₦airaland Forum

fergie001:
I have read the CTC of the judgement..... The appeal was dismissed.
However, only the NLS is affected!

Thanks for your attention to this matter.....yarimo Otti 😔

DoTheNeedful:
GEJ for president!

The Turaki wing of the PDP are Atiku's apologists. They are pushing Jonathan's candidacy for an obvious reason. Were they not part of the Ibadan declaration for a unified opposition against APC?

Kukutente23:
The Supreme Court upheld the suspension of Anyanwu
How can he be suspended and still function as the Secretary? The Appeal Court laid that bare

chidiokay:
if you have read the APPeal CTC, can you post wheee in the judgement Judge Uche upheld Ibadan FHC judgement that recognised Abdulrahmon

ppst the judgement CTC

Kukutente23:
Did any court order them to derecognise the Mark-led group in ADC before they gave interpretation to ante bellum and did their master's bidding? Did any court ask them to derecognise the Gabam led group in SDP before they did so? You guys should continue enjoying the obvious corruption by INEC. When the time comes, you'll alto cry. Na turn by turn

Besides, if you insist that the CoA upheld the FHC Ibadan judgement which it never did, then that means the Turaki group can still appeal to the SC right?

fergie001:
Listen attentively....
Turaki went to FHC Ibadan to affirm his Chairmanship having been elected by the Ibadan Convention....the Wike people said No, the Convention is still subjudice.

Justice Agomuo says NO, the Wike group are the leadership of the PDP. The Woke neigher told the Court they are the right group nor sought from the Court to affirm them the right group.
The Appeal Court held that whilst Agomuo was wrong to have done that, the whole issue has become more academic. The Appeal Court held that ordinarily, it would have struck off the case and taken it back to the FHC to be handled by another job but the issue is not a live controversy. It has now become academic as a result of the fact that the foundation is the Ibadan Convention and the Supreme Court had settled that. Hence, she dismissed the appeal.

On a second appeal, Durosaro SAN represented the PDP and later the Turaki in the PDP case, Ajibade, the National Legal Adviser held that it was his responsibility ito choose who represents the PDP as the NLS. Hear the Appeal Court;

"...While I agree that the suspension of A.K. Ajibade, SAN, elapsed after one month from November 1, 2025, his tenure of office nevertheless expired in December 2025. Either way, A.K. Ajibade, SAN, could not have issued a valid letter of instruction thereafter, unless there was an intervening circumstance. The Objector, in Paragraph 6(h) of the Further Affidavit, deposed that A.K. Ajibade, SAN, was re-elected, without stating when, where, and by whom he was re-elected as the National Legal Adviser of the 2nd Respondent."

Hence, the Appeal Court held that Ajibade in any capacity could not dictate who to represent the PDP. Ajibade is the NLS of the Wike-faction.....

Okoyeeboz:
Look at the comments of sensible Obidients like FergieOO1, now look at your own.

Even in your Obidients meeting where they are collecting 2k per person, do you think you deserve even 100 Naira?

seunmsg:
Of course they can waste their time appealing to the Supreme Court, nobody will stop them. However, their appeal to the Appeal Court suffered irreparable damage because it was based on the argument that they emerged from the Ibadan PDP convention which has now been nullified. So, on what ground do they want to base the appeal on at this stage?

Sometimes, you accept defeat and cut your losses. The PDP case is a dead end, Wike has won. Stop chasing shadows.

seunmsg:
Lol

Lol ok.

Kukutente23:
Is Ibadan PDP convention the reason for their appeal or that the trial court gave a ruling that was not in the prayers before it?
Are you saying the SC is duty bound to follow the reasoning of the Appeal court
If the Appeal court said the Ibadan convention and the issues around it have been dispensed by the SC and that renders the case academic, why are you insisting that Wike's group should benefit from an academic case

seunmsg:
Once the appeal was dismissed, what else do you want?

chidiokay:
Oga show evidence, i have dropped my own sources

Drop the judgement of Appeal court by Judge Uche i want to read what he said about FHC judgment.

just post the judgement let peiple read it themselves

seunmsg:
lol. Turaki won. Go and help him submit his candidates to INEC.

fergie001:
You seem not to understand how these things work.
They did close ranks but Wike insisted he wouldn't give them a slot because the Turaki opted for sharing some positions in the NWC before the March Convention. There was no choice! Even his loyalists in Rivers and Abuja, he declined them from contesting under the PDP, they are APC now...

As at today, his faction holds sway for reasons unsurprising to anyone but it's a slippery slope.

fergie001:
Listen attentively....
Turaki went to FHC Ibadan to affirm his Chairmanship having been elected by the Ibadan Convention....the Wike people said No, the Convention is still subjudice.

Justice Agomuo says NO, the Wike group are the leadership of the PDP. The Woke neigher told the Court they are the right group nor sought from the Court to affirm them the right group.
The Appeal Court held that whilst Agomuo was wrong to have done that, the whole issue has become more academic. The Appeal Court held that ordinarily, it would have struck off the case and taken it back to the FHC to be handled by another job but the issue is not a live controversy. It has now become academic as a result of the fact that the foundation is the Ibadan Convention and the Supreme Court had settled that. Hence, she dismissed the appeal.

On a second appeal, Durosaro SAN represented the PDP and later the Turaki in the PDP case, Ajibade, the National Legal Adviser held that it was his responsibility ito choose who represents the PDP as the NLS. Hear the Appeal Court;

"...While I agree that the suspension of A.K. Ajibade, SAN, elapsed after one month from November 1, 2025, his tenure of office nevertheless expired in December 2025. Either way, A.K. Ajibade, SAN, could not have issued a valid letter of instruction thereafter, unless there was an intervening circumstance. The Objector, in Paragraph 6(h) of the Further Affidavit, deposed that A.K. Ajibade, SAN, was re-elected, without stating when, where, and by whom he was re-elected as the National Legal Adviser of the 2nd Respondent."

Hence, the Appeal Court held that Ajibade in any capacity could not dictate who to represent the PDP. Ajibade is the NLS of the Wike-faction.....