₦airaland Forum

Refraining from the miraculous or supernatural please explain "scientifically" how a point one-trillionth the diameter of a proton became the present universe in 10^-36 seconds.

Ask scientist, not atheist.

We dey watch

FSBoperator:
Refraining from the miraculous or supernatural please explain "scientifically" how a point one-trillionth the diameter of a proton became the present universe in 10^-36 seconds.

This is like asking how an uranium atom of diameter 10^-10m destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Note: All atheist are not scientists.
you want answer to your question? grab a popular science journal.

niyihawking:
This is like asking how an uranium atom of diameter 10^-10m destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Note: All atheist are not scientists.
you want answer to your question? grab a popular science journal.

This is the scientific theory behind the big bang theory.

The Planck era, which is an event period that can be described as the smallest unitary possible time frame, from where an incredibly super dense mass generated the concept of space and time or rather led to the beginning of the very universe from virtually nothing (and everything) gave birth to the universe. The "let there be light" period.

From this era of our universe's very first beginning, scientists can't prove but still insists that the creation story from which out of nothing, God declared everything at instant is false.

Science has finally ridiculed the very same Atheist and proven the creation theory.

Random chance

Richirich713:
Random chance

lmao

I wonder how long its gona take these clowns to realize that Atheism tops the stupidest inventions man has ever made . You only trust your bottom up circuitry /low road / emotional mind for automatic reactions in stuff like sports , routines , security etc not on God's existence - atheism is based on the emotional mind .

niyihawking:
This is like asking how an uranium atom of diameter 10^-10m destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Note: All atheist are not scientists.
you want answer to your question? grab a popular science journal.

Any cosmologist who is an atheist shouldn't be taken so seriously .

FSBoperator:
Refraining from the miraculous or supernatural please explain "scientifically" how a point one-trillionth the diameter of a proton became the present universe in 10^-36 seconds.

Nothing comes from nothing - nihil fit ex nihilo

So you can't have a vast universe like ours just pop out of nothingness without any transcendent force orchestrating that , its both scientifically and logically impossible .

But there is no true rationale behind atheism, it is not based on science , philosophy , logic etc . It just says "God does not exist " - nothing else expounded - because it feels (emotional mind ) with no paucity of logical reasoning or evidence that God does not exist .

Therefore my wonderful brother , asking the atheist for scientific, philosophical or logical reasons for his beliefs will never produce any meaningful result. Just ramblings and interminable rigmaroles , fruitless arguments . Why? Its very natural for man to reject anything that impugns his beliefs .

I implore you big bro you to make judicious use of your time on things that matter - atheists and their repulsive foolishness just don't matter .

KingEbukasBlog:
Nothing comes from nothing - nihil fit ex nihilo

So you can't have a vast universe like ours just pop out of nothingness without any transcendent force orchestrating that , its both scientifically and logically impossible .

But there is no true rationale behind atheism, it is not based on science , philosophy , logic etc . It just says "God does not exist " - nothing else expounded - because it feels (emotional mind ) with no paucity of logical reasoning or evidence that God does not exist .

Therefore my wonderful brother , asking the atheist for scientific, philosophical or logical reasons for his beliefs will never produce any meaningful result. Just ramblings and interminable rigmaroles , fruitless arguments . Why? Its very natural for man to reject anything that impugns his beliefs .

I implore you big bro you to make judicious use of your time on things that matter - atheists and their repulsive foolishness just don't matter .

Well said.

But I want to hear from the atheists who claim science and logic to expound on the miraculous creation of our universe as claimed by science.

Christians please explain how 2lions were in Noah's ark and they dint eat up all the other animals

KingEbukasBlog:
Nothing comes from nothing - nihil fit ex nihilo

So you can't have a vast universe like ours just pop out of nothingness without any transcendent force orchestrating that , its both scientifically and logically impossible .

But there is no true rationale behind atheism, it is not based on science , philosophy , logic etc . It just says "God does not exist " - nothing else expounded - because it feels (emotional mind ) with no paucity of logical reasoning or evidence that God does not exist .

Therefore my wonderful brother , asking the atheist for scientific, philosophical or logical reasons for his beliefs will never produce any meaningful result. Just ramblings and interminable rigmaroles , fruitless arguments . Why? Its very natural for man to reject anything that impugns his beliefs .

I implore you big bro you to make judicious use of your time on things that matter - atheists and their repulsive foolishness just don't matter .

your arguments are obscurant, which makes the arguments not an honest exploration of the subject; they hide their weaknesses behind assertions and bluster and when challenged you'll give more assertions and bluster. I have no idea whether you are an honest person or not, never having met you, but I tend to assume without prior information that people are basically honest. Do you not recognize a formal distinction between your statements and yourself?

KingEbukasBlog:
Any cosmologist who is an atheist shouldn't be taken so seriously .

are you pained by the fact that cosmologists are rarely Christians?

MrMontella:
are you pained by the fact that cosmologists are rarely Christians?

he's pained that Sean Carroll destroyed his lord and personal saviour William Lane Craig in the god and cosmology debate

no theist cosmologist should be taken serious

MrMontella:
are you pained by the fact that cosmologists are rarely Christians?

That might not be entirely true as most scientist are actually coming to believe in the God formula in creation.


Liberal studies academicians are the ones most likely to be atheists.

Breaking advances in science is making more scientist believe in the concept of a grand architect behind the universe and life.

Even the core research at CERN is to search for what they describe as "the God molecule ".

hopefulLandlord:
he's pained that Sean Carroll destroyed his lord and personal saviour William Lane Craig in the god and cosmology debate

no theist cosmologist should be taken serious

when I read his statement,
I was like :typical kingebukasblog.

OP. when did atheism ever claim to know "scientifically" how a point one-trillionth the diameter of a proton became the present universe in 10^-36 seconds?

where did you see atheism say such?

FSBoperator:
That might not be entirely true as most scientist are actually coming to believe in the God formula in creation.


Liberal studies academicians are the ones most likely to be atheists.

Breaking advances in science is making more scientist believe in the concept of a grand architect behind the universe and life.

Even the core research at CERN is to search for what they describe as "the God molecule ".

I have no problem with God bro,
go and check what I said up,
1...cosmologists, are rarely Christians.
2....a greater number of scientists are irreligious.

Pastafarian:
OP. when did atheism ever claim to know "scientifically" how a point one-trillionth the diameter of a proton became the present universe in 10^-36 seconds?

where did you see atheism say such?

That is the science behind creation which on its own puts scientific logic on its head.

Since Atheist believe in science and require scientific proof to believe in the biblical concept of creation then they should tell us why science now believes in the biblical creation theory because that is what the Planck epoch signifies

MrMontella:
when I read his statement,
I was like :typical kingebukasblog.

Whenever I listen to apologists, I try to remember that they are always preaching to the choir. Whether they know it or not, these arguments are not designed to bring in new believers, the arguments are designed to comfort current believers by telling them how smart they are for believing.

FSBoperator:
That is the science behind creation which on its own puts scientific logic on its head.

Since Atheist believe in science and require scientific proof to believe in the biblical concept of creation then they should tell us why science now believes in the biblical creation theory because that is what the Planck epoch signifies

you said a lot of things without answering my question

FSBoperator:
That might not be entirely true as most scientist are actually coming to believe in the God formula in creation.


Liberal studies academicians are the ones most likely to be atheists.

Breaking advances in science is making more scientist believe in the concept of a grand architect behind the universe and life.

Even the core research at CERN is to search for what they describe as "the God molecule ".

hahahahahahaha.

If you know why the Higgs boson particle was called "the God particle";
you won't have included it.

---

As to your question;

What if I told you........






I'm an Atheist; not a physicist

MrMontella:
I have no problem with God bro,
go and check what I said up,
1...cosmologists, are rarely Christians.
2....a greater number of scientists are irreligious.

Google :

God particle
CERN
Jacobs ladder.


Scientists are searching for the "God particle". That secret and undetectable force behind the fabric of the universe .

Scientist are more likely to be conservative and God fearing

SirWere:
hahahahahahaha.

If you know why the Higgs boson particle was called "the God particle";
you won't have included it.

---

As to your question;

What if I told you........






I'm an Atheist; not a physicist

Then you are no different from the earliest religious being who worshipped a stone.

If wise men of science can be convinced on the miraculous creation of the universe then who are you bottom feeding pseudo science believers to doubt God

FSBoperator:
Google :

God particle
CERN
Jacobs ladder.


Scientists are searching for the "God particle". That secret and undetectable force behind the fabric of the universe .

Scientist are more likely to be conservative and God fearing

Jesus!
this guy thinks I don't know about the higgs boson...
baba, carry your problem go.

why don't you confirm what I asked you to do? since you love google?
scientists are majorly irreligious.
anytime, anyday.

FSBoperator:
Google :

God particle
CERN
Jacobs ladder.


Scientists are searching for the "God particle". That secret and undetectable force behind the fabric of the universe .

Scientist are more likely to be conservative and God fearing

ooh jeez. The Higgs boson doesn't mean what you think it means

jonbellion:
ooh jeez. The Higgs boson doesn't mean what you think it means

Nobody knows what it is as scientist are yet to actually detect it.

That's why they built the biggest machine ever to study it.