires, but with millions of persons still living in poverty.. and these billionaires just wanna keep ripping off the system. it’s an utter shame!! And these folks claim to be Christians.

See a bible principle below that supposed Christian’s have failed to inject in the American welfare system.

you are confusing condemning greed with condemning wealth itself. We should use the Bible correctly and not use it to push our biased opinions.

The Bible does not say being rich is automatically evil. Bible warn against loving money, oppressing the poor, and trusting in riches instead of God. The position you hold is a failed system.

Many billionaires and wealthy people have created jobs, fund things like hospitals, paid scholarships, supported medical research, disaster relief, food programs, universities, churches, and charities.

That does not mean every billionaire is good, but pretending they only rip off the system is dishonest.
So do us a favour and tell us how they ripped off the system?

The same Bible you quoted also says:

1 Timothy 6:17-18
Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth… Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share.

Notice the Bible does not say command the rich to stop being rich. It just says they should be humble, generous, and do good.

Even Abraham, Job, David, Solomon, Joseph of Arimathea, and others were wealthy. Their wealth was not the sin. The sin is greed, oppression, pride, and refusing to help others.

Proverbs 13:22 says:
A good person leaves an inheritance for their children’s children.

So the Bible supports building wealth responsibly.

What it condemns is wickedness and selfishness.

Even the passage you quoted in 2 Corinthians was about voluntary generosity among believers, not government-forced welfare or hatred of people who have more.

Paul was encouraging giving from the heart, not teaching jealousy or class warfare (cococandy)

So yes, help the poor. Yes, condemn greedy billionaires. But don’t pretend every wealthy person is evil or that poverty is solved by insulting people who create value, businesses, jobs etc. You don't even believe half of what you are saying.

cococandy:
I know you think this is a gotcha. And I’m responding to you against my better judgment because I don’t discuss terminations with men on the internet. But seeing as we are talking about teenagers I’ll oblige you. I support terminations in many instances and one of them is in immature mothers. Aka all underage moms. The kinds you and your ilk like.

Statistically most underage moms have adult partners in their 20s and 30s. Such a travesty. Your baby mama should’ve gotten one (or several). Since we don’t know how many times you abused her.

19 is not underage, not even 18. Some of whom moms like you groom to follow older rich men. But for someone like you who aborted a couple as a teenager, I understand your advocacy for abortion.

cococandy:
Lame and dull. I don’t remember having any interaction with you that didn’t end up like this. Dry & uninteresting.

This is why I usually either have you blocked or ignored.

The same way you blocked Ibime 😂😂
Short temper or short person which is it?

What do you call employing people at just below minimum hours so that you don’t have to pay health insurance as the law requires for all full time employees? Not greed?

What’s the proper way to describe lobbying politicians to reduce regulations so that you don’t have to observe safety rules. Just to save a few bucks while risking the lives of your workers and the communities where your industries are? That’s not greed?

What do you call monopolizing insurance companies and pharmacies and hospitals so that you as an organization can dictate how much an ICU stay costs (millions of dollars for week stay BTW) and the insurance company can’t refuse to pay you because you own it and the Pharmacy can’t charge the patient less for medications because you also own. And the people who regulate the system can’t say jack because you own them too?

You’re quite happily show us how slow your neurons fire with every line you utter. This conversation is beyond you because you don’t even begin to understand how American greed works. Just yapping to yap.

benalvino3:
you are confusing condemning greed with condemning wealth itself. We should use the Bible correctly and not use it to push our biased opinions.

The Bible does not say being rich is automatically evil. Bible warn against loving money, oppressing the poor, and trusting in riches instead of God. The position you hold is a failed system.

Many billionaires and wealthy people have created jobs, fund things like hospitals, paid scholarships, supported medical research, disaster relief, food programs, universities, churches, and charities.

That does not mean every billionaire is good, but pretending they only rip off the system is dishonest.
So do us a favour and tell us how they ripped off the system?

The same Bible you quoted also says:

1 Timothy 6:17-18
Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth… Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share.

Notice the Bible does not say command the rich to stop being rich. It just says they should be humble, generous, and do good.

Even Abraham, Job, David, Solomon, Joseph of Arimathea, and others were wealthy. Their wealth was not the sin. The sin is greed, oppression, pride, and refusing to help others.

Proverbs 13:22 says:
A good person leaves an inheritance for their children’s children.

So the Bible supports building wealth responsibly.

What it condemns is wickedness and selfishness.

Even the passage you quoted in 2 Corinthians was about voluntary generosity among believers, not government-forced welfare or hatred of people who have more.

Paul was encouraging giving from the heart, not teaching jealousy or class warfare (cococandy)

So yes, help the poor. Yes, condemn greedy billionaires. But don’t pretend every wealthy person is evil or that poverty is solved by insulting people who create value, businesses, jobs etc. You don't even believe half of what you are saying.

benalvino3:
19 is not underage, not even 18. Some of whom moms like you groom to follow older rich men. But for someone like you who aborted a couple as a teenager, I understand your advocacy for abortion.

Your lame attempt at rectifying this is embarrassing for you. Give it up.

Are you the “rich man” someone groomed their teenage daughter to follow? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Are they marching against institutional racism?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3d2ryyz0jzo

cococandy:
Your lame attempt at rectifying this is embarrassing for you. Give it up.

Are you the “rich man” someone groomed their teenage daughter to follow? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Give up what?
That young girls are allowed to marry from 18 or 19?

Or that your hosbiii is somewhere watching pron-hub of a young woman. You don't have issues with society letting 18 or 19 do pron but your issues is that men are having children with them.

To check on the hosbiii 😂

P

This shame of being a pay dough is yours alone to carry. You can’t project it on anyone else.

E
I know if the law allows them to marry at 13, you’ll be down there in the playgrounds scouting for a 13 year old child. Agadi na agwo ofe.

R
That’s why I never bought into the “protect the kids” hogwash of the right wing. They were only political props at the time. But at the end of the day, your precedents speaks for itself.

V
From openly lusting after them on the internet to admitting to sleeping with them and your law makers voting against outlawing child marriage, you show yourselves as the true danger to kids.

E
We can’t let you forget that. And you can never succeed at projecting it onto other people.

R

Kids are not safe around you guys. End of discussion
T

benalvino3:
Give up what?
That young girls are allowed to marry from 18 or 19?

Or that your hosbiii is somewhere watching pron-hub of a young woman. You don't have issues with society letting 18 or 19 do pron but your issues is that men are having children with them.

To check on the hosbiii 😂

cococandy:
What do you call employing people at just below minimum hours so that you don’t have to pay health insurance as the law requires for all full time employees? Not greed?

What’s the proper way to describe lobbying politicians to reduce regulations so that you don’t have to observe safety rules. Just to save a few bucks while risking the lives of your workers and the communities where your industries are? That’s not greed?

What do you call monopolizing insurance companies and pharmacies and hospitals so that you as an organization can dictate how much an ICU stay costs (millions of dollars for week stay BTW) and the insurance company can’t refuse to pay you because you own it and the Pharmacy can’t charge the patient less for medications because you also own. And the people who regulate the system can’t say jack because you own them too?

You’re quite happily show us how slow your neurons fire with every line you utter. This conversation is beyond you because you don’t even begin to understand how American greed works. Just yapping to yap.

My point is simple: you cannot take the bad actions of some wealthy people or corporations and use that to condemn wealth itself or every billionaire.

That is short or lazy reasoning.

The Bible encourages rich people.

It's the governments job to protect people from being exploited. There are laws that governs wages.

Everyone earns differently. A care helper like you earns wages. A small business owner earns profit. An investor earns returns. A founder’s wealth grows when the company they built becomes more valuable

Billionaires’ wealth is tied to ownership, shares, investments, real estate, companies, and assets.

Their net worth rises or falls based on the value of those assets. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg etc etc. are not collecting billions per month in paychecks.

Elon musk does not have 20billion sitting in his bank. Bayelsaowei you know about investments and assets. It's a shame that you are indulging yourself in this nonsensical talk as who knows who you are, you might be building your wealth.

You people rgument is: Some rich people are greedy, therefore billionaires are bad. That is emotional, not intelligent, that's envy when you acting as if billionaires receive billions of dollars every month like a salary. That is not how wealth works.

Deuteronomy 8:18 says:
But remember the Lord your God, for it is he who gives you the ability to produce wealth.

cococandy:
P

This shame of being a pay dough is yours alone to carry. You can’t project it on anyone else.

E
I know if the law allows them to marry at 13, you’ll be down there in the playgrounds scouting for a 13 year old child. Agadi na agwo ofe.

R
That’s why I never bought into the “protect the kids” hogwash of the right wing. They were only political props at the time. But at the end of the day, your precedents speaks for itself.

V
From openly lusting after them on the internet to admitting to sleeping with them and your law makers voting against outlawing child marriage, you show yourselves as the true danger to kids.

E
We can’t let you forget that. And you can never succeed at projecting it onto other people.

R

Kids are not safe around you guys. End of discussion
T

18 and above are considered adults. If you have issues with that go and stop the pron they allow them to act. Your advocacy should be that not men marrying them and starting a family with them.

You always have misguided priorities. You yourself did multiple abortions as a teenager

I’m trying to understand your warped logic. So because unwholesome websites allow teenagers to participate in their unwholesome activities, that makes it okay for you to partake? What a weird take .

Also makes my point. If 13 was the limit we’d find you there as well. No consideration for maturity etc.

Pay dough.

Now we’re marrying and starting families with them too? Silly liar. Always lying .

benalvino3:
18 and above are considered adults. If you have issues with that go and stop the pron they allow them to act. Your advocacy should be that not men marrying them and starting a family with them.

You always have misguided priorities. You yourself did multiple abortions as a teenager

cococandy:
I’m trying to understand your warped logic. So because unwholesome websites allow teenagers to participate in their unwholesome activities, that makes it okay for you to partake? What a weird take .

You won't understand with short reasoning like this. It's not the website allowing it. It is them (women) using their given right as an adult to do it. Why the websites allows 18 and above when they can go down further? Maybe it's because they are not allowing it but the adults are voluntarily doing it.

cococandy:
Also makes my point. If 13 was the limit we’d find you there as well. No consideration for maturity etc.

Pay dough.

You have no point. You should be denying doing multiple abortions as a teenager.

The state allow it because the state says they are adults.

Your side push and sexualize kids then encourage abortion. You have experience in abortion as a teenager.

This people would not live in a communist country.

The best question to ask a communist that will melt their brains is this: if workers own the means of production, that means all markets are essentially abolished. Everything is given communally. But what if there’s a group of workers at a flag factory and they all decide to make… pic.twitter.com/Rawx699Kjc

— Ava (@Ava_AM12ff) May 15, 2026

See Obama's husband playing victim 😂🤣

Did Michelle Obama get enough scrutiny for these hilariously divisive comments?

(Via patriotic_em on IG) pic.twitter.com/twxFAxHrtX

— Turning Point Action (@TPAction) May 14, 2026

He sounds like Deepsight

benalvino3:
See Obama's husband playing victim 😂🤣

Did Michelle Obama get enough scrutiny for these hilariously divisive comments?

(Via patriotic_em on IG) pic.twitter.com/twxFAxHrtX

— Turning Point Action (@TPAction) May 14, 2026

He sounds like Deepsight

If that clip is real and she said that, its completely daft of her. Disappointing.
There you go.
This is what you cant say or do if it were even a certain Eastern European stripper who rose from escort to first lady.

DeepSight:
If that clip is real and she said that, its completely daft of her. Disappointing.
There you go.
This is what you cant say or do if it were even a certain Eastern European stripper who rose from escort to first lady.

It's real, and she has been saying crap like this left and right.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtUX1BQGYoo

Phew

I know when you started your bragging about bedding teenagers, it was probably one of those lame attempts conservative men make at shaming women for waiting until they’re older to start families. Probably did it for a lil
pat on the back from other Neanderthals 🤭.

You didn’t imagine it would come back to bite you in the but like this. Now look at you. All embarrassed. Looking silly and clutching to fiction as a way to try to get a word in. You would shush if had any shame but we know you don’t. Carry on.

benalvino3:
You won't understand with short reasoning like this. It's not the website allowing it. It is them (women) using their given right as an adult to do it. Why the websites allows 18 and above when they can go down further? Maybe it's because they are not allowing it but the adults are voluntarily doing it.



You have no point. You should be denying doing multiple abortions as a teenager.

The state allow it because the state says they are adults.

Your side push and sexualize kids then encourage abortion. You have experience in abortion as a teenager.

16/06/2026

raumdeuter:
So you dont know the meaning of what you claimed exists and cannot give examples of it in 2026

Typical leftist ignorance

Bwahahahahahahaha! Typical Republican projection.