Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,165,474 members, 7,861,372 topics. Date: Saturday, 15 June 2024 at 10:56 AM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (164) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1001802 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (161) (162) (163) (164) (165) (166) (167) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu2: 1:30pm On Apr 30, 2017
The company formed to receive cavalry, but the CAVALRY ADVANCING deployed to the right and left when within musket range and unmasked a body of seven hundred NEGRO INFANTRY, all armed with muskets, who opened fire on our men, wounding two lieutenants and two privates, and rushing forward surrounded the company of Germans who cut their way through killing six of the negroes and wounding several more. The main body, hearing the firing, advanced at a double-quick in time to recover their wounded, and drive the enemy back, but did not succeed in taking any prisoners. The wounded men TESTIFY POSITIVELY that they were shot by Negroes, and that not less than seven hundred were present, armed with musket 1st pic fought for the South.
https://myscv./category/war-between-the-states/

They weren't nurses,grooms,footmen and auxiliaries but fighters. The entire race history of the US must be rewritten. Also our assumptions on class don't hold true.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:38pm On Apr 30, 2017
PLANAF

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:41pm On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:
PLANAF

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu2: 1:45pm On Apr 30, 2017
The REAL HISTORY of US blacks is long and complicated and I can only touch on it briefly. Fyi,Abraham Lincoln was actually mulatto as can be seen in this extremely rare US library of Congress record and he wasn't the first black leader while the first American killed in the anti Brit riots of the 1770 was a Black American,Crispus Attucks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6csH779lM7g

More black vets.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 3:59pm On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:
JF17B
All I see are Chinese.
Jointly funded.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 4:14pm On Apr 30, 2017
MikeCZA:
All I see are Chinese.

Jointly funded.

Chinese made yes and jointly funded. Funding should include TOT etc blablabla.. Someone said it's about giving the Chinese access to the F-16
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:28pm On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:


Chinese made yes and jointly funded. Funding should include TOT etc blablabla.. Someone said it's about giving the Chinese access to the F-16
its more like joint production.



chinese access to F16 is something i would take it with a pinch of salt as the americans would chew the ******** up big time , its got more to do with ********* giving the Chinese exposure to western aerial warfare tactics , SOPs , operational concepts etc.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:45pm On Apr 30, 2017
Indian Air Force (IAF) Beriev A-50EI "Phalcon" AWACS over Tel Aviv Ben Gurion Airport (TLV), Israel

looks like it is one of the 2 additional Phalcon which was ordered

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:04pm On Apr 30, 2017
tdayof:


Chinese made yes and jointly funded. Funding should include TOT etc blablabla.. Someone said it's about giving the Chinese access to the F-16

I also wanted to bring that up. All I've seen in the videos and pictures are Chinese engineers and pilots.

Is the JF-17 jointly funded or jointly produced?

It kinda looks like it is jointly funded.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:07pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


I also wanted to bring that up. All I've seen in the videos and pictures are Chinese engineers and pilots.

Is the JF-17 jointly funded or jointly produced?

It kinda looks like it is jointly funded.

grin

don't mention it again
and
don't say it too loud

if it reaches..............

be ready to bear the consequences grin





jokes aside developing a fighter is not a childs play something which the indians have learnt at a great cost of both money and time.

u need to have a corresponding civilian industrial complex to support such endeavors. in reality the military industrial complex is a poor cousin to the civilian industrial complex.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:11pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


grin

don't mention it again
and
don't say it too loud

if it reaches..............

be ready to bear the consequences grin





sorry could not help myself grin grin


I don't see anything there to be ashamed of, as long as there is still TOT at the end. However we have to be honest with ourselves, the JF-17 is a Chinese plane.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:16pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


grin




jokes aside developing a fighter is not a childs play something which the indians have learnt at a great cost of both money and time.

u need to have a corresponding civilian industrial complex to support such endeavors. in reality the military industrial complex is a poor cousin to the civilian industrial complex.


You have to have the economy and a highly skilled work force to develop a fighter jet. The Chinese have this in abundance.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:21pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


I don't see anything there to be ashamed of, as long as there is still TOT at the end. However we have to be honest with ourselves, the JF-17 is a Chinese plane.

what ashamed ?

i never mentioned anything about being ashamed


tell me this (a general life question)

u r a owner of a garage and a good mechanic

and i give u the TOT for a car engine

what good will it do to u ?


now think this in respect of a country

unless u have the eco system in place to absorb and put into practice the TOT with reasonable economical feasibility , it is useless.

it takes 25-30 years and billions of dollars to create a aviation ecosystem strong enough to absorb full spectrum TOT and even then it will struggle becz technology is always evolving.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:23pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


You have to have the economy and a highly skilled work force to develop a fighter jet. The Chinese have this in abundance.


the Chinese r rolling in extravagance

wont mind kidnapping a few thousand of them , i am sure they wont be missed grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by PattyCake: 5:24pm On Apr 30, 2017
Free men?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:29pm On Apr 30, 2017
@MikeCZA

how about handing over the list of SA topflight aviation specialists ?

i will sell it to the indians who can lure them with with some spicy bollywood dance and songs grin

we will share the profits 60 /40 grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:31pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


the Chinese r rolling in extravagance

wont mind kidnapping a few thousand of them , i am sure they wont be missed grin

grin grin

They already have 1.4 billion of them, and that's only mainland China. If we add Taiwan, Hongkong and Macau that number is expected to swell.

Probably kidnap 5 million of them to work in the highly skilled sectors of the economy.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:33pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


what ashamed ?

i never mentioned anything about being ashamed


tell me this (a general life question)

u r a owner of a garage and a good mechanic

and i give u the TOT for a car engine

what good will it do to u ?


now think this in respect of a country

unless u have the eco system in place to absorb and put into practice the TOT with reasonable economical feasibility , it is useless.

it takes 25-30 years and billions of dollars to create a aviation ecosystem strong enough to absorb full spectrum TOT and even then it will struggle becz technology is always evolving.

Yeah, I agree.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:34pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


grin grin

They already have 1.4 billion of them, and that's only mainland China. If we add Taiwan, Hongkong and Macau that number is expected to swell.

Probably kidnap 5 million of them to work in the highly skilled sectors of the economy.

taiwan

ur hereby being prioritized as a target for Taiwan foreign covert action group grin

enjoy ur few days now grin

u might use this time to post beautiful pics ladies military preferably

i will personally write a glowing obituary for u if u do so grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:37pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


taiwan

ur hereby being prioritized as a target for Taiwan foreign covert action group grin

enjoy ur few days now grin

Don't they both claim to be the real China.

Man, they are all the same.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:41pm On Apr 30, 2017
Henry240:


Don't they both claim to be the real China.

Man, they are all the same.

talk about double suicide grin

now ur hereby being prioritized as a target for PRC foreign covert action group grin

enjoy ur very few days now

friendly reminder :

u might use this time to post beautiful pics of ladies military preferably

i will personally write a glowing obituary for u if u do so grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by iblawi(m): 6:14pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:


what ashamed ?

i never mentioned anything about being ashamed


tell me this (a general life question)

u r a owner of a garage and a good mechanic

and i give u the TOT for a car engine

what good will it do to u ?


now think this in respect of a country

unless u have the eco system in place to absorb and put into practice the TOT with reasonable economical feasibility , it is useless.

it takes 25-30 years and billions of dollars to create a aviation ecosystem strong enough to absorb full spectrum TOT and even then it will struggle becz technology is always evolving.

Bad guy. But it has elements of truth in it.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 6:33pm On Apr 30, 2017
nemesis2u:
@MikeCZA

how about handing over the list of SA topflight aviation specialists ?

i will sell it to the indians who can lure them with with some spicy bollywood dance and songs grin

we will share the profits 60 /40 grin
We would be entering an already saturated market. grin grin grin

Tough competition from the Europeans.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:38pm On Apr 30, 2017
MikeCZA:
We would be entering an already saturated market. grin grin grin

Tough competition from the Europeans.

who was it,
who said that

victory never kissth the feet of who never tryth grin

i really now see the utility of MIB's memory eraser pen

u getting my idea ? grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:33pm On Apr 30, 2017
CVN-78 Ford
newest ones

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:54pm On Apr 30, 2017
ALQ184 EW Pod

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:56pm On Apr 30, 2017
Tactical Approach Lighting System (TALS)

it is a field deployable, manportable, solid-state, battery-powered lighting system that provides both infra-red and visible light sources. Light Units can be fully configured and operated via a UHF radio Remote Control Unit up to a typical range of 5km, or configured and operated manually. Illumination is provided over a hemispherical area by LED light sources. In infra-red mode the Light Units are NVG-compatible.

The primary purpose of the TALS is to indicate landing and drop zones, forward arming and refuelling points, and can also be used for both covert and overt infiltration/ex-filtration operations.

Such systems are fully NATO-codified. A system consists of the following and is contained and transported in a backpack: one Remote Control Unit, six Light Units, six Ground Spikes (for deploying Light Units), one Universal input Battery Charger, and one Backpack which houses all the system units. The system provides sufficient Lights for a minimum operating strip (MOS) for fixed-wing aircraft or marking out a ‘T’ formation, typically used for helicopters.

If a larger or more complex layout is required then any number of packs can be combined, and may be remote-controlled by single or multiple controllers either from on the ground or from in the air.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:06pm On Apr 30, 2017
Ground Master 400 Long range light weight radar

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:27pm On Apr 30, 2017
harop suicide drone

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:32pm On Apr 30, 2017
mig 29k

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:58pm On Apr 30, 2017
never before seen AS-90 Turret on T72M grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:01pm On Apr 30, 2017
this infograph will help any body wanting to do a Armoured Campaign on their neighbors grin

(1) (2) (3) ... (161) (162) (163) (164) (165) (166) (167) ... (668) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 47
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.