delzbaba:
its called stigmata,those that know,,, know

From the Catholic perspective, stigmata (singular stigma) is a term used to describe body marks, sores, or sensations of pain in locations corresponding to the crucifixion wounds of Jesus Christ, such as the hands, wrists, and feet.
For the purposes of clarity, it's necessary to understand Jesus ministry here on earth, it's a ministry of substitution; He took our place that we should take his place period.
He was made sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him - 2 Cor.5:21
He became poor that we might be rich
-2. Cor. 8:9
He became a ransom that we might be free, saved and justified. Matt 20:28, Acts 13:38-39.
Having said this, it's important to know that anybody that is not practising this substituted life of Christ is not a child of God. every child of God took the place of Christ and that is what unbelievers in Antioch saw and called them CHRISTAINS. Act 11:19-26. No Christain or church is permitted to suffer the pains or marks Christ has suffered in correspondence to him,for he paid the price once and forever for everyone. read this:
By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.
Hebrews 10:10‭-‬14 KJV
whoever that practices this pains of Christ is therefore demonic and anti -Christ beacuse he/she goes against the scripture.

BinaryLord:
mind what u say with mouth , that's not a drama but real injury that opened by itself... It rare occurrence that happens to some1 during lent period. The person will start to experience open bleeding unharmful wounds from some parts of his body exactly that places Jesus Christ go wounded during his passion. It doesn't happen to everybody.
When it starts the person become unconscious. And starts bleeding from parts of his or her body. Which can last for hours or minutes.. And the injury heals by its self after few days or weeks depending.

They are called stigmatists. It didnt start today.
It has been happening sinse ages the first person to experience is was a monk rev father. (St Francis of Asisi) in 1880,s .

It has also happen to one bro Chima in IMO state around 2009.

I asked a simple question. Of what essence is it? What does the stigmatist or the onlookers stand to benefit or lose by watching or not watching.
Where is you stigmatism found in the Bible and how do we classify it. Is it entertainment or what?

stephenduru:
As shared by Ebuka....

'Happening live
Rev. Sr Martina of Enugu Ezike, aka (sister aka Na agba Obara) on Thursday 8th March 2018 experienced her usual weekly  Lenten season PASSION OF CHRIST. It's an outburst of unbearable pains all over her body with blood flow in her hand, feet, head and eyes. And also a very large Host or Holy Communion coming out of her mouth as you can clearly see from the pictures. It's not a film trick, it's real'

Source: http://www.trezzyhelm.com/2018/03/see-what-happened-to-nigerian-lady-in.html?m=1

please,please and please
make them carry this scam far from catholic church ooo

Dottore:

I asked a simple question. Of what essence is it? What does the stigmatist or the onlookers stand to benefit or lose by watching or not watching.
Where is you stigmatism found in the Bible and how do we classify it. Is it entertainment or what?

I have just told u when it first experienced.
Along know that not everything was recorded in d Bible.
If u are to record every single thing that happed in the days.
I can tell u that d size of the bible will be bigger than a house or car to contain them all.

Lastly the onlookers dont standto gain anything they just saw something that that they havnt seen before before and they decided to look. As human beings they are.
The stigmatist may stand to gain something or nothing I'm not God.. But He is just using him to pass a message across

they better take her to the hospital for diagnosis,ignorance wont kill us in africa

BinaryLord:


I have just told u when it first experienced.
Along know that not everything was recorded in d Bible.
If u are to record every single thing that happed in the days.
I can tell u that d size of the bible will be bigger than a house or car to contain them all.

Lastly the onlookers dont standto gain anything they just saw something that that they havnt seen before before and they decided to look. As human beings they are.
The stigmatist may stand to gain something or nothing I'm not God.. But He is just using him to pass a message across

So u agree its a form of entertainment? A gory one at that. It's most likely a mystic exercise/experiment gone wrong. She had better look for an exorcist to set her free because there's no perceivable importance of the subject matter.

rheether:
Ezike orba of all places? What do you expect?

tell us more

BinaryLord:


I have just told u when it first experienced.
Along know that not everything was recorded in d Bible.
If u are to record every single thing that happed in the days.
I can tell u that d size of the bible will be bigger than a house or car to contain them all.

Lastly the onlookers dont standto gain anything they just saw something that that they havnt seen before before and they decided to look. As human beings they are.
The stigmatist may stand to gain something or nothing I'm not God.. But He is just using him to pass a message across

What message? That He shed His blood so we too can shed ours?

this movie is scary o!!!

donnie:


What message? That He shed His blood so we too can shed ours?

Well I don't know.. But u can go to Enugu and get d message in details if u really wana know.. But I'm just trying to let u know that thing is so real.. And doesn't happen every time . this my second time of seeing it since after that one that happened 2009 in IMO state.

Magician on the stage.

Dottore:

So u agree its a form of entertainment? A gory one at that. It's most likely a mystic exercise/experiment gone wrong. She had better look for an exorcist to set her free because there's no perceivable importance of the subject matter.

Ok sir. Case closed

Nature129:
The poster cannot even write correct English to help readers understand what he's talking about. Mtcheeeww

I swear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tutPJ0jHyKs

BinaryLord:

Ok sir. Case closed

Its worrisome how priests will stand before the congregation and torment them psychologically about the passion of Christ. The gullible majority of the audience will just be wailing and crying and twisting and all manner of drama only to return home to their poverty and hardship while the priests go home to enjoy their bounties; better food and choice wines and premium DSTV subscription on better TV. Same. With Pastors. oh gosh

You won't try this in a civilized society. The authorities will prosecute your ass for fraud.

Dottore:


Its worrisome how priests will stand before the congregation and torment them psychologically about the passion of Christ. The gullible majority of the audience will just be wailing and crying and twisting and all manner of drama only to return home to their poverty and hardship while the priests go home to enjoy their bounties; better food and choice wines and premium DSTV subscription on better TV. Same. With Pastors. oh gosh

You won't try this in a civilized society. The authorities will prosecute your ass for fraud.

Lol ok

DonDiego:


I see. Your last sentence just revealed who you are, the type that argues about the Bible and its contents with those the very Church that put the Bible together. If it's not in the Bible it is not of God must be the most hilariously ignorant comment that anyone who claims to be a Christian can make despite the fact that the very last verse in the gospel according to St John specifically stated that there were so many things Jesus did where left out the Bible as we know it.

I will conclude by sharing St. Thomas Aquinas' famous quote with you:

"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who do not, no proof is possible."

And there's a reason those "many things" weren't included in the bible. The same John said at the end of revelation that whoever adds or removes from the bible will be cursed. Keep adding o, you've been told the outcome...

BinaryLord:


I have just told u when it first experienced.
Along know that not everything was recorded in d Bible.
If u are to record every single thing that happed in the days.
I can tell u that d size of the bible will be bigger than a house or car to contain them all.

Lastly the onlookers dont standto gain anything they just saw something that that they havnt seen before before and they decided to look. As human beings they are.
The stigmatist may stand to gain something or nothing I'm not God.. But He is just using him to pass a message across

what message please?

If this story is true then the woman is a mystic just like Padre pio and she should be bundled to a monastery where she belongs.

Wiseman5:

what message please?

Go to Enugu sir n get it in detail s

Nah Chelsea fan oh?

Nodogragra4me:



Your ignorance of the source of the Bible is epic..... The Catholic Church out the Bible together.... A big laugh.


Educate yourself in proper doctrine.... Nobody is telling you that everything Jesus did was recorded..... His bathing wasn't recorded...what you have is a complete guide for correction, instructions and directing in righteousness.... The Bible is complete as far as knowledge and walk with God is concerned..... It is the constitution of every believer and every so called by laws....doctrines must find a support their in...



Now let me subsidize your ignorance..... Take and stop advertising your ignorance like a flag of honour



The catholic Church did not give us the Bible-certainly not the Old Testament, for there was no Church in those days. And if the Roman Catholic Church was not needed to give us the Old Testament, then clearly it was not needed to give us the New either.

A favorite question of Catholic apologists is, "How do you know that Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke or that Matthew wrote the Gospel of Matthew?" They claim that Roman Catholic tradition contains this information. Yet no tradition proves who wrote Hebrews, Job, Esther, or various Psalms. Nor does it matter. That the authors were inspired by the Holy Spirit is what counts. This inspiration bears witness within readers who are themselves indwelt by the same Holy Spirit who inspired the writing of Scripture.

Catholicism's claim that the New Testament comes from the Church by decision of the councils is false. No early council even ruled on what was canonical; yet in these councils, to support their arguments, both sides quoted the New Testament, which had obviously been accepted by general consensus without any conciliar definition of the canon.


The Synod of Antioch, in A.D. 266, denounced the doctrine of Paul of Samosata as "foreign to the ecclesiastical canon." The Council of Nicea in 325 refers to "the canon"; and the Council of Laodicea in 363 exhorted that "only the `canonized' books of both Old and New Testaments be read in the church." Yet none of those councils deemed it necessary to list the canonized books, indicating that they were already well-known and accepted by the common consent of Christians indwelt by the Holy Spirit.


Not until the Third Council of Carthage, in A.D. 397, do we have the first conciliar decision on the canon.18 That is rather late if without it Christians didn't know what books were in the New Testament and therefore couldn't use them, as Rome claims today! History proves that the books of the New Testament were known and accepted by Christians and in wide circulation and use at least 300 years before Carthage listed them.


Historian W.H.C. Frend writes: The Gospels and epistles were circulating in Asia, Syria, and Alexandria (less certainly in Rome), and being read and discussed in the Christian synagogues there by about 100.


In Polycarp's short letter there is an astonishing amount of direct and indirect quotation from the New Testament: Matthew, Luke, and John, Acts, the letters to the Galatians, Thessalonians, Corinthians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Romans, the Pastorals, 1 Peter particularly, and 1 and 2 John are all used.... The Christian Scriptures were quoted so familiarly as to suggest that they had been in regular use a long time.19


No rabbinical body decided upon the canon of the Old Testament. That canon was recognized by Israel and available as it was being written. Daniel, a captive in Babylon, had a copy of Jeremiah written only a few years earlier and was studying it as Scripture (Daniel 9:2). We are certain that the entire Old Testament was well-known when Christ was here and undoubtedly long before, for every Israelite was required to meditate upon it day and night. God's Word Speaks Directly to All In Old Testament times the common people were expected to know God's Word, not through rabbinical interpretation but for themselves, and were able to know it.


That fact, as well as its availability to all, is very clear from Christ's rebuke of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus: "0 fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken...." (Luke 24:25). He would not have used such harsh language in holding these two ordinary people responsible for their ignorance of prophecies had not all of the Old Testament Scriptures been readily available,familiar, and understandable to the ordinary Jew. He then expounded unto them in all the Scriptures (which must therefore have been known) "the things concerning himself" (Luke 24:25-27).

All of the Scriptures were even available to the faraway Bereans north of Greece, who, as we have seen, "searched the Scriptures daily" (Acts 17:11). The same evidence is found in the fact that Timothy knew the Old Testament from early childhood (2 Timothy 3:15) and that it was taught to him not by the rabbis in the synagogue but at home by his mother and grandmother, who themselves were women of faith (2 Timothy 1:5).

It is certainly clear that no one in Old Testament times looked to any hierarchy for an official interpretation of Scripture. Nor did the early church. Nor should we today. The plain words of the Bible, without Rome's domineering interpretation, give the lie to the hierarchical structure of the Roman Catholic Church and the authoritarianism of its clergy.

Priscilla and Aquila were an ordinary husband and wife who labored daily at tentmaking (Acts 18:3). Yet a "church [met] in their house" (1 Corinthians 16:19) and they were capable teachers of God's Word, even instructing a man so eloquent as Apollos (Acts 18:26). Paul referred to them as "my helpers in Christ Jesus" (Romans 16:3).

They had never been to seminary and were not part of a clerical hierarchy (which didn't exist), but they knew God and His Word by the Holy Spirit indwelling them. So should all Christians today. According to Paul, ordinary Christians are to judge whether a preacher is speaking God's truth. Paul submitted his writings to the same criteria, inviting his readers to judge by the Holy Spirit within them whether his epistles were from God or not: "If any man think himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord" (1 Corinthians 14:37).

It was by the same witness of the Holy Spirit within each individual believer that the first-century church decided which books were canonical. In exactly the same way Christians today recognize the Bible as God's inspired Word.

God bless you for sharing this truth, I pray that everyone that's still under the shackles of ignorance especially the believers of Roman Catholic doctrines be set free today for their damnation will be worst than those that do not believe in Jesus Christ.

They just crossed the national red line with this kain joke.

Apina:
There are saints in the Catholic church who hve experienced such in the past and its on record, for those who choose to be ignorant and tag it as witchcraft or the most stupid of them all asking wheres it in the Bible as it was their ears Thomas put his hands into when Jesus appeared

go and sit down Mr man. This is absolutely nonsense and not christ like. She should better open a mammy water centre for consultation.

nothernstar:
go and sit down Mr man. This is absolutely nonsense and not christ like. She should better open a mammy water centre for consultation.

I would not dignify u with a response

Rule out head injury , sub arachnoid haemorrhage, Severe high blood pressure, She need urgent CT scan.

BinaryLord:
Its true it happens

Shot the f up. Wetin happen? Ur pastors too de fake things. Last time we ia one de fly now this. Get the f out of ia

donnie:


Don't mind them...they'll say that one too is a miracle. When people regard church tradition over God's eternal Word, this is what you get.

If smoke begins to come down in one of pastor Oyaks service today you'd say it's the power of God.

Bloody hypocritical double standard.

chinedubrazil:
This must be an attack or something unknown..

Nigeria is becoming scary these days oooo

the worst is people climbing poles to see buhari

Are u sure we are not doing the african version of the bible?

is is true am from the area

Jh0wsef:
Osheyy, Red Panther

Guy you no well

obynno7:
is is true am from the area

i'm not saying it is not true

Catholic church and their unbiblical beliefs. Combing Christianity and satanism since time immemorial