₦airaland Forum

boldaslion:
Did you just say that you are a lawyer? I'm ashamed of you if truly you are a lawyer. You must be one of those hausaFulani lawyers that always got southern mercenaries to write exams for them.

Bro, stop commenting on issues you know nothing about...

You don't know the law, you are not a lawyer... So shhhhhhhh.


Assignment - check section 11 of the Interpretation Act and then tell me if Buhari cannot suspend the CJN

Vrengkat:
Section 1 of the Constitution does not say any word not recognized by the Constitution is null and void, it say if any law is inconsistent... Suspension is not found in the Constitution, so I get why you want to equate it to removal, but it's not up to you...it is for the court to use its discretion to decide... But i assure you, if a court is faced with this, he will not rely on that section...

Do you know there is a section for the removal of a senator, but none for the suspension of a senator, but do you know senator Ali Ndume was suspended?

This is different. We’re talking about the head of the executive branch suspending the head of another branch of government. What section of the constitution empowers him to do that?

socialmediaman:
This is different. We’re talking about the head of the executive branch suspending the head of another branch of government. What section of the constitution empowers him to do that?

Toh, let me burst your bubble, was saving this for last

Assignment - check section 11 of the Interpretation Act and then tell me if Buhari cannot suspend the CJN

Vrengkat:
Maybe you don't know the law, but let a lawyer guide you... The interpretation Act gives the president the power to suspend the CJN


Check section 11 of the Interpretation Act... When you read it say hi, cause you people blow too much trumpets on issues you know nothing about... Just cause you hate Buhari is not an excuse to be irrational

the interpretation act is help you understand the Interpretation of the main constitution should be.The interpretation act cannot nullify the meaning of the main constitution. what the interpretation says is that the president can appoint where the main constitution says appoint;remove where it says remove or suspend where the main constitution says suspend.
no where in the main constitution does it say the president can suspend the CJN and the interpretation act shows remove.the president can only suspend as mentioned in the interpretation act on his ministers of his cabinet or any officials because the main constitution says so

Vrengkat:
Section 11 of the Interpretation Act gives the president the power to suspend the CJN

I know you will deliberately avoid the question. If you are sure of yourself, kindly post what the Nigeria 1999 constitution says about appointment of a new or acting CJN.

baralatie:
the interpretation act is help you understand the Interpretation of the main constitution should be.The interpretation act cannot nullify the meaning of the main constitution. what the interpretation says is that the president can appoint where the main constitution says appoint;remove where it says remove or suspend where the main constitution says suspend.
no where in the main constitution does it say the president can suspend the CJN and the interpretation act shows remove.the president can only suspend as mentioned in the interpretation act on his ministers of his cabinet or any officials because the main constitution says so

I am a sound lawyer bro... I get paid to know these things... The interpretation Act gets its power I think from section 388 of the Constitution, it is not null and void, even Walter knows buhari has the power to suspend him, if you want Walter, your last card is to go on the street and beg Buhari to reinstate him(he possesses this power to, under the same section 11 of the IA)

Vrengkat:
I am a sound lawyer bro... I get paid to know these things... The interpretation Act gets its power I think from section 388 of the Constitution, it is not null and void, even Walter knows buhari has the power to suspend him, if you want Walter, your last card is to go on the street and beg Buhari to reinstate him(he possesses this power to, under the same section 11 of the IA)

does the interpretation act supercede the constitution?

erosimo:
I know you will deliberately avoid the question. If you are sure of yourself, kindly post what the Nigeria 1999 constitution says about appointment of a new or acting CJN.

The NJC recommends, and the president appoints

baralatie:
does the interpretation act supercede the constitution?

Surely not... But if the act was inconsistent, it would have been null and void... But it is a well valid drafted document till today

Vrengkat:
Surely not... But if the act was inconsistent, it would have been null and void ... But it is a well valid drafted document till today

the interpretation act is consistent with the main constitution therefore if the main constitution says remove you cannot introduce suspension because suspension is not consistent with the main constitution. thereby the president cannot evoke suspension order from any where

Vrengkat:
The NJC recommends, and the president appoints

[b][/b]

so, who now recommended Tanko, the acting CJN

baralatie:
the interpretation act is consistent with the main constitution therefore if the main constitution says remove you cannot introduce suspension because suspension is not consistent with the main constitution. thereby the president cannot evoke suspension order from any where

Dude... Were are you getting this interpretation from? Quote it

Vrengkat:
Dude... Were are you getting this interpretation from? Quote it

did you see suspension of CJN in the main constitution

erosimo:
[b][/b]

so, who now recommended Tanko, the acting CJN

By our law, the most Senior judge of the supreme Court becomes CJN by default

Vrengkat:
By our law, the most Senior judge of the supreme Court becomes CJN by default

was he recommended by the NJC?

Vrengkat:
By our law, the most Senior judge of the supreme Court becomes CJN by default

without the recommendation you stated earlier?

I can't help it but to laugh. can you now see that Buhari really goofed

baralatie:
did you see suspension of CJN in the main constitution

There Is no main Constitution, just constitution... Every other law compliments(completes) it... As not everything is captured by it

Vrengkat:
There Is no main Constitution, just constitution... Every other law compliments(completes) it... As not everything is captured by it

what is not captured will change the meaning of the constitution?

erosimo:
without the recommendation you stated earlier?

I can't help it but to laugh. can you now see that Buhari really goofed

What are you talking about... The position of CJN cannot be empty... The moment he suspended walter, he has to swear in the most Senior as acting, that is the law... Don't know why u laughing

Vrengkat:
Section 1 of the Constitution does not say any word not recognized by the Constitution is null and void, it say if any law is inconsistent... Suspension is not found in the Constitution, so I get why you want to equate it to removal, but it's not up to you...it is for the court to use its discretion to decide... But i assure you, if a court is faced with this, he will not rely on that section...

Do you know there is a section for the removal of a senator, but none for the suspension of a senator, but do you know senator Ali Ndume was suspended?

SUSPENDED BY WHO? HIS COLLEAGUES !

baralatie:
what is not captured will change the meaning of the constitution?

God... Your mind is really made up... Sha, I have spread the truth... Hate is all that is driving right now, not rationality

sevenhundred:
SUSPENDED BY WHO? HIS COLLEAGUES !

Assignment - check section 11 of the Interpretation Act and then tell me if Buhari cannot suspend the CJN

Vrengkat:
God... Your mind is really made up... Sha, I have spread the truth... Hate is all that is driving right now, not rationality

youbsaid the interpretation act is consistent with constitution. you now came again to saw not all parts are captured in the constitution
what is not captured is it to change the meaning of the constitution since it has to be consistent.
if that is the case you cannot use the interpretation act unlawfully to enforce the unenforceable that does not exist in the constitution.
That is,you can not enforce suspension where it does not exist in the constitution

If the chief judge can be suspended, that means the president can be suspended.

Vrengkat:
Section 1 of the Constitution does not say any word not recognized by the Constitution is null and void, it say if any law is inconsistent... Suspension is not found in the Constitution, so I get why you want to equate it to removal, but it's not up to you...it is for the court to use its discretion to decide... But i assure you, if a court is faced with this, he will not rely on that section...

Do you know there is a section for the removal of a senator, but none for the suspension of a senator, but do you know senator Ali Ndume was suspended?

.

You are confusing yourself , Senators can be suspended by the Senate committee not by the Presidency or Executive arm of Government

Whiteangel1234:
.

You are confusing yourself , Senators can be suspended by the Senate committee not by the Presidency or Executive arm of Government

You are making my point for me, were the Constitution does not state a particular thing, you can rely on other laws to compliment... We have section 11 which compliments and state that the president can suspend the CJN

baralatie:
youbsaid the interpretation act is consistent with constitution. you now came again to saw not all parts are captured in the constitution
what is not captured is it to change the meaning of the constitution since it has to be consistent.
if that is the case you cannot use the interpretation act unlawfully to enforce the unenforceable that does not exist in the constitution.
That is,you can not enforce suspension where it does not exist in the constitution

Bro, ur defence is not a defence... You can't fault the IA it gives meaning and buttresses the constitution... The Constitution can't capture everything

Vrengkat:
Bro, ur defence is not a defence... You can't fault the IA it gives meaning and buttresses the constitution... The Constitution can't capture everything.

you cannot introduce something that the constitution does not recognise.it is that simple

Vrengkat:
You are making my point for me, were the Constitution does not state a particular thing, you can rely on other laws to compliment... We have section 11 which compliments and state that the president can suspend the CJN

does the word suspension of a the CJN compliment the removal of the CJN in the constitution

baralatie:
you cannot introduce something that the constitution does not recognise.it is that simple

I know why you write like this... U already hate Buhari to the point that you can't see reasons...


I don't get paid to do this(doing it to educate parasites of fake news) have to stop here...

If you are educated and not just here cause of your hate for buhari, you will know that the president has the power to suspend the CJN by section 11 of the IA

baralatie:
does the word suspension of a the CJN compliment the removal of the CJN in the constitution

I don't get paid to do this(doing it to educate parasites of fake news) have to stop here...

If you are educated and not just here cause of your hate for buhari, you will know that the president has the power to suspend the CJN by section 11 of the IA