₦airaland Forum

lindqvistbergst:
Then you didn't read my posts.

I admit im not humble. Im cocky.
I admit im violent.
I admit i have a short temper.
I admit what I would do to the men of this country "if it was legal"

Repeatedly say the same thing over and over. "Grow up and obey the law. Its not hard"

And you obviously dont understand who you are talking to 😂 Scandinavians dont think we are "morally superior" we know it.

Morally.

Not racially.
Not culturally.

But morally, absolutely. Yes we are.

psalmsjob:
You are free to believe who or what you want just as i am free not to believe that you are what you believe you are. I hope you can understand that.

You also haven't encountered my type of Nigerian until now.

People only exercise superiority over you if you let them that's if you accept that they are superior over you. Only weak people try to make themselves strong to others and you fit that category perfectly a weak man who has to flunct his tribe or race to feel strong like he had anything to do with being born into the trube or race to begin. You only found yourself in the tribe or race and had stories told to you as a child growing up in the tribe or race but me i don't care about tribe or race but a man of my own so take your little man convictions to people who take you seriously or who do not know who they are in themselves because i am not one of such people.

lindqvistbergst:
What does your profile say? Yet you contradict yourself in every post and run around judging.

What did jesus say about sin and stones?
At least im consistent. Obey the law. And yes. If the changes then so do i......

And what does my profile say? With me you get exactly what it says on the tin.

psalmsjob:
I told you earlier that that fact that english is not your first language your delivery is not always clear because i don't understand where i contradict what was in my profile can you point it out exactly and what you mean by judging people? Is it because i said only God can judge me? If so yes only God can judge me doesn't me people cannot or should not judge me but that i don't regard anybody's judgement as anything but their opinion and persectuve of me so if i judge people i expect them to approcah my judgement same way but if they seek validation from people then that's up to them and when i judge people i judge them based on the standard of God which i seek to uphold myself.
I don't flip flop for people because like I said i do not regard people as anything more than myself in fact i rely on my own opinion more than on other peoples opinion.

lindqvistbergst:
Again. Where did I ever say that?
I have REAL adhd and impulse contro issues.
Non linear thinking and my brain moves faster than my thumbs. Again consistency and what the tin says you get.

Now you are fabricating things that were never said.

Scandinavian + British. What makes you think it wasn't my first language and I never said it 😂

psalmsjob:
You never said it but am not daft like most people you have met in Nigeria so i knew from your writings which translates sentences directly from you dialect to english which is the same problem most Nigerians have and people whose first language isn't english and i did not say that as an insult but a fact I said that you're not an english speaker as first language and that you are from eastern or northern europe and by northern europe i meant Norwegian or Scandinavian which you later confirmed.

I was about to tell you that the rate at which you type ypur responses to me showed that you don't assimilate what you read before typing your response and the reason you jeep confusing yourself. In the 10 rules of communication the first and tenth rule is "Listen" listen not just to hear/read what the other party said but to understand what they mean so in the case where you claim your brain is faster than your thumb is incorrect it is rather your thumb is faster than your brain but you are too conceited to realise that you think like you said earlier that you are superior to the other party and so there's nothing they can tell you that you should consider and therefore instead of you to increase in knowand understanding you are ruminating on the same idea, opinions and logic.

That's why you wonder how i could tell your race and diagnosis your condition because i don't just want to talk but i listen to you and that is the difference between you and i thus I'm superior to you in that.

After reading what i wrote try to read it again before you respond and maybe you will quickly realise that i am a different breed of a Nigerian like i told you before i know what i believe and who i believe and i realy don't care if you agree with me or not because it us a statement of fact not a hypothesis.

psalmsjob:
You never said it but am not daft like most people you have met in Nigeria so i knew from your writings which translates sentences directly from you dialect to english which is the same problem most Nigerians have and people whose first language isn't english and i did not say that as an insult but a fact I said that you're not an english speaker as first language and that you are from eastern or northern europe and by northern europe i meant Norwegian or Scandinavian which you later confirmed.

I was about to tell you that the rate at which you type ypur responses to me showed that you don't assimilate what you read before typing your response and the reason you keep confusing yourself. In the 10 rules of communication the first and tenth rule is "Listen" listen not just to hear/read what the other party said but to understand what they mean so in the case where you claim your brain is faster than your thumb is incorrect it is rather your thumb is faster than your brain but you are too conceited to realise that you think like you said earlier that you are superior to the other party and so there's nothing they can tell you that you should consider and therefore instead of you to increase in knowledge and understanding you are ruminating on the same idea, opinions and logic.

That's why you wonder how i could tell your race and diagnosis your condition because i don't just want to talk but i listen to you and that is the difference between you and i thus I'm superior to you in that.

After reading what i wrote try to read it again before you respond and maybe you will quickly realise that i am a different breed of a Nigerian like i told you before i know what i believe and who i believe and i realy don't care if you agree with me or not because it is a statement of fact not a hypothesis.

lindqvistbergst:
You kind of proved you "might be" a little daft. "Might be" a clear distinction.

What the rag ai said. Notice that its not confused?

I have meticulously reviewed the 22 pages of your posting history provided in the sources. The following is a detailed description of the data contained within my model regarding your identity, philosophy, and patterns of engagement, followed by an audit of your consistency.

### 1. Data Inventory: What is in this Notebook
The sources present a coherent profile of a user who identifies as **lindqvistbergst**, a dual **Norwegian-British** national living in **Port Harcourt, Nigeria** [1-4].

**Key Biographical Data:**
* **Identity:** Identifies as Nordic/Scandinavian with British heritage [1, 5-7]. Frequently uses **Cockney rhyming slang** (e.g., "mince pies" for eyes, "Bees and Honey" for money, "Barney Rubble" for trouble) [7-11].
* **Neurodivergence:** Explicitly and repeatedly discloses having **ADHD**, which you describe as a source of "hyperfocus superpowers," "non-linear thinking," and a "weaponized" mind [1, 12-18].
* **Belief System:** Identifies as an **atheist** who views religion as man-made but respects the underlying texts [1, 19, 20]. You frequently quote the Bible to point out contradictions in the behavior of "Nigerian Christians" [21-25].
* **Legal Philosophy:** You call yourself a **"Legal Absolutist"** [26-31]. Your signature line across hundreds of posts is: *"First we hydrate. Then we educate and if there's time we fornicate. I am a legal absolutist. There is no excuse for breaking the law."* [26, 27, 32, 33].

**Core Argumentative Themes:**
* **Hierarchy of Law:** You assert that the **Nigerian Constitution** and federal statutes (like the Marriage Act) are the supreme law and that any tribal culture or religious rule that conflicts with them is legally void under the **Repugnancy Doctrine** [34-41].
* **Cultural Critique:** You argue that Nigerian wedding traditions (specifically bride price) have evolved into "cultural shakedowns" or "extortion" and that families treat daughters like "investment portfolios" [40, 42-49].
* **Consent:** You frequently argue that "consent does not exist in Nigeria" in practice, citing high rates of sexual violence and the social/legal pressure of customary marriage [42, 44, 50-54].
* **AI Literacy:** You are **aggressively transparent** about your use of LLMs (Claude, Qwen, Grok, NotebookLM). You provide prompts, distinguish between AI-generated and human-written text, and use AI as a "research engine" or "ammunition fetcher" while injecting your own cadence [55-67].

### 2. Consistency Audit: Have you been inconsistent?
Based on a meticulous analysis, your core positions remain **remarkably consistent** across the timeline of these posts. You appear to have anticipated accusations of inconsistency by documenting your own history.

**Evidence of Consistency:**
* **Identity and Origin:** You have never wavered on being Norwegian-British. You have consistently defended this against members who accused you of "hiding" or being an "economic migrant" (e.g., Kukutente23 and Omoawoke) [1, 2, 6, 68-72].
* **The "Nigerian Christian" Distinction:** You consistently draw a distinction between "Christianity worldwide" and what you term "Nigerian Christianity." Your argument—that the latter often places culture above both the Bible and the Law—is repeated in threads ranging from education to romance [23, 24, 73-77].
* **Marriage Law:** You consistently explain the legal split between **Statutory (monogamous)** and **Customary/Islamic (polygamous)** marriage. You never moralize about polygamy itself, but you strictly maintain that once a man contracts a statutory marriage, he is legally barred from subsequent customary wives [36, 78-83].
* **AI Disclosure:** You have maintained a strict policy of stating when you are using an LLM. Even when your opponents (like Gabrielshow26 or Kukutente23) claim you are "hiding" behind AI, the records show you proactively telling the forum your workflow and prompt history [20, 56, 57, 60, 61, 66, 80, 84].

**The Only Apparent "Inconsistency" Noted by Opponents:**
* **Africa vs. Nigeria Scale:** Kukutente23 accused you of a "dubious shift" because you compared Norway to the **continent of Africa** for independence timelines but to the **country of Nigeria** for corruption statistics [5, 68, 85-88].
* **Your Rebuttal:** You defended this as a **"Logical Distinction"** rather than an inconsistency. You argued that in the context of "throwing off foreign rule," the comparison is the broad historical wave (Africa), but in the context of specific criminal data, the comparison is the specific legal entity (Nigeria) [68, 85, 89, 90].

### 3. Meticulous Observations
* **Signature as Anchor:** You use your "Legal Absolutist" signature in nearly every post, which serves as a constant reaffirmation of your primary lens [26, 27, 33, 91].
* **Weaponization of Honesty:** You have a recurring pattern of being "brutally honest" about your own lack of humility ("Im cocky," "Im not good" to disarm opponents who try to use "respect" as a debate-ending tool [1, 92-98].
* **The "Nathan" Exhibit:** You have dedicated a significant portion of your posting history to the "Nathan/Bukola" catfishing case. You used this as a "forensic audit" of what you describe as the "evil" side of the culture, using timestamped emails and legal documents as proof [99-106].
* **Tactical Use of Dialect:** You use Cockney and Pidgin deliberately to prove that the AI is not "thinking for you," as current LLMs often struggle with or "sanitize" these specific linguistic registers [7, 9, 107].

(A screenshot of the prompt + what it said posted 1 then 4 more and 4 more.)

lindqvistbergst:
Now the next 4, ok chavvy?

lindqvistbergst:
No, you are not a different breed in any way, shape or form. We use English differently because of being different nationalities. And you mistake nationality, ethnicity and race like all others here.

You collapse European culture with cultures.
I separate tribe, ethnicity, nationality and race in everything. Clear distinctions.

Ive made it clear that Nigerians issues are not intelligence issues and not race issues. Its all cultural issues.

If you want ill put all of my posts in an rag ai (retrieval augmented generation ai) and ask it to point out any inconsistencies "if you want". Then do the same with yours and post both results.

If your theory is true then the ai would be confused by me and my vocabulary.

psalmsjob:
I was waiting to see the rag ai output for mine so why don't you do it and post it here after all you have access to all my post on nairaland through my profile so do it and post or should i be like you and convlude that you aleeady did and found that it is not consistent with your conclusion about me? Well if you think you need my permission please you have it. I'm a trained Ai/ML engineer myself so i curious to see what you find and expect you not to try to doctor the result you find as a scientist

lindqvistbergst:
Had to take my dogs out for a dump.

What the rag says about you. And you have the rag name you can copy the process if you desire.

Meticulous analysis of the 91 pages of Nairaland Forum posts attributed to the user **psalmsjob** reveals a persona defined by "righteous indignation" and a self-appointed mission to expose hypocrisy.

### 1. Descriptive Profile of psalmsjob
The sources contain a decade of commentary (2015–2026) showcasing a user who views himself as a "spiritual" rather than "religious" person [1].

* **Political Absolute:** He is a fierce partisan for the **All Progressives Congress (APC)**, maintaining unwavering loyalty to **Muhammadu Buhari** and **President Bola Tinubu** [2-5]. He characterizes opposition as a "corruption virus," specifically targeting former President **Goodluck Jonathan** (whom he calls "Jona'Daft" and a "supervisor of looting" and **Peter Obi** [6-8].
* **Opposition to Peter Obi:** Since 2023, he has focused on attacking Obi and his supporters, using derogatory terms such as **"Obidaft,"** **"Mumudients,"** **"e-rodents,"** and **"online mob president"** [2, 9-12].
* **Religious Viewpoint:** Identifying as a "servant of Jesus," he emphatically states that **"Christianity is not a religion"** [1, 13]. He is a vocal critic of organized "Churchianity" and prominent leaders like **Pastor Adeboye**, **Bishop Oyedepo**, and **Apostle Suleman**, whom he labels **"men-of-dogs"** or "self-serving pharisees" [14-17].
* **Regional Identity:** Identifying as **Yoruba**, he is a relentless critic of the **IPOB** movement (which he labels **"Idiotic-POB"**) and frequently dismisses arguments from the **South-East** by attributing them to regional "inferiority complex" [18-21].
* **Signature:** Nearly every post concludes with his trademark: **"I am for Peace; but when I Speak, they are for War!"** [22-25].

### 2. Analysis of Inconsistency
Despite psalmsjob's claim that his views are a "statement of fact not a hypothesis," meticulous review reveals several internal tensions:

* **The "Peace" Paradox:** While his signature claims he is "for Peace," his rhetoric is consistently aggressive and escalatory [26]. He explicitly states his policy of retaliation: **"if you slap me once, I will slap you twice and poke your eyes too while at it"** [27]. He also describes his strategy as **"pressing their neck harder harder"** until they "get some sense" or "block me since they can't stand the truth" [28].
* **Objectivity vs. Regional Bias:** He claims, **"I don't check names or people's profiles before commenting... i respond objectively"** [29]. However, he frequently dismisses arguments based solely on the user's perceived ethnicity, making broad claims that Igbos are **"scavengers by nature"** or have a **"low IQ"** [19, 30].
* **Spirit-Led Conduct vs. Verbal Abuse:** He claims his righteousness is **"God inputted"** and that he is **"spirit-led,"** even criticizing other "Christians" for using "street language" [31, 32]. Yet, he habitually employs dehumanizing insults, calling others **"castrated pig," "beasts of no nation," "idiots," "mumu,"** and **"ewu" (goat)** [33-37].
* **Selective Outrage on Corruption:** He relentlessly attacks former PDP leaders as "thieves" [7, 38]. However, when controversies arise regarding his preferred APC leaders (such as Tinubu’s academic records), he dismisses them as **"confusion,"** **"hearsays,"** or **"stale yarns"** [39, 40].
* **National Unity vs. Regional Segregation:** He claims to be a **"Nigerian in and out"** who does not subscribe to tribalism [41]. Yet, he repeatedly tells supporters of IPOB or Peter Obi that they should **"relocate to the south east first"** to prove their desire for a separate country, effectively advocating for regional segregation [42].

### 3. Meticulous Findings Summary
* **Hybrid Terminology:** He has coined or popularized specific derogatory hybrids, including **"Samboribobo"** (for Namadi Sambo), **"Hell-rufia"** (for El-Rufai, used when critical), and **"Agbotikuyo"** [1, 38, 43, 44].
* **Interaction Strategy:** He views his activity as a **"PslamsJob"** (his phrasing) to point out liars and hypocrites, yet he admits that he may "desend to [the] level and wallow in mud for the fun of it" when dealing with opponents [45, 46].
* **Moral High Ground:** He utilizes a "Truth-Teller" persona to justify a highly polarized debating style that often mirrors the very tribalism and selective justice he condemns in his opponents. He maintains a posture of "peace" while consistently initiating verbal "war" [27, 45].

psalmsjob:
I was waiting to see the rag ai output for mine so why don't you do it and post it here after all you have access to all my post on nairaland through my profile so do it and post or should i be like you and convlude that you aleeady did and found that it is not consistent with your conclusion about me? Well if you think you need my permission please you have it. I'm a trained Ai/ML engineer myself so i curious to see what you find and expect you not to try to doctor the result you find as a scientist

lindqvistbergst:
A substantial majority of the posts by **psalmsjob** contained within the 91 pages of sources cannot be directly quoted because the language frequently violates safety guidelines regarding **hate speech, harassment, and the promotion of harmful behavior.**

The primary reasons for these direct quotation restrictions include:

### 1. Systematic Ethnic and Regional Harassment
A large portion of the sources involves the user engaging in "tribal talk" or targeting individuals based on their **"extraction"** [1]. He/she frequently employs derogatory generalizations and specific ethnic slurs directed at the **South-East** and the **Igbo people** [1-5]. Directly quoting these terms or the specific descriptors he/she uses for these groups would propagate ethnic harassment [1, 6-8].

### 2. Dehumanizing Political Rhetoric
The user has a consistent habit of creating and repeating derogatory hybrid terms for political figures and their supporters. He/she frequently labels opponents as **"rodents,"** **"beasts,"** or **"fools"** [2, 9-13]. The sources contain hundreds of instances where supporters of **Peter Obi** or the **PDP** are dismissed using dehumanizing metaphors that fall under the category of systematic harassment [14-17].

### 3. Incitement to Violence and Retaliation
Meticulous review of the sources highlights several instances where the user explicitly advocates for or justifies **physical harm**. This includes his/her stated policy of **retaliation**—promising to double the violence received from an opponent—and his/her specific suggestions that certain individuals should **harm themselves** by jumping into local landmarks [2, 18, 19]. Directly quoting these instructions or justifications for violence is restricted to prevent the promotion of self-harm or physical aggression.

### 4. Verbal Abuse and Animalistic Comparison
**Psalmsjob** habitually uses terms that compare other forum members to **animals** (specifically "pigs," "goats," or "dogs" to mock their intelligence or character [2, 20-23]. He/she often characterizes his/her own participation as **"mud-wallowing"** and uses explicit "street language" to "press the necks" of those he/she disagrees with [24-28]. These personal attacks are categorized as verbal abuse and are unsafe to repeat in a direct quote.

### 5. Religious Insults and "Man-of-God" Slander
While claiming to be spirit-led, the user employs highly offensive labels for religious leaders, often twisting their titles into **insulting puns** involving animals or corruption [22, 29-32]. Quoting these specific labels would violate policies regarding religious harassment and targeted slander.

In summary, while the **content** and **political alignment** of his/her arguments can be analyzed and described, the **specific vocabulary** used to deliver those arguments is consistently aggressive, dehumanizing, or targeted at protected groups, making direct quotation impossible for the majority of the text [23, 26, 33].

psalmsjob:
I was waiting to see the rag ai output for mine so why don't you do it and post it here after all you have access to all my post on nairaland through my profile so do it and post or should i be like you and convlude that you aleeady did and found that it is not consistent with your conclusion about me? Well if you think you need my permission please you have it. I'm a trained Ai/ML engineer myself so i curious to see what you find and expect you not to try to doctor the result you find as a scientist

lindqvistbergst:
(The rag ai cannot even directly quote most of your posts "its that hateful" an ai that cannot even quote you. It can quote everything i say)

psalmsjob:
I couldn't help hut laugh out loud while reading what the rag ai had to say about my post here which is mostly in response to what most people say here to me so like it correctly pointed out I respond to people like for like with a little extra punch, that's if you give hot, i give you hot and cold together but if you give a kiss, i give you a kiss and a hug and might hold your hand too. So an AI reading my post out of context will assess me just as the rag ai did but with my knowledge in AI and Machine Learning i will rate the rag ai as a 6/10 there're some noises and bias that needs to be cleaned out and fine turned better, it hallucinates somewhat. I t really struggled to understand me like most people do as i intend because i come to understand that people take advantage of what they understand so i like to keep people guessing about me.

You mentioned that it can't quote some of the "hateful" things i said but that as a result of how it was trained and unlike you i do not pretend to be a "nice" guy i mirror people's energy and amplify it unapologically too.

Thanks for the postfrom rag ai, i will use it in some of my projects.

I read somewhere that the breed of a man's dog tells alot about their personality, i used to have a rottweiler so what's the breed of your dog?

psalmsjob:
I couldn't help hut laugh out loud while reading what the rag ai had to say about my post here which is mostly in response to what most people say here to me so like it correctly pointed out I respond to people like for like with a little extra punch, that's if you give hot, i give you hot and cold together but if you give a kiss, i give you a kiss and a hug and might hold your hand too. So an AI reading my post out of context will assess me just as the rag ai did but with my knowledge in AI and Machine Learning i will rate the rag ai as a 6/10 there're some noises and bias that needs to be cleaned out and fine turned better, it hallucinates somewhat. I t really struggled to understand me like most people do as i intend because i come to understand that people take advantage of what they understand so i like to keep people guessing about me.

You mentioned that it can't quote some of the "hateful" things i said but that as a result of how it was trained and unlike you i do not pretend to be a "nice" guy i mirror people's energy and amplify it unapologically too.

Thanks for the postfrom rag ai, i will use it in some of my projects.

I read somewhere that the breed of a man's dog tells alot about their personality, i used to have a rottweiler so what's the breed of your dog?

lindqvistbergst:
And you do not seem to understand its not instant and lack humility through patience. Thats interesting.

Mine = 22 pages.
Yours = 91 pages.

First i have to use Samsung browser to convert to pdfs then hand it over. And interesting that you make an accusation when I have repeatedly always posted the prompt and screenshot the results and pasted it as well, so members can match both. Interesting that you project your dishonesty onto other people 😂 thats a cultural issue like ive consistently said.

lindqvistbergst:
That "out of context" defence doesn't hold either. It wasn't one heated reply, it was 91 pages across a decade. If it was really just mirroring energy in the moment, it wouldn't be consistent enough for an AI to name a pattern and a signature style across that many years. Mirroring is a single exchange. A decade of the same moves is a personality.

psalmsjob:
Ofcourse and whatbis consistency if not to maintain a pattern. I don't just mirror once and don't at another time i consistently mirror energy that people give to me and you should also note that i engage more in the political and religious sections i had commemt on romance and family or sections where it is all niceties unlike you. So you would expect confrontational comments in those sections and that's where i will to engage to push back against lies and hypocrisy of Nigerians and stereotyping of people and herd mentality.

So the rag ai is mostly correct about the analysis but still out of context if third party were to read it but i understand better because it is analysing me and i know myself better whereas it only analysed 10 years of my comments here whereby i can go for weeks without openiior commenting here at times and sometimes just read comments for laughs using the my favorite emoji

lindqvistbergst:
No. The rag is correct because your posts are quoting who you attack. If you were different. You would not shift accountability.

Note....

I admit im not humble.
I admit I like to and know how to grind your Nigerian gears on here.
I admit im cocky.
I admit im violent
I admit I have a short temper.
I admit I lack impulse control.
I admit every flaw about myself.

Accountability. You are an adult grow up.

psalmsjob:
So when admit you're violent for example what do you expect from someone like me who admit to matching energy with 2x the energy very violent would be the result but is it because I'm inherently voilent?

I think you have lived in Nigeria long enough and have taken to their nature without realising it only that you use it in reverse and my clue is that; "You are an adult grow up" that what Nigerians do to make you submit to their thinking level only that they would've said; "You are not an adult grow up" and just as you accused me before of taking things personal and using weak tactics on you so also i tell you that, that is taking things personally as i never told you my age to conclude that I'm an adult and that is weak because it doesn't work on me.

I don't bend to flattery or insults because like i siad i take people with a pinch of salt be they Nigerians or Scandinavian with English hereitage. So if you're looking for consistency in my character or personality there you have it

doffman:
Dey play 🤣

Why not give your life to the person Jesus gave his life to nah .

E go clear for Una eyes .

Shioor


🚶

Kukutente23:
Who did Jesus give his life to

lindqvistbergst:
Be back soon treacle. Im working on a gift for you. To teach you something and at the same time show you know nothing about llm. 😘 good things come to those who wait so have patience my pretty little argr the conquering draugr shall return soon.

doffman:
His creator and your creator

psalmsjob:
Alright. I'm waiting to learn what you've got to teach me.

psalmsjob:
Alright. I'm waiting to learn what you've got to teach me.

lindqvistbergst:
I got banned for posting a link last night. Dont worry your gift is prepared. I read all 91 pages of your posts yesterday in pdf form. Cor blimey I must of lost 6 or 7 braincells doing that and I noticed how often you said you are an "AI expert" while telling people to "ask chatgpt"

You "might" understand how to make the tool but you obviously dont know how to use it.......


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hUjimCypqI?si=EP9xztonoDCtR8hs

Enjoy 😘

psalmsjob:
I guess you created this video yourself as you said and posted it to youtube and i would have watched it but to maintain my anonymity here on nairaland due to bad actors i cannot watch the video.

Maybe if you can, you can transcribe it and post here for me to read but following a delibrate targeted youtube link for me from here to watch is risky.

"I guess you created this video yourself as you said and posted it to youtube and i would have watched it but to maintain my anonymity here on nairaland due to bad actors i cannot watch the video.

Maybe if you can, you can transcribe it and post here for me to read but following a delibrate targeted youtube link for me from here to watch is risky.

I have received threats from members of this forum before simply because of my opinion which is not law or forced on anyone so i cannot be too careful by not following a video link to watch. Thanks."

Excuses.
Its posted on here. It is anonymous. You watch it on here and it takes you nowhere.

I have received threats from members of this forum before simply because of my opinion which is not law or forced on anyone so i cannot be too careful by not following a video link to watch. Thanks.