This is the wonderful work of your god. Don't watch if you are too emotional.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bwvp4DZO0Y

I love hyenas.

AlfaSeltzer:
This is the wonderful work of your god. Don't watch if you are too emotional.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bwvp4DZO0Y

I love hyenas.

It could have been you the hyenas are feasting on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xdA9fvZqg0

Hyenas are awesome. No mercy. Isn't god great?

PastorKun:


It could have been you the hyenas are feasting on

that would be your xtian wet dream come true.

you should see them take on baby elephants. taste b better warm n fresh. so decreed god.. a.bi una like c.old food?

The excuse is that all animals ate plants before "the fall", "man's sin" brought death...

davien:
The excuse is that all animals ate plants before "the fall", "man's sin" brought death...

So they suffer for our sins too?

I don tire...

wiegraf:


So they suffer for our sins too?

I don tire...

Yup, "man's sin" doomed everything...animate and inanimate according to Christianity...

No biggie. it is the law of the jungle. The Hyenas did not kill out of hatred (perhaps only humans kill out of hatred), they killed because they had to feed. It isn't about wickedness or cruelty, it is the instinct to feed and nothing more. The struggle by the pregnant Zebra and the injured wildebeest meant nothing to the predators who had to feed, conscious reasoning would have pitied the preys, but in the jungle, instinct rules.

The predators weren't merciless, they are incapable of being either merciful or merciless, they only obeyed the rules by which they live, the instinctual rule of the wild.

Unlike atheists and satanists who consciously and deliberately deny the existence of their creator, human hyenas, they deny because they want the freedom to act instinctively like the wild hyenas, free from the shackles of reason and conscious morality.

MrPresident1:


Unlike atheists and satanists who consciously and deliberately deny the existence of their creator, human hyenas, they deny because they want the freedom to act instinctively like the wild hyenas, free from the shackles of reason and conscious morality.

And which creator would that be? The Muslim one? Or the Christian one?

Weah96:


And which creator would that be? The Muslim one? Or the Christian one?

It appears you have water in the place of brains.

James 1:27
Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

MrPresident1:
No biggie. it is the law of the jungle. The Hyenas did not kill out of hatred (perhaps only humans kill out of hatred), they killed because they had to feed. It isn't about wickedness or cruelty, it is the instinct to feed and nothing more. The struggle by the pregnant Zebra and the injured wildebeest meant nothing to the predators who had to feed, conscious reasoning would have pitied the preys, but in the jungle, instinct rules.

The predators weren't merciless, they are incapable of being either merciful or merciless, they only obeyed the rules by which they live, the instinctual rule of the wild.

Unlike atheists and satanists who consciously and deliberately deny the existence of their creator, human hyenas, they deny because they want the freedom to act instinctively like the wild hyenas, free from the shackles of reason and conscious morality.

You miss the point totally.
Is your god also incapable of mercy? What was going through your god's head when he created animals that eat others alive? Couldn't your consciously merciful omni omni god devise another way for hyenas to feed? If African wild life was the best your omni god can do, how useless is he!

AlfaSeltzer:
This is the wonderful work of your god. Don't watch if you are too emotional.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bwvp4DZO0Y

I love hyenas.

Couldn't watch that,even tho Yahweh/Allah loved it.

MrPresident1:


It appears you have water in the place of brains.

James 1:27
Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.

What is this? When was the last time you showed up at an orphanage?

AlfaSeltzer:


You miss the point totally.
Is your god also incapable of mercy? What was going through your god's head when he created animals that eat others alive? Couldn't your consciously merciful omni omni god devise another way for hyenas to feed? If African wild life was the best your omni god can do, how useless is he!

Still, what's your point?

^^ DON'T FEED THE TROLLS^^

italo:
Still, what's your point?

that no intelligent, compassionate, omnipotent being created such horror.

oluwalfa:


that no intelligent, compassionate, omnipotent being created such horror.

So such horror could have been created by a being not intelligent, compassionate and omnipotent?

That's okay for me.

I'll just take it you have the wrong idea of "compassionate, intelligent, omnipotent."

italo:
So such horror could have been created by a being not intelligent, compassionate and omnipotent?

That's okay for me.

I'll just take it you have the wrong idea of "compassionate, intelligent, omnipotent."

You want me to admit to the idea of a creator? if it makes you happy. But I can only show people that believe the creation nonsense the reality of creatures. A reasonable person cannot associate the idea of a compassionate loving god with the realities of its creation. But then, if xtians were reasonable, there wouldn't be xtians.

MrPresident1:

The predators weren't merciless, they are incapable of being either merciful or merciless, they only obeyed the rules by which they live, the instinctual rule of the wild.

And according to your brand of religion this attribute was their "design"...to kill anything else living on sight...

Unlike atheists and satanists who consciously and deliberately deny the existence of their creator, human hyenas, they deny because they want the freedom to act instinctively like the wild hyenas, free from the shackles of reason and conscious morality.

Linking satanism and atheism as though they represent the same clade is willfully dishonest of you.....
Atheists do not deny the existence of a creator/creators...as no such things as a "creator/creators" have ever been established from the onset.
It is the unvalidated claims of the existence of a "creator/creators" that is rejected..until such claims can be justified...
And simply because of this skepticism towards your theistic claims you've tagged atheists as "human hyena's" who you claim want to be free from the "shackles of reason and conscious morality"...
And yet these atheists that you claim want to be free from "reason and conscious morality" didn't fly that plane into the world trade centre, nor instituted a "holy crusade" to wipe out all heretics, nor restrained peoples rights.
It is a person like yourself who would claim a moral standard on issues and yet cannot differentiate when something is good from evil just because it was written to have been done by your "god" ...

AlfaSeltzer:


You want me to admit to the idea of a creator? if it makes you happy. But I can only show people that believe the creation nonsense the reality of creatures. A reasonable person cannot associate the idea of a compassionate loving god with the realities of its creation. But then, if xtians were reasonable, there wouldn't be xtians.

You're still saying God probably created the world but he is not loving and compassionate?

I'd just take it you have the wrong idea of "compassion" and "love."

davien:
And according to your brand of religion this attribute was their "design"...to kill anything else living on sight...
Linking satanism and atheism as though they represent the same clade is willfully dishonest of you.....
Atheists do not deny the existence of a creator/creators...as no such things as a "creator/creators" have ever been established from the onset.
It is the unvalidated claims of the existence of a "creator/creators" that is rejected..until such claims can be justified...
And simply because of this skepticism towards your theistic claims you've tagged atheists as "human hyena's" who you claim want to be free from the "shackles of reason and conscious morality"...
And yet these atheists that you claim want to be free from "reason and conscious morality" didn't fly that plane into the world trade centre, nor instituted a "holy crusade" to wipe out all heretics, nor restrained peoples rights.
It is a person like yourself who would claim a moral standard on issues and yet cannot differentiate when something is good from evil just because it was written to have been done by your "god" ...

Atheists in Soviet Union killed millions in their bid to stamp out religion.

Atheists in North Korea and China continue to do the same today.

The crusades wasn't to wipe out heretics. It was to primarily defend Christians.

I guess if there was a crusade against ISIS today, satanists like you would claim 1000 years from now that it was to wipe out heretics...just to discredit the Church.

And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing,......
.
.
.
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

italo:
Atheists in Soviet Union killed millions in their bid to stamp out religion.

That was fascism with a dash of communism not atheism...atheists reject the concepts...not the followers of religion.
killing millions has nothing to do with atheism nor being an atheist....

Atheists in North Korea and China continue to do the same today.

North korea is a dictator-like regime....not atheist,china you could say secular....then again does not equate to atheism...the same way you can be humanist and still be a theist...
Again,killing has nothing to do with atheism nor being an atheist...

The crusades wasn't to wipe out heretics. It was to primarily defend Christians.

And they burnt people alive because?...why did crusaders burn entire families alive?

I guess if there was a crusade against ISIS today, satanists like you would claim 1000 years from now that it was to wipe out heretics...just to discredit the Church.

For my skepticism i'm a "satanist"?
This is ofcourse coming from a person who believes in an absolute moral standard
And christians were the ISIS back in the day....ostricizing anyone who doesn't think the same way or believe as they do...
Even now....according to you,i'm a "satanist" for not believing....

italo:


You're still saying God probably created the world but he is not loving and compassionate?

I'd just take it you have the wrong idea of "compassion" and "love."

Maybe the person that called you a troll was right.

Goshen360:
And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing,......
.
.
.
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Sounds like things one would hear in the corridors of a mental asylum.

AlfaSeltzer:


Sounds like things one would hear in the corridors of a mental asylum.

Maybe the one whose mental capability is in order should think more if he's God's creation and had not killed even a fly and judge by the same standard. . Quit disgracing yourself all over the world wide web.

Goshen360:


Maybe the one whose mental capability is in order should think more if he's God's creation and had not killed even a fly and judge by the same standard. . Quit disgracing yourself all over the world wide web.

And got doesn't mind when flies are killed? his perfect creation just destroyed like that? and he does nothing about it. mumu god?

italo and goshen360, what do you think about the videos?
Are those hyenas honouring god by eating the raw rear end of live pregnant mothers?

AlfaSeltzer:


You want me to admit to the idea of a creator? if it makes you happy. But I can only show people that believe the creation nonsense the reality of creatures. A reasonable person cannot associate the idea of a compassionate loving god with the realities of its creation. But then, if xtians were reasonable, there wouldn't be xtians.

Are you a vegetarian?

Thugnificent:
Are you a vegetarian?

no