Na today people dey fok?abeg make we hear word jo

OKPO EVERY CONFIRMING THE PLANNED SCRIPT ,SEX NOT RAPE AND NA ONE PERSON D SCH SEE FIT TO EXPEL ,DIS GIRL MUST HAVE SPREAD D LEGS FOR A LOT OF SCH PEOPLE AND MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN THE MAIN PERSON

The boy himself is a big fool, an international kiss and tell in a school where kiss and tell is not supposed to be kiss and told.....

As everything come favour you in the end, instead of the toddler to let sleep dogs lie, he prefers to let sleeping dogs die and still went for the kill for a matter that has already been buried by the courts....

I supposed gather all these Nairaland Romancelanders whey dey beat chest up and down, enter PH and go and beat the hell out of that foolish boy, but..............

That in itself is typical bobrisky behaviour..........

My body dey forbid that kind thing, so therefore, lemme comman be going home.......

After all, it is not my sex, it is not my kiss and tell......

my question is why they expell only the guy, ?

d whole story is confusing

Fine boys dey rarely get sense.

Stupidity is nature's balancing act against their fineness .

I am the exception though.

Queenext:
To me, the sex happened BTW two consenting adults.

And I don't think it happened within the confines of CU territory.

So, CU has no case expelling him in the first case, when the issue of rape wasn't reported.

I feel CU is saving face, by compelling the student to say this.

Even if true, CU still has no case, cos its BTW two adults,except it's stated in their handbook that sex mustn't happen BTW two students as long as they are still student, even at that, this is infringement on them

Rules: without them we r with d animals.
Unfortunately that standard is alien to us.
Welcome to animal farm 101.
Wen in Rome do like d Romans. CU does hv a law that prohibits premarital sex and d penalty was clearly spelt out wch u consented to and not under duress. Bros they hv bin made, if u can commit a crime u should b man enough to do d time.

Ndlistic:


https://www.google.com.ng/amp/s/lailasnews.com/covernant-university-expulsion-saga-effanga-marilyn-confirms-she-had-sex-with-adooh-emmanuel/amp/

oyedepo call ur school authority to order, They are manufacturing fake news.

THE COURT HAS SPOKEN

So why hasn't she been expelled? Abi only one person had the sex.

This is what happens when kids have sex and refuse to cover up their tracks and act all immature about it. I knew from all his epistle that he actually had sex with this Marilyn babe. Tho the babe didnt deny.. like it always is with private universities, the moment you are caught doing something wrong, the first thing they'll seize is your phones or tablets because they believe a lot of students have porn or any explicit messages in it. But why shouldn't she have deleted the messages or even passworded her device. Now the whole kasala has burst, they are going to court here and there. Anyway the boy papa get money to hire a whole Femi Falana (SAN). Immature kids who need to grow up...

LessNoise:
He could have enjoyed his court verdict in silence but no the stupidity in him couldn’t resist SOCIAL MEDIA

The most sensible comment since this saga began.

Authoreety:
D boi is still a child


He neva mature at all

Most of these big men children you, that's just how they are, completely immature!

Here is the picture of the girl in question

toye440:

Rules: without them we r with d animals.
Unfortunately that standard is alien to us.
Welcome to animal farm 101.
Wen in Rome do like d Romans. CU does hv a law that prohibits premarital sex and d penalty was clearly spelt out wch u consented to and not under durex. Bros they hv bin made, if u can commit a crime u should b man enough to do d time.

Under DUREX
���

toye440:

Rules: without them we r with d animals.
Unfortunately that standard is alien to us.
Welcome to animal farm 101.
Wen in Rome do like d Romans. CU does hv a law that prohibits premarital sex and d penalty was clearly spelt out wch u consented to and not under durex. Bros they hv bin made, if u can commit a crime u should b man enough to do d time.

Under DUREX
���

If I should comment on this whole saga
.
CU has no right what so ever to take informations which is not linked to the reason they seized her phone in the first place; it's a breach of privacy
.
Secondly, it happened been two consenting adults and there was never a report of rape, so
.
Except these laws are written on CUs student handbook
.
That's why it safer to always read the 'terms and conditions' before agreeing to anything; am guilty of not always reading it. Sex is probably against school rules
.
All the best to them

D fact is y would d school authorities go through her private stuffs.. Nigerians and their overreaching attitude.

AZee4short:
If I should comment on this whole saga
.
CU has no right what so ever to take informations which is not linked to the reason they seized her phone in the first place; it's a breach of privacy
.
Secondly, it happened been two consenting adults and there was never a report of rape, so
.
Except these laws are written on CUs student handbook
.
That's why it safer to always read the 'terms and conditions' before agreeing to anything; am guilty of not always reading it. Sex is probably against school rules
.
All the best to them

All laws are still subject to laws of the state.. Did they breach state laws by having sex?

D holier than thou's in that school went overboard.

Bidobado1:


All this Shiit coming from a university, Almost like a secondary school!!
Can someone please mention the largest paedophile organization in this world... The Christian catholic church.

Thank God u put "Catholic" there

Slimmacho:


Under DUREX ���

sorry a legal terminology.

wittyt98:
Na for covenant all this things dey happen so?
too many lowkey fuckernizing activities going on in the "Prestigious School"

Inside?

capofwesh:
He was accused of chapel misconduct not having sex in ph or Lagos. For chapel misconduct, he was framed and the testified confirms that

?

CSTR1005:
Fine boys dey rarely get sense.

Stupidity is nature's balancing act against their fineness .

I am the exception though.

I have long suspected most fine people. Seem like they always trade their brain for fine body?

AZee4short:
If I should comment on this whole saga
.
CU has no right what so ever to take informations which is not linked to the reason they seized her phone in the first place; it's a breach of privacy
.
Secondly, it happened been two consenting adults and there was never a report of rape, so
.
Except these laws are written on CUs student handbook
.
That's why it safer to always read the 'terms and conditions' before agreeing to anything; am guilty of not always reading it. Sex is probably against school rules
.
All the best to them

So if police armed with warrant for a search and are originally after drugs but find a fresh and blood dripping human head instead it can be termed a breach of privacy?

toye440:

sorry a legal terminology.

I knew it was a mistake..
The correct spelling is Duress

dhantey324:


All laws are still subject to laws of the state.. Did they breach state laws by having sex?

D holier than thou's in that school went overboard.

If we use this principle then only murderers will be expelled.

Slimmacho:
Here is the picture of the girl in question

Please take down that picture. You don't need it. There is life after expulsion or saga.

toye440:

Rules: without them we r with d animals.
Unfortunately that standard is alien to us.
Welcome to animal farm 101.
Wen in Rome do like d Romans. CU does hv a law that prohibits premarital sex and d penalty was clearly spelt out wch u consented to and not under durex. Bros they hv bin made, if u can commit a crime u should b man enough to do d time.

Durex ko, Gold circle ni

Queenext:
To me, the sex happened BTW two consenting adults.

And I don't think it happened within the confines of CU territory.

So, CU has no case expelling him in the first case, when the issue of rape wasn't reported.

I feel CU is saving face, by compelling the student to say this.

Even if true, CU still has no case, cos its BTW two adults,except it's stated in their handbook that sex mustn't happen BTW two students as long as they are still student, even at that, this is infringement on them

So long as the knacking dint take place within the school environment and it was not a rape case, the school has no case against any of them. Even a fresh law school graduate can win such case against the university.

ngwababe:
They bleeped, how is it the School's business? No be so them dey train person oooo, even Jesus no do us like this ooo!

if you have problem with the school policy, then you are free to leave the school.

Jesus didn't know you self so why should he bother to do you like that.

Trash

LessNoise:
He could have enjoyed his court verdict in silence but no the stupidity in him couldn’t resist SOCIAL MEDIA

...age of smart phones and stupid people!