₦airaland Forum

DieVluit:
Yet another instance of South Africans bringing civilisation to Nigeria.

"Then, everyone expected it to be a product for the few among the many, but today it is the product for everybody. Nigerians have been able to get affordable telecommunications," Strand said. That's because Nigeria has Africa's largest population, estimated at 170 million, and building a telecommunications network costs roughly the same for 1 million or 10 million subscribers, he said. Mobile telephone networks, in a country without working landlines, have immeasurably boosted business and trade.

http://m.news24.com/fin24/Tech/News/nigerias-52bn-fine-against-mtn-is-worlds-largest-20151120

Augugust is right. The poor country that's Nigeria desperately needs MTN's money, it is so desperate for it, it even forgot to think about investors. Bush, voodoo economic policies.

You cannot deny there might be a fiscal element to the massive fine,” he said by phone from Paarl, near Cape Town. “It will make investors a little bit more wary of investing in Nigeria.” ----> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-26/buhari-bounce-becomes-bust-as-nigeria-policies-annoy-investors

So embarrassing and pathetic are the Nigerians that they are now trying to find reason by reducing the fine ---> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34992892. Spanked by the market, no doubt. But even then, they are still in no-man's land. Pathetic nation, this Nigeria.

Now, kicked out are MTN Nigeria's useless Nigerians. In are the South Africans to watch after them to make sure they aren't ever given a chance to be useless again. Talk about things backfiring. Massive harm to brand Nigeria today. ---> http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/194373-nigeria-slashes-mtn-n1-4trillion-fine-as-nigerias-ceo-michael-ikpoki-resigns.html

i only got suspiscion when there was a date set for the fine to be paid, the 31 december 2015. The money is planned for 2016 budget. How do you budget by killing a foreign company, now thats too extreme or is it desperation at its best.

lezz:
You need a source for Obasanjor's letter to Thatcher? Jeez! You're embarrassing the very name you bear, you clan and country.

If you need a source for Obasanjor's letter, I should question the circumstances surrounding your very birth and breeding.

You really need someone to gauge your level of Intelectual morbidity.

Perhaps you should guage your own level of intellectual morbidity by going back and reading my posts

Thats not the source i am asking for

Congradulations on humiliating yourself before all those on the forum

lezz:
I have called you by your name and like a demented dog, you heed not. Remember when agsugust talked about this letter? You asked for a citiation of it. I supplied you the entire letter.

You shifted and retorted, shamefully, "who cares about a worthless letter"

Now you're back to its source again? Bwahahaha, you're a circus monkey who loves going round and round and arriving at same spot. You have kept the longest thread in NL's history by sheer denial and vain repetition

The only circus monkey here is the one who cannot follow a simple argument

Go back, read my posts again

That is not the source i have been asking you for

.

lezz:
Are you doubting the entire articles written on nairaland?
****modified****You beat Patrick and he logs onto guest mode to observe and lick his wounds in the shadows

Are you basing arguments on what you learn on open source forums?

lezz:
Are you doubting the entire articles written on nairaland?
****modified****You beat Patrick and he logs onto guest mode to observe and lick his wounds in the shadows

Are you basing all your arguments on what you learn on open source forums?

lezz:
A "skilled" south African patriot, historian, military expert is asking for the source of Obasanjor's letter in 1986 to Margaret Thatcher pertaining apartheid.

Patrick,oh Patrick, what wiped shame and pride off your head.
You just proved you're a lame troll and a shallow ranter.

It would have been less shocking if you had asked for the source of the fact that Buhari is Nigeria's president.


You really like to keep the thread going. There most be so little going on in your life outside nairaland.

Read my posts again

Thats not the information i am questioning

Simple questions seem to cause you allot of difficulty

jln115:
Do you even read my posts thoroughly? If you did you would've noticed that I never said he never praised the Angolan army, but what I in-fact stated was that he never said anything about the Angolan army literally defeating the SADF!!

Now READ my post thoroughly, before you quote me again, I'm getting board of repeating myself over and over!

Lezz has reading difficulties go easy on him

lezz:
So what's Zuma praising the Angolan army for? For surrendering to the SANDF and taking a beating?

Nope, he praised the Angolan army for bringing peace to the entire region and putting a stop to the progress of apartheid. He praised them for Namibian independence and for defeating the south African troop.

Why would he prais them for things they didnt do?

jln115:
He praised them for the role they played in the fight against apartheid and having the bravery to take arms against a military superpower.NOT because they defeated the SADF.

bwahahaaha. Then rhino poachers should be idolozed for dribbling the sandf in and out of south African boarders.

Your president didn't go all the way to Angola to praise a 'defeated' army. He went to there to acknowledge an army that fought your sandf to seek negotiations.

patches689:
Read my posts again

Thats not the information i am questioning

Simple questions seem to cause you allot of difficulty

nope, son. You can't ask what was never in the contention. Are you convulsing with amnesia?

I jumped on you when you asked of agagust for proof of Obasanjo tacking Thatcher. I took the pain to provide the entire letter and your reaction was to shift ground.

I don't go over the scribbles of a mentaly disturbed newt like you. Petty denial which is your trademark has kept this thread for 5 unholy years.

Thanks to your little heart. You seem to be blown by every wind out of Nigeria. Zulu-dummy.

patches689:
Lezz has reading difficulties go easy on him

Bruised south African e-warriors on a self-healing, feel-good mission.

patches689:
Read my posts again

Thats not the information i am questioning

Simple questions seem to cause you allot of difficulty

At this point, I have to ask you finish recovering from the daze-punch I landed you before reacting. You're hiding in shame.

You asked for the proof of my "excerpt". DUMMY, THE ONLY EXCERPT I HAVE SUBMITTED HERE IS THE LETTER WRITTEN BY OBASANJO IN 1986 TO MARGARET THATCHER.

Please what are you saying? Go home patrick, you're getting homesick already.

@patchesagain, jnl115 etc, you all always hide in guestmode to read my scourging diatribes of facts from the saftey of the questmode. That way, you can prepare your responses without having the pressure of spontaneity. I have 5 bleeding guests viewing and we don't have that kind of numbers on this thread.

_fucking come to the ring away from the shadows.

patches689:
Are you basing all your arguments on what you learn on open source forums?

You didn't answer the question; Are the entire articles submitted on nairaland without facts and truth?

lezz:
nope, son. You can't ask what was never in the contention. Are you convulsing with amnesia?

I jumped on you when you asked of agagust for proof of Obasanjo tacking Thatcher. I took the pain to provide the entire letter and your reaction was to shift ground.

I don't go over the scribbles of a mentaly disturbed newt like you. Petty denial which is your trademark has kept this thread for 5 unholy years.

Thanks to your little heart. You seem to be blown by every wind out of Nigeria. Zulu-dummy.

Read my posts again

That is not what i am asking for

Read the posts
Understand the posts
Respond accordingly

lezz:
At this point, I have to ask you finish recovering from the daze-punch I landed you before reacting. You're hiding in shame.

You asked for the proof of my "excerpt". DUMMY, THE ONLY EXCERPT I HAVE SUBMITTED HERE IS THE LETTER WRITTEN BY OBASANJO IN 1986 TO MARGARET THATCHER.

Please what are you saying? Go home patrick, you're getting homesick already.

Thats not the source i have been asking for

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

lezz:
@patchesagain, jnl115 etc, you all always hide in guestmode to read my scourging diatribes of facts from the saftey of the questmode. That way, you can prepare your responses without having the pressure of spontaneity. I have 5 bleeding guests viewing and we don't have that kind of numbers on this thread.

_fucking come to the ring away from the shadows.

Delusions on grandeur

lezz:
You didn't answer the question; Are the entire articles submitted on nairaland without facts and truth?

Irrelevant question

No one is talking about the letter

Try to follow the argument

patches689:
Irrelevant question

No one is talking about the letter

Try to follow the argument

Irrelevant? Whoah!!

But you compared nairaland to my so-called "sources".

So I ask you: are the articles here without facts entirely?

Answering the question will expose you for an empty, logically deficient troll.

Hahaha, nice move calling it irrelevant. You got beaten yet again.

patches689:
Delusions on grandeur

You sneak out of the shadows to throw jibes and run away. Fact.

patches689:
Thats not the source i have been asking for

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

Patrick, stop your dance of shame. I never referenced any of your worthless posts. My argument with you was and still is your demanding for proof from agsugust for OBJ's letter to Thatcher.

You asked for the source of my excerpt. The only excerpt I have supplied here is that very letter. So that's your bone of contention.

You got whooped boy. Apologise for being a flip-flopping, dishonest and baselessly proud fellow, then we move on.

You stay on this part, I'll break every single bone of yours as a prelude to Christmas.

Tell me you're sorry for wasting my time. Convey it in your next post.

lezz:
Irrelevant? Whoah!!

But you compared nairaland to my so-called "sources".

So I ask you: are the articles here without facts entirely?

Answering the question will expose you for an empty, logically deficient troll.

Hahaha, nice move calling it irrelevant. You got beaten yet again.

What is the source for your "facts" on the Border War?

That is why your question is irrelevant, because no one is talking about the letter

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

lezz:
Patrick, stop your dance of shame. I never referenced any of your worthless posts. My argument with you was and still is your demanding for proof from agsugust for OBJ's letter to Thatcher.

You asked for the source of my excerpt. The only excerpt I have supplied here is that very letter. So that's your bone of contention.

You got whooped boy. Apologise for being a flip-flopping, dishonest and baselessly proud fellow, then we move on.

You stay on this part, I'll break every single bone of yours as a prelude to Christmas.

Tell me you're sorry for wasting my time. Convey it in your next post.

No - read my posts, i am not asking about the letter.

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

lezz:
Patrick, stop your dance of shame. I never referenced any of your worthless posts. My argument with you was and still is your demanding for proof from agsugust for OBJ's letter to Thatcher.

You asked for the source of my excerpt. The only excerpt I have supplied here is that very letter. So that's your bone of contention.

You got whooped boy. Apologise for being a flip-flopping, dishonest and baselessly proud fellow, then we move on.

You stay on this part, I'll break every single bone of yours as a prelude to Christmas.

Tell me you're sorry for wasting my time. Convey it in your next post.

No - read my posts, i am not asking about the letter.

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

Yes i am sorry, sorry for wasting my time with someone whom is incapable of basic comprehenison

patches689:
What is the source for your "facts" on the Border War?

That is why your question is irrelevant, because no one is talking about the letter

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

The border war wasn't in contention with you. I never even supplied any excerpt on the border war. YOU ASKED FOR THE SOURCE OF MY EXCERPT ON THE LETTER. YOU DENIED OBASANJO ENGAGED THATCHER.

Stop this. You're boring me.

lezz:
You sneak out of the shadows to throw jibes and run away. Fact.

Yes, because the whole world revolves around you and this forum

Narcasistic delusions

patches689:
No - read my posts, i am not asking about the letter.

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accordingly

Yes i am sorry, sorry for wasting my time with someone whom is incapable of basic comprehenison

That's not the kinf of apology I was expecting. But we're making progress.

I will dub you the letter boy from south Africa. Since you had the ignorance to demand proof of a letter that has become as popular as aparthied itself.

I question your education foundation and world-awarness. You asked for a proof of my excerpt? You can't tell the writing style of diplomatic correspondence?

Patrick, you aren't my favourite Zulu for nothing.

lezz:
The border war wasn't in contention with you. I never even supplied any excerpt on the border war. YOU ASKED FOR THE SOURCE OF MY EXCERPT ON THE LETTER. YOU DENIED OBASANJO ENGAGED THATCHER.

Stop this. You're boring me.

Read my posts, i was asking where you got your "facts" on the border war - very simple posts with a very simpe argument, which was clearly beyond your cognative abilities.

Congrafulations on humiliating yourself in such spectacular fashion

So now i ask again: what is the source of your "facts"?

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accrodingly

lezz:
That's not the kinf of apology I was expecting. But we're making progress.

I will dub you the letter boy from south Africa. Since you had the ignorance to demand proof of a letter that has become as popular as aparthied itself.

I question your education foundation and world-awarness. You asked for a proof of my excerpt? You can't tell the writing style of diplomatic correspondence?

Patrick, you aren't my favourite Zulu for nothing.

So despite the fact that i have clearly informed you that no one is talking about the letter you are still unable to realize that no one is talking about the letter?

patches689:
Read my posts, i was asking where you got your "facts" on the border war - very simple posts with a very simpe argument, which was clearly beyond your cognative abilities.

Congrafulations on humiliating yourself in such spectacular fashion

So now i ask again: what is the source of your "facts"?

Read my posts
Understand my posts
Respond accrodingly

You asked for proof of the LETTER. You demanded for proof of my excerpt and the only excerpt is of the LETTER.

You changed to the border war when I laughed at your grand ignorance and shallow tactics of engagement. Did I supply any excerpts in my post on border war?
Nope. So your demand for proof of excerpt is clearly on the LETTER which is the only excerpt I have submitted.


Dyslexia isn't curable, Patrick. So you're going to be a life-long intellectual vegetable.

lezz:
You asked for proof of the LETTER. You demanded for proof of my excerpt and the only excerpt is of the LETTER.

You changed to the border war when I laughed at your grand ignorance and shallow tactics of engagement. Did I supply any excerpts in my post on border war?
Nope. So your demand for proof of excerpt is clearly on the LETTER which is the only excerpt I have submitted.


Dyslexia isn't curable, Patrick. So you're going to be a life-long intellectual vegetable.

Read my posts - it is glaringly obvious that i was not talking about the letter.

Read my posts - i did not refer to an "excerpt", i asked for the "source" of your "facts"

Read my posts and you shall avoid future embarrasment

Also, you quite obviously have no idea what dyslexia is.