₦airaland Forum

menxer:
I was clear about what I said.
is the big bang theory parallel to theory of evolution?

You can correlate all these the way you understand for us to learn from.

I am trying to correct you from your obvious mistake, if you want to accept it fine, if you dont want to, na your business...Evolution of life and The Big bang has absolutely nothing to do with each other....

donnffd:
I am trying to correct you from your obvious mistake, if you want to accept it fine, if you dont want to, na your business...Evolution of life and The Big bang has absolutely nothing to do with each other....

Are you trying to be funny?
Correct me how?
What have you said about creationism, evolution, big bang theory that I should take correction?

Connect the 3 let me see where I am at variance. I guess that's the reason for the thread

KingEbukasBlog:
And how does serve as an evidence for macro-evolution ? Like I said , I won't accept it because its not observed .

General scientific consensus does not see the difference between micro- and macroevolution, neither do I.

That is why I'm asking you to define this difference.

CoolUsername:
General scientific consensus does not see the difference between micro- and macroevolution, neither do I.

That is why I'm asking you to define this difference.

I stated it right there , observation .

KingEbukasBlog:
I stated it right there , observation .

That is not satisfactory. What makes you believe that microevolution stops at a point? What barriers can't it cross?

CoolUsername:
That is not satisfactory. What makes you believe that microevolution stops at a point? What barriers can't it cross?

I never said it stops at a point - I'm a progressive creationist by the way . But the claim micro evolution caused microbes to become man over aeons is ludicrous .

KingEbukasBlog:
I never said it stops at a point - I'm a progressive creationist by the way . But the claim micro evolution caused microbes to become man over aeons is ludicrous .

If you can't define a barrier then your entire argument falls apart. You are no stranger to conversations like this, I've told you about sympatric speciation taking place among fruitflies.

If speciation can take place, along with the ridiculous variation we see
occur within short periods of time between animals of the same species, with such little change to the genome then we can see that given enough time. Single-celled organism to man isn't so far-fetched.

CoolUsername:
If you can't define a barrier then your entire argument falls apart. You are no stranger to conversations like this, I've told you about sympatric speciation taking place among fruitflies.

If speciation can take place, along with the ridiculous variation we see
occur within short periods of time between animals of the same species, with such little change to the genome then we can see that given enough time. Single-celled organism to man isn't so far-fetched.

I can't define a barrier because its an assumption , just like yours .

I think this article addresses some issues I have with evolution

http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scienctific-facts-prove-theory-of.html

Include evolution of sexes and sexual reproduction .

KingEbukasBlog:
I can't define a barrier because its an assumption , just like yours .

I think this article addresses some issues I have with evolution

http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scienctific-facts-prove-theory-of.html

Include evolution of sexes and sexual reproduction .

This article is quite erroneous. I'm not going to debunk each claim it made one at a time. But I can tell you some of the poor knowledge the author has shown in broad strikes.

Speciation has taken place in the lab. Lack of interbreeding would eventually lead to closely related but distinct species. As we can see closely related animals in the same family but different species can interbreed (although with difficulty). Even speciation is in degrees.

Furthermore, comparing humans with animals is disingenuous in many ways. Humans wear clothes, and build fires. We have large brains and the ability to shape our own selection.

Tropical mammals grow fur because they still need to conserve heat at night. In fact, all terrestrial animals under the size of a rhino (besides humans) have a coat of fur or hair. Tropical animals have other methods of keeping cool, such as sweating, panting, vasodilatation, etc.

Finally, sexual reproduction provides the advantage of creating quick variation in species. This would be helpful in times where there is a pressure to adapt, such as changing environments, etc.

I know that these explanations won't change your mind or make you want to double-check your conviction that evolution is false and you'll probably go back to posting memes later today. But I did it anyway.

Evolution is voodoo science. Simple. Its actually an insult to reasoning.

KingEbukasBlog:
If it being observed is part of the evidence then I will accept . No observation , no proof anything otherwise is nugatory . Plus putative ancestors are used to link so many fossils to make the theory work . These putative ancestors keep getting modified till it seems believable . So much falsehood in that crap .

Men the religious are funny, you claim you need more proof for you to believe in evolution, but even though there are absolutely no proof what soever that jesus did any of the miracles in the bible or that things that would leave a mountain of evidence like the great flood ever happened. you believe staunchly in them.

felixomor:
Evolution is voodoo science. Simple. Its actually an insult to reasoning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZt1Gn0R22Q