JackBizzle:

$1,000,000 to whoever can translate this verbose nonsense.
mtcheww.

Lololol. What if I translate?

teechudleyy:
@Jackbizzle And @ reyginus

Two babies in the womb are discussin

Baby a: do you believe in mom? do you believe in life after birth?

baby b: no. I cant see mom. Why should i believe she. Exists? what is the proof? it all ends here. I dont believe in life after birth

Discuss your opinions on these.

Teechdudelyy's two boobs on her chest are discussing

Breast A; do you believe in brain? do you believe that there is a conscious entity controlling the body?

Breast B; no, I can see the brain. Why should I believe it exists? What is the proof? It all ends here. I dont believe in the CNS


=========================

The pertinent questions would be;

1) WHY IN THE HELL WOULD A BREAST OR A BABY BE ABLE TO CONTEMPLATE THE MEANING OF LIFE OR BIRTH?

2) IF THE BREASTS OR BABIES COULD REASON, THEY WOULD AUTOMATICALLY KNOW THAT THERE IS SOME LIFE-FORCE THAT THEY ARE ATTACHED TO.

Reyginus:
Simply, lack of absolute information of their location. But it is a weak argument. You didn't factor the fact that one of the babies claim to hear mum singing them to sleep. Something it other says it's not possible.

I dont think its weak. We Can say for sure those two are ignorant because we already know what they dont. But we as humans are to proud, just like one of those kids to accept that there are just thinks we do not know. We believe we have it all figured out.

sonOfLucifer:

Why don't we call this a mystery? What we do not know?
Why assume 'it' to a being, then give it a form in our own image?

My 'it' wasn't referring to God but his descriptions which he wants me to call 'experience'.

teechudleyy:
What is atheism? a lack of belief in theism. A belief that theres no God.

Mathematically, an entity created out of a null entity is a null entity. Its Like 8×0=0.

in that case, the existence of atheism itself, is the acknowledgment of God, but presenting God as a null entity.

If God doesnt exist dont you think Atheism wouldnt exist?

In conclusion, can we just say atheism is just a barrage. Of Words and conceptualization of what we dont really understand?

oya Debate. Cc amicable09, nihilist

Onus of proof lies with the theist

All this one is story.

We're talking about genderless featureless deity who is advertised as an ethereal money doubler, and extremely spiteful character who is unable to forgive until blood is spilled...including his own son's...

But why you are trying to use mathematics to prove his existence?

I mean this guy has a backstory spanning thousands of years, a huge and fully developed cast of supporting characters, a large number of watershed(literally) events, and a merchandise line patronised by billions of customers....and the best you can do to 'prove' his existence is give me a maths analogy?

teechudley I hail o

teechudleyy:

I dont think its weak. We Can say for sure those two are ignorant because we already know what they dont. But we as humans are to proud, just like one of those kids to accept that there are just thinks we do not know. We believe we have it all figured out.

If both are arguing without claims it would have been an easier argument. Here one says mum speaks to it so mum must exist while the other looks around and say mum just can't exist.

Yeah. We are too proud to admit inadequate knowledge. I agree with that. The reason I don't consider atheism a very intelligent position right now. Their are a lot to be known to arrive at that.

Nihilist
I swear, when we take these arguments serious, we only encourage nonsense.

JackBizzle:



Teechdudelyy's two boobs on her chest are discussing

Breast A; do you believe in brain? do you believe that there is a conscious entity controlling the body?

Breast B; no, I can see the brain. Why should I believe it exists? What is the proof? It all ends here. I dont believe in the CNS


=========================

The pertinent questions would be;

1) WHY IN THE HELL WOULD A BREAST OR A BABY BE ABLE TO CONTEMPLATE THE MEANING OF LIFE OR BIRTH?

2) IF THE BREASTS OR BABIES COULD REASON, THEY WOULD AUTOMATICALLY KNOW THAT THERE IS SOME LIFE-FORCE THAT THEY ARE ATTACHED TO.

Chai! My guy is finished. What a man! Wow. Genius.

Reyginus:

Yeah. We are too proud to admit inadequate knowledge. I agree with that. The reason I don't consider atheism a very intelligent position right now. Their are a lot to be known to arrive at that.

Even as an atheist, I agree with this.

I console myself by saying at least, I'm not dreaming up imaginary spirit daddies.

Reyginus:
Lololol. What if I translate?

It doesnt count.

sonOfLucifer:
Nihilist
I swear, when we take these arguments serious, we only encourage nonsense.

Oh boy, wetin man go do?

Reyginus:
Chai! My guy is finished. What a man! Wow. Genius.

Na lacasera dey high you so?

JackBizzle:



Teechdudelyy's two boobs on her chest are discussing

Breast A; do you believe in brain? do you believe that there is a conscious entity controlling the body?

Breast B; no, I can see the brain. Why should I believe it exists? What is the proof? It all ends here. I dont believe in the CNS


=========================

The pertinent questions would be;

1) WHY IN THE HELL WOULD A BREAST OR A BABY BE ABLE TO CONTEMPLATE THE MEANING OF LIFE OR BIRTH?

2) IF THE BREASTS OR BABIES COULD REASON, THEY WOULD AUTOMATICALLY KNOW THAT THERE IS SOME LIFE-FORCE THAT THEY ARE ATTACHED TO.

How Are you sure my boobs or those babies cant reason when we all know. Everythin in nature inter relates in other to make things the way they are. The fact that its not done the way we understand doesnt mean its not done.

We can reason, yet we reject all assumptions of life form we may or may not be attached to because. Theres no proof.

Lets Assume my boobs could reason or those babies could. What proof would they hold on to to help them arrive at this conclusion you hv stipulated?

Also, why did you say they would automatically know... and not logically.

Automatic knowledge is the backbone of religion.

Nihilist:


Onus of proof lies with the theist

All this one is story.

We're talking about genderless featureless deity who is advertised as an ethereal money doubler, and extremely spiteful character who is unable to forgive until blood is spilled...including his own son's...

But why you are trying to use mathematics to prove his existence?

I mean this guy has a backstory spanning thousands of years, a huge and fully developed cast of supporting characters, a large number of watershed(literally) events, and a merchandise line patronised by billions of customers....and the best you can do to 'prove' his existence is give me a maths analogy?

teechudley I hail o

Lol! @nihilist I see you. I see your brain but i'll say this.

That is not a mathematical proof of God. I have no proof except the believe tht theres more to life, and the existential questions i ask my universe.

Using Mathematics because it is the most logical item i can get hold of. I Only used to to quesrion the logic behind atheism, not to proove the existence of God.

JackBizzle:


Na lacasera dey high you so?

Lol. You and your third leg eh! I'm praying for you.

sonOfLucifer:

Even as an atheist, I agree with this.

I console myself by saying at least, I'm not dreaming up imaginary spirit daddies.

Lol. You guys are really powerful.

teechudleyy:


How Are you sure my boobs or those babies cant reason when we all know. Everythin in nature inter relates in other to make things the way they are. The fact that its not done the way we understand doesnt mean its not done.

We can reason, yet we reject all assumptions of life form we may or may not be attached to because. Theres no proof.

Lets Assume my boobs could reason or those babies could. What proof would they hold on to to help them arrive at this conclusion you hv stipulated?

Also, why did you say they would automatically know... and not logically.

Automatic knowledge is the backbone of religion.

How do babies get food in the womb? How do breasts get milk to lactate?



Well, at this stage, I'm confused myself. I'm an atheist and so I must see the evidence. I think I would prefer to physically examine the breasts in question.

Reyginus:
Lol. You and your third leg eh! I'm praying for you.

What third leg?

Guy, I'm not a casanova! I'm just a classic man.

Ask muskeeto aka sonoflucifer, he is the one that has all the babes' numbers.

teechudleyy:


Lol! @nihilist I see you. I see your brain but i'll say this.

That is not a mathematical proof of God. I have no proof except the believe tht theres more to life, and the existential questions i ask my universe.

Using Mathematics because it is the most logical item i can get hold of. I Only used to to quesrion the logic behind atheism, not to proove the existence of God.

Blind faith is not a bad thing.

I myself still have faith that a fantasised 3sum involving Giselle Bundchen,Aisha Buhari and dear old nihilist will soon become reality

I just don't go around pretending that this faith is grounded in any kind of logic...unlike one of your colleagues on this thread

JackBizzle:



What third leg?

Guy, I'm not a casanova! I'm just a classic man.

Ask muskeeto aka sonoflucifer, he is the one that has all the babes' numbers.

Classic Man? Okay. I will let peace reign. I'm baffled at the source of your analogies. You are blessing to all the earth.

Reyginus:
Classic Man? Okay. I will let peace reign. I'm baffled at the source of your analogies. You are blessing to all the earth.

Classic man!! CLASSIC MAN!!

Gaddemit!! Do you not have a tv in your house?


Here is the Gaddem reference;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsiN0W15w0U

=================================


Must I teach you everything? Guy, you need to start paying me.

JackBizzle:


Classic man!! CLASSIC MAN!!
Gaddemit!! Do you not have a tv in your house?

Here is the Gaddem reference;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsiN0W15w0U
=================================

Must I teach you everything? Guy, you need to start paying me.

Of course I know. I'm a hiphop head. Kendrick is my number two now.

JackBizzle:



How do babies get food in the womb? How do breasts get milk to lactate?



Well, at this stage, I'm confused myself. I'm an atheist and so I must see the evidence. I think I would prefer to physically examine the breasts in question.

It Would take faith of a non atheist to believe that theres a pair of breasts behind this message sent to you via codes and algorithms available for Physical examination. in the logical sense of it... i dont exist.

Diddyydiva:

You are welcome to the non-christian chatbox.

If you are lost, the romance section is to the left <<<<<< that way.

teechudleyy:


It Would take faith of a non atheist to believe that theres a pair of breasts behind this message sent to you via codes and algorithms available for Physical examination. in the logical sense of it... i dont exist.

You dont exist?

Guess what? Neither does my fantasy of squeezing some breasts.


We all win in the game of non-existence!

JackBizzle:




You are welcome to the non-christian chatbox.

If you are lost, the romance section is to the left <<<<<< that way.

wao what an absurd welcome.

You received a visitor and then show her the way.

You are one hell of a confused person.



I didn't lost my way BTW, I followed someone here to see what's happening here

Reyginus:
Of course I know. I'm a hiphop head. Kendrick is my number two now.

I sha hope it is not the same way you "support" barcelona.

-just claiming to be a fan when they are winning/very popular

JackBizzle:



You dont exist?

Guess what? Neither does my fantasy of squeezing some breasts.


We all win in the game of non-existence!

Exactly. In The game of non existence, we all win! but we cant say one thing exists and then expel the other.

Diddyydiva:
wao what an absurd welcome.

You received a visitor and then show her the way.

You are one hell of a confused person.



I didn't lost my way BTW, I followed someone here to see what's happening here

It is not my fault that I seem confused......I've been dealing with nonsensical religious arguments all day, and so, I'm feeling the stress.

teechudleyy:


Exactly. In The game of non existence, we all win! but we cant say one thing exists and then expel the other.

What we can do is look for evidence for things that we say exist.

So far, no evidence for God.

JackBizzle:



It is not my fault that I seem confused......I've been dealing with nonsensical religious arguments all day, and so, I'm feeling the stress.

I see.




I will silently scan through the thread to see what's up



Till I'm through