₦airaland Forum

lezz:
Give me a valid link of 2015, dummy. You're submitting a blog written in 2013 that was mired in controversy.

There is no need for that since that was only a reporting about your law that allows infants to get legally married.

FighterPilot:
You will dismiss all that because you truly do not master South African history. It is not by surprise you don't know that all tribes in South Africa had self governing homelands.



http://www.britannica.com/topic/Bantustan

Why should I master the history of slaves and blood thirsty primates? I know enough to know that there's nothing left in Zulus worth saving.

FighterPilot:
There is no need for that since that was only a reporting about your law that allows infants to get legally married.

what's your definition of infant?

One thing I have learnt here is that no South African can take responsibility without trying to drag others down with them. You all behave like _cunts.

You use the word "infant" to make the situation as shameful as your actual raping of 3 months infants to cure AIDS.

Show me where you lost your shame in the journey of your life, I can retrace your path. Let's give it a try.

lezz:
what's your definition of infant?

One thing I have learnt here is that no South African can take responsibility without trying to drag others down with them. You all behave like _cunts.

You use the word "infant" to make the situation as shameful as your actual raping of 3 months infants to cure AIDS.

Show me where you lost your shame in the journey of your life, I can retrace your path. Let's give it a try.

In Nigeria there is no need to even rape because the law allows you to sleep with infants through Islamic laws that they recognise.

lezz:
Why should I master the history of slaves and blood thirsty primates? I know enough to know that there's nothing left in Zulus worth saving.

You must then stop distorting our history because we will forever correct you.

FighterPilot:
In Nigeria there is no need to even rape because the law allows you to sleep with infants through Islamic laws that they recognise.

Don't skip the facts now. What's your definition of infant? What does Islam say about child marriage? Judging by your brain power, you shouldn't be having a mobile with internet access.

You should be watching cartoons.

FighterPilot:
You must then stop distorting our history because we will forever correct you.

What I opined here is ensync with history.

Deny it here all you want. History is on my side. You're enslaved by the Boers who still own you to this day.

Your rantings will be lost in the ocean of facts.

lezz:
What I opined here is ensync with history.

Deny it here all you want. History is on my side. You're enslaved by the Boers who still own you to this day.

Your rantings will be lost in the ocean of facts.

Boers never owned anyone in SA.

FighterPilot:
Boers never owned anyone in SA.

Really? That sums up every thing you have said in this thread.

lezz:
Don't skip the facts now. What's your definition of infant? What does Islam say about child marriage? Judging by your brain power, you shouldn't be having a mobile with internet access.

You should be watching cartoons.

You allow Islamic thighing. Legally allowing your infants to be abused.

lezz:
Really? That sums up every thing you have said in this thread.

Even to this day they don't own anyone but what I know is that they are scared of Zulus.

lezz:
Don't skip the facts now. What's your definition of infant? What does Islam say about child marriage? Judging by your brain power, you shouldn't be having a mobile with internet access.

You should be watching cartoons.

Infants are babies which your government allows to be raped. One of your senator is evenarried to a five year old.

FighterPilot:
You allow Islamic thighing. Legally allowing your infants to be abused.

You're going round and round in a dance of evasion of fact. What is your definition of infant? Where in Islam that allows the marriage and copulation of infant?

You can't answer because you know your words carry no value. Take responsibility for once on your life of obliquity.

You're watching me, tearing you to pieces. Your Zulus friends should give a hand. The fun is thawing.

FighterPilot:

Infants are babies which your government allows to be raped. One of your senator is evenarried to a five year old.

that's your definition of infant? you're just another infant with a mobile phone, judging by your IQ,that is.

And tell me, which senator is married to a 5 year old? You're entangling yourself in your own web of cluelessnes. Hope you got enough balls to remain in there.

FighterPilot:
Even to this day they don't own anyone but what I know is that they are scared of Zulus.

Julius Maleke of the democratic alliance says, he would like to seize all white lands and frims, but if Zulus do just that , south Africans will suffer because whites control the economy.

That's why Zulus being nearly 80% of the population have just one billionaire, Patrice mutesape. While 7% whites have over 7 billionaire and have more white female Millionaires than Zulus.

Show me the depth of the cuts I have inflicted on you now.

lezz:
You're going round and round in a dance of evasion of fact. What is your definition of infant? Where in Islam that allows the marriage and copulation of infant?

You can't answer because you know your words carry no value. Take responsibility for once on your life of obliquity.

You're watching me, tearing you to pieces. Your Zulus friends should give a hand. The fun is thawing.

Just Goole Islamic thighing.

lezz:
The Dutch wrote your own history, forcing you to admit you're immigrant settlers just like them. Well the native Indians weren't so downed, neither are the Aboriginals of Australia. Only Zulus are being told Europeans came to Africa and founded a place in their backyard. Can you hear yourself talk?
How ludicrous, you stink of dishonesty.

Wow, your knowledge on Southern African history is mindbogglingly... Or should I say lack there of!

Why don't you do yourself a favour and research when the cape colony was established and when the Zulu kingdom was established.

lezz:
Julius Maleke of the democratic alliance says, he would like to seize all white lands and frims, but if Zulus do just that , south Africans will suffer because whites control the economy.

That's why Zulus being nearly 80% of the population have just one billionaire, Patrice mutesape. While 7% whites have over 7 billionaire and have more white female Millionaires than Zulus.

Show me the depth of the cuts I have inflicted on you now.

Bwahahaha… who is Julius Maleke of DA?

I only know Julius Malema of Economic Freedom Fighters.

I told you to stop going about the history of SA because you know nothing about it.

jln115:
Wow, your knowledge on Southern African history is mindbogglingly... Or should I say lack there of!

Why don't you do yourself a favour and research when the cape colony was established and when the Zulu kingdom was established.

Let me help you, Zulus conquered the Boers and ruled them over. Zulus took the gold and land belonging to the dutch. Soweto, mpumalanga, khayelitsha are the most developed cities in south Africa.

Today, Zulus have 80% rich and 10% poor. The Boers are 90% poor and 10% rich.

I know that's how you want the story to be told. Sorry.

FighterPilot:
Bwahahaha… who is Julius Maleke of DA?

I only know Julius Malema of Economic Freedom Fighters.

I told you to stop going about the history of SA because you know nothing about it.

Yes, Julius of economic freedom fighters, my error. Now did he make that statement or not? Tell us.

lezz:
Julius Maleke of the democratic alliance says, he would like to seize all white lands and frims, but if Zulus do just that , south Africans will suffer because whites control the economy.

That's why Zulus being nearly 80% of the population have just one billionaire, Patrice mutesape. While 7% whites have over 7 billionaire and have more white female Millionaires than Zulus.

Show me the depth of the cuts I have inflicted on you now.

Who the Fvck is Julius Maleka? And I can guarantee you the DA will never allow someone to make a statement like that, because its entirely against every single one of their policies.

lezz:
Yes, Julius of economic freedom fighters, my error. Now did he make that statement or not? Tell us.

What does it matter? The EFF only got 6% of the national vote in 2014, the guy is fvcking retaaard and 99% of what he says is utter B.S.

FighterPilot:
Bwahahaha… who is Julius Maleke of DA?
I only know Julius Malema of Economic Freedom Fighters.
I told you to stop going about the history of SA because you know nothing about it.

FighterPilot:
Bwahahaha… who is Julius Maleke of DA?
I only know Julius Malema of Economic Freedom Fighters.
I told you to stop going about the history of SA because you know nothing about it.

jln115:
Who the Fvck is Julius Maleka? And I can guarantee you the DA will never allow someone to make a statement like that, because its entirely against every single one of their policies.

Did he make that statement, yes or no. I have said the DA was an error. He is of the economic freedom fighters. Point taken. Now stop chasing shadows and follow substance.

Julius was the youth leader in ANC, before he left for the economic freedom fighters after allegation of corruption. Very popular chap.

Now did he say he would seize white lands if not that they own the economy of south Africa? _fucking answer me.

lezz:
Yes, Julius of economic freedom fighters, my error. Now did he make that statement or not? Tell us.

Error my foot. That's what you always do because you don't know the history of South Africans neither do you know anything with its politics.

jln115:
What does it matter? The EFF only got 6% of the national vote in 2014, the guy is fvcking retaaard and 99% of what he says is utter B.S.

Shut up, who gives a rat's arse about which Zulu wins this or that.

What I'm asking is did he say white own your _fucking economy and that's what's stopping him seizing their lands?

lezz:
Let me help you, Zulus conquered the Boers and ruled them over. Zulus took the gold and land belonging to the dutch. Soweto, mpumalanga, khayelitsha are the most developed cities in south Africa.

Today, Zulus have 80% rich and 10% poor. The Boers are 90% poor and 10% rich.

I know that's how you want the story to be told. Sorry.

Boers never conquered the Zulus, they had their own kingdom with their own king till this day... hell the Boers technically didn't even start apartheid, the so called father of apartheid wasn't even South African....and BTW don't confuse oprestion with being conquered and being a slave.

FighterPilot:

Error my foot. That's what you always do because you don't know the history of South Africans neither do you know anything with its politics.

@ bolded just about sums up the kind of man I am. I take responsibility and own up.

You don't, have never in your entire life marked with cowardice and denial. That's the difference between the both of us.

I have talked about Julius since last year on this thread and no one has corrected me because there was no error then.


Now keep gropping in the dark looking to hold on to my sleeves; I'm by your side landing you another left hooker.

lezz:
Did he make that statement, yes or no. I have said the DA was an error. He is of the economic freedom fighters. Point taken. Now stop chasing shadows and follow substance.

Julius was the youth leader in ANC, before he left for the economic freedom fighters after allegation of corruption. Very popular chap.

Now did he say he would seize white lands if not that they own the economy of south Africa? _fucking answer me.

Why do we always have to teach you politics of SA. Julius never left ANC, he was expelled and not because of corruption. Go and read history of Malema and come again for discussion because now you hardly know a thing and you will not even be able to discuss anything about Julius.

lezz:
Shut up, who gives a rat's arse about which Zulu wins this or that.

What I'm asking is did he say white own your _fucking economy and that's what's stopping him seizing their lands?

Does it matter what he said?, should one listen to a fool just for the sake of listning? Hell if I took juju seriously I could just as well take you seriously!! Hahaha never going to happen

lezz:
@ bolded just about sums up the kind of man I am. I take responsibility and own up.

You don't, have never in your entire life marked with cowardice and denial. That's the difference between the both of us.

I have talked about Julius since last year on this thread and no one has corrected me because there was no error then.


Now keep gropping in the dark looking to hold on to my sleeves; I'm by your side landing you another left hooker.

That's what you've been doing since from the start of this discussion. You hardly know a thing about SA. You practically turned yourself into a joke.

jln115:
Boers never conquered the Zulus, they had their own kingdom with their own king till this day... hell the Boers technically didn't even start apartheid, the so called father of apartheid wasn't even South African....and BTW don't confuse oprestion with being conquered and being a slave.

English borrowed the word "Apartheid" from the Boers. It's never an original English word. Keep trying to deny the obvious. I will have you for Christmas fun.

Work is done, all there is are long holidays, lazy-reading and zulu-slaughtering .

I'm counting on you especially to make my holidays great.

FighterPilot:
That's what you've been doing since from the start of this discussion. You hardly know a thing about SA. You practically turned yourself into a joke.

bwahahaha, your chasing shadows. You can't prove the statement false so you cling on my erring of his political party. I just have you a summation of his political life sndvyou couldn't deny it. Zulu. Keep the denial up. That's how you deny you're never slaves when your very breath is determined in the mansion of the Dutch sitting on s piece of land owned by your father.