₦airaland Forum

Soreza:
VERY STUPID AND UNPROFESSIONAL ACT,SAHARA SHOULD LEARN FROM CHANNELS AND PROTECT NIGERIA'S INTEREST NOT WESTERN INTEREST,WE ARE NO PUPPETS FOR THE WEST,IF I WAS THERE I WOULD HAVE PERSONALLY SLAPPED THAT GIRL,AND APOLOGISE TO MUGABE ON NIGERIA'S BEHALF.SAHARA SHOULD GO AND ASK QUEEN ELIZABETH WHY SHE IS STILL ON POWER TILL TODAY AND CONTROLS THE UK.

Typical African fuuktard.

Guyman02:
Very idiotic western paid propagandist calling herself a journalist. She was partisan in asking him to step down and embrace democracy, there was nothing journalistic about her conduct and should be banned from official presidential engagements in order not to embarrass the country further.

What she deserves is promotion rather

justwise:
[/b]

What she deserves is promotion rather

Rubbish! Do you think a journalist with Channels will behave like that? Evry politician in Nigeria wants to be interviewed by Channels because they have displayed real journalistic ethics, even the British Foreign Minister was interviewed by them at that event and other Heads of State and prominent Nigerians inclusive not this gutter journalism called Sahara Reporters. Mugabe was President Buharis guest and nobody has the right to harass the Presidents guest.

Guyman02:
Rubbish! Do you think a journalist with Channels will behave like that? Evry politician in Nigeria wants to be interviewed by Channels because they have displayed real journalistic ethics, even the British Foreign Minister was interviewed by them at that event and other Heads of State and prominent Nigerians inclusive not this gutter journalism called Sahara Reporters. Mugabe was President Buharis guest and nobody has the right to harass the Presidents guest.

We have patronizing journalists who are afraid of offending these dictators then we have Sahara Reporters a non-PC journalists who ask some searching questions that every peace loving African wants to ask and politicians like Mugabe fear them. There is noting wrong with their behavior, credit to them.

EMANY01:
Nice to meet someone from FUTA on Nairaland .

hahahahaha, nice to meet u too. I'm an alumni though. Perhaps you know the kegite guy i was referring too.

Not a bad one, but these Sahara reporters razz! This is Africa and watever you do, you do with respect

nollywoodbabe:
Your reply already shows you are not even willing to Learn.... I know what I am talking about, not just the British Press many Foreign Press do a lot more than that... Even little Aisha of CNN go watch how she Conducted her Interview with President Jonathan, even when they were both sitting, and you will weep for Jonathan... SR were not Harassing Mugabe, they were doing their Jobs trying to Bring a Difficult answer to the Rest of the World.. Maybe when you travel the world or reside and Grew up outside Africa, you would be more exposed to these, Until then, I am not ready to argue with you cos you have already made up your mind. Thank you

Lol, I should be the one asking you if you have ever left ya village hut...and perhaps cos you had a few glimpse of paparazzi here and there, you think that's what the foreign press do, no? Heckle and harass dignitaries at events, with ridiculous questions, no? And do you even know the difference between paparazzi and professional journalism? Based on the way you put words together, I doubt you finished secondary school. Ditto all the odious and despicable louts on this thread supporting this utter inane show of shame. I doubt these folks have ever been in a professional setting in their pathetic lives.

It isn't shocking cos most of you are loud and you lack fundamental interpersonal skills, hence some naija woman had her mouth bloodied on a bus in London the other day. But I shall keep educating you obnoxious monkeys till you learn and see the reason why a lot of folks can't stand Nigerians.

Now let me proceed: do you even know the difference between an organised interview session, and unnecessary impromptu heckling? And did Aisha Sesay heckle GEJ at an event he was invited to, or was the interview organised?

And again: cite any example where British journalists ever acted the way this despicable riff raff acted like a raving monkey at an event organised by Downing Street, in the UK, with leaders from other countries?

Alphaoscar:
That is crass stupidity on her part. The venue , occasion, the manner and the language deployed are totally wron. That is a very wrong way of conduct.

[size=14pt]....is there a right way to communicate with a tyrant?
I think she was bold, afterall this may be the best and only opportunity for that.
If you like carry camera go Zimbabwe go ask dat kin question,
you go see Wetin no dey do you![/size]

Plss did anybody hear...where is dat Zuma sef *Lmao

justwise:
[b]

Violence, intimidation, harassment and rigging toke place.

Why haven't his people thrown him out? The same reason Iraqi or Libyans could not throw Saddam or Gaddafi out for many years

same always happen in Nigerian elections, so why haven't they been treated the same way?

slimmy05:
same always happen in Nigerian elections, so why haven't they been treated the same way?

They have to start somewhere when the opportunity presented itself

Sagamite:
Typical cretinous African black monkey!

You are a nasty animal to use such racist language here. The whites you worship call you the same thing to your back yet like a brainless dunce, you regurgitate the same vomit when addressing Africans.

Henry120:
Yes, it is all about land re-distribution, as much as it is about sanctions. We just cannot exclude them.

By 1994 when he was still very much a darling of the west and a knight of the british empire, he had already spent 14 years in power. Why wasn't their a demonisation of mugabe then, I mean by the standards of most countries he had done the maximum 8 years, or 10 in the Southern-Africa region, so he should have left power.


There might have been many cases of intimidation in Zimbabwe, however the fact is, the Zanu-PF still enjoys sweeping support in Zimbabwe, same as mugabe.

Do you think our imperialist influenced, BBC conditioned brethren here know anything about these details? They don't actually realise Mugabe is very popular in his country especially in the rural areas where the majority live, whose lives have been transformed for the better by the land redistribution program. That's why they keep voting him in. BBC always accepted those results until Mugabe began the land redistribution program. Thereafter all his electoral victories were "rigged" according to them.

ROSSIKE:
Do you think our imperialist influenced, BBC conditioned brethren here know anything about these details? They don't actually realise Mugabe is very popular in his country especially in the rural areas where the majority live, whose lives have been transformed for the better by the land redistribution program.

You are clueless, you are obviously getting your news from herald news paper or presstv. Zimbabweans in rural areas are going through the worst situation

justwise:
[b]

Violence, intimidation, harassment and rigging toke place.

Why haven't his people thrown him out? The same reason Iraqi or Libyans could not throw Saddam or Gaddafi out for many years

Now that the above have been "thrown out" courtesy of your white master, what has been the result in those places?

justwise:
[/b]

You are clueless, you are obviously getting your news from herald news paper or presstv. Zimbabweans in rural areas are going through the worst situation

Where do you get YOUR news from? Let me guess - 'mainstream western media' , correct?

ROSSIKE:
Now that the above have been "thrown out" courtesy of your white master, what has been the result in those places?

That what happens when one tyrant stays in power too long and when he is gone it creates power vacuum. The oppressed comes out to regain their freedom.

ROSSIKE:
Where do you get YOUR news from? Let me guess - 'mainstream western media' , correct?

Unlike you I lived there before and during land grabbing madness and when Zimbabwe crumbled

justwise:
That what happens when one tyrant stays in power too long and when he is gone it creates power vacuum. The oppressed comes out to regain their freedom.

So you equate the current anarchy in Libya and Iraq with "the oppressed regaining their freedom". Have you actually been following the news from those places? Do you realise over 90% of people there wish for the old days of their "tyrant" compared to the social chaos and mass bloodshed and terrorism they are experiencing?

ROSSIKE:
So you equate the current anarchy in Libya and Iraq with "the oppressed regaining their freedom". Have you actually been following the news from those places?

Yes that is what it's, when one man from a particular tribe oppressed other tribes and suddenly he is gone the fear factor is gone and people will start taking revenge by all means.

justwise:
Unlike you I lived there before and during land grabbing madness and when Zimbabwe crumbled

So you are a white guy or a representative of whites who sees the redistribution program as "land grabbing madness"? No wonder you hate Mugabe. Well, go and tell your masters that Zimbabwean land belongs to ALL Zimbabweans. Forever. Don't come to Africa and steal land and resources, and then seek to demonize the leader who gets the stolen lands back off you to redistribute among his people.

ROSSIKE:
So you are a white guy or a representative of whites who sees the redistribution program as "land grabbing madness"? No wonder you hate Mugabe. Well, go and tell your masters that Zimbabwean land belongs to ALL Zimbabweans. Forever.

I'm quite happy to have an open minded debate with you if you stop acting like Alex Jones. I'm 110% Nigerian and having different opinions does not make me white or white representative. I'm not programmed to think one sided like you.

justwise:
Yes that is what it's, when one man from a particular tribe oppressed other tribes and suddenly he is gone the fear factor is gone and people will start taking revenge by all means.

To prevent such a descent into anarchy you stay away from interference in such countries. They evolve at their own pace. You don't go lighting the flame by intervention and making the stuation 100 times worse.

ROSSIKE:
To prevent such a descent into anarchy you stay away from interference in such countries. They evolve at their own pace. You don't go lighting the flame by intervention and making the stuation 100 times worse.

The difference between what is happening now and what happened during saddam or gadaffi time is that then one man was busy killing at will but now different tribes are fighting for their rights

justwise:
I'm quite happy to have an open minded debate with you if you stop acting like Alex Jones. I'm 110% Nigerian and having different opinions does not make me white or white representative. I'm not programmed to think one sided like you.

Spare me your crap. You think in one direction only and that is pro-white imperialist interests, which you are here to defend. Couldn't care less about your nationality.

ROSSIKE:
Spare me your crap. You think in one direction only and that is pro-white imperialist interests, which you are here to defend. Couldn't care less about your nationality.

You couldn't careless about my nationality but you were quick to call me white? Poor minded thing.

justwise:
The difference between what is happening now and what happened during saddam or gadaffi time is that then one man was busy killing at will but now different tribes are fighting for their rights

Much preferable to have one man killing than to have 3 million men killing. That is why most Libyans and Iraqis yearn for their past.

justwise:
You couldn't careless about my nationality but you were quick to call me white? Poor minded thing.

It's usually whites who call Mugabe's land redistribution "land grabbing". The cheek of it.

ROSSIKE:
Much preferable to have one man killing than to have 3 million men killing. That is why most Libyans and Iraqis yearn for their past.

Typical African man mentally. Thank God those scumbags are gone. Zimbabwe will face the same fate when that old scum is gone because other tribes will take revenge on Shonas

ROSSIKE:
It's usually whites who call Mugabe's land redistribution "land grabbing". The cheek of it.

This is why I said before that you are clueless about Zimbabwe situation. Majority of whites are not against land redistribution but the violent way it way carried out by war veterans paid and purported by Sekuru Mugabe and ZANU Pf

justwise:
Typical African man mentally. Thank God those scumbags are gone. Zimbabwe will face the same fate when that old scum is gone because other tribes will take revenge on Shonas

I guess your typical European man mentality is at play, ie invade and destroy countries to steal their oil and land while pretending to search for non existent weapons of mass destruction, and claiming to hate dictatorship while embracing killer ruling dictatorial cults in Saudi Arabia for financial benefit.

Shymm3x:
Journalism isn't about heckling and harassing dignitaries, especially leaders, at an event. There's a place and time for everything. And is he a diplomat or Nigerian politician? That's the leader of a sovereign country, and if they (sahara "primitive" reporters) have "pertinent questions" to ask him, they should wait till he's on a working visit to Nigeria, when he's taking questions from the journalists - not the plebeian way devoid of any professionalism they went about it. Even during the annual UN summit in New York, with all kinds of leaders in attendance - do you see journalists act the way these uncivilised oafs acted in that video? They look so crude it's not even funny. Anyway, sahara reporter is more or less a paparazzi medium that deals with gossips...so it shouldn't be shocking. My bad for taking that rogue news paparazzi outlet seriously.

He shared power with Tsvangirai because of external pressure, and Mandela was influential in that deal. If majority of Zimbabweans had a problem with him, especially with the millions of dollars both the UK and US keep pumping into that country to support an uprising - there would have been an uprising there time ago. However, there has been none - and to ordinary Zimbabweans, he's better than what the opposition has to offer. Yes, he has stayed in power for too long - but can you expatiate on how he brought Zimbabwe to its knees, and not the crippling sanctions imposed by western countries due to land issues?

Erm, let me correlate Nigeria under GEJ with Zimbabwe, to buttress my point. GEJ was a terrible leader, far worse than Mugabe. However, based on ya logic, the fact that there was no uprising during GEJ's scandalous regime means that the people were suppressed, no? And despite how terrible GEJ was, didn't he have popular support from two sections of the country, and a decent amount of sympathisers in two other regions? Now, correlate that with Zimbabwe and Mugabe's Shona ethnic group (in which he enjoys popular support), who make up about 82% of the country's population. When you do that, you'll see why he keeps winning elections in that country, hence I asked if you have an understanding of how Zimbabwe's politics work.

Buhari won an election, just as Mugabe keeps winning election in Zimbabwe. However, I correlated the two because Buhari once ruled Nigeria as a dictator, and he's part of the same bandits who have been ruling the country post civil war. And the same folks are still the power-brokers in the country - the untouchables. Ditto the recycling of the same politicians from one party to the other since 1999. So how is that different? Different faces, but the same old story.

Anyway, you just added credence to my argument about the farce that "democracy" is with the Bush-Clinton dynasty in America. Then again, America isn't a democracy - it's a constitutional republic. In "democracy" you just have to keep going with what the majority want, and the majority in Zimbabwe are the Shona people, hence he stays winning. That's the same reason why Angela Merkel has been ruling Germany since 2005, and she might end up ruling Germany till she dies cos there's no term limit for German Chancellor. So you'll agree with me that Mugabe is no different from these other folks albeit his only crime is that he ought to keep changing the faces of the puppets, and fall back into the background as the puppet-master, no?

P.S: the world isn't celebrating anything, the last election was won and lost based on the natural fault lines in Nigeria that have been there since the country was created. They just wanted regime change for reasons I don't want to digress to, and they got it. Only Nigerians are caught up in their own delusions. Yes, he should perform far better than GEJ (anyone will), but it's going to be window-dressing - with no fundamental change in the systematic structural defects plaguing the country. same ol same ol.

I haven't quoted your post in a very long time.. but I've gotta quote this.. Apt