JackBizzle:


I stand corrected.. the guys last papers were in the 60s

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00260192

Do you see how you are exposing yourself by yourself?

First you claimed you researched and his last paper was in the 70s and now you are claiming 60s

I have told you your thread was brought in dead.

Blocked brain Bizzle

butterflyl1on:


Do you see how you are exposing yourself by yourself?

First you claimed you researched and his last paper was in the 70s and now you are claiming 60s

I have told you your thread was brought in dead.

Blocked brain Bizzle

It even makes my case better. The guy was scientifically comatose since the 60s.

Such a reputable scientist

JackBizzle:



It even makes my case better. The guy was scientifically comatose since the 60s.

Such a reputable scientist

If he was scientifically comatose since the 60s and got awarded in the 70s when then did he get born again and when was he an atheist?

If he was atheist in the 60s and you claim he was scientifically comatose in the 60s are you not also killing your own thread?

Hint: he was scientifically comatose as an atheist.

Mega jumbo dumbo blocked brain Bizzle

So when then was he an alcoholic? Do you see how stupid you make yourself?

Jackbizzle as a final nail in your coffin of buffoonery


https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00927380

This is from the link and paper

Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
October 1981, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 335–345 | Cite as
Histochemical, cytochemical and autoradiographic studies on the rostellum of Hymenolepis diminuta
Authors
Authors and affiliations
Robert D. Specian Richard D. Lumsden


I repeat, take your L and go

ToZaraWithaZ:
Disgusting hypocritical goat - just like his Jewish Lord, the megolomaniacal, narcissistic Jesus Christ who holds his crumbling destiny in his hands without any plans of repair.

You're a walking, talking mass of contradictions.

Where is decorum and civility in your own comment?

Jackbizzle the blocked brain here is another paper from 1980

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00927728

GoodMuyis:


Where is decorum and civility in your own comment?

I'm not the fool preaching decorum and civility, only to turn around to do the exact thing he's preaching against. Face your disgusting Christard brethren for being a hypocritical bastard.

I've always advocated the suffering of fools and morons, and putting retarrds in their place. I never preached "civility" and "decorum" towards disgusting people disgracing the human race.

butterflyl1on:
Jackbizzle as a final nail in your coffin of buffoonery


https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00927380

This is from the link and paper

Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde
October 1981, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 335–345 | Cite as
Histochemical, cytochemical and autoradiographic studies on the rostellum of Hymenolepis diminuta
Authors
Authors and affiliations
Robert D. Specian Richard D. Lumsden


I repeat, take your L and go

Still. The Richard Lumsden guy is still not a respectable scientist.


Oh and waitt for it.........ACCORDING TO YOUR LINK, THE ORIGINAL WORK WAS DONE IN 1979.


STILL THE 70S BABY!!!



SWERVE

JackBizzle:



Still. The Richard Lumsden guy is still not a respectable scientist.


Oh and waitt for it.........ACCORDING TO YOUR LINK, THE ORIGINAL WORK WAS DONE IN 1979.


STILL THE 70S BABY!!!



SWERVE

Still on the zombie train I see

He wasn't reputable but was awarded the highest award on parasitology ba?

I guess all those who also bagged such awards as he did were also not reputable.

The first link I gave was 1981 spot on. The second link was reviewed in February 1980 but received in November 26 1979 (which is a month from the end of the year) That was why it was left and reviewed in 1980.

Do you see how you keep making a fool of yourself?

Second paper screen shot below

I repeat take your mega L and go

Jackbizzle don't run away from your own thread o.

You must finish what you started. Or don't you want to expose more of my falsehood?

Boomerang fall on you dia

butterflyl1on:
Jackbizzle don't run away from your own thread o.

You must finish what you started. Or don't you want to expose more of my falsehood?

Boomerang fall on you dia

The guy has no shame . He says the stupidest things ever . He even calls agnostics atheists . Every new day he enters a new level of displaying foolishness

KingEbukasBlog:


The guy has no shame . He says the stupidest things ever . He even calls agnostics atheists . Every new day he enters a new level of displaying foolishness

His monotonous foolishness always makes me laugh

butterflyl1on:


His monotonous foolishness always makes me laugh

I think he should see comedy as a career prospect . He does not have the mind to engage in intellectual discussions

KingEbukasBlog:


I think he should see comedy as a career prospect . He does not have the mind to engage in intellectual discussions

He would be a colossal failure even as a comic. He lacks the focus and intellectual know how to even make comedy funny.

He is a mess and does not know when serious is serious and when a joke is a joke. When it's time to be serious he becomes a fool. When it is time to be a fool he becomes a joke, when it is time to be a joke he becomes serious.

He is an L.

butterflyl1on:


He would be a colossal failure even as a comic. He lacks the focus and intellectual know how to even make comedy funny.

He is a mess and does not know when serious is serious and when a joke is a joke. When it's time to be serious he becomes a fool. When it is time to be a fool he becomes a joke, when it is time to bed joke he becomes serious.

He is an L.

Exactly ! This is JackBizzle in a nutshell . Well done sir

butterflyl1on:


Still on the zombie train I see

He wasn't reputable but was awarded the highest award on parasitology ba?

I guess all those who also bagged such awards as he did were also not reputable.

The first link I gave was 1981 spot on. The second link was reviewed in February 1980 but received in November 26 1979 (which is a month from the end of the year) That was why it was left and reviewed in 1980.

Do you see how you keep making a fool of yourself?

Second paper screen shot below

I repeat take your mega L and go

All this your explaining does not change the facts


1) Richard Lumsden was not relevant in science for almost 20 years of his life (18 years thereabout)

2) His last meaningful contribution to science was in 1979 which is still the 70s

3) He died as an alcoholic creationist.



He is not a respectable scientist. His views on evolution are irrelevant.

JackBizzle:




All this your explaining does not change the facts


1) Richard Lumsden was not relevant in science for almost 20 years of his life (18 years thereabout)

2) His last meaningful contribution to science was in 1979 which is still the 70s

3) He died as an alcoholic creationist.



He is not a respectable scientist. His views on evolution are irrelevant.

You thread has been thrashed dumbo

So a paper of 1981 is now 1979?

He did die but he died from complications he got from alcoholism when he was an atheist.

Let me show you the date on the paper again. 1981 is clearly written on that paper which is the first link I gave you. Or are you blind to that first link and only seeing the second link which was reviewed in 1980 but submitted 26th November 1979?

How come your argument is no longer your claim about him submitting his last paper was in the 60s?

Quietly take your L and go and stop embarrassing yourself freely

Mega jumbo dumbo blocked head Jackbizzle you opened a thread to try and discredit my thread but ended up decapitating yourself with your own hands and leaving me to dance one corner on your thread

Thread derailed.

JackBizzle:



Thread derailed.

Ode! Who derailed the thread?

Mega cop out jumbo dumbo

butterflyl1on:


Ode! Who derailed the thread?

Mega cop out jumbo dumbo

Ogbeni swerve. People with common sense know that you are both a provider and connoisseur of fake news

JackBizzle:



Ogbeni swerve. People with common sense know that you are both a provider and connoisseur of fake news

Lmao

People with true common sense know you have been roundly trounced on your own thread and it boomeranged on you.

Any more false claims you have to make?

Look into my eyes mega jumbo dumbo blocked brain Bizzle

butterflyl1on:
Jackbizzle from my very credible and provable response to you it clearly shows you are the one spreading false information and not myself or Felixomor or kingebukasblog.

You are a peddler of falsehood and if atheists like yourself who happen to be top on the list for the award of the dumbest atheist with the dumbest threads on Nairaland by december are not checked, you would use your falsehood to pollute and lure away those who have no time or means to actually check your nonsensical claims for credibility.

Well I have time and the means and my robust and credible response says it all.

Jumbo Dumbo blocked brain Bizzle

Hehehehe LMAO

His thread was dead before it could even breathe.

butterflyl1on:
Mega jumbo dumbo blocked head Jackbizzle you opened a thread to try and discredit my thread but ended up decapitating yourself with your own hands and leaving me to dance one corner on your thread

Chai.
Lol

jonbellion:

You dey vex say I bitch slap your brother?

butterflyl1on:


You thread has been thrashed dumbo

So a paper of 1981 is now 1979?

He did die but he died from complications he got from alcoholism when he was an atheist.

Let me show you the date on the paper again. 1981 is clearly written on that paper which is the first link I gave you. Or are you blind to that first link and only seeing the second link which was reviewed in 1980 but submitted 26th November 1979?

How come your argument is no longer your claim about him submitting his last paper was in the 60s?

Quietly take your L and go and stop embarrassing yourself freely

What does L mean?

Ranchhoddas:
What does L mean?

L = Loss.

butterflyl1on:


L = Loss.

Loss? Loss?

I knew that you were daft but I did not know that you were this daft! You couldn't just type "loss"? Jesus, I thought it was symbolic "L" for "Learner".

Christ man, you are daft.

JackBizzle:



Loss? Loss?

I knew that you were daft but I did not know that you were this daft! You couldn't just type "loss"? Jesus, I thought it was symbolic "L" for "Learner".

Christ man, you are daft.

Well you could be both. A loser and a learner so I say Amen to both.

Ogbeni this thread of yours stinks to the high heavens of how daft you can be and this is you being daft on level 1 o. Imagine you being daft on level 5 SMH . That would be you going full atheitard on me. Not like it would be shocking though.

hopefulLandlord:
booked

i like this guy, no homo.

Kingebukasblog and butterfly1on.

Atheism is a mental disease but your church members roll in the mud for prayers.

Lies and fake news