₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,107 members, 8,425,011 topics. Date: Friday, 12 June 2026 at 12:01 AM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (165) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1163585 Views)

1 2 3 ... 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:02pm On Apr 30, 2017
PK-10 decoys ( naval ) for countermeasures against ashms

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 9:08pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:
mig 29k
any idea how the 29's will fair against the Jf17 blk2/blk3
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:23pm On Apr 30, 2017
giles14:
any idea how the 29's will fair against the Jf17 blk2/blk3
blk 3 is still on paper, will be sometime before it comes into play


in the first place , u cannot compare a 2 engined medium category aircraft with a light weight single engined aircraft . therefor the comparison is not on equal grounds.

judge ur self grin
a 2 engined , MWF against 1 engined LWF , who do u think will win ?

jf17 can only be compared against similar category aircrafts like lca , t50 (s korean) gripen f16 etc
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 7:34am On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
blk 3 is still on paper, will be sometime before it comes into play


in the first place , u cannot compare a 2 engined medium category aircraft with a light weight single engined aircraft . therefor the comparison is not on equal grounds.

judge ur self grin
a 2 engined , MWF against 1 engined LWF , who do u think will win ?

jf17 can only be compared against similar category aircrafts like lca , t50 (s korean) gripen f16 etc
was wondering how our Jf17 will fair against the chadian mig29
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:38am On May 01, 2017
giles14:
was wondering how our Jf17 will fair against the chadian mig29
grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 10:36am On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
grin
if all 3 mig29 are operational dey can serve as AD asset.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Ibrahimmoses202(m): 10:38am On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
RULES ON POSTING

post videos photos only to support the topic which is being analyzed , discussed by you.

debate using available open source information , no assumptions please.

dont post comments from other websites in order to support ur views , god gave everybody a brain use it ,post your own opinions as much as u like, if not get out of the thread

dont feed the trolls or start a flame war.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:00am On May 01, 2017
giles14:
if all 3 mig29 are operational dey can serve as AD asset.
IMO 3 mig 29s r not going to make that big a impact unless they get really innovative like the Israelis against a larger no of aircrafts

low no of an aircraft types decreases the turnaround time after every sortie becz they will not have the required extensive support equipment's/infra in the first place . economically it does not make sense.

low persistence AD becz if 3 r airborne and then land back they will need to go through mandatory checks, refuelling re-arming etc , this will take more than 1 hour depending on infra available and technical capability.if an engine needs to be changed then god help them.

IMO atleast a squadron must be available to justify economic investment for necessary and reasonably quick time support and maintenance (manpower + infra).
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 11:48am On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
IMO 3 mig 29s r not going to make that big a impact unless they get really innovative like the Israelis against a larger no of aircrafts

low no of an aircraft types decreases the turnaround time after every sortie becz they will not have the required extensive support equipment's/infra in the first place . economically it does not make sense.

low persistence AD becz if 3 r airborne and then land back they will need to go through mandatory checks, refuelling re-arming etc , this will take more than 1 hour depending on infra available and technical capability.if an engine needs to be changed then god help them.

IMO atleast a squadron must be available to justify economic investment for necessary and reasonably quick time support and maintenance (manpower + infra).
but the Jf17 can't give ur air superiority over the mig29.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:23pm On May 01, 2017
2 days ETA [color=#000000]Analysis of KHIBINY L-175V versus DONALD COOK[/color] grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:29pm On May 01, 2017
giles14:
but the Jf17 can't give ur air superiority over the mig29.
aerial warfare is not dependent on one aircraft versus another perse.

there r many aspects to it ,

for example

what happens if enemy SF manages to sneak in to ur bases and disable/destroy majority of the limited no of aircraft's ?

also can smaller numbers of aircraft assets even with complete aerial freedom impact/stop an overwhelming land attacking force backed with reasonable air defence assets ?

do not miss the big picture

war is a multi spectrum engagement most of the times and inevitably one factor effect another dynamically
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:26pm On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
2 days ETA [color=#000000]Analysis of KHIBINY L-175V versus DONALD COOK[/color] grin
Then can you compare the an alq 99 to the khibiny.

Any update on NGJ which is going to replace the alq 99?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:24pm On May 01, 2017
ever wonder why the Russians install 2 jammers on their fighters, one on either side of the wingtips ?

grin

figure it out if ur smart grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 7:26pm On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
ever wonder why the Russians install 2 jammers on their fighters, one on either side of the wingtips ?

grin

figure it out if ur smart grin grin grin
should one shutdown the other takes over
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:49pm On May 01, 2017
giles14:
should one shutdown the other takes over
nah , not so simple grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 8:13pm On May 01, 2017
nemesis2u:
who was it, who said that
victory never kissth the feet of who never tryth grin
i really now see the utility of MIB's memory eraser pen
u getting my idea ? grin
Yes. grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:04pm On May 01, 2017
Indian Navy Tu-142 with Mk11 Depth Charges (manufactured by OFB)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:04pm On May 01, 2017
Indian Navy Tu-142 with APR-2E air dropped torpedo

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:05pm On May 01, 2017
IAF jaguars

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:09pm On May 01, 2017
navy and coast guard dorniers for EW with EO pod etc comes with 2 hard points on the wings too

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:20am On May 02, 2017
LCH

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:09am On May 02, 2017
nemesis2u:
ever wonder why the Russians install 2 jammers on their fighters, one on either side of the wingtips ?

grin

figure it out if ur smart grin grin grin
Us uses 4 AN-ALQ 99 pod so I don't see a big deal.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:44am On May 02, 2017
tdayof:
Us uses 4 AN-ALQ 99 pod so I don't see a big deal.
wrong answer grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
x
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:48am On May 02, 2017
nemesis2u:
wrong answer grin grin grin
Cocks pump action, woss wobi ! What is the answer grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:51am On May 02, 2017
nemesis2u:
x
Downloaded ..you just removed it angry
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:53am On May 02, 2017
tdayof:
Cocks pump action, woss wobi ! What is the answer grin grin
trying to upload KHIBINY L-175V write up

guess i will have to convert it to image

the answer to the question is in the KHIBINY write up
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:55am On May 02, 2017
tdayof:
grin grin grin
Downloaded ..you just removed it angry
grin grin grin
the online converter messed some parts of it, will correct it later , have to join work

will upload it later

sorry
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 10:44am On May 02, 2017
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
here it is DECODING THE MYSTERY OF KHIBINY L-175V

the most difficult part was to make it simple enough without too much jargon and details so that none of u would fall asleep grin

plz do post ur comments/view/opinion on the article

https://i.imgur.com/YXvmoKv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/pVkOmIS.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/NItg8Pl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/TVUNdW1.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/P8pvyvU.jpg
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 11:55am On May 02, 2017
nemesis2u:
the most difficult part was to make it simple enough without too much jargon and details so that none of u would fall asleep grin

plz do post ur comments/view/opinion on the article

https://i.imgur.com/YXvmoKv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/pVkOmIS.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/NItg8Pl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/TVUNdW1.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/P8pvyvU.jpg
Still not visible.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:57am On May 02, 2017
tdayof:
Still not visible.
not visible ?

it is on my end , u can try refresh ur page , due to slow/intermittent speed maybe

say what should i post the image links so that u can download them and view it

http://imgur.com/YXvmoKv

http://imgur.com/pVkOmIS

http://imgur.com/NItg8Pl

http://imgur.com/TVUNdW1

http://imgur.com/P8pvyvU
1 2 3 ... 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)