₦airaland Forum

Babe2sure:
The guy is just being mean! Why not joint custody rather than wanting to have full custody of the child?
This is not a matter of whether she can take care of him or not. Going by his actions, he wanted to completely alienate mother and child, which is bad. I know he may want to cite like her lifestyle as excuse to take him from her. We don't know the full story anyway.
Why there would be court order for him to take full custody without the lady being invited is what I don't understand.
Anyways, it's not new, justice is most often skewed in favour of...........*sighs*

birmingham04:
I will never ever like our judiciary till thy kingdom come. What this guy did ii any black guy do similar thing to a white lady am 100% sure that black guy will rot on jail because they will call it kidnapping. Even if Franck got order he got no right to go and take the child at school without the consent of the mother.In oversea white will treat black like cheat in our country again they will treat us like animal, who to blame? Black race is cursed. We are the enemy of yourself.If you av ever travelled before you will understand what I mean see the way our immigration treat us at our airport, they give special treatment to white people than us, and the white will never do that to anybody has their passport talkless of their white people. Youths this is time we need to send our old cargo fool to an exile.

Philpham:
I keep saying, men do not raise children. They do not have any capacity to nurture or breed any child because they lack the innate ability to do so. Men take children as an accessory, something they can add to their portfolio as an acquisition, not that they value their existence., eg are the likes of davido, wiz kid, chris brown, who flash their bastard children on Social media for attention. That is why men can easily without reason abandon their children with their mother, or kill them if they do not get their way, which is why full custody for parenting should and will always be given to a woman who is much more responsible and capable of raising a successful child.

Call me myopic, but men are realistically sperm donors in the cycle of procreation, any thing outside that , they are lone wolves.
This insane French man is cold hearted vindictive tyrant who has made use of the loopholes in Nigerian legislative system to kidnap this child from the mother, and we look on.
Things like this cannot happen if he were in France with this woman, it's only in Nigeria where bribery, and "white man effect" is at its peak that this monkey can do that.
I hope the Nigerian government looks into this case and the woman should get a good lawyer and get her child back, and repatriate that man back to France.

doncent12:
Let's hear his part of the story...I don't trust this ladies.

erico2k2:
Big lie.the world has since changed

namuguibe:
Good morning Sir. Please cancel my Arsenal jersey order. Papa Wenger and the whole gunner guys have seriously vex me.

erico2k2:
Check very well a court order was issued so the mother must have been invited.the question should be where was the court order issued

erico2k2:
Seriously?
It is worse in Europe. He won't need police.

Kobicove:
The title of this post is quite misleading. The man in question is the boy's biological father and he got custody of his son through court procees. Please stop making it look as if this is a case of abduction or kidnap!!!

Philpham:
Which part of Europe do u mean, u mean to say he can try this trash in Europe and go scot free, the woman only reporting to child services alone will land that foolish man in a nasty position, all the woman needs is a good lawyer and he will be chilling prison and when he comes out he will be give a restraining order to the boy and the woman for life. He is a criminal, a kidnapper, illegally holding a minor under his care. He could be assaulting the boy as we speak, cos for him to display such dastardly act and abduct this child, shows he has no morals , God knows what that poor boy is passing through in his hands, that's child abuse.

erico2k2:
Don't get too drawn into this.the woman is at fault not the man.she must have been asked to come to court and ofcos the Nigerian factor took over her.he has the right from the court and he is entitled to the child. If she wants him back she has to go fru the courts simple.

Siena:
[color=Blue]Dude, relax, and keep your emotions in check.

You say the father is a criminal, a kidnapper. How do you work this out? He IS the boy's father, and he WAS awarded custody by a court. He has gone by the book. Does a father have LESS right than a mother to be a parent?

As for saying he may be assaulting the boy, that is pure conjecture on your part. If the Nigerian mother had done the same, she would be supported, even if she did NOT go through the legal system. The mother is quite within her rights to get a lawyer to fight the father of her child for custody, and get the original court order overturned, but unless she can prove the man is an unfit father, she is unlikely to succeed, and WILL be wasting her money.

Father's have the right to be full time custodians of their children too. And just so you DO know - mothers have also been known to abuse and kill their own children too. It's not a gender issue, it's a personality trait.

The thread title here is also misleading, and could do with changing. [/color]

k4kenny:
Who awards custody to a parent without a full court hearing with both parties present. Our legal system has turned to a nasty joke. What evidence did the court consider before handing FULL CUSTODY the father. The mother would have to be a lunatic drug addict before such an can be given out. There's nothing wrong whit having joint custody of the child, but full custody? Without a court hearing No no no

Siena:
[color=Blue]Dude, relax, and keep your emotions in check.

You say the father is a criminal, a kidnapper. How do you work this out? He IS the boy's father, and he WAS awarded custody by a court. He has gone by the book. Does a father have LESS right than a mother to be a parent?

As for saying he may be assaulting the boy, that is pure conjecture on your part. If the Nigerian mother had done the same, she would be supported, even if she did NOT go through the legal system. The mother is quite within her rights to get a lawyer to fight the father of her child for custody, and get the original court order overturned, but unless she can prove the man is an unfit father, she is unlikely to succeed, and WILL be wasting her money.

Father's have the right to be full time custodians of their children too. And just so you DO know - mothers have also been known to abuse and kill their own children too. It's not a gender issue, it's a personality trait.

The thread title here is also misleading, and could do with changing. [/color]

k4kenny:
You must have skipped the part where she said she was never served any papers neither was there a court appearance. The foreigner must have bribed some paralegals or so to quickly rustle up the court order for full unconditional custody.

I've said it before. There's an unavoidable curse for anyone who deliberately tries to sever the mother-child bond. When God Himself has placed the rank of a mother to her child higher than anyone else on this earth, one yeye man wants to go against that. He will surely face God's wrath both on earth and the hereafter.

Siena:
[color=Blue]Dude, relax, and keep your emotions in check.

You say the father is a criminal, a kidnapper. How do you work this out? He IS the boy's father, and he WAS awarded custody by a court. He has gone by the book. Does a father have LESS right than a mother to be a parent?

As for saying he may be assaulting the boy, that is pure conjecture on your part. If the Nigerian mother had done the same, she would be supported, even if she did NOT go through the legal system. The mother is quite within her rights to get a lawyer to fight the father of her child for custody, and get the original court order overturned, but unless she can prove the man is an unfit father, she is unlikely to succeed, and WILL be wasting her money.

Father's have the right to be full time custodians of their children too. And just so you DO know - mothers have also been known to abuse and kill their own children too. It's not a gender issue, it's a personality trait.

The thread title here is also misleading, and could do with changing. [/color]

Philpham:
Listen, if you even know the judicial system of the country u live in, you will know that the high court awards primary custody of a minor child to the mother even after a divorce, so the fact that this french maniac was awarded sole custody of this minor child means there is a big flaw in the Nigerian judicial system, that is not to say that the man will not have access to the child, but the definitive law awards full custody of care and upbringing to the mother, as men generally cannot not raise children successfully, they do not have that innate ability to do so. Most men cannot nurse an offspring, and the law understands that. Period!
This man must have bribed the lawyers to the point that he had the audacity to use armed men to abduct this poor child from school.
He is wrong at every level and guilty of harm to this child.
He is already unfit to have custody of this child with the dubious actions he has taken so far.
If it were in western world where things work properly , he would be a fugitive by now and even banned frrom having further children as he is a potential danger to minors.
Nigeria is a place where everything goes but most annoying how foriengers will come and corrupt the system even more against our own people.

prince3009:
Where are all those female Nairalanders who say that white men are better lovers than Nigerian men?

techmart:
Funny... dont be a shaky fan.... stand with your team and support them.

Order for your quality jerseys now.

doncent12:
Let's hear his part of the story...I don't trust this ladies.

Siena:
I am aware of the NJ system, and I sympathise with anyone who has to rely on it.

But...you can NOT conclude that the father in this case can not bring up his child. You said MOST (not all) men can not nurse a child. Well, this man may possibly be one of those that can. I myself am a father, and I have no issues nurturing my kids.

As for saying the father "must have bribed" the lawyers, that is a pretty baseless assumption. You can't just say that as if you were there. If the mother herself accused the father of bribing his lawyer, she could find herself defending a libel / slander case in addition to other counter-defense she may wish to mount against her son's father. I'm not an attorney, but I know there are certain things you don't state when trying to overturn a court's decision.

I know this whole case is one that you are expressing a lot of emotion over, but calling the boy's father a French maniac will NOT overturn the court's decision, nor will tarring one of the court's servants (and indirectly the court itself) with the corruption brush.

I still maintain the mother needs to mount a robust case against her son's father, IF she is going to have any chance of regaining sole custody of her child. And that means keeping emotion and conjecture out of things, and NOT using Twitter to attack the boy's father. Right now, SHE is the one creating unwanted publicity, and dragging her son through the mud.

Whether she likes it or not, he remains the boy's father.

prince3009:
Where are all those female Nairalanders who say that white men are better lovers than Nigerian men?