A lot has been said about a certain and perhaps the most significant possibility- Existence.

And there are some theories that exist in a bid to explain the "reason" for this possibility which include:The Theory of Everything, The Big Bang ,The Intelligent Design and The Supereme Dimensions.
But I would like to point out the FLAWS in them that would make it STUPID for anyone to find them worthy of COMPLETE appreciation.

The most important thing about The Theory of Everything is that it ends with "The Possibility of The All".
This possibility doesn't really explain anything.It only makes explanation(of its meaning)necessary.
"All"here is assumed as we all know that "Existence" doesn't have specified boundaries.
You can't say "all the elements" when you can't discover all of them due to your limited strengths/abilities (not just knowledge) and the "Possibility of the Appearance of naturally occurring elements".
The most terrible aspect of this theory is the attempt of the people behind it to make it sound reasonable when they say "We are part of a whole" , "This whole has a Divine consciousness", "The personification of this can be referred to as the "the Supreme Being".
But that is just stupid!!!!!!
Fine,"GOD/First Cause/Designer/Whatever " can be described in which ever way they choose yet it still doesn't make any sense to describe humans as "parts of a whole" .
We have a beginning that can be described as "funny' considering the "purpose of our existence".
How was the "whole" feeling when we weren't around?
"Aliens/Animals" caused it to express itself ,right?
And I suppose the aliens disappeared after we appeared, right?
Now, this "whole'" keeps our "alien brothers" far from us for reasons best known to it,right?
What else could this crazy "All" do in the next hundred years that is "awe-inspiring" to its "people".?

Now,concerning "the big bang" theory there is one thing it can never explain and that is simply because it should never have bothered to make an attempt to do so in the first place,which is the reason for the appearance of every physical property of matter.
The so-called reason doesn't exist and even if it does,it will be in form of an explanation. Yet,,if anyone should do that,it has to be someone who knows the purpose of every event that has taken place since our universe became existent but that doesn't mean there was someone with "intelligence" or even a "sound mind" before that preceding event ,neither does it mean that "In-Existence" is possible.
The "big bang" theory made this attempt by attributing the events to "Chance".
Unfortunately,"Chance" is not and will never be the right word to even describe "The Possibility of anyone's chance to exist" with, considering the fact that certain things are bound to happen and that also includes 'biological disasters'.
It would also be unreasonably futile to attempt to find a "reason" why something unreasonable such as "genetic syndromes" would occur.
The "cause" of such misfortunes can never be reasonable.
Rather,they can only explain that Man is an "Expression of Predetermined Absurdities".

The 'Intelligent Design' is overly and pathetically horrible.
It can only EXIST as a concept/theory.
This is because the supposed intelligence is actually 'insanity'.
And the supposed design is actually an 'error'.
But even this 'Insane Error' wouldn't explain anything significant.
How can you describe magnificent absurdities/inexplicably awesome but meaningless events as an 'EFFECT' of 'intelligence?
Does the fact that 'Things' are working in a 'Seemingly Programmed' manner mean there is an 'Intelligent Programmer' behind the scenes considering 'All that has ever happened' since the appearance of Mankind on Earth?
Limitation of knowledge is possible but applied wisdom can neither be limited nor unlimited so I don't find it WISE to assume that there is 'A superior intellectual capacity' that is worth considering simply because 'We haven't discovered everything',which might not be USEFUL.
In summary,'we shouldn't be in awe of anything that 'scares' us,we should only appreciate things that are beneficially useful to us and whatever is superior to us should 'Exist to Happen Reasonably and Understanbly' before it can be described LOGICALLY.
The 'Intelligent Designer' is actually 'The Possible Mastermind of Masterminded Nonsense'.

The last concept/theory I would like to address is that of 'Higher Beings in Higher Dimensions'.
First,The concept of the 'Possibility of the Spirit Realm' is actually a 'declarification'.
And,'the fact that we can't see supposedly more intelligent/powerful beings only proves that we are probably 'scammed' for we find ourselves in a planet that supports life(and death) but not a planet we can actually call 'home'.
Furthermore,there is nothing beneficially significant about discovering this 'Higher Dimensions' where we have 'Incosequentially Super-Complex Beings'.
Their supposed 'Super-Intelligence' has not proven to be worth any sort of consideration
And "Humans shouldn't celebrate any form of 'necessity' to worship any 'anything/anyone'(including GREATLY-POWERFUL-FOR-NOTHING-SUPER-FLOPS).

Lastly,I choose to describe this 'Ever-Existing-Drive',behind the ever-occurring event which I have observed as 'The Forming of Existence', as the 'Existential Constant'.
This 'Constant' allows possibilities to become actualized in different ways.
The manner in which this possibilities are actualized depends on the functional consequences of the possibilities .

And having elaborated on my stand,I would like everyone to know that "'I can't always be what I am and I am always what I can't be."

Following

HellVictorinho:
A lot has been said about a certain and perhaps the most significant possibility- Existence.

And there are some theories that exist in a bid to explain the "reason" for this possibility which include:The Theory of Everything, The Big Bang ,The Intelligent Design and The Supereme Dimensions.
But I would like to point out the FLAWS in them that would make it STUPID for anyone to find them worthy of COMPLETE appreciation.

The most important thing about The Theory of Everything is that it ends with "The Possibility of The All".
This possibility doesn't really explain anything.It only makes explanation(of its meaning)necessary.
"All"here is assumed as we all know that "Existence" doesn't have specified boundaries.
You can't say "all the elements" when you can't discover all of them due to your limited strengths/abilities (not just knowledge) and the "Possibility of the Appearance of naturally occurring elements".
The most terrible aspect of this theory is the attempt of the people behind it to make it sound reasonable when they say "We are part of a whole" , "This whole has a Divine consciousness", "The personification of this can be referred to as the "the Supreme Being".
But that is just stupid!!!!!!
Fine,"GOD/First Cause/Designer/Whatever " can be described in which ever way they choose yet it still doesn't make any sense to describe humans as "parts of a whole" .
We have a beginning that can be described as "funny' considering the "purpose of our existence".
How was the "whole" feeling when we weren't around?
"Aliens/Animals" caused it to express itself ,right?
And I suppose the aliens disappeared after we appeared, right?
Now, this "whole'" keeps our "alien brothers" far from us for reasons best known to it,right?
What else could this crazy "All" do in the next hundred years that is "awe-inspiring" to its "people".?

Now,concerning "the big bang" theory there is one thing it can never explain and that is simply because it should never have bothered to make an attempt to do so in the first place,which is the reason for the appearance of every physical property of matter.
The so-called reason doesn't exist and even if it does,it will be in form of an explanation. Yet,,if anyone should do that,it has to be someone who knows the purpose of every event that has taken place since our universe became existent but that doesn't mean there was someone with "intelligence" or even a "sound mind" before that preceding event ,neither does it mean that "In-Existence" is possible.
The "big bang" theory made this attempt by attributing the events to "Chance".
Unfortunately,"Chance" is not and will never be the right word to even describe "The Possibility of anyone's chance to exist" considering the fact that certain things are bound to happen and that also includes 'biological disasters'.
It would also be unreasonably futile to attempt to find a "reason" why something unreasonable such as "genetic syndromes" would occur.
The "cause" of such misfortunes can never be reasonable.
Rather,they can only explain that Man is an "Expression of Predetermined Absurdities".

The 'Intelligent Design' is overly and pathetically horrible.
It can only EXIST as a concept/theory.
This is because the supposed intelligence is actually 'insanity'.
And the supposed design is actually an 'error'.
But even this 'Insane Error' wouldn't explain anything significant.
How can you describe magnificent absurdities/inexplicably awesome but meaningless events as an 'EFFECT' of 'intelligence?
Does the fact that 'Things' are working in a 'Seemingly Programmed' manner mean there is an 'Intelligent Programmer' behind the scenes considering 'All that has ever happened' since the appearance of Mankind on Earth?
Limitation of knowledge is possible but applied wisdom can neither be limited nor unlimited so I don't find it WISE to assume that there is 'A superior intellectual capacity' that is worth considering simply because 'We haven't discovered everything',which might not be USEFUL.
In summary,'we shouldn't be in awe of anything that 'scares' us,we should only appreciate things that are beneficially useful to us and whatever is superior to us should 'Exist to Happen Reasonably and Understanbly' before it can be described LOGICALLY.
The 'Intelligent Designer' is actually 'The Possible Mastermind of Masterminded Nonsense'.

The last concept/theory I would like to address is that of 'Higher Beings in Higher Dimensions'.
First,The concept of the 'Possibility of the Spirit Realm' is actually a 'declarification'.
And,'the fact that we can't see supposedly more intelligent/powerful beings only proves that we are probably 'scammed' for we find ourselves in a planet that supports life(and death) but not a planet we can actually call 'home'.
Furthermore,there is nothing beneficially significant about discovering this 'Higher Dimensions' where we have 'Incosequentially Super-Complex Beings'.
Their supposed 'Super-Intelligence' has not proven to be worth any sort of consideration
And "Humans shouldn't celebrate any form of 'necessity' to worship any 'anything/anyone'(including GREATLY-POWERFUL-FOR-NOTHING-SUPER-FLOPS).

Lastly,I choose to describe this 'Ever-Existing-Drive',behind the ever-occurring event which I have observed as 'The Forming of Existence', as the 'Existential Constant'.
This 'Constant' allows possibilities to become actualized in different ways.
The manner in which this possibilities are actualized depends on the functional consequences of the possibilities .

And having elaborated on my stand,I would like everyone to know that "'I can't always be what I am and I am always what I can't be."

ofcourse everything regarding the universe as we know it maybe incorrect or false.

Will talk about the big bang.

The expansion of the universe has been cross-checked in many ways and the evidence is fairly compelling.

And be sure everything in science is transient, every prevailing theory is simply “what makes most sense at any given moment according to the present knowledge.

But most often with scientific progress successful theories don’t get to be proven wrong they just become incomplete version of the truth, useful approximations to whatever deeper theory, which most probably has not yet been found, the latest formulations being only more accurate than previous ones but still not yet being the whole truth.

vaxx:
ofcourse everything regarding the universe as we know it maybe incorrect or false.

Will talk about the big bang.

The expansion of the universe has been cross-checked in many ways and the evidence is fairly compelling.

And be sure verything in science is transient, every prevailing theory is simply “what makes most sense at any given moment according to the present knowledge.

But most often with scientific progress successful theories don’t get to be proven wrong they just become incomplete version of the truth, useful approximations to whatever deeper theory, which most probably has not yet been found, the latest formulations being only more accurate than previous ones but still not yet being the whole truth.

What do you think about the Existential Constant, whose possibility represents Existence.
Do you find it amazing?
Anyways, I don't.

HellVictorinho:


What do you think about the Existential Constant, whose possibility represents Existence.
Do you find it amazing?
Anyways, I don't.

i am not sure of what you mean by existential constant. We you be willing to share?

vaxx:
i am not sure of what you mean by existential constant. We you be willing to. Share?

I have explained this in reply to your recent post in the topic 'problems with the atheistic position'

Still looking for the import of this thread.

HellVictorinho:


What do you think about the Existential Constant, whose possibility represents Existence.
Do you find it amazing?
Anyways, I don't.

I don't think I know what you mean by "Existential Constant". You might want to explain what it is much clearer.

However, everything described as first cause, including gods, big bang etc, is human explanations similar to what the Holy books say. No one really knows yet how the universe began. The latest is that a [url=https://edition-m.cnn.com/2019/01/02/world/ultima-thule-contact-binary-snowman/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&rm=1]snowman done it[/url]. But at least there's something to show for that conclusion, as ridiculous as it is. And any reason for its existence is mere speculation.

budaatum:

I don't think I know what you mean by "Existential Constant". You might want to explain what it is much clearer.

However, everything described as first cause, including gods, big bang etc, is human explanations similar to what the Holy books say. No one really knows yet how the universe began. The latest is that a [url=https://edition-m.cnn.com/2019/01/02/world/ultima-thule-contact-binary-snowman/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&rm=1]snowman done it[/url]. But at least there's something to show for that conclusion, as ridiculous as it is. And any reason for its existence is mere speculation.

The Universe is a 'Form of Existence' and not Existence itself which is a possibility that is actualized by the Existential Constant.
This Constant acts like an ever-existing drive that keeps the ever-occurring activity which is the 'Forming of Existence' in Actuality.
Here,Possibilities get actualized in different forms by occurring in a manner that is determined by their functional consequences.
These occurrences take place at ANYTIME.
The 'Settings',which determine how 'The Possibility of Existence' functions consequently are responsible for the state of The Plane on which 'The Forming of Existence' takes place.
The Plane is un-dimensional so there is nothing like 'Everything',there has never been and there will never be.
Consciousness is just a functional consequence.
And there has never been 'Nothing'
The Existential Constant maintains the Possibility of Existence and it can't be determined by time.
It is the Ever-existing 'Drive' that doesn't require any 'Form'.
It is that which makes In-Existence ever-impossible.
There has never been a 'period' when 'nothing' was happening and there will never be.

The Constant of Existentiality is a phenomenon that cannot be discovered due to its 'Ever-Existing Function'
It can only be deduced.
The manner in which 'The Forms of Existence' are expressed also depends on the functional consequences of their possibilities.
In conclusion,'The Settings' are determined by the functional consequences of 'The Possibility of The Existential Constant'.

gensteejay:
Still looking for the import of this thread.

Think critically as you read my post

HellVictorinho:


The Universe is a 'Form of Existence' and not Existence itself which is a possibility that is actualized by the Existential Constant.
This Constant acts like an ever-existing drive that keeps the ever-occurring activity which is the 'Forming of Existence' in Actuality.
Here,Possibilities get actualized in different forms by occurring in a manner that is determined by their functional consequences.
These occurrences take place at ANYTIME.
The 'Settings',which determine how 'The Possibility of Existence' functions consequently are responsible for the state of The Plane on which 'The Forming of Existence' takes place.
The Plane is un-dimensional so there is nothing like 'Everything',there has never been and there will never be.
Consciousness is just a functional consequence.
And there has never been 'Nothing'
The Existential Constant maintains the Possibility of Existence and it can't be determined by time.
It is the Ever-existing 'Drive' that doesn't require any 'Form'.
It is that which makes In-Existence ever-impossible.
There has never been a 'period' when 'nothing' was happening and there will never be.

The Constant of Existentiality is a phenomenon that cannot be discovered due to its 'Ever-Existing Function'
It can only be deduced.
The manner in which 'The Forms of Existence' are expressed also depends on the functional consequences of their possibilities.
In conclusion,'The Settings' are determined by the functional consequences of 'The Possibility of The Existential Constant'.

Honestly i think you are not making any point, i am finding what you put up here difficult to understand, maybe some do and if that is the case, they should reply you.

vaxx:
Honestly i think you are not making point, i am finding what you put up here difficult to understand, maybe some do and if that is the case, they should reply you.

Actually,there are many points in the post.
But the points require critical thinking and highly intellectual reasoning to be fully understood.
I am not concerned with your view concerning the post.
Rather,I hope you're not expecting it to satisfy your expectations.
If you think it is too difficult to understand, keep searching for other explanations that have nothing to do with 'Existence' because there is nobody that can actually explain why 'Existence' is possible.
Existence is not possible because of any defined reason.
No 'Being' should be attributed with having any 'Purpose' in 'Mind'. for 'Existence'.
'The Actuality of Things is the Ultimate Crap'.

HellVictorinho:


The Universe is a 'Form of Existence' and not Existence itself which is a possibility that is actualized by the Existential Constant.
This Constant acts like an ever-existing drive that keeps the ever-occurring activity which is the 'Forming of Existence' in Actuality.
Here,Possibilities get actualized in different forms by occurring in a manner that is determined by their functional consequences.
These occurrences take place at ANYTIME.
The 'Settings',which determine how 'The Possibility of Existence' functions consequently are responsible for the state of The Plane on which 'The Forming of Existence' takes place.
The Plane is un-dimensional so there is nothing like 'Everything',there has never been and there will never be.
Consciousness is just a functional consequence.
And there has never been 'Nothing'
The Existential Constant maintains the Possibility of Existence and it can't be determined by time.
It is the Ever-existing 'Drive' that doesn't require any 'Form'.
It is that which makes In-Existence ever-impossible.
There has never been a 'period' when 'nothing' was happening and there will never be.

The Constant of Existentiality is a phenomenon that cannot be discovered due to its 'Ever-Existing Function'
It can only be deduced.
The manner in which 'The Forms of Existence' are expressed also depends on the functional consequences of their possibilities.
In conclusion,'The Settings' are determined by the functional consequences of 'The Possibility of The Existential Constant'.

You don come here again with this sentences nobody understands

kkins25:

You don come here again with this sentences nobody understands

Who is nobody?

kkins25:

You don come here again with this sentences nobody understands

Lols. The thread looks Greek to me. The message he is trying to convey remains unclear

gensteejay:

Lols. The thread looks Greek to me. The message he is trying to convey remains unclear

Read my reply to Budaatum above.
Then read my recent posts in 'What are the problems of the atheistic position'

HellVictorinho:

Actually,there are many points in the post.
But the points require critical thinking and highly intellectual reasoning to be fully understood.

He did not say there were no points. It's "difficult to understand" because you just typed without even bothering to define your terms! Or do you expect us to look up the meaning of "Existential Constant",
"ever-existing drive", "ever-occurring activity", and "'Forming of Existence' in Actuality" in a dictionary?

At this rate, you are going to end up talking to yourself, HellVictorinho!

HellVictorinho:


The Universe is a 'Form of Existence' and not Existence itself which is a possibility that is actualized by the Existential Constant.
This Constant acts like an ever-existing drive that keeps the ever-occurring activity which is the 'Forming of Existence' in Actuality.
Here,Possibilities get actualized in different forms by occurring in a manner that is determined by their functional consequences.
These occurrences take place at ANYTIME.
The 'Settings',which determine how 'The Possibility of Existence' functions consequently are responsible for the state of The Plane on which 'The Forming of Existence' takes place.
The Plane is un-dimensional so there is nothing like 'Everything',there has never been and there will never be.
Consciousness is just a functional consequence.
And there has never been 'Nothing'
The Existential Constant maintains the Possibility of Existence and it can't be determined by time.
It is the Ever-existing 'Drive' that doesn't require any 'Form'.
It is that which makes In-Existence ever-impossible.
There has never been a 'period' when 'nothing' was happening and there will never be.

The Constant of Existentiality is a phenomenon that cannot be discovered due to its 'Ever-Existing Function'
It can only be deduced.
The manner in which 'The Forms of Existence' are expressed also depends on the functional consequences of their possibilities.
In conclusion,'The Settings' are determined by the functional consequences of 'The Possibility of The Existential Constant'.

Hmm, ok. I guess I just don't have the "critical thinking" and "highly intellectual reasoning" abilities you speak of.

Vaxx, do you know he reminds me of a previous you, lol, with apologies.

budaatum:

Hmm, ok. I guess I just don't have the "critical thinking" and "highly intellectual reasoning" abilities you speak of.

Vaxx, do you know he reminds me of a previous you, lol, with apologies.

First,I shouldn't be stupidly compared with VAXX.
And my terms are actually simple.
'Ever-occurring' simply means timeless.
'Ever-existing' means ageless/timeless.
'The Forming of Existence' is an activity whereby things happen to exist.
But these things occur/become characterized by acting upon themselves in different ways.
In Summary-TIMELESS Phenomenon (Existential Constant)=Actuality=Forming of Existence=Actualization of Existential Possibilities=Determination of Characterization=Forms of Existence.
We are all Humans.
But Humans are just Existence in Human Form.
We occurred at ANYTIME after the components of NATURE (another Form of Existence) had acted upon the Actualization of our Existential Possibility in the Forming of Existence, which occurred in a manner that was determined by the functional consequences of our Existential Possibility.

budaatum:

Hmm, ok. I guess I just don't have the "critical thinking" and "highly intellectual reasoning" abilities you speak of.

Vaxx, do you know he reminds me of a previous you, lol, with apologies.

shouild i take this as an insult or joke? Previous vaxx doesn't exist, vaxx is still much with the philosophy she propagate on nairaland. Which are, There is probability of God existence, Atheism does not equal inteligence, religion is part of the natural value holding humanity together,Ancient african tradition should be more embrace than foreign traditions etc... These are what vaxx propagate on nairaland. So if you say previous vaxx, you may need to explain it.

HellVictorinho:


First,I shouldn't be stupidly compared with VAXX.
And my terms are actually simple.
'Ever-occurring' simply means timeless.
'Ever-existing' means ageless/timeless.
'The Forming of Existence' is an activity whereby things happen to exist.
But these things occur/become characterized by acting upon themselves in different ways.
In Summary-TIMELESS Phenomenon (Existential Constant)=Actuality=Forming of Existence=Actualization of Existential Possibilities=Determination of Characterization=Forms of Existence.
We are all Humans.
But Humans are just Existence in Human Form.
We occurred at ANYTIME after the components of NATURE (another Form of Existence) had acted upon the Actualization of our Existential Possibility in the Forming of Existence, which occurred in a manner that was determined by the functional consequences of our Existential Possibility.

Honestly, it is stupid as you said for budaatum to compare you with vaxx. Vaxx is even considering it as an insult, By comparing her to you will be tantamount to intentional mistake. She vaxx, i know will not have come with this hogwash of yours not even when she was drunk.

You want to sound clever on the subject you know little or Notting of, but before an enlightment, if i consider it worth my time to engage you. I recommend you to read “Either/Or” by Soren Kierkegaard. It is a clever pair of books that present an introduction to Existentialism philosophy you are trying to flawed.

You can't just put up any silly statement based on false premises and inaccurate assumptions about subjects you know nothing of, then base your arguments on the premise of this false assumption, then base your question on these false premise, assumption and definition.

And expect people to answer your idiocy, expect people to answer your own misconceptions, lack of proper information, jumper assumptions and personal false premises taken as truth.

vaxx:
Honestly, it ia stupid as you said for budaatum to compare you with vaxx. Vaxx is even considering it as an insult, By comparing her to you will be tantamount to intentional mistake. She vaxx i know will not have come with this hogwash of yours not even whe she was drunk.

You want to start clever on the subject you know little of Notting of, but before an enlightment, if i consider it worth my time to engage you. I ecommend you read “Either/Or” by Soren Kierkegaard. It is a clever pair of books that present an introduction to Existentialism philosophy you are trying to flawed.

You can't just put up any silly statement based on false premises and inaccurate assumptions about subjects you know nothing of, then base your arguments on the premise of this false assumption, then base your question on these false premise, assumption and definition.

And expect people to answer your idiocy, expect people to answer your own misconceptions, lack of proper information, jumper assumptions and personal false premises taken as truth.

This has nothing to do with the goddamn philosophy you are talking about.
My use of the word 'Existential' doesn't give you the premise to type nonsense.
I can't subscribe to anyone's writing.
The man and the people behind 'Existentialism' are just like every other people who claim to know the truth.
My post is about 'Existentiality'.
I don't give a damn about what you think and if you are so pleased with the so-called information in 'Existentialism',Fine!!!!!!!!!
Hell is here and he doesn't give a Bleep about brainwashed people like you!!!!!!
The Truth is a lie.
And the 'Actuality of Things' is the 'Ultimate Crap'

HellVictorinho:


This has nothing to do with the goddamn philosophy you are talking about.
My use of the word 'Existential' doesn't give you the premise to type nonsense.
I can't subscribe to anyone's writing.
The man and the people behind 'Existentialism' are just like every other people who claim to know the truth.
My post is about 'Existentiality'.
I don't give a damn about what you think and if you are so pleased with the so-called information in 'Existentialism',Fine!!!!!!!!!
Hell is here and he doesn't give a Bleep about brainwashed people like you!!!!!!
The Truth is a lie.
And the 'Actuality of Things' is the 'Ultimate Crap'

Your level of understanding had been tested on the logic explanation in the former thread. Well, it might not be half enough to judge you, but it is quarter enough to assess you. You display a way below standards of reasoning, and your view on the subject was still very much like a baby still struggling on how to grasp or locate the nipple of her mother breast. Same is the issue you raised here, nothing at all shows you understand a bit of information you are trying to process. It is a way above your assessment.

Mantra had been ring to your brainskull, and it is now your own version of vitamin k you absorbed every morning, and anybody who lack this your very version of vitamin k is brainwashed according to your own delusion. Fine by me, it is just the way you see it.

vaxx:
So if you say previous vaxx, you may need to explain it.

How you communicate, your method of communicating, has changed. But I now agree that its an insult to compare you with hell and sincerely apologise though I did not intend it as an insult, just an observation.

vaxx:
Your level of understanding had been tested on the logic explanation in the former thread. Well, it might not be half enough to judge you, but it is quarter enough to assess you. You display a way below standards of reasoning, and your view on the subject was still very much like a baby still struggling on how to grasp or locate the nipple of her mother breast. Same is the issue you raised here, nothing at all shows you understand a bit of information you are trying to process. It is a way above your assessment.

Mantra had been ring to your brainskull, and it is now your own version of vitamin k you absorbed every morning, and anybody who lack this your very version of vitamin k is brainwashed according to your own delusion. Fine by me, it is just the way you see it.

You words indicate your daftness!!!!!
What makes you think I am trying to process whatever information you're claiming to have?
My post has nothing to do with your goddamn philosophy or that of the philosophers you admire.
The subject you are proud of is not as significant as your life so don't kill yourself because of it.
I don't really owe you an explanation for using certain words.
So don't prove that you are critically stupid by criticizing me stupidly!!!!!

vaxx:
Honestly, it is stupid as you said for budaatum to compare you with vaxx. Vaxx is even considering it as an insult, By comparing her to you will be tantamount to intentional mistake. She vaxx, i know will not have come with this hogwash of yours not even when she was drunk.

You want to sound clever on the subject you know little or Notting of, but before an enlightment, if i consider it worth my time to engage you. I recommend you to read “Either/Or” by Soren Kierkegaard. It is a clever pair of books that present an introduction to Existentialism philosophy you are trying to flawed.

You can't just put up any silly statement based on false premises and inaccurate assumptions about subjects you know nothing of, then base your arguments on the premise of this false assumption, then base your question on these false premise, assumption and definition.

And expect people to answer your idiocy, expect people to answer your own misconceptions, lack of proper information, jumper assumptions and personal false premises taken as truth.

Your description of yourself as someone who can read properly must be an overstatement!!

HellVictorinho:


First,I shouldn't be stupidly compared with VAXX.

Trust me. It was a huge error on my part, and one for which I will be begging vaxx for forgiveness all year!

Are you really the old billynaire?

HellVictorinho:


You words indicate your daftness!!!!!
What makes you think I am trying to process whatever information you're claiming to have?
My post has nothing to do with your goddamn philosophy or that of the philosophers you admire.
The subject you are proud of is not as significant as your life so don't kill yourself because of it.
I don't really owe you an explanation for using certain words.
So don't prove that you are critically stupid by criticizing me stupidly!!!!!

i know it when my words hit the right place. Eventually my words had hit the vital components of your biological system which is now founding fault in every internal stimuling speeding up in your cells. My words must have done more than damage to your medically diagnosed cognitive impairement. I am sorry, it wasn't my intention, i simply wanted to pass an obvious message.

Let me quicky correct a mistake you made up there, vaxx is not in anyway a follower of any philosophy apart from"" ifa " which vaxx hold in a very high esteem. But common sense tell vaxx that every rational information should be taken seriously regardless of whom may hold it. Even if it is bible.

Your attempt to flew away from the subject suck, it make your writting look like a standard definition of what the World health organization we called epedimic. It need immediate and emergency attention.

vaxx:
i know it when tmy words hit the right place. Eventually my words had it the right components of biological system which is now founding fauilt in every internal stimuling speeding up in your cells. My words must have done more than damage to your medically diagnosed cognitive impairement. I am sorry, it wasn't my intention, i simply wanted to pass an obvious message.

Let me quicky correct a mistake you made up there, vaxx is not in anyway a follower of any mphilosophy apart from"" ifa " which i hold in a very high esteem. But common sense tell me that every rational information should be taken seriously regardless of whom may hold it. Even if it is bible.

Your attempt to flew away from the subject suck, it make your writting look like a standard definition of what the World health organization we called epedimic. It need immediate and emergency attention.

Why can't you accept that you don't really know how to read?
And do you know what 'complete appreciation' means?

HellVictorinho:


Why can't you accept that you don't really know how to read?
And do you know what 'complete appreciation' means?

lol, i am laughing it loud. You know it is gabbage in >gabbage out. You put up a mess, and you are expecting a delight reply, You are served with your own tea cup.

vaxx:
lol, i am laughing it loud. You know it is gabbage in >gabbage out. You put up a mess, and you are expecting a delight reply, You are served with your own tea cup.

I wasn't expecting any reply from someone like you.

budaatum:

Trust me. It was a huge error on my part, and one for which I will be begging vaxx for forgiveness all year!

Are you really the old billynaire?

oh now you're insulting billyonaire..