₦airaland Forum

dmcdad:
Funny enough, this is not a good-enough excuse to lose to Bilbao home and away. We lost against City some weeks back according to you, according to your logic then, it's either we sold the match or we just weren't interested in winning since we knew definitely we would top the group regardless of that result.

Bottom line? Winning is winning! Losing is losing! Don't come up with cheap excuses like the above. I rest my case.

Chelseafan1:
See as u dey throw am to me like na u be prosecuting counsel...lol

I was clearly talking about this season by including Pool as a title contender, they have no European commitment and are still much better than Spurs over all....

I for one cannot say who is gonna win the league but I can tell you its gonna be either city, Pool or Chelsea.

coded01:
It seems Bayern Munich is the new Man Utd...

airmark:
Why wouldn't i turn back the hands of time? Did the english media hype start last year ? Ronaldo, bale and co were hyped and that was why barca and real paid hugely to get them and they justified it. Since you lost this arguement, it's better you dont raise that next time. Nzonzi who was sold for peanuts away from epl is the one barca is trying to lure to their team. Now , name the players in villareal and other moribund la liga teams that are better technically than sanchez and hazard?

airmark:
Most epl top teams will prefer to concentrate on winning epl and qualifying for the next ucl rather than getting distracted by a less-glamorous europa league. The schedule of epl fixtures has always been an issue for top sides in england as it always take its toll on those top sides.

kinggogo:
Cavani is officially d wooorrrrrssstttt striker in d worldd

D guy na confirm minus 1

*spitsssss*

airmark:
Most epl top teams will prefer to concentrate on winning epl and qualifying for the next ucl rather than getting distracted by a less-glamorous europa league. The schedule of epl fixtures has always been an issue for top sides in england as it always take its toll on those top sides.

hinohsend:
Guy, no jinx us ooo

Chelseafan1:
Barca could have easily won Malaga if Messi had played

dmcdad:
If he had not played against City you would have said the same thing. Thank goodness he played. Which excuse you go use for that one?

bykebyke:
LOL..Are you not entertained?

bykebyke:
LOL..Are you not entertained?

Chelseafan1:
The team won City in the first leg na.
City were disgraced sef, they just had to fight really hard in the second leg.

dmcdad:
Oga, losing na losing. Let's not start with such justification about winning the first leg.

City won the first leg against Mönchengladbach, they could have lost the second leg they played tonight na. As e be say e dey allowed to lose the second leg after winning the first leg of a tie.

Chelseafan1:
I am not in a tussle with you, its clear to the deaf, blind and dumb that Messi 's brilliance and masterclass has bailed this Barca team out on too many occasion this season. He just did it again tonight.

It isn't coincidence that Barca lost, drew or won unconvincingly in most of the matches he didn't feature this season, No?

dmcdad:
The same person you called into question just a fortnight ago? Huh? Issorait! I rest my case.