₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
Is it one sin you commit all your life?

And secondly did you not read of the kano father who said that the govt should kil his son for the murders he has committed?
https://www.nairaland.com/8602510/father-kano-murder-suspect-demands#138196002

sajb:
Very well said. I guess you're Catholic

SultanYoung:
I'm asking you as person how did it make sense

JuanDeDios:
My fairy tail book? Are you ok?

Dtruthspeaker:
And I re-ask you as a person what is the just is that you would demand be given to bandits and kidnappers if they have murdered your parents, wife and kidnapped your children as in Plateau state?

Kushites:
SHUT UP AND USE YOUR BRAIN.

GO AND RESEARCH N.D.Es BEFORE TRASHING THEM, SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY CONTRADICT YOUR ''WHITE MAN IS MY ONLY SAVIOUR'' STUPID COLONIAL INVADER RELIGION.

THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO REPORT NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCES ARE HOSPITAL PATIENTS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED DEEP ILLNESS AND HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED CLINICALLY DEAD, AND HAVE LUCKILY BEEN REVIVED, ONLY TO RECOUNT THEIR EXPERIENCE DURING THE PERIOD, IN REMARKABLY SIMILAR STORIES ACROSS VARIOUS NATIONS AND PEOPLES.

THEIR TESTIMONY IS 10000000000 TIMES MORE CREDIBLE AND WORTHY OF INVESTIGATION THAN SOME STUPID COLONIAL ''HOLY BOOK'' OF INDETERMINATE ORIGIN, BROUGHT BY FOREIGN INVADERS WHO CAME HERE TO MASSACRE YOUR PEOPLE AND LOOT YOUR RESOURCES.

DON'T USE YOU HEAD, YOU HEAR?

SultanYoung:
does that make the person to be in a furnace of fire for an forever pain and anguish??

You can't balance this scale brother if person commit a sin let him get his judgements be according to his sins

JuanDeDios:
So you don't realise that "sin" is defined by scripture? ...

geoworldedu:
That's scam. God Almighty the creator of Jehovah doesn't make a judgement after death. You already saw the reference but you chose to remain ignorant of the truth.

Dtruthspeaker:
Was there scripture to define sin when Adams, Cain's, Noah's world's sins were captured?

And is sin not a description of things we call wrong and bad ?

Dtruthspeaker:
See pain!
When the debate is lost, insults become the tool of the loser"- Socrates

And your screaming won't stop a hearsay testimony from being a very bad testimony especially when it is known that people lie! So, your brain still has work to do

Kemetian:
OH SURE...400 MILLION PEOPLE REPORTING THE SAME EXPERIENCE ARE ''LYING''.

THE ONLY TRUTH TELLER IS YOUR WHITE BRITISH COLONIAL INVADER WHO SLAUGHTERED YOUR ANCESTORS, PLUNDERED YOUR LAND FOR A CENTURY AND GAVE YOU HIS ''HOLY'' BOOK.

THE SAME ''HOLY'' BOOK WHOSE ''COMMANDMENTS'' HE COMPLETELY IGNORED WHILE ENSLAVING, ROBBING AND SLAUGHTERING YOUR ANCESTORS.

CHAI.... AFRICANS...

THE DAY YOU ARE READY TO RECOVER IS STILL FAR AHEAD.

HOPELESS.

JuanDeDios:
Captured? Ha. Captured by what naa? Scripture! No scripture, no Adam story for you. No scripture, no sin. See?

JuanDeDios:
No. Sin is not a description of things we call right and wrong. A Christian's "sin" is things called wrong by the Bible. A Moslem's "sin" is something called wrong by the Quran. A smart and objectively moral person's wrong is anything that harms someone or something. Anyway, I explained it before - if you don't understand it, I won't reply you further. If you just want to argue, no point replying you further either.

Dtruthspeaker:
Do you not have a dictionary?
cap·ture ˈ
kap-chər
2 a : to record or note something, such as a scene, mood, or quality

So, are you saying that the Bible was written even before Adam's was created and he sinned?



Are you sure you are ok?

I said sin is a description of things we call wrong and bad and first admitted that "sin is things called wrong" by Christians and Moslems then you switch over to define harm as i sure that you are the moral objective person.

Is harm, the same as sin? If not, define sin according to your objective moral person let us see.

JuanDeDios:
You're hilarious. I swear.

Dtruthspeaker:
You judge and tell us what would be the just is you would demand if they did these things directly to you.

sajb:
Very well said. I guess you're Catholic

SultanYoung:
my answer is already there if you kill you should be killed, if you chop of someone hand yours should be chop of and vice versa but the idea of a punishment with fire till eternity is a mirage and a fugazi by Religious folks trying to use fear to taunt everyone around and behind close doors they commit some of the most hideous crime humanity has ever seen.

How do you justify God destroying the whole earth with water only to spear some few folks?

How do you justify god sending devil to earth to taunt humanity into sin despite god knowing to well that he wlwas able to convince enough angles to rebel against god.

How do you justify god sending Satan to Job with all those calamity be falling Job without Job commitng any sin against god just so that god can prove a point to Satan that Job was faithful.

Answer this and let's continue from there .

Dtruthspeaker:
You are just reciting The Law and not speaking truthfully from the position of a person seeking just is for the murder of hi father, mother, wife, maybe one child.

You are speaking from the position of the guilty and you would have said that just is should be a slap on the wrist and bye bye, but you know that the world will condemn your answer because it is manifestly wrong. So you went for the safer option of reciting The Law as your least.

Whereas, since you are speaking from bias and not being Truth Full or at least balanced, therefore, you cannot appreciate the just is of this, if not you would have immediately seen that whilst he murdered 4 of your loved ones you are only taking 1 which his own life, can his life compensate you for the loss of 3 of your loved ones?

And come to think of it, does the loss of his life satisfy even the murder of the 1 loved one he took, since your loved one had no business with him, so your loved one owed him nothing, yet he came and killed your loved one? So, does his life even satisfy the murder of 1 of your loved one? NO

So, SINCE HE IS DEAD, how is he going to complete payment for the murder of your 1st loved one, before we then move to the murder of the remaining 3, for remember it must just, to the is. Not a drop more, not a drop less. So, who can extract that exactitude?

Then, don't forget, he must still pay interest aka Damages for his breach of Law. So, who can extract and exact that interest SINCE HE IS DEAD? Oya, do just is to this.

Then, don't forget the question i asked you in the beginning which is "is this the only sin/crime/offence/trespass that he has committed in his entire life?

if No, then multiply the number of times he has broken The Law, throughout his life on Earth, then count the number of persons who lay a case against him.

And if guilty, then count the number of just ises he has to pay to each and every aggrieved victim.

And then, count the number of compensation (damages) he has to pay to each and every aggrieved victim.

Count and see if your desktop computer can compute the number.

SultanYoung:
fair enough but it still doesn't compare to the punishment I. Internal Furnace not 1 year in it not 10 not 100 not 1000 not 10,000 not 100,000 but forever does that make any sense to you my brother?