Qupp:

Abeg any1 knows abeg dis apart from @thesoj
He hz not replying

Qupp:

Abeg any1 knows abeg dis apart from @thesoj
He hz not replying

MeinKampf:

Thanks for your response. I contacted the school and was told the letter is OK. That whenever CAQ gives that reason for intent to refuse, it means I only submitted first page of the admission letter. That I should send the complete admission letter and offer to CAQ and I'll be fine with that

mcobex:
What exactly do you want to know bro? I haven't been following your case

jnyuwa02:


Not true!! It’s another things to be accused of misrepresentation and another thing to be found to have misrepresented. That is why there is a fair process allowed by law for anyone accused to defend themselves. Many are accused of misrepresentation and successfully explain themselves and do not get a ban. I believe this is the case with the asker here and the GCMS will reveal that beyond the reasonable doubt. I know someone who was accused of misrepresentation, responded to the procedural fairness letter he received and did not get ban, but CIC went on and denied him based on purpose of visit. He is planning to apply again and tackle purpose of visit. Please let us make sure we handing out accurate information on this platform, not rushing to judgement or saying things we know nothing about.

Aallizzwellwole:
Pls gurus is the house, can someone who had been banned in applying for Canada Visa, apply for Australia study permit visa

Solitin40:

Reasons for the Ban ?

Aallizzwellwole:


Ban is ban,... Just want to know if that person can apply for Australia study permits visa

jnyuwa02:


Not true!! It’s another things to be accused of misrepresentation and another thing to be found to have misrepresented. That is why there is a fair process allowed by law for anyone accused to defend themselves. Many are accused of misrepresentation and successfully explain themselves and do not get a ban. I believe this is the case with the asker here and the GCMS will reveal that beyond the reasonable doubt. I know someone who was accused of misrepresentation, responded to the procedural fairness letter he received and did not get ban, but CIC went on and denied him based on purpose of visit. He is planning to apply again and tackle purpose of visit. Please let us make sure we handing out accurate information on this platform, not rushing to judgement or saying things we know nothing about.

justwise:


I'm getting concerned about your contribution here lately, you say things with imaginary authority that worries me sometimes.

Nogen:


I think he meant that until the guy gets his GCMS more, he can't be sure if he was banned or not. It could be a case of rejection or also an outright ban. Only his notes can say if he got banned or not.

jnyuwa02:


They go wrong, they are not infallible, in fact quite from it. I can guarantee it that this guy presented true statements from his bank, otherwise he won’t even have the audacity to place his question here. They do so for all kinds of psychological reasons.

VickyRotex:


Oh Okay. Sounds good. All the best!

justwise:


I'm getting concerned about your contribution here lately, you say things with imaginary authority that worries me sometimes.

jnyuwa02:


Imaginary hmnn? The last time it was smoking weed now it is imaginary? You are trying here bro. I hope I make sense and that in the end, my perspective contending for the power of ideas, are shown to be the right ones.

justwise:


You are giving people false hope, stating personal opinion as fact, this is not going to help the intended recipient.

Have you been able to prove here that people were wrongly accused by cic for misrepresentation or fraud?

Maxihyfr:
Good day all.. So if someone is called for medicals.. Where do one go for it.. The embassy??

mcobex:
@KISHKOSH;
1. Use the bank with enough fund, but if you feel like adding the gtbank account then no problem(but its not a must).
2. Pictures aren't accepted(for paper route), a letter of support fromhim stating he has been helping you out with your studies and other things will do, also you should state it boldly in your SOP as well.
3. Family tree isn't compulsory as well, but if you can then no qualms. But another way you can show relationship is getting your mum's birth cert and that of your uncle or his international passport(with your mum and him having same surname). Even at that you and your uncle will still state it in your SOP and letter of support respectively.
4. Submit all your accounts statements(as long as you have money in it, no matter how small).
NB: Make sure your uncle state the exact amount he will be contributing to your studies in his letter of support and IF POSSIBLE LET HIM TRANSFER THE SAID AMOUNT INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT OR PAY TO YOUR SCHOOL to show commitment, since he is a third party(the instruction in CAPs is my sincere advise).

Maxihyfr:
Good day all.. So if someone is called for medicals.. Where do one go for it.. The embassy??

Kishkosh:
Pls anyone going to Uottawa here or in Uottawa already .

Uchboggy:
please house, i need some gurus to help me evaluate my girlfriends statement of purpose and give their honest opinions.

kindly indicate if you're willing to assist so i can send a PM. God bless you

Aallizzwellwole:
Hello Gurus in the house.. I really commend yours effort, the shared experience and advice given to me, which has been the driving factor that kept me going.
Please I've come again to seck your advice, I received a message from the embassy yesterday that
"In the current application package, you submitted a bank statement purportedly issued by FirstBank that has been determined to be fraudulent"
It's my personal bank statement Of account not that of sponsorship bank statement and I was given seven days altematum to respond to this information and my application will be judged base on the respond I provide to them ... Please I want you guys to put me through .
I will be very happy to hear from you soon. Thanks

jnyuwa02:


They go wrong, they are not infallible, in fact quite from it. I can guarantee it that this guy presented true statements from his bank, otherwise he won’t even have the audacity to place his question here. They do so for all kinds of psychological reasons.

Frankrobbn1:


You think so? Some involve themselves into sharp practises and when it's too hot for them, they come here to seek for advise from the gurus. So don't be too sure/guarantee of another man's case.

jnyuwa02:


It makes no sense. I fraudulently make bank statements and when confronted I come to a guru for a way out, while telling the guru that I submitted true bank statement? This is not logical. A person who submits fraudulent bank statement and caught will not reply to CIC. Or he will silently confide with his co-conspirators.

Frankrobbn1:


I wonder why jnyuwa02 will be too sure of another man's case. We both argued this yesterday. I noticed he was taking the matter so personal, so I decided to let the sleeping dog lie.

vibrant99:
Send it Immediately, let me cultivate it for you.

Aallizzwellwole:


@Frankrobbn1,
At least I can read and I can see very well. If I was banned, it will clearly stated and they won't tell me to reapply if I can demonstrate that I meet the eligibility requirements.

jnyuwa02:


Na wa for you ooh, so many misdirections. He may not have been given a five year ban, he should order his GCMS notes. That is the way he can find out whether he got the ban or not. He may simply have been denied on a different reason. Simply because a person got an administrative letter don’t mean when they are denied, they get the ban. Many are accused and when they respond, are denied on other grounds and do not get the 3 or 5 year ban. How did you reach this 5 year ban you said he got?

Frankrobbn1:









Flash back April 27th!

Frankrobbn1:



Flash back April 27th!

Frankrobbn1:

Sir,
Your refusal ground was stating you're found inadmissible to Canada. What else do you want to know?
The Visa officer ticked only Section 40(1)(a) : For directly or indirectly mispresentating or withholding materials facts relating to a relevant matter that indues or could induce an error in the administration of this Acts:
Ask yourself was purpose of visit, insufficient funds, home ties and the rest ticked? Why do you think it's not a ban?
I know very well, prior this refusal letter was sent to you, you must have recieved a correspondence letter from the embassy.
Also, as a matter of fact, you will always be encouraged to reapply if you feel that you can respond to those concerns (a ban) and can demonstrate that your situation meets the legislative requirements for a study permit. Don't rely on this generic words from cic okay.
I am not trying to make mockery of your present predicament, but it's simply the truth!



Lol! Attorney jnyuwa02, are you here to defend his case again like you did previously?
Are you in essence saying he was not issued a ban? Attorney jnyuwa02, it's more better to say minority of people and not many because not everyone was falsely accused.
Has he not responded to them? Of course he has, that's why he was refused based on mispresentation Section 40(1)(a). What other grounds are you talking about here? He wasn't refused on other grounds, the Visa officer ticked mispresentation and you know what that means. Why giving the young man high hopes, when you already know the outcome of his application. Let tell ourselves the truth here!

jnyuwa02:


Did he place the decision letter here on Nairaland and you saw misrepresentation ticked as a reason for denial?