₦airaland Forum

IjeBos:
Ur like a piñata, everyone takes turns beating on you because you make it so easy to.
Then you get emotional and start crying.

I've never meant someone who spends so much time online yet never says anything intelligent.
The thread jester.

The emotional unstable leftists cannot handle logic so they spazz out and throw tantrums like toddlers

Look at you for example

GracieX3:
round and round the merry-go-round. Who is grasping and doubling down now?

You have been educated. Next time, learn to discuss with facts.

Me:

I have continued to ask you to name one present-day institution or police department whose official policies, established practices, or leadership are demonstrably based on racial discrimination. You are running around like an headless chicken.

Your screenshots does not answer my question. It says that extremist groups have attempted to infiltrate law enforcement and that some individual officers have had racist or extremist ties.

That proves what I and raumdeuter had been saying, that racist individuals can exist within institutions; it does not prove that a specific police department is institutionally racist.

With all your supposed studies and research, you still cannot name one. Name the department and show the documented discriminatory policy or institutional practice.

Oya, we dey wait.

You: round and round. Studies blah this, blah that.

benalvino3:
Me:

I have continued to ask you to name one present-day institution or police department whose official policies, established practices, or leadership are demonstrably based on racial discrimination. You are running around like an headless chicken.

Your screenshots does not answer my question. It says that extremist groups have attempted to infiltrate law enforcement and that some individual officers have had racist or extremist ties.

That proves what I and raumdeuter had been saying, that racist individuals can exist within institutions; it does not prove that a specific police department is institutionally racist.

With all your supposed studies and research, you still cannot name one. Name the department and show the documented discriminatory policy or institutional practice.

Oya, we dey wait.

How about a Sheriff's office in Los Angeles?

raumdeuter:
So what are the official policies practices and rules that are disadvantageous to minorities

Read the thread please, raumdeuter.

Past "official policies" and current "practices" and "rules that are disadvantageous to minorities" have been listed many times and mostly in response to you.

raumdeuter:
I dont think you should go to jail for getting things wrong if you didnt do it maliciously. Science is filled with a lot of trying and failing, hypothesis thought to be true but were proven wrong later when more evidence came to light

If you jail people for getting it wrong at a time, then no one will do scientific work anymore

It sounds like you have not been following this topic at all.

This was not simply a case of a scientist getting something wrong. He knew what he was doing.

He concealed information, people around him discussed destroying conversations so there would be no trace, and efforts were made to discredit or go after those who questioned him.

He supported blanket policies, worked around concerns about gain-of-function research to keep funding it, and was accepting awards while people were dying, even pressuring organizations to honour him.

He lied to remove any culpability for the creation of the virus. He constantly deflected from lab leaks while in his private email he said it's from the lab.

The issue is not that he made a mistake; the issue is the xoncealment, evasion of oversight and misleading testimony.

Nobody is saying scientists should be jailed whenever a theory fails. But when someone knowingly conceals evidence, evades oversight or lies under oath, that is no longer scientific error. That is misconduct.

He himself had complications from the vaccine and hid it. He is behind the vaccine mandate that destroyed people's career. All these why seeing himself as the greatest celebrity.

budaatum:
Read the thread please, ramdeuter.

Past "official policies" and current "practices" and "rules that are disadvantageous to minorities" have been listed many times and mostly in response to you.

What are the current official practices and rules that are made against minorities

raumdeuter:
Educated people know that when majority of illegal immigrants have a particular characteristics, then the majority of those arrested will have the same

You are already a lemming to the left which is why you dont think

Yo n u m p t y there are citizens and legal residents with the same characteristics, which only serves to highlight the racist nature of the policy but it is just breeze passing between your ears so how will you reason.

LordReed:
Yo n u m p t y there are citizens and legal residents with the same characteristics, which only serves to highlight the racist nature of the policy but it is just breeze passing between your ears so how will you reason.

If you have have characteristics that match the individuals being found its legit to ask you questions whether you are later found innocent or guilty

If a young boy of between age 20-30 commits a crime, its not sexist to question every boy between that age range

Its basic common sense which leftists like you do not have.

All these emotional rants do not apply in real world. Its the extreme lack of logic, poor education and emotional responses

GracieX3:
How about a Sheriff's office in Los Angeles?

Was it the Sheriff office policy to do that or an individual

GracieX3:
How about a Sheriff's office in Los Angeles?

Your screenshot does not show that LASD had an official policy directing deputies to discriminate against Black or Latino people, it did not establish that every officer or the entire department was governed according to racial discrimination.

So which argument are you making?

Racist gangs operated inside LASD and leadership failed to stop them

or

LASD itself was officially governed by a race-based discriminatory policy?

Various gangs have infiltrated the police department before. From drug gangs to etc. It does not mean the police department is institutionally drug-related or systemic in that nature. It means some people who are drug dealers joined the department.

So you are not making sense.

raumdeuter:
If you have have characteristics that match the individuals being found its legit to ask you questions whether you are later found innocent or guilty

If a young boy of between age 20-30 commits a crime, its not sexist to question every boy between that age range

Its basic common sense which leftists like you do not have.

All these emotional rants do not apply in real world. Its the extreme lack of logic, poor education and emotional responses

What kind of vapidity is this? What has age and sex got to do with racism for the love of Andromeda?

LordReed:
Can you answer the question or are you just doing a useless grandstand?

Go and watch C-span. Don't be lazy.

benalvino3:
Go and watch C-span. Don't be lazy.

Bro Cspan doesn't cover crazy conspiracy theory bullshit.

LordReed:
What kind of vapidity is this? What has age and sex got to do with racism for the love of Andromeda?

Never thought I could see this type of cluelessness in real life but here we are. The left has them in huge numbers

benalvino3:
Your screenshot does not show that LASD had an official policy directing deputies to discriminate against Black or Latino people, it did not establish that every officer or the entire department was governed according to racial discrimination.

So which argument are you making?

Racist gangs operated inside LASD and leadership failed to stop them

or

LASD itself was officially governed by a race-based discriminatory policy?

Various gangs have infiltrated the police department before. From drug gangs to etc. It does not mean the police department is institutionally drug-related or systemic in that nature. It means some people who are drug dealers joined the department.

So you are not making sense.

These type of logical step by step process of thinking is too hard for them

Anything beyond ba ba black sheep is complex

raumdeuter:
I don't want Fauci to go to jail though

Nazis in their nineties were executed.
I want him on a rack with every
bone broken

LordReed:
Bro Cspan doesn't cover crazy conspiracy theory bullshit.

Good, so go and watch C-span. Don't be lazy. All Fauci did was laid out and coupled with his diary.

LordReed:
Accountability for what exactly?

What he did with AZT.what he did to beagles.
Funding covid .
Locking down the world.
He wiil die a villain.

Why was he pardoned in the first case if he is clean

raumdeuter:
Never thought I could see this type of cluelessness in real life but here we are. The left has them in huge numbers

Bro 3 fingers right back you. You would win gold medal in the clueless Olympics and if they were handing out Nobel prizes for cluelessness you'd be the first recipient.

benalvino3:
Good, so go and watch C-span. Don't be lazy. All Fauci did was laid out and coupled with his diary.

In other words you have nothing concrete to say. Got it.

basilico:
What he did with AZT.what he did to beagles.
Funding covid .
Locking down the world.
He wiil die a villain.

Why was he pardoned in the first case if he is clean

Because of baseless malicious persecution like this. Or rather conspiracy bullshit based malicious persecution as you have outlined.

raumdeuter:
If you have have characteristics that match the individuals being found its legit to ask you questions whether you are later found innocent or guilty

If a young boy of between age 20-30 commits a crime, its not sexist to question every boy between that age range

Its basic common sense which leftists like you do not have.

All these emotional rants do not apply in real world. Its the extreme lack of logic, poor education and emotional responses

Captain save-A-Racist doing his best impression of racist country bumpkin lawyer.

You may want to revisit (my fault visit, because I'm sure you've never read it) the Fourt amendment.
What you describe may or may not be sexist, but it is illegal.
Police can't stop and detain swaths of people based on demographic characteristics alone without individualized suspicion.

Like I said, I don't think I've read one intelligent post of yours.

LordReed:
In other words you have nothing concrete to say. Got it.

Do you want me to put food in your mouth as well?
Your laziness is not my problem

IjeBos:
Captain save-A-Racist doing his best impression of racist country bumpkin lawyer.

You may want to revisit (my fault visit, because I'm sure you've never read it) the Fourt amendment.
What you describe may or may not be sexist, but it is illegal.
Police can't stop and detain swaths of people based on demographic characteristics alone without individualized suspicion.

Like I said, I don't think I've read one intelligent post of yours.

Temu don lemon is here 😂😂😂

benalvino3:
Do you want me to put food in your mouth as well?
Your laziness is not my problem

LoLz. Empty barrel.

IjeBos:
Captain save-A-Racist doing his best impression of racist country bumpkin lawyer.

You may want to revisit (my fault visit, because I'm sure you've never read it) the Fourt amendment.
What you describe may or may not be sexist, but it is illegal.
Police can't stop and detain swaths of people based on demographic characteristics alone without individualized suspicion.

Like I said, I don't think I've read one intelligent post of yours.

That will be if you can read or have the intelligence to process it

raumdeuter:
These type of logical step by step process of thinking is too hard for them

Anything beyond ba ba black sheep is complex

This post though
.
Raumdeuter is talking to a dude, who writes English like it was his 3rd language, can't conjugate a basic verb, and now uses ChatGPT to write his posts because he is so embarrassed at how illiterate he is, about "anything beyond ba ba black sheep is complex".
How utterly clueless.

Oga, writing a sentence with verb tense agreement is complex for Bemeruca.t.

My gosh, I can't. God, I'm dying over here
You are jester.

LordReed:
Bro 3 fingers right back you. You would win gold medal in the clueless Olympics and if they were handing out Nobel prizes for cluelessness you'd be the first recipient.

You are quite d u ll which is why its easy to deceive you. Even an article you brought, you couldn't read properly, A perfect leftist who cannot read and make logical conclusion

raumdeuter:
That will be if you can read or have the intelligence to process it

Bwahahahah @ posting something and not even understanding it.
Jesus, you and Bemeruca have to be 2 of the most undereducated posters in this thread.

You see the part where it says "Is it legal?"
That's probably the part you should have read.
Let me help you. I circled it in red.

"A person's sex alone is generally not enough to justify detention or arrest"

raumdeuter:
You are quite d u ll which is why its easy to deceive you. Even an article you brought, you couldn't read properly, A perfect leftist who cannot read and make logical conclusion

Bro you're a n u m p t y asking ridiculous questions because it is breeze blowing between your ears. My joy though is that Quislings like you are not many or in a position to stop these people from receiving their due.