₦airaland Forum

.

LordAdam16:
Oga the only person giving baseless, poorly researched assertions and lies is you.

Were the Moors colonized by Islamic Arabs? Yes or No?

Did the ancient Roman Empire in all its glory exist before the Moors were colonized by Islamic Arabs? Yes or No?

Did Ife and Bini Empires exist before the Persian Empire? Yes or No?

Did the Ife and Bini Empire have navies that rival the Persian and Greek Empire navies? Yes or No?

Answer these questions truthfully, and you'll see what I've been saying all this while. That African Supremacy is a stup*d conjecture from heavily disturbed minds.

If you want to talk about sub-Saharan African achievements (even though other ancient civilizations had achievements that were miles better) count me in, but African supremacy, you must be high on horse sh*t.

You can not be superior than someone who had a far advanced civilization than you ever had.

-Lord

Why are you dividing Africans and not dividing Europeans? Why should you be comparing SubSahran Africa with the whole world?

You are listing names of empires from the whole world against only West africa? What about Abbysinia (Ethiopia)? What about Ancient Egyptians? Why are you not crediting their achievements to the black race, when it is very obvious that these people are also of the Black race?

And yes, the Ancient Egyptian, Abyssinia (Ethiopian) and Nubian empires can compete with the ancient Persian and Greek empires.

Nowenuse:
Nobody ever mentioned here that we are better than others neither the OP nor his supporters. All we are concluding from this enlightenment is that Africa at least is not completely worthless.
Many of us have been made to believe that absolutely nothing can be credited to the black race and we have been slaves and inferior people from the beginning of the world which is not true.

There is nothing like beliefs of supremacy or we being better than anyone here. So take a chill!

They said so. What exactly does black supremacy mean? Can you hear yourself. It means blacks are superior to other races. It has no other meaning. You should read intently because you pick sides.

And all I've been saying is that blacks are not superior.

And as I have said repeatedly here, I go against any form of supremacy belief, whether it is White Supremacy or Black Supremacy. And point out that White Supremacy is a relatively new phenomenon.

White supremacists in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century said nothing can be credit to Blacks. That is changing by the day. We're still a long way away from the exotic lifestyles of pre-17th century Europe or ancient civilizations, but White Supremacists are pretty much in the shadows. KKK is a criminal organization.

If these images are shown as simply evidence of black rule in Spain and Portugal as well as blacks living as free men in Europe prior to the 17th century; you'll learn. They don't have to lie that blacks ruled the entire Europe or that blacks brought civilization to Europe. Those are lies.

And they're lying because they are trying to pass on a Black Supremacy Agenda like the Aryan Agenda of Hitler.

Several people on this thread have seen my point. Read back and you'll see posts openly canvassing for Black or African Supremacy.

If you notice, I've never discredited any of the paintings or sculptures they've posted, because those are facts. What I am discrediting is the narrative.

I can bring a bread to you and say it is a tasty bread. That's fact. You wouldn't disagree. It's different from me bringing the same bread and saying it is the tastiest bread in the whole of Nigeria. Note the change in narrative. It has nothing to do with the bread, but everything to do with the person describing the bread.

-Lord

LordAdam16:
They said so. What exactly does black supremacy mean? Can you hear yourself. It means blacks are superior to other races. It has no other meaning. You should read intently because you pick sides.

And all I've been saying is that blacks are not superior.

And as I have said repeatedly here, I go against any form of supremacy belief, whether it is White Supremacy or Black Supremacy. And point out that White Supremacy is a relatively new phenomenon.

White supremacists in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century said nothing can be credit to Blacks. That is changing by the day. We're still a long way away from the exotic lifestyles of pre-17th century Europe or ancient civilizations, but White Supremacists are pretty much in the shadows. KKK is a criminal organization.

If these images are shown as simply evidence of black rule in Spain and Portugal as well as blacks living as free men in Europe prior to the 17th century; you'll learn. They don't have to lie that blacks ruled the entire Europe or that blacks brought civilization to Europe. Those are lies.

And they're lying because they are trying to pass on a Black Supremacy Agenda like the Aryan Agenda of Hitler.

Several people on this thread have seen my point. Read back and you'll see posts openly canvassing for Black or African Supremacy.

If you notice, I've never discredited any of the paintings or sculptures they've posted, because those are facts. What I am discrediting is the narrative.

I can bring a bread to you and say it is a tasty bread. That's fact. You wouldn't disagree. It's different from me bringing the same bread and saying it is the tastiest bread in the whole of Nigeria. Note the change in narrative. It has nothing to do with the bread, but everything to do with the person describing the bread.

-Lord

Yes sir,

you don't start any conversation with "Your head dey pain you". Its very barbaric and uncultured. Kindly take note for next time.

Yes you are right!, very right they are all "scampering for safety". Like i said earlier most Nigerian don't know History. Not our fault though.You can easily blame that on the government or Waec.

No Sir,
Lets no start with the Moors. Lets start from earlier Civilizations. Indus valley civilization --> Sumeria --> Egypt e.t.c Lets be intellectually orderly about this. Am an android programmer by profession so obviously i loathe disorderliness.

Also,
for the sake of orderliness kindly attach historical dates.For instance i can't understand anything you wrote here

"showed that the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs conquered the dominant North African kingdoms hundreds of years before the Moors marched on Spain and Portugal"

The facts are skewed and the historical timeline again is not coherent. Kindly spare my ignorance and explain in "detail" again.

Thanks

Also, please stop avoiding me! its killing me . Answer my question..............am so waiting for you.

I believe even if Jesus or Muhammad come down from heaven to tell you this, you won't still believe because you've been brain washed, you believe any about foreigners than your African brothers. You are one of those people politicians deceived with religion n tribalism. The divide n rule tactics that was used by colonial masters has been manifesting long ago even our politicians are making use of it.

LordAdam16:
Oga.

All evidence point to Black Africans living in Europe before the Moors attacked Spain and Portugal.

So the OP is clearly wrong that Black Africans ruled Europe starting from the Moors. Even the Moors ruled only Spain and Portugal. They did not rule the whole Europe.

If you read my posts you'd know why I'm against the tone of the OP. Paste facts as facts. Don't misrepresent them.

Did Black Africans live in Europe as free men prior to Moors? Yes.
Did they attain positions of authority as free men? Yes.
Did they rule Europe as the OP claims? No.

Black Africans that leave Africa elsewhere usually excel even to this day. It doesn't mean black Africans in the diaspora are ruling over there.

This is common sense and I've pasted multiple facts over time.

The issue is not about the achievements but about African Supremacy. These supremacists are using the right tool for the wrong purpose. There is no such thing as African Supremacy. Kapish!

-Lord

.

khalids:
Have you noticed that whenever Nigeria is playing in the world cup, nations cup or any soccer event, there is always unity at that point.
I believe what we need is a common rally point, a common enemy so to speak. We need to sink it into the subconscious of our populace, the importance of lifting ourselves on to greatness.....And if we can sell that, that will be our rallying point, our point of unity and then we can leave all the pettiness and move forward because they will all suddenly be of little importance, all previous points of division will appear insignificant compared to the goal and dreams ahead of us........

Yes you are correct. When it comes to facing a common enemy, of course we have to speak with one voice, but do you think we can keep on always finding and using a common enemy or opposition to unite ourselves?

Talking about setting and achieving goals as a source of unity may not be sellable because each of the individual ethnic groups and religion that make up the country also have their own goals and achievements which their promoters actively propagate in order to make their own ethnic/religious groups show greater allegiance to than the actual unity of their country.

The average Nigerian loves his religion and ethnicity more than his country. As long as the majority have this mindset, do you think we can ever grow united as a people? Until people begin to love and propagate the factor(s) that brings us together as one nation more than our individual affiliations, we may never get it together as one people.

LordAdam16:
Answer my questions before I answer yours.

We all know all of ancient Egypt wasn't black. Of course we had prominent black figures like Queen Nefrititi. But many of the Egyptian Pharoah paintings are not black even the sculpture. The Nubians were primitive and sacked continuously by the superior mixed Egyptian Empire.

Ancient Egypt was a black African civilization. Little boy debating what he knows nothing about.

Excerpts;

Diop noted that “Egyptians had only one term to designate themselves: KMT, which literally means ‘the Blacks.’ This is the strongest term existing in the Pharaonic tongue to indicate blackness.”

He added: “The term is a collective noun which thus described the whole people of Pharaonic Egypt as a Black people.”

Virtually all of the early Latin eyewitnesses described the ancient Egyptians as black-skinned with woolly hair. Several ancient Greek historians noted that Egyptians and Ethiopians had complexions that were “melanchroes,” which most scholars translate as black, while some scholars translate it as “dark” or “dark skinned.”

According to most translations, Herodotus wrote that a Greek oracle was known to be from Egypt because she was “black,” that the natives of the Nile region are “black with heat,’ and that Egyptians were “black skinned with woolly hair.”

Diodorus Siculus wrote that the Ethiopians considered the Egyptians their colony.

Lucian observes an Egyptian boy and notices that he is not merely black, but has thick lips.


Appollodorus called Egypt the country of the black-footed ones.

Aeschylus, a Greek poet, wrote that Egyptian seamen had “black limbs.”

Gaston Maspero states that “by the almost unanimous testimony of ancient [Greek] historians, they [ancient Egyptians] belonged to the African race, which settled in Ethiopia.”

http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/25/10-arguments-that-proves-ancient-egyptians-were-black/10/

And Rome was miles better than Nubia.

Oh was it?? Wow!!

And arguably better than Egypt

Oh yes of course!!!

which is expected since they existed after Egypt and had improved technology passed from the Egyptians to Babylonians to the Greeks. Ife and Bini can never measure up to Rome or even Egypt (despite being in close proximity to Egypt).

Rome and Greece were grander civilizations than Egypt in all things except architecture. And as I said Egypt was not entirely black like Ife and Bini. Moreover Egypt is not in sub-Saharan Africa.

Rome sacked the Egyptian army. Greek proteges sacked the Egyptian army. No army on the planet could stand up to the Romans and Greeks in the height of their power.

The Shaka Zulus and Nubian military never ever crossed the shores of Africa. They didn't even have a formidable Navy. The Celts, Germanic tribes, and Vikings would have turned them to shreds if they were in close proximity.

The strongest you just named are Egyptian and Nubian, both of them were crushed by the Greeks and Romans. Egypt never conquered Europe but Europe conquered Egypt.

Let's not even start talking about Ife and Bini. That are actually core sub-Saharan black African kingdoms.

I've told you to tell me any sub-Saharan black African kingdom that rivals any of the great civilizations and you are yet to show one.

You don't even know that Egypt is not in sub-Saharan Africa. You are too dull.

Or will you call the shaka-Zulus wearing leaves and animal skin a match for the Babylonians? Or is the Nubian civilization a match for the Persians?

Now can you see that your African supremacy does not hold water.

-Lord

How can anyone debate this madman? You're just all over the place. I think you're a clown. In terms of African historical knowledge, you are at a very low level in my view. Have you read the Destruction of African Civilization by Chancellor Williams? Have you read the works of Cheikh Anta Dipo? What actual African history books have you read? I bet the answer is zero. You just talk talk talk like some wind up doll. The majority of what you say is just laughable, off point, and ludicrous. Honestly, those who can debate you, face them. I'm done. And nobody mentioned anything about ''black supremacy''. That came entirely out of your own scatterbrain head.

Nowenuse:
Why are you dividing Africans and not dividing Europeans? Why should you be comparing SubSahran Africa with the whole world?

You are listing names of empires from the whole world against only West africa? What about Abbysinia (Ethiopia)? What about Ancient Egyptians? Why are you not crediting their achievements to the black race, when it is very obvious that these people are also of the Black race?

And yes, the Ancient Egyptian, Abyssinia (Ethiopian) and Nubian empires can compete with the ancient Persian and Greek empires.

Because North Africans are different from sub-Saharan Africans. Even to this day. Despite the fact that North Africa and much of Sub-Saharan Africa are Muslims and share core Arabic influences, the difference is like Night and Day. Western Europeans and Eastern Europeans differ, but not as much as North Africans and sub-Saharan Africans.

If you don't someone to compare Sub-Saharan Africa with the whole world, don't start talking about African Supremacy. I said you guys should bring any civilization in sub-Saharan Africa that rivals anything of the great civilizations of the Ancient World. I said anything. You can't find any.

Ancient Egyptian and Nubian Empires are North African. Nubian Empire cannot even compete with Egyptian not to talk about competing with the Persian or Greek empires. Xerxes I the Persian king burned Athens to the ground. Alexander conquered all of Asia. The Egyptian Empire did not not cross the Mediterranean.

The Abbysinia Empire can not rival the Egyptian Empire not to talk of the Babylonian, Persian, Greek, or Roman Empires. They did not even have a massive navy.

And that's arguably the best in sub-Saharan Africa.

I don't know why you guys can't be objective. Make arguments that can't stand the test of time.

There is nothing in sub-Saharan Africa that rivals any of the great civilizations. That's a fact.

So you can't be talking about African Supremacy. That's what I am against here. There is no such thing as African or Black Supremacy.

-Lord

https://africanknowledge.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/9/8/14980458/1547583_orig.jpg

pisanello, Torneo-battaglia di Louverzep in the Palazzo Ducale 1440

https://africanknowledge.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/9/8/14980458/3113_orig.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c4/19/39/c419392dd66e29cc3f2bc94607f6e546.jpg

St. Maurice ,Germany (1500)

Source http://africanknowledge.weebly.com/blacks-in-europe.html

Rosskii:
How can anyone debate this madman?

Please don't call him "Mad" he his just "ignorant" there is a huge difference .

I already quoted him severally and asked him to supply dates to all the "Proofs" he has been posting. Suprisingly he has been ignoring me. .


He just came on the thread and started spitting incoherent lies. Pulling events from random times in history and stringing them together.
You don't have to waste your time on people like that.

donniemc:
Yes sir,

you don't start any conversation with "Your head dey pain you". Its very barbaric and uncultured. Kindly take note for next time.

Yes you are right!, very right they are all "scampering for safety". Like i said earlier most Nigerian don't know History. Not our fault though.You can easily blame that on the government or Waec.

No Sir,
Lets no start with the Moors. Lets start from earlier Civilizations. Indus valley civilization --> Sumeria --> Egypt e.t.c Lets be intellectually orderly about this. Am an android programmer by profession so obviously i loathe disorderliness.

Also,
for the sake of orderliness kindly attach historical dates.For instance i can't understand anything you wrote here

"showed that the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs conquered the dominant North African kingdoms hundreds of years before the Moors marched on Spain and Portugal"

The facts are skewed and the historical timeline again is not coherent. Kindly spare my ignorance and explain in "detail" again.

Thanks

Also, please stop avoiding me! its killing me . Answer my question..............am so waiting for you.

I will not explain in detail when you can do a Google search.

Greeks sacked the Egyptians.

Then Romans sacked the Greeks in Egypt and also sacked Carthage in Tunisia.

Then Arabs sacked the Romans.

Then Moors with Arabic imprint sacked Spain and Portugal.

Do a Google search and prove me wrong.

-Lord

Rosskii:
Ancient Egypt was a black African civilization. Little boy debating what he knows nothing about.



Oh was it?? Wow!!



Oh yes of course!!!



How can anyone debate this madman? You're just all over the place. I think you're a clown. In terms of African historical knowledge, you are at the level I was maybe twenty years ago. Have you read the Destruction of African Civilization by Chancellor Williams? Have you read the works of Cheikh Anta Dipo? What actual African history books have you read? I bet the answer is zero. You just talk talk talk like some wind up doll. The majority of what you say is just laughable, off point, and ludicrous. Honestly, those who can debate you, face them. I'm done. And nobody mentioned anything about ''black supremacy'' That came entirely out of your own scatterbrain head.

You need to have your head checked.

You can tell yourself whatever you like to sleep well at night.

MrMaestro:
Yup, I found this out a few years ago as well. I've always believed the only think holding us back is ourselves mentally. We've either consciously or unconsciously internalized that the African is inferior. Due to a variety of factors, largely promoted by the west. In order to offset this, Africans need to start developing an African supremacist ideology. Not in the genocidal sense, but in our society and in teaching our children. Anyone who doesn't realize this or doesn't agree is just being naive. We're decades if not hundreds of years behind the west. I look at ai, and shows like Westworld and think that if we don't start having more urgency, we'll PERMANENTLY be left behind.

Artificial intelligence is already rapidly improving. And Elon Musk is creating a company called Neural link, to combine the human brain with ai. He has the BEST scientists in the WORLD working on this. What happens if they achieve this? Do you think the African would catch-up anytime soon with Rich white people becoming exponentially smarter with ai in their brains? And what happens when the middle class white person can afford to do the procedure? Africans would effectively have a timer of extinction through natural selection.

They're researching multiple dimensions, discovering what dark energy and dark matter is, organizing trips to colonize the solar system and galaxy, and even researching how they can create a human themselves using silicon and ai (see Westworld). We are getting LEFT BEHIND! And the gap is getting larger! People think we have an unlimited amount of time to get it right, but we don't! If they accomplish any of those goals in the next 75 years and African countries are still busy trying to create a functioning society and countries, we need to just pack up go because there's no catching up from then.

It is for this reason I say we need to have a STRONG sense of urgency in fixing ourselves. And this includes African supremacy. Us and our children need to believe that they're the smartest in the world, numerous studies have proven that people act in accordance to stereotype. In this study, girls and boys were told that boys are better at math than girls, and then gave all the kids a math test. Unsurprisingly, the boys did better and the girls did worse. When no such stereotype was presented before the exam, both were equal in their results ( I actually think the girls might've scored better). My point is, psychology rules EVERYTHING. The vast majority of humans are followers. The African has been following the West's perception of the African because they haven't been presented with a strong alternative. It is up to US to present that and make them follow this new ideology. If we can do that you'll see how quickly things can change.

Anyway, I've said all I needed to say. Centuries of white supremacy not only promoted white confidence, as their children began to believe they're better than Africans because they're black and their parents told them so. But it also damaged the African because he too was told white people were better, whether it be directly or indirectly. We as African parents/ leaders need to reverse this effect immediately. It is extremely important.

So much for no one said anything about black supremacy.

Liar!

-Lord

African101:
I believe even if Jesus or Muhammad come down from heaven to tell you this, you won't still believe because you've been brain washed, you believe any about foreigners than your African brothers. You are one of those people politicians deceived with religion n tribalism. The divide n rule tactics that was used by colonial masters has been manifesting long ago even our politicians are making use of it.

I'm not a religious person. So, Jesus and Muhammad can't say this trash much less try to convince me.

All of what I've said is verifiable. If you know any part I said that is not verifiable bring proof and show I'm wrong.

Until then, stay your lane.

-Lord

LordAdam16:
Answer my questions before I answer yours.

We all know all of ancient Egypt wasn't black. Of course we had prominent black figures like Queen Nefrititi. But many of the Egyptian Pharoah paintings are not black even the sculpture. The Nubians were primitive and sacked continuously by the superior mixed Egyptian Empire.

-Lord

What!!! you call the Nubians primitive?. Do your research to find out that the Nubians had more pyramids than Egypt

Braden2:
I really like that link you shared about the Khoisan. It makes sense that all humans may have descended from them. Very beautiful people with nice skin and hair. I also like their desert climate and the blue skies.

Don't mind these people.

They can do attache by force.

Everything nai them 1 attach to. Europeans, North Africans, next na Asians and Aliens.

-Lord

OP,
STOP spreading falsehood.

NO BLACK AFRICAN RULED EUROPE! NOT IN THE PAST AND NOT NOW.

LordAdam16:
I will not explain in detail when you can do a Google search.

Greeks sacked the Egyptians.

Then Romans sacked the Greeks in Egypt and also sacked Carthage in Tunisia.

Then Arabs sacked the Romans.

Then Moors with Arabic imprint sacked Spain and Portugal.

Do a Google search and prove me wrong.

-Lord

Yay!!,
you finally replied. oh wait a minute...."Do a Google search and prove me wrong". Oh!!, so you have been pulling all your facts from random websites on Google?. No wonder. . And here was i thinking you were actually the ignorant one. My bad.

Ok,
Lets get started.

First of all,
The Greeks did not sack the Egyptians. Egypt fell by herself. Thats what all great civilizations do."They RISE and Fall".

So lets start with Egypt:

The History of Ancient Egypt is divided into three period namely:

1 The Old Kingdom (about 2,700-2,200 B.C.E.)

2. The Middle Kingdom (2,050-1,800 B.C.E.)

3. New Kingdom (about 1,550-1,100 B.C.E.).

Also, Egypt had a bonus kingdom after the "New kingdom usually referred to as the " Late New Kingdom" it lasted about 343 B.C.E.

[size=8pt][/size]

The first period known as the old kingdom was dominated by dark skinned Africans the most notable of which was a king called Khufu.( i attached is photo below. He was also known to have built the largest Pyramid in Ancient Egypt (I also attached a photo of the Pyramid).

Also its important to note that there is no debate about Khufu's skin hue. He was a "Black pharaoh".

.............................................obviously i can't write the whole history of Egypt in one post. So am going to break it into bits.

See you on the next one.

Horus:
What!!! you call the Nubians primitive?. Do your research to find out that the Nubians had more pyramids than Egypt

Sure. Pyramids just like those of the Egyptians.

The area of the Nile valley known as Nubia, which lies within present day Sudan, was home to three Kushite kingdoms during antiquity. The first had its capital at Kerma (2600–1520 BC). The second was centered on Napata (1000–300 BC). Finally, the last kingdom was centered on Meroë (300 BC–AD 300).

Kerma was Nubia's first centralized state with its own indigenous forms of architecture and burial customs. The last two kingdoms, Napata and Meroë, were heavily influenced by ancient Egypt culturally, economically, politically, and militarily.

It is these Kushite kingdoms with heavy influence from Egyptians often overran by the Egyptians that built the Nubian Pyramids.

Ancient Egyptians had already developed and extensively used pyramid technology before Nubia used it.

So when I say Nubia was primitive I know what I'm talking about. They were increasingly dominated by Egyptians throughout antiquity until 751 BC. And so can never rival the Ancient Egyptian Empire.

-Lord

.

donniemc:
Please don't call him "Mad" he his just "ignorant" there is a huge difference .

I already quoted him severally and asked him to supply dates to all the "Proofs" he has been posting. Suprisingly he has been ignoring me. .


He just came on the thread and started spitting incoherent lies. Pulling events from random times in history and stringing them together.
You don't have to waste your time on people like that.

To me he's just a young lad with a big mouth and outsized ego. You can tell the kind of guy he is in real life - domineering and callous.. When you catch him on one lie, he tells 10 more. By the time you've researched those 10 to correct him, he's spewed another 20. He cannot follow a single train of thought, or line of argument. Because he knows that if he does, he will be demolished by superior facts. So he just jumps from one bombastic assertion to another in rapid succession. Each post he makes contains like 20 assertions, none backed by research. How do you debate that? He thinks he's smart. I'm just ignoring him completely no matter how much garbage he writes.

donniemc:
Yay!!,
you finally replied. oh wait a minute...."Do a Google search and prove me wrong". Oh!!, so you have been pulling all your facts from random websites on Google?. No wonder. . And here was i thinking you were actually the ignorant one. My bad.

Ok,
Lets get started.

First of all,
The Greeks did not sack the Egyptians. Egypt fell by herself. Thats what all great civilizations do."They RISE and Fall".

So lets start with Egypt:

The History of Ancient Egypt is divided into three period namely:

1 The Old Kingdom (about 2,700-2,200 B.C.E.)

2. The Middle Kingdom (2,050-1,800 B.C.E.)

3. New Kingdom (about 1,550-1,100 B.C.E.).

Also, Egypt had a bonus kingdom after the "New kingdom usually referred to as the " Late New Kingdom" it lasted about 343 B.C.E.

[size=8pt][/size]

The first period known as the old kingdom was dominated by dark skinned Africans the most notable of which was a king called Khufu.( i attached is photo below. He was also known to have built the largest Pyramid in Ancient Egypt (I also attached a photo of the Pyramid).

Also its important to note that there is no debate about Khufu's skin hue. He was a "Black pharaoh".

.............................................obviously i can't write the whole history of Egypt in one post. So am going to break it into bits.

See you on the next one.

Oga shut up and get to the point. Did Alexander the Great conquer Egypt in 332 and was proclaimed Pharaoh of Egypt? Yes or No. Don't start typing long nonsense.

-Lord

LordAdam16:
Sure. Pyramids just like those of the Egyptians.



It is these Kushite kingdoms with heavy influence from Egyptians often overran by the Egyptians that built the Nubian Pyramids.

Ancient Egyptians had already developed and extensively used pyramid technology before Nubia used it.

So when I say Nubia was primitive I know what I'm talking about. They were increasingly dominated by Egyptians throughout antiquity until 751 BC. And so can never rival the Ancient Egyptian Empire.

-Lord

Call the caucasians primitives but not the Nubians

The region of Nuri is home to some 73 pyramids, including the tomb of King Taharqa

while the Pyramids of Meroe hold another 177.

That is a total of 250 pyramids for the Nubians

Source http://www.express.co.uk/travel/articles/784496/egypt-pyramids-sudan-travel

LordAdam16:
Sure. Pyramids just like those of the Egyptians.



It is these Kushite kingdoms with heavy influence from Egyptians often overran by the Egyptians that built the Nubian Pyramids.

Ancient Egyptians had already developed and extensively used pyramid technology before Nubia used it.

So when I say Nubia was primitive I know what I'm talking about. They were increasingly dominated by Egyptians throughout antiquity until 751 BC. And so can never rival the Ancient Egyptian Empire.

-Lord

Nubia was "Primitive"?!!!!.

Nubia ruled Egypt for 75 years Straight. The same way The United kingdom colonised/ruled Nigeria.


So now i think i made a mistake by joining this thread.

You are not serious, you are just trolling. I have apps to code.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Bye

.

Rosskii:
To me he's just a young lad with a big mouth and outsized ego. You can tell the kind of guy he is in real life - domineering and callous.. When you catch him on one lie, he tells 10 more. By the time you've researched those 10 to correct him, he's spewed another 20. He cannot follow a single train of thought, or line of argument. Because he knows that if he does, he will be demolished by superior facts. So he just jumps from one bombastic assertion to another in rapid succession. He thinks he's smart. I'm just ignoring him completely no matter how much garbage he writes.

And you are a pathological liar.

Shebi u said no one said anything about black supremacy? That it was all from my head?

Liars. Don't ignore me, continue let me keep making you sound stupid.

-Lord

donniemc:
Nubia was "Primitive"?!!!!.

Nubia ruled Egypt for 75 years Straight. The same way The United kingdom colonised/ruled Nigeria.


So now i think i made a mistake by joining this thread.

You are not serious, you are just trolling. I have apps to code.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Bye

Please stay. Don't go. We are all laughing at him. Just ignore him and enjoy the thread pls.

LordAdam16:
Oga shut up and get to the point. Did Alexander the Great conquer Egypt in 332 and was proclaimed Pharaoh of Egypt? Yes or No. Don't start typing long nonsense.

-Lord

You see,
Your problem is your IQ might be very low. That "Long nonsense" is called historically fact. Am not like you. Am a critical thinker. I've been programming since i was just 8 years old.

So i can't "just get to the point". Thats was dimwits do. they skip all the facts and just jump to the part that suits them.

Honestly,
Forget about this thread. You really need to work on the way you think. You need to pick up a skill like programming.
It would at the very least help you think in a more structured manner.

donniemc:
Nubia was "Primitive"?!!!!.

Nubia ruled Egypt for 75 years Straight. The same way The United kingdom colonised/ruled Nigeria.


So now i think i made a mistake by joining this thread.

You are not serious, you are just trolling. I have apps to code.

Thanks for the entertainment.

Bye

You don't want to answer my simple question?

Did Alexander the Great conquer Egypt in 332? Yes or No?

Nubians were primitive. They lived in the shadows of Egypt from 2800 BC until 751 BC.

That's over 2000 years.

In 751 BC when the Egyptian Empire was already past its Zenith, the Kushite king Piankhi overthrew the 24th Dynasty and united the entire Nile valley from the delta to the city of Napata under his rule. Piankhi and his descendants ruled as the pharaohs of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty. The Napatan domination of Egypt ended with the Assyrian conquest of Egypt in 656 BC.

So you want to compare rule of 75 years to domination of 2000 years.

You are very smart.

Even the Moors ruled Spain and Portugal for far longer.

Why couldn't the Nubians take on Assyria despite the fact that they were at their strongest.

-Lord

Braden2:
When we think of black,we think of this ,not the desert ones. We think Lebron James descends from this black culture ,not from Ethiopia or Khosian, that's just the fact .

This was the man who founded Egypt, and was the first ruler to unite the 'Two Lands' - Upper and Lower Egypt. His name was Narmer. Also known as Menes I.

Sure looks like a 'Lebron James type' black man to me...

He actually reminds me of former Nigerian President Obasanjo.


Pharaoh Narmer Circa 3150 BC
First Ruler of Egypt

https://www.aldokkan.com/egypt/menes.jpg

http://www.egyptabout.com/2016/11/ten-facts-about-king-narmer.html

donniemc:
You see,
Your problem is your IQ might be very low. That "Long nonsense" is called historically fact. Am not like you. Am a critical thinker. I've been programming since i was just 8 years old.

So i can't "just get to the point". Thats was dimwits do. they skip all the facts and just jump to the part that suits them.

Honestly,
Forget about this thread. You really need to work on the way you think. You need to pick up a skill like programming.
It would at the very least help you think in a more structured manner.

Get to the point.

And answer the damn question.

Did Alexander the Great conquer Egypt? Yes or no.

I said the Greeks conquered Egypt, you said it's not true.

Oya is Alexander a black man too? Abi is he not Greek.

Now you are telling me to learn programming. Is that the answer to the simple question I asked you?

-Lord

Rosskii:
Please stay. Don't go. We are all laughing at him. Just ignore him and enjoy the thread pls.

He has been trumped. Like you.

He said I'm making incoherent arguments and dodging his questions.

He asked me and I answered, I asked him one and he is running away.

Typical ignorant person that just got served.

-Lord