₦airaland Forum

Ayodeji2k14:
someof these ladies are nymphos.A married woman was raped by armed robbers and she was moaning and twisting her hips to meet the robbers thrusts in her husband presence.Indeed,some women are dogs!

When I see comments like this, I wonder.

perez100:
The judge is one of the best in Africa. The victim claimed to have been raped but the Defendant claimed she consented, but no witness at the scene. Now, the judge questions and the answers she got from the victim proved she consented cos you can't enjoy rape. You cannot just bring such case and expect everybody to accept your claim without any proof.

Really?

The Lawyer was stupid for asking if she 'enjoyed' the rape. Her feelings or otherwise of the act is immaterial. The question is did the guy rape her?

maasoap:
Firstly, the story made sense, not a perfect story because it was real. The perfect story is a fictional one.
Two, if it was consensual, there wouldn't be a torn fabric and marks on the neck.
Third, going by the accounts of the woman, she's mentally okay.
Four, lawyers are smart. They can ruin any case by asking tricky questions. What if it was non consensual but the woman actually enjoyed it? Was that enough not to see it as forceful sex?
The truth was that the question shouldn't have been allowed to stand.

100% on point.

That question was a trick question.

@bukatyne, the man said he didn't rape her but the lady claimed otherwise. Remember, no witness was there. So, you expect the Judge to believe everything the lady claimed and crucify the man? We have seen some ladies with false raping stories.

maasoap:
Firstly, the story made sense, not a perfect story because it was real. The perfect story is a fictional one.
Two, if it was consensual, there wouldn't be a torn fabric and marks on the neck.
Third, going by the accounts of the woman, she's mentally okay.
Four, lawyers are smart. They can ruin any case by asking tricky questions. What if it was non consensual but the woman actually enjoyed it? Was that enough not to see it as forceful sex?
The truth was that the question shouldn't have been allowed to stand.

But that is the sole reason women conclude that a guy cannot be raped because they enjoy the sex in fact just because they had erection.
if you agree with the above then the judgement is valid.
@ your last question .

Dcholeric:
But that is the sole reason women conclude that a guy cannot be raped because they enjoy the sex in fact just because they had erection.
if you agree with the above then the judgement is valid.
@ your last question .

That's exactly my point. You can't say it's not a rape because a man sustained an erection. It is nature.

the interrogation was complex for the poor woman

maasoap:
That's exactly my point. You can't say it's not a rape because a man sustained an erection. It is nature.

well I see you're unsentimental...
But the ladies crying foul ....I have only a big laughter for them because everyone should be able to accept what they dish out.
their rules has been used against them.

thumbs up to you though

godofuck231:
Actually know a girl that was raped by robbers way back in school, her roomie wasn't left out, only for her to grip one of them begging him for his number, the irony is that today they are married, found out the guy has a bloody 14 inches Mopol bat, u don't get such whooping that easily, lol

My chest....

You cracked me up

Cutehector:
the lawyer who asked the question is a woman.. Your kind.. In the court, its all about facts and not emotions.

it doesn’t matter if she is a woman or not. Women can be misogynistic as a matter of fact.

If we are talking facts, then asking her if she enjoyed the rape or not has nothing to do with facts. It’s a subjective line of questioning that has nothing to do with facts. Only meant to victimize the victim some more.

cococandy:
it doesn’t matter if she is a woman or not. Women can be misogynistic as a matter of fact.

If we are talking facts, then asking her if she enjoyed the rape or not has nothing to do with facts. It’s a subjective line of questioning that has nothing to do with facts. Only meant to victimize the victim some more.

you know nothing about law..

Cutehector:
you know nothing about law..

you sound like an expert

perez100:
@bukatyne, the man said he didn't rape her but the lady claimed otherwise. Remember, no witness was there. So, you expect the Judge to believe everything the lady claimed and crucify the man? We have seen some ladies with false raping stories.

True ladies have false rape stories which is why I said on another thread that fight for consent and underaged/stranger rape should be seperated.

I believe this woman; she has admitted that she 'enjoyed' the rape so what else does she have to lose?

The man might have been asking her out or a stranger however that night, the sex started as rape.

Remember she is very conscious of her marriage so she would have organised a safe rendezvous for their affair instead of having her knickers torn on the streets in the possible view of neighbours.

cococandy:
you sound like an expert

my dad is a SAN...

valdes00:
My chest....

You cracked me up

That issue broke a barrier in my life I realised some women achieve orgasm when handled rough some do when shot with an anti tank gun, simply put female psychology differs, don't try to predict any woman

Coolgent:
you must be stupid.
i blame your parent for lack of moral upbringing.

Olori buruku somebody

Cutehector:
my dad is a SAN...

Umm sarcasm? Flew over your head.

Dad = SAN
doesn’t make you = SAN

cococandy:
Umm sarcasm? Flew over your head.

Dad = SAN
doesn’t make you = SAN

now I know you lack reason

Martin0:
I totally agree to some extent! but then again, who tha hell told you no one enjoys rape?

Rape victims themselves and a psychiatrist friend who treated many rape victims. It completely ruined their lives for good.

revontuli:
Rape victims themselves and a psychiatrist friend who treated many rape victims. It completely ruined their lives for good.

hmmmm OK.

I will conduct a search myself around town to see.

UyoBoy5:

hmm