Similar concept trying to kidnap the president and launching nuclear missiles.

I love both movies, I saw them within hours of each other.


Which one do you prefer?

You saw them both, you had fun, you liked them - simple!

Who cares which was better? Kinda pointless; since these things are always subjective.

Olympus Has Fallen, by a slim margin though.

White house down,i would say, cus it was abit cocky,olympus is over serious..which is good bt nt in all instance..all are good sha

Olympus was too serious, completely by the book and a lot of people died but white-house had a bit of comedy to it


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74F_pts7Uhg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AXbiCdmXgw

How can anybody compare them. White house down is a joke wit a pretty boy lead character that was scarcely believable. Imagine Jamie fox in white sneakers running around as president. That white house lawn car chase scene was rubbish. Olympus was way better. Butler was dope

Olympus has fallen to me is the movie of the year so far...

How I wish they gave the leading role to Bruce Willis

I could see the comparison but Jamie Fox acting the role of a US President was a joke, interviewing for the security job in the white house is another joke.

But in reality a plan by the North Korean activists flew all the way to white house without been challenged is a no no, they would have blown it out of the sky before it reaches anywhere near the white house

VillageBoi:


You saw them both, you had fun, you liked them - simple!

Who cares which was better? Kinda pointless; since these things are always subjective.

true.


the thinking is too linear.