₦airaland Forum

Demmzy15:
Bros why you dey change mouth? Must you lie and speak with both sides of your mouth? You clearly stated that Ibn Taymiyyah and his students are terrorists, you were ignorant to know that Ibn Kathir was a student of Ibn Taymiyyah. Instead of you to admit that you've made a mistake and publicly recant your statement, you dey here dey form boss.

From your statements and posts, you're the terrorist and intolerant one here. This is just a glaring hypocrisy, please don't quote me again!

Salam Alaikum!

Wallahi, I had know Ibn kathir as Ibn Taimiyyah's student before starting this discussion. Allah is my witness. For who is a terrotist? the world knows better! Did u see me striving hard to say Iam not a terrotrist? Is the terrorist that is paying through his nose to improve his mage going as far as NYTimes. No amount of image burnishing can change these facts brother. Here is Ibn Taumiyyah. Enjoy reading.
POSTED IN IBN TAYMIYYA’S MISGUIDED
VIEW ON VISITING THE PROPHET’S GRAVE
(SALLALLAHU ‘ALAIHI WA SALLAM)
Imam ibn Nasir al-Din al-Dimashqi calling ibn
Taymiyya a Deviant? – Visiting the Grave of the
Prophet (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)
The Taymiyyun love to quote Imam ibn Nasir al-
Din al-Dimashqi (d.846AH) and his book al-Radd
al-Wafir in defence of their Imam, ibn
Taymiyya. However, the following is a clear cut
example of how many of those who defended
him weren’t truly aware of all the deviant
positions held by him on various issues. Imam
ibn Nasir al-Din al-Dimashqi falls into this
category as is evident from the following,
where he declares anyone who rejects the
Hadiths in relation to the reward and virtue of
visiting the grave of the Prophet (sallallahu
‘alaihi wa sallam) a deviant. It is well known that
ibn Taymiyya is the foremost proponent of the
view that travelling out to visit the blessed
grave of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa
sallam) is a reprehensible innovation – a view
which he based on the rejection of the
aforementioned narrations. Imam ibn Nasir al-
Din al-Dimashqi mentions:
“Visiting the grave of Rasulullah (sallallahu
‘alayhi wa sallam) is a Sunnah of the
Muslims, it is unanimously accepted as an
act of reward and it is an act of virtue
that is encouraged. The Hadiths on this
topic have been accepted and practised
upon, even though a few of these Hadiths
have weakness. Only a deviant will reject
them totally.”
(Jami’ al-Athar, vol.8 pg.141)
In addition, it is worth noting that Imam ibn
Nasir al-Din al-Dimashqi has written extensively
on this and has approved several Hadiths on
this issue in the book of his which has been
quoted from above (Jami’ al-Athar) – see vol.8
pgs. 129-141.
Quote taken from HERE
December 1, 2014
Leave a reply
Imam al-Qastallani on ibn Taymiyya’s Prohibiting
of Travelling to Visit the Prophet’s Grave
(sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)
Imam Ahmad al-Qastallani (D. 923AH)
expressing his outrage on ibn Taymiyya’s
prohibition of travelling to visit the Prophet’s
grave (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam):
“The Shaykh Taqi al-Din ibn Taymiyya has
abominable and odd statements on this issue to
the effect that travelling to visit the Prophet
(sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) is prohibited and is
not a pious deed but the contrary. Shaykh Taqi
al-Din al-Subki has replied to him in Shifa al-
Saqam and has gratified the hearts of the
believers.”
[Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Baqi al-Zurqani, Sharh
al-Mawahib al-Laduniyya (Cairo 1291AH), 8:343]
February 9, 2013
Leave a reply
Mulla ‘Ali al-Qari on ibn Taymiyya’s Prohibiting
of Travelling to Visit the Prophet’s Grave
(sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)
Mulla ‘Ali al-Qari al-Harawi al-Hanafi (D.
1014AH) on ibn Taymiyya’s prohibition of
travelling to visit the Prophet’s grave (sallallahu
‘alaihi wa sallam):
“Amongst the Hanbalis, ibn Taymiyya has gone
to an extreme by prohibiting travelling to visit
the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam), just as
others have gone to the opposite extreme in
saying: the fact that the visiting is a pious deed
is known with certainty and he who denies this
is an unbeliever. Perhaps the second position is
closer to the truth, for to prohibit something
that scholars by consensus deem commendable
is unbelief, since it is worse than prohibiting
what is (merely) permissible, in regards to
which there is agreement (i.e. there is
agreement that the prohibition of what is
permissible by consensus is unbelief).”
[Mulla ‘Ali al-Qari al-Harawi, Sharh al-Shifa
(Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 2001), 2:152]
From the above-mentioned words of Mulla ‘Ali
al-Qari al-Harawi al-Hanafi, it seems he has
retracted his statements in praise of ibn
Taymiyya, as Jarh Mufassar (Specified
Criticism) takes precedence over General
Tawthiq/Ta’dil (Praise).
Anyone who wishes to object to the above
should know that in his sharh (commentary) on
the Shifa of al-Qadhi ‘Iyadh he mentioned his
al-Mirqat Sharh al-Mishkat ( al-Masabih ) in 2
places – 1/24 and 1/547. Also, in the same
Sharh al-Shifa , he referred to his sharh
(commentary) on Shama-il al-Tirmidhi known as
Jam’ al-Wasa-il (1/324, 343 and 2/366). This
means that his Sharh al-Shifa is later than his
sharh (commentary) on Mishkat al-Masabih and
his sharh (commentary) on Shama-il al-Tirmidhi ,
and thus what he mentioned in it, is his last
stance on ibn Taymiyya, as it overrides what he
thought about him in the earlier two works
named, in which he had praiseworthy remarks
for ibn Taymiyya.
February 9, 2013
Leave a reply
Imam al-Khafaji on ibn Taymiyya’s Prohibiting of
Travelling to Visit the Prophet’s Grave
(sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)
Imam Ahmad al-Khafaji (D. 1069) on ibn
Taymiyya’s prohibition of travelling to visit the
Prophet’s grave (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam):
“Know that this is the hadith that led ibn
Taymiyya and those who follow him, such as ibn
al-Qayyim, to the despicable statement due to
which he was declared an unbeliever, and
against which al-Subki devoted a separate work,
and this is his prohibiting the visit to the tomb
of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) and
travelling to it… He imagined that he protected
monotheism ( tawhid ) on the basis of drivel that
should not be mentioned, for they do not come
from a rational, let alone an eminent, person,
may Allah the Exalted forgive him.”
[Ahmad al-Khafaji, Nasim al-Riyad , 5:100-101]
February 9, 2013
Leave a reply
ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani on ibn Taymiyya’s
Prohibiting of Travelling to Visit the Prophet’s
Grave (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)
Shaykh al-Islam ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani (D.
852AH) on ibn Taymiyya’s prohibiting of
travelling to visit the Prophet’s grave (sallallahu
‘alaihi wa sallam):
“Al-Kirmani (D. 786AH) has said: On this issue
there has been much discussion in our Syrian
lands, and many treatises have been written by
both parties. I say: He is referring to Shaykh
Taqi al-Din al-Subki and others’ responses to
Shaykh Taqi al-Din ibn Taymiyya… and the crux
of the matter is that they have pointed out that
his position implies that it is prohibited to
travel to visit the tomb of the Prophet
(sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)… This is one of the
ugliest positions that has been reported of ibn
Taymiyya. One of the things he has adduced to
deny the claim that there is a consensus on the
matter is the report that (Imam) Malik disliked
people saying: I have visited the tomb of the
Prophet. The discerning scholars of the (Maliki)
school have replied that he disliked the phrase
out of politeness, and not the visiting itself, for
it is one of the best actions and the noblest of
pious deeds with which one draws near to Allah
the Majestic, and it’s legitimacy is a matter of
consensus without any doubt, and Allah is the
One who leads to truth.”
[ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, Fath al-Bari Sharh Sahih
al-Bukhari (Cairo: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi,
1959), 3:308]. source: https://taymiyyun./category/ibn-taymiyyas-misguided-view-on-visiting-the-prophets-grave-sallallahu-alaihi-wa-sallam/

lexiconkabir:
pls don't run off, if you are condemning ibn taymiyyah, and if you condemning his students, condemn all, not some! why condemn ibn qayyim and spare ibn katheer? they are both students of ibn taymiyyah, so why spare ibn katheer? because you've read his work and saw sense in it? only if you'll "open-mindedly" read the work of ibn taymiyyah and ibn qayyim. you'll see that they are no different from ibn katheer! all you depend on is hearsay and not facts! which is why i am reluctant to engage you in the first place! all the hearsays that was circulated about ibn taymiyyah and ibn Abdulwahhab by their enviers are the same hearsays you are repeating today, don't critisize people because others do, do your independent research about that person and why so much people speak about them, today Islam is what everybody vilify, because of hearsays and misconception, but you being a muslim know fully well that all the allegations levied against Islam and Muslims are not true, do not let your hatred for someone blind you from being just, Allaah azza wa jal says;


"O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah , witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do"

Brother, U don't have the sole legitimacy to tell me who I should condemn and respect! Many of Ibn Taimiyyah's books, not most or all are but terrorism manuals.

President99:
Brother, U don't have the sole legitimacy to tell me who I should condemn and respect! Many of Ibn Taimiyyah's books, not most or all are but terrorism manuals.

your opinion and your problem.

[quote author=lexiconkabir post=50662437]your opinion and your problem.[/quote
The way u r equally entitled to ur opinion to deceive unsuspecting muslims of Salafism.

Saudi Arabia
WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a
cash machine for terrorists
Hillary Clinton memo highlights Gulf states'
failure to block funding for groups like al-
Qaida, Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba
The terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab walks through
the Chhatrapati Shivaji train station in Mumbai
during the 2008 attacks. Lashkar-e-Taiba,
which carried out the atrocity, is one of several
groups that have raised funds via Saudi Arabia.
Photograph: Sebastian D'souza/AP
Declan Walsh in Islamabad
Sunday 5 December 2010 15.30 GMT
Last modified on Wednesday 15 December 2010
14.46 GMT
This article is 5 years old
Saudi Arabia is the world's largest source of
funds for Islamist militant groups such as the
Afghan Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba – but the
Saudi government is reluctant to stem the flow
of money, according to Hillary Clinton.
"More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia
remains a critical financial support base for al-
Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist
groups
," says a secret December 2009 paper signed
by the US secretary of state. Her memo urged
US diplomats to redouble their efforts to stop
Gulf money reaching extremists in Pakistan and
Afghanistan.
"Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most
significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist
groups worldwide," she said.
Three other Arab countries are listed as
sources of militant money: Qatar, Kuwait and
the United Arab Emirates.
The cables highlight an often ignored factor in
the Pakistani and Afghan conflicts: that the
violence is partly bankrolled by rich,
conservative donors across the Arabian Sea
whose governments do little to stop them.
The problem is particularly acute in Saudi
Arabia, where militants soliciting funds slip into
the country disguised as holy pilgrims, set up
front companies to launder funds and receive
money from government-sanctioned charities.
One cable details how the Pakistani militant
outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the
2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front
company to fund its activities in 2005
.
Meanwhile officials with the LeT's charity wing,
Jamaat-ud-Dawa, travelled to Saudi Arabia
seeking donations for new schools at vastly
inflated costs – then siphoned off the excess
money to fund militant operations.
Militants seeking donations often come during
the hajj pilgrimage – "a major security loophole
since pilgrims often travel with large amounts
of cash and the Saudis cannot refuse them
entry into Saudi Arabia". Even a small donation
can go far: LeT operates on a budget of just $
5.25m (£3.25m) a year, according to American
estimates.
Saudi officials are often painted as reluctant
partners. Clinton complained of the "ongoing
challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat
terrorist funds emanating from Saudi Arabia as
a strategic priority".
Washington is critical of the Saudi refusal to
ban three charities classified as terrorist
entities in the US. "Intelligence suggests that
these groups continue to send money overseas
and, at times, fund extremism overseas," she
said.
There has been some progress. This year US
officials reported that al-Qaida's fundraising
ability had "deteriorated substantially" since a
government crackdown. As a result Bin Laden's
group was "in its weakest state since 9/11" in
Saudi Arabia.
Any criticisms are generally offered in private.
The cables show that when it comes to powerful
oil-rich allies US diplomats save their concerns
for closed-door talks, in stark contrast to the
often pointed criticism meted out to allies in
Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Instead, officials at the Riyadh embassy worry
about protecting Saudi oilfields from al-Qaida
attacks .
The other major headache for the US in the
Gulf region is the United Arab Emirates. The
Afghan Taliban and their militant partners the
Haqqani network earn "significant funds"
through UAE-based businesses
, according to one report. The Taliban extort
money from the large Pashtun community in the
UAE
, which is home to 1 million Pakistanis and
150,000 Afghans. They also fundraise by
kidnapping Pashtun businessmen based in Dubai
or their relatives.
"Some Afghan businessmen in the UAE have
resorted to purchasing tickets on the day of
travel to limit the chance of being kidnapped
themselves upon arrival in either Afghanistan or
Pakistan," the report says.
Last January US intelligence sources said two
senior Taliban fundraisers had regularly
travelled to the UAE, where the Taliban and
Haqqani networks laundered money through local
front companies.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding

Saudi Arabia, 9/11, and what we know about the
secret papers that could ignite a diplomatic war
There is growing clamour for declassification of
the pages along with allegations about attempts
by the Saudis to keep their alleged role in the
attacks hidden
14K
shares
The allegations of Saudi involvement in the
attacks come against a backdrop of the ultra-
conservative Kingdom’s funding violent Islamist
groups AP
Twenty-eight secret pages of a report locked
away in a room in the Capitol in Washington lie in
the centre of a crisis between America and
Saudi Arabia which threatens to have severe
and widespread repercussions.
The US Congress is considering legislation
which would enable the families of victims of
the September 11 attacks to sue Saudi Arabia,
presented by the West as its most valuable ally
in the Middle East, over alleged links with al-
Qaeda terrorists who carried out the attacks
on New York and Washington.
READ MORE
Obama knows 9/11 was linked to Saudi Arabia –
but it has oil
The issue had cast a long shadow over the
recent visit of President Barack Obama to
Riyadh, with the Saudis threatening to sell off
$750bn of American assets they hold if the bill
is passed by Congress.
Why this ad?
Ad covers the page
Stop seeing this ad
The classified pages are in a file titled
“Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding
Certain Sensitive Narrative Matters”, which
have never been published from the findings of
the Joint Congressional Inquiry into the attacks
which killed 3,000 people and injured more than
6,000 others.
Former President George W Bush claimed the
publication of this part of the report would
damage America’s national security by revealing
“sources and methods that would make it harder
for us to win the War on Terror”.
Inside the White House on 9/11
But there is growing clamour for
declassification of the pages along with
allegations about attempts by the Saudis to
keep their alleged role in the attacks hidden.
The latest public figure to demand disclosure
was Rudi Giuliani, the mayor of New York at the
time of the attacks.
A Saudi prince, claimed Mr Giuliani, had given
him a cheque for $10m (£7m) in an effort to
persuade him to deflect attention away from
the Kingdom. The former mayor said he
returned the cheque after tearing it up. He
declared: “His money he can keep and go burn it
in hell. The American people need to know
exactly what was the role of the Saudi Arabia
government in the attacks: we are entitled to
know who killed our loved ones and who almost
killed us all.”
It was reported on Sunday that White House
House officials have said privately that at least
some of the 28 pages will be made public.
Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/finding-discussion-and-narrative-regarding-certain-sensitive-narrative-matters-saudi-arabia-911-11-a6999091.html

Noooo!


We all know who are terrorist...


Terrorist are wahabi

Boko haram isis and all the extremism sects where from teaching of Ibn Abdul Wahab annajdi



the name Najdu is place where our beloved prophet Tells us that

"the horn of shaytan shoul emerg there"

and even Ibn Abdul Wahab's brother "Sulaiman"


an Educated man comfirmed that the horn of shaytan that our beloved prophet told us is his brother (Ibn Abdul Wahabi)


in the book "Sawa'iq Ilahiyya"


so leave wahabi teaching follow the right path of our beloved prophet


I am video that Abubakar Shekau lecture in their blief and he is quoting from Ibn Abdul Wahab Books


So take care Wahabi are terrorist

Extremist Sects ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺀﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ISIS is a branch of the Wahhabi cult. Wahhabis are a sect that emerged 250 years ago that follows a deviant man who emerged from a place called Najd, the place where the Prophet said "the tribulations and sedition will occur from there". They oppose the majority of Muslims and declare whomever opposes them as blasphemers and thus promote chaos and killing amongst the nations. Bismillah, praise be to Allah the of creator everything, the one who has no beginning or ending, and Whom does not resemble his creations and does not need any of his creations, we ask Allah to raise the rank of Prophet Muhammad more and to honor him and his Al and companions. And to unite our ummah ameen. The mufti of Makkah Ahmad bin Zaini dahlan already authored a book called "The Fitnah of Wahhabis" and he exposed some of what he saw and wittnessed from the wahhabi extreme and terrorist acts and crimes besides their radical beliefs and misguidance in aqeedah. Read the book "The Fitnah of Wahhabis" ﻣﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ، ﻛﺸﻒ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ" ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﻭﺗﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻼﻝ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺳﺮﻗﻬﻢ ﻭﻧﻬﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﻴﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺤﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻟﺢ. ﺍﻗﺮﺃ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ: ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ Islam is a moderate faith that all Prophets followed. Many people throughout the eras try to pervert the religion. Unfortunately, even in Islam we have extremists who distort the real meaning of Islam, among those are the Wahhabis. Wahhabis (falsely Salafis) are a small misguided radical sect that opposes the Muslim majority. They deem Muslims who oppose them as blasphemers and permit bombing, terrorizing and killing them by the name of Islam. We are obligated to warn people from their evil misguidance. Islam is against radical ideologies and disowns extremist groups (like Wahhabis, Hizb al-ikhwan and hizb at-Tahrir extremists) that misuse the name of Islam for misleading purposes and hidden agendas. And for that the schools of these cults ended up producing uncontrolled extremists like "Bin Laden", "Zarqawi" and "Zawahiri" whom are the reason behind all the terrorist attacks in countries like Algeria, Morrocco, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. And that's the outcome of following the ideologies of Ibn Taymiah, Ibn Abdul-Wahhab and Sayid Qutub that were misguided opinionated extremists opposing Islam. As part of our Islamic obligation in warning from the evil, we intend in this research to expose some of the deviated teachings of these people with full references to stand as a warning to everyone, especially the Muslim communities and families so that they too warn their children from indulging with such extremist groups as the Wahhabis. In Qur'an Allah said in Surat Al ^Imran, Ayah 11 which means: [You are the best of the nations that were brought to the people commanding the lawful and forbidding the unlawful.] And Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam said what means: "If you see my nation fearful of telling he who is unjust, 'You are unjust'--then know the support of Allah is withdrawn from them." We will post their claims in English and put the reference of their books in Arabic so it’s easier to find. We ask Allah to guide us to what is acceptable, enable us to be always steadfast on the path of the Prophet, and to be always protectors and defenders of the creed of Ahlus-Sunnah that the Prophet brought to the people. And Allah knows best. For full references with quotations to the deviant sayings of the Wahhabis see: http://alsunna.org/The-Radical- ideas-of-Wahhabis-towards- Muslims.html http://alsunna.org/Quoting- blasphemous-beliefs-of-Wahhabis- about-Allah-God.html http://alsunna.org/Quoting-The- Misguidance-of-Wahhabis-in- Beliefs-Aqeedah.html http://www.alsunna.org/forum/ index.php?topic=987.0 http://alsunna.org/Proofs-that- Wahhabis-oppose-the-way-of- True-Salaf.html Warning from Nasir Deen al-Albani: http://alsunna.org/Al-Alban-s- Deviations.html ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ؟ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺮﺓ www.alsunna.org/aqwal.htm

Ibnarabi4:
Extremist Sects
ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪ ﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺀﺍﻟﻪ
ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ
ISIS is a branch of the Wahhabi
cult. Wahhabis are a sect that
emerged 250 years ago that
follows a deviant man who
emerged from a place called Najd,
the place where the Prophet said
"the tribulations and sedition will
occur from there". They oppose
the majority of Muslims and
declare whomever opposes them
as blasphemers and thus promote
chaos and killing amongst the
nations.
Bismillah, praise be to Allah the of
creator everything, the one who
has no beginning or ending, and
Whom does not resemble his
creations and does not need any
of his creations, we ask Allah to
raise the rank of Prophet
Muhammad more and to honor
him and his Al and companions.
And to unite our ummah ameen.
The mufti of Makkah Ahmad
bin Zaini dahlan already
authored a book called "The
Fitnah of Wahhabis" and he
exposed some of what he
saw and wittnessed from the
wahhabi extreme and
terrorist acts and crimes
besides their radical beliefs
and misguidance in aqeedah.
Read the book "The Fitnah of
Wahhabis"
ﻣﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ
ﺃﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ، ﻛﺸﻒ ﻓﻲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ" ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﺍﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﻭﺗﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺴﻤﺔ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻼﻝ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ
ﻭﺳﺮﻗﻬﻢ ﻭﻧﻬﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﻴﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺤﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻟﺢ. ﺍﻗﺮﺃ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ:
ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ
Islam is a moderate faith that all
Prophets followed. Many people
throughout the eras try to pervert
the religion. Unfortunately, even in
Islam we have extremists who
distort the real meaning of Islam,
among those are the Wahhabis.
Wahhabis (falsely Salafis) are a
small misguided radical sect that
opposes the Muslim majority. They
deem Muslims who oppose them
as blasphemers and permit
bombing, terrorizing and killing
them by the name of Islam. We are
obligated to warn people from
their evil misguidance. Islam is
against radical ideologies and
disowns extremist groups (like
Wahhabis, Hizb al-ikhwan and hizb
at-Tahrir extremists) that misuse
the name of Islam for misleading
purposes and hidden agendas.
And for that the schools of these
cults ended up producing
uncontrolled extremists like "Bin
Laden", "Zarqawi" and "Zawahiri"
whom are the reason behind all
the terrorist attacks in countries
like Algeria, Morrocco, Egypt, Syria
and Lebanon. And that's the
outcome of following the
ideologies of Ibn Taymiah, Ibn
Abdul-Wahhab and Sayid Qutub
that were misguided opinionated
extremists opposing Islam.
As part of our Islamic obligation in
warning from the evil, we intend
in this research to expose some of
the deviated teachings of these
people with full references to
stand as a warning to everyone,
especially the Muslim communities
and families so that they too warn
their children from indulging with
such extremist groups as the
Wahhabis. In Qur'an Allah said in
Surat Al ^Imran, Ayah 11 which
means: [You are the best of the
nations that were brought to the
people commanding the lawful
and forbidding the unlawful.] And
Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu
Alayhi Wa Sallam said what means:
"If you see my nation fearful of
telling he who is unjust, 'You are
unjust'--then know the support of
Allah is withdrawn from them."
We will post their claims in English
and put the reference of their
books in Arabic so it’s easier to
find.
We ask Allah to guide us to what is
acceptable, enable us to be always
steadfast on the path of the
Prophet, and to be always
protectors and defenders of the
creed of Ahlus-Sunnah that the
Prophet brought to the people.
And Allah knows best.
For full references with quotations
to the deviant sayings of the
Wahhabis see:
http://alsunna.org/The-Radical-
ideas-of-Wahhabis-towards-
Muslims.html
http://alsunna.org/Quoting-
blasphemous-beliefs-of-Wahhabis-
about-Allah-God.html
http://alsunna.org/Quoting-The-
Misguidance-of-Wahhabis-in-
Beliefs-Aqeedah.html
http://www.alsunna.org/forum/
index.php?topic=987.0
http://alsunna.org/Proofs-that-
Wahhabis-oppose-the-way-of-
True-Salaf.html
Warning from Nasir Deen al-Albani:
http://alsunna.org/Al-Alban-s-
Deviations.html
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﻴﺮﺓ
www.alsunna.org/aqwal.htm

. Jazakallahu khair! U v said it all. Wahabbism(falsely salaf) is the root caused of terrorism. Ask them what did the muslims of Hijaz, Madina, Macca and Taif do for slaying them? c

Ibnarabi4:
Noooo!


We all know who are terrorist...


Terrorist are wahabi

Boko haram isis and all the extremism sects where from teaching of Ibn Abdul Wahab annajdi



the name Najdu is place where our beloved prophet Tells us that

"the horn of shaytan shoul emerg there"

and even Ibn Abdul Wahab's brother "Sulaiman"


an Educated man comfirmed that the horn of shaytan that our beloved prophet told us is his brother (Ibn Abdul Wahabi)


in the book "Sawa'iq Ilahiyya"


so leave wahabi teaching follow the right path of our beloved prophet


I am video that Abubakar Shekau lecture in their blief and he is quoting from Ibn Abdul Wahab Books


So take care Wahabi are terrorist

What a bravo! thanks. Wahabbism must be exposed as the mastermind of terrorism in the world just to spread their false aqeeda courtesy of Ibn taimiyya and Abdulwahabb the murderer