APC has taken Nigerians, the people they promise to represent their intrest completely forgranted. Do you represent a people by forcing and ramming your personal opinion down their spines? Does the people you intend to represent have a voice? Do they have any right at all to make any impute on how they choose to be represented? In trying to profer pertinent answers to these salient questions, let us review the attitude of the CHANGE propagandists towards the demands of Nigerians with respect to the just concluded presidential debate. It will be pertinent here to recall one the most profound master pieces of public speach wich advocates "obidience before complaints." Did the change propagandists recognise it? But if we are not bothered by these questions, what about the disrespect metted out to Nigerians by the manner of impunity of a group advocating change to its people by not minding what they wanted or how they would feel about it. Having disrespected Nigerians, they deemed it fit to conjure an incomprehensive excuse, bereft of facts to exonorate their incompetence. What a change?

You don;t know what change is if you until you have met APC

voltron:
You don;t know what change is if you until you have met APC

No doubt. I'm begining to decode the actual meaning of change by the APC's manifesto. And by what we have on the papers, it's quite an undesirable change. What we need after all is progress instead of an ambigious change

You are bothering your mind over the changes APC is preaching but not about the disgrace Mr. Joe brought on your party and his supporters by cheating during the national debate yesterday.