₦airaland Forum

Teempakguy:
are you _fucking kidding me?

man, are you a troll or what? I mean, this is unbelievable. man. you have Got to be faking this. a human being CANNOT be this slow.

from the video you yourself posted.


the video then goes on to simply doubt that NASA's equipment is safe. it doesn't even question the statement above. and NASA itself has claimed that it's equipment was safe. and in fact, since then, we have had a lot of photographs of mars from the rovers and orbiters. which wouldn't have been possible had they been destroyed.

explode is very different from ignite. man. if a balloon bursts and explodes. do you say it has ignited? the seeming "ignition" is simply because of the heat and light that emanated from the intense friction that arose when the comet brushed by mars. I assure you. no fires were lighted. and the planet certainly did not "burn"

Teempakguy:
Selective disbelief.

honestly, you can't expect me to take you seriously when you have selective disbelief. that makes you an extremely illogical and irrational person. so you don't believe NASA's images of a round earth. but you believe it's images of a comet hitting another planet. the hell?

Teempakguy:
Mr . . . I have researched this so called flat earth conspiracy. I crawled their website and even downloaded an ebook. "200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball!" by some eric dubay character.

of course, the proofs were nothing but ad hoc, emotion driven explanations that didn't actually prove anything and could be easily debunked by any scientist.

Flat earthers are flat earthers because of one reason. they can't bear the truth of their insignificance in the grand scheme of the cosmos. they feel the need to be the babies of a God. be at the center of the entire universe. because their bible/quran tells them so. in fact, eric dubay blatantly states this in his proof #197




This is a movement driven by emotion. not cold hard science.

Teempakguy:
Mr . . . I have researched this so called flat earth conspiracy. I crawled their website and even downloaded an ebook. "200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball!" by some eric dubay character.

of course, the proofs were nothing but ad hoc, emotion driven explanations that didn't actually prove anything and could be easily debunked by any scientist.

Flat earthers are flat earthers because of one reason. they can't bear the truth of their insignificance in the grand scheme of the cosmos. they feel the need to be the babies of a God. be at the center of the entire universe. because their bible/quran tells them so. in fact, eric dubay blatantly states this in his proof #197



This is a movement driven by emotion. not cold hard science.

Jay5000:
"Our eyes and experience tell us the Earth is flat and motionless, and everything in the sky revolves around us. When we cease to believe our own eyes and experience we must prostrate ourselves at the feet of the very pseudo-scientists who blinded us, to treat them as "experts," astronomical "priests" who have special knowledge only they can access, like the Hubble telescope. By brainwashing us of something so gigantic and fundamental, it makes every other kind of lesser indoctrination a piece of cake!

Earth being the flat, fixed center of the universe, around which everything in the heavens revolves denotes a special importance and significance not only the Earth, but to us humans, the most intelligent among the intelligent designer's designs. By turning Earth into a spinning ball thrown around the Sun and shot through infinite space from a Godless Big Bang they turn humanity into a random meaningless, purposeless accident of a blind, dumb universe! It's trauma-based mind-control! They beat the divinity out of us with their mental manipulations. "

Galileo,NASA and their ilk have done a fantastic job.

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2014/11/the-globe-earth-lie.html

Dawdy:
Tell us how the apollo made it through the deadly van allen belt. If the moon landing is true, why has Nasa not returned to the moon since since 1969, with advence in technology? Assuming they went to the moon, and the earth was spinning 1000 mph, how did they manage to land in the same place they took off? Why hasn't Nasa shown the real picture of the earth from the space? Just CGI planet? Why hasn't Nasa shown the video of the spinning earth from the moon?

Dawdy:
Tell us how the apollo made it through the deadly van allen belt. If the moon landing is true, why has Nasa not returned to the moon since since 1969, with advence in technology? Assuming they went to the moon, and the earth was spinning 1000 mph, how did they manage to land in the same place they took off? Why hasn't Nasa shown the real picture of the earth from the space? Just CGI planet? Why hasn't Nasa shown the video of the spinning earth from the moon?

Jay5000:
You just proved my point yet again. Hundreds of articles, debates, documentaries and videos on this topic and you visit one website and read an ebook and come to your conclusions and yet you talk about science. the fact that you learnt something in science class or white folks "said so" doesn't make it proven science, but im sure you already knew that.

Teempakguy:
you first tell me how it's possible for a van allen belt to exist in a flat earth.
You are not arguing for a flat earth. this is the moon landing hoax conspiracy. which is another topic entirely.

sukkot:
you do know in october 2014 there was a HUGE collision by comet siding spring C / 2013 A1 with mars. very huge collision. it fried some of NASA roving equipment on mars. point being thats a very good guess cuz mars is always getting hard collisions.

Craigston:
A science fiction theory postulates that the state of Mars resulted from an interplanetary war that had cosmic effects.
It's science fiction, of course.
The writer, Joseph Farrell, a Physicist, suggests that the Giza pyramid was an ancient experiment for an interplanetary weapon of mass destruction, and that a similar weapon was being developed by Mars' inhabitants at the time: a kind of arms race. Eventually, the weapon on Earth was armed and deployed, and our near cousins on Mars suffered the effect more terribly.
You can find the book "The Giza Death Star Deployed" by Joseph Farrell.
It seems this link will work:
[url]projectavalon.net/Joseph_Farrell_The_Giza_Death_Star_Deployed_The_Physics_and_Engineering_of_the_Great_Pyramid_2003.pdf[/url]
Cute theory for fiction.

johnydon22:
Head of it... its no surprise seeing that the Asteroid belt lies between Mars and Jupiter, so both get more bombardment recently than most others

sukkot:
decent question

teempak did you solve that maths question in that thread i posted ?

Dawdy:
Tell us how the apollo made it through the deadly van allen belt. If the moon landing is true, why has Nasa not returned to the moon since since 1969, with advence in technology? Assuming they went to the moon, and the earth was spinning 1000 mph, how did they manage to land in the same place they took off? Why hasn't Nasa shown the real picture of the earth from the space? Just CGI planet? Why hasn't Nasa shown the video of the spinning earth from the moon?

Teempakguy:
yeah. I'm doing that right now.

sukkot:
Teempakguy or johnydon22, i need both of yall to answer this brilliant question

Teempakguy:
it's not brilliant at all.

the spacecraft took off from the kennedy space center in florida. and they landed in honolulu.

do you know how far honolulu is from the take off point?

4,700 miles!

how on earth is that even remotely the same place?

sukkot:
mind if i ask this question ? what was the speed of the rocket ?

Teempakguy:
when it was leaving the earth or when it was coming back?

when it was leaving, it had more than the escape velocity of earth, and when it was falling down, I don't know.

sukkot:
when it was leaving. do you have the numbers ?

banmee:
Really? Are you sure you understand how the internet works? If you have access to the internet, specifically Google, every form of information will be at your fingertips. People are just lazy and don't want to put forth the effort to want to learn anything. I can put up a topic on Rocket science in 10 minutes on NL. It does not mean I know anything about rocket science.

Teempakguy:
no.

Teempakguy:
no.

sukkot:
ahhh ok cuz i see where that guy is coming from. like if the earth flies through space at 67,000 miles per hour meaning the moon is at roughly this speed too cuz the moon keeps up with the earth. so once this rocket takes off, it has to have a minimum speed of 67,000 miles per hour to be on course between both bodies and it has to go faster to be able to catch up with the moon. so now we have to know what the speed of a rocket is. now according to this scientist, rockets can only reach 40,000 miles per hour. so the question is -- how was it possible for this rocket to get to the moon ?

http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/Propulsion/2-how-fast-conventional.html

Teempakguy:
no.

SirWere:
Dude, those are conventional rockets. Space rockets are much different.

Honestly, are you for real on the moon propanganda

Cuz China and Russia has landed on the moon also. China even has a lunar rover there right now.

sukkot:
i have an even better question. the diameter of the earth is 7,926.41 miles, so if the speed of the earth is 67,000 miles per hour ( meaning it covers its own diameter 10 times in an hour - thats how fast it is going ), if a plane that is doing 350 miles per hour flies into the sky it will take less than 20 minutes before the earth overtakes the plane and the plane is left behind in some remote part of the universe lost forever >>>> but how come this does not happen and the plane manages to get to its destination on earth ?

sukkot:
i have an even better question. the diameter of the earth is 7,926.41 miles, so if the speed of the earth is 67,000 miles per hour ( meaning it covers its own diameter 10 times in an hour - thats how fast it is going ), if a plane that is doing 350 miles per hour flies into the sky it will take less than 20 minutes before the earth overtakes the plane and the plane is left behind in some remote part of the universe lost forever >>>> but how come this does not happen and the plane manages to get to its destination on earth ?

sukkot:
...

SirWere:
Hahahahaha........ Can you actually type this question with a straight face??.

I'm sorry. My reply will be really long and my phone is on low battery.

Hopefully by tommorow it will be charged. Booking space below.

LoJ:
[s]The answer to the apparent problem is very simple: Relative velocity.

If someone X is walking in a huge train T at 5 km/h and the train travels at 140 km/h, then:

- The velocity of the man (Vx) in relation to other passenger of the same train is 5 km/h. However The V'x which is the velocity of the man in relation to people outside the train who are static, will be equal to:

V'x = Vx + Vt, in this case V'x = 5 + 140 = 145.

Apply now this simple principle to the planes and the earth - The Train being the earth, and the plane being the passenger and you will begin to fathom the answer.[/s]