mynd44 lalasticlala

Vrengkat:
First of all, the word removal is not synonymous to suspension, unless there is precedent for this, buhari has not gone contrary to law, it is left for the court to use the mischief rule to adjudicate this matter... The word removal is not defined
.

Secondly, Walter for fear that the NJC would suspend him, adjourned the NJC seating indefinitely... That just reaffirms his guilt.


Thirdly, why are you putting out your neck for someone you are sure is guilty, do you know how many supreme Court cases has suffered due to this struggle, today was suppose to be the hearing of the APC portharcourt case, but nothing... Cause of one man


The fight against corruption in Nigeria is a hard one, I commend Buhari for this, I am a lawyer, part of the judiciary, I do not see this as an attack on the judiciary, but a cleansing, after all, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands...


I won't use Sanusi as a precedent, try to reconcile this with GEJ and Ayo salami

socialmediaman:
The President’s action of suspending the Chief Justice of Nigeria and swearing in of a new CJN in acting capacity unambiguously constitutes a removal of Justice Onoghen from office (whether temporarily or permanently) as the Chief Justice is no longer able to perform his constitutional duties.

Now, I understand that ‘smart’ people are trying to equate this to the suspension of Sanusi during GEJ’s tenure as president. Do you realize that in this case, The office of the Chief Justice does not report to the Executive arm of government?

Now, see what the constitution clearly states in Section 292, subsections (a) and (b):

The president can only remove the Chief Justice of Nigeria under one or two conditions:

1. Recommendation from the National Judicial Council

2. Voted by two-thirds majority of the Senate

Can someone please tell us which of these 2 conditions occurred?

Is Buhari not truly a tyrant?

Vrengkat:
First of all, the word removal is not synonymous to suspension, unless there is precedent for this, buhari has not gone contrary to law, it is left for the court to use the mischief rule to adjudicate this matter... The word removal is not defined
.

Secondly, Walter for fear that the NJC would suspend him, adjourned the NJC seating indefinitely... That just reaffirms his guilt.


Thirdly, why are you putting out your neck for someone you are sure is guilty, do you know how many supreme Court cases has suffered due to this struggle, today was suppose to be the hearing of the APC portharcourt case, but nothing... Cause of one man


The fight against corruption in Nigeria is a hard one, I commend Buhari for this, I am a lawyer, part of the judiciary, I do not see this as an attack on the judiciary, but a cleansing, after all, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands...


I won't use Sanusi as a precedent, try to reconcile this with GEJ and Ayo salami

Vrengkat:
First of all, the word removal is not synonymous to suspension, unless there is precedent for this, buhari has not gone contrary to law, it is left for the court to use the mischief rule to adjudicate this matter... The word removal is not defined
.

Secondly, Walter for fear that the NJC would suspend him, adjourned the NJC seating indefinitely... That just reaffirms his guilt.


Thirdly, why are you putting out your neck for someone you are sure is guilty, do you know how many supreme Court cases has suffered due to this struggle, today was suppose to be the hearing of the APC portharcourt case, but nothing... Cause of one man


The fight against corruption in Nigeria is a hard one, I commend Buhari for this, I am a lawyer, part of the judiciary, I do not see this as an attack on the judiciary, but a cleansing, after all, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands...


I won't use Sanusi as a precedent, try to reconcile this with GEJ and Ayo salami

socialmediaman:


See where you got it wrong, if the word “removal” cannot be equated with suspension which both prevent the judge in question from performing his duties, it means the constitution does not recognize the act of “suspension” which itself renders his order illegal

Cajal:
...is removal synonymous with suspension..!!!
Get ur fact clear...

baralatie:

is their existing in the constitution of Nigeria that the CJN can be removed from office by suspension

baralatie:

can you quote the law that empowers the president to suspend the CJN

Vrengkat:




That is the fun part about law... Not everything is covered by the law, this is why people say judges make laws, cause where there is mischief in our law, the judges have the discretion to interpret such law how they feel is best to correct the mischief, which is then binding on inferior law courts...



This is an issue not covered by our law, it is only the court that can say if Buhari is wrong... Therefore i advice all these carriers of bad tidings to approach the courts, except you know you are wrong, why would you clamour for people to protest on a matter were you could go to the court...


Let me tell you the only reason these people don't want to go to court... There case is dead... Walter already confessed and pleaded ignorance, which is not an excuse in law... The NJC was going to recommend his suspension today, which is why he adjourned the seating indefinitely

baralatie:

the bolded speaks volumes.the question is where did the president get executive powers not covered in the constitution to suspend the CJN come from?
Does it not make the president the official law breaker

socialmediaman:
The President’s action of suspending the Chief Justice of Nigeria and swearing in of a new CJN in acting capacity unambiguously constitutes a removal of Justice Onoghen from office (whether temporarily or permanently) as the Chief Justice is no longer able to perform his constitutional duties.

Now, I understand that ‘smart’ people are trying to equate this to the suspension of Sanusi during GEJ’s tenure as president. Do you realize that in this case, The office of the Chief Justice does not report to the Executive arm of government?

Now, see what the constitution clearly states in Section 292, subsections (a) and (b):

The president can only remove the Chief Justice of Nigeria under one or two conditions:

1. Recommendation from the National Judicial Council

2. Voted by two-thirds majority of the Senate

Can someone please tell us which of these 2 conditions occurred?

Is Buhari not truly a tyrant?

Jonathan:

Where did the constitution forbid the president from suspending the cjn?
You’re not wise

Jonathan:

Where did the constitution forbid the president from suspending the cjn?
You’re not wise

sotall:

Just as your name suggest...you acting according to it's meaning.

If the president decides to blow you dumb skull with a gun, will you ask if the Constitution forbids him from doing so?

Vrengkat:
First of all, the word removal is not synonymous to suspension, unless there is precedent for this, buhari has not gone contrary to law, it is left for the court to use the mischief rule to adjudicate this matter... The word removal is not defined
.

Secondly, Walter for fear that the NJC would suspend him, adjourned the NJC seating indefinitely... That just reaffirms his guilt.


Thirdly, why are you putting out your neck for someone you are sure is guilty, do you know how many supreme Court cases has suffered due to this struggle, today was suppose to be the hearing of the APC portharcourt case, but nothing... Cause of one man


The fight against corruption in Nigeria is a hard one, I commend Buhari for this, I am a lawyer, part of the judiciary, I do not see this as an attack on the judiciary, but a cleansing, after all, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands...


I won't use Sanusi as a precedent, try to reconcile this with GEJ and Ayo salami

Cajal:
...he has not been removed... sir

baralatie:

the constitution says that the president can only remove the CJN by the following means

a, by recommendation of the National Judicial Council

b, 2/3 majority vote of the senate

c, due to I'll health or unfit healthwise to continue to discharge his duties

d, when he/she clocks the retirement age of 70

Jonathan:

As expected.
No coherence

Jonathan:

So?
Did the president remove the CJN?
Do you need a dictionary to know the difference between remove and suspend?

erosimo:


If you are truly a lawyer, what does the constitution say about the appointment of CJN?

sotall:

Yes, that was how dumb the question you asked him was.
No coherence

baralatie:

the president does not have any legal instrument whatsoever to even suspend the CJN at all?

Cajal:
...is removal synonymous with suspension..!!!
Get ur fact clear...

Vrengkat:




Section 1 of the Constitution does not say any word not recognized by the Constitution is null and void, it say if any law is inconsistent... Suspension is not found in the Constitution, so I get why you want to equate it to removal, but it's not up to you...it is for the court to use its discretion to decide... But i assure you, if a court is faced with this, he will not rely on that section...

Do you know there is a section for the removal of a senator, but none for the suspension of a senator, but do you know senator Ali Ndume was suspended?

baralatie:

the bolded speaks volumes.the question is where did the president get executive powers not covered in the constitution to suspend the CJN come from?
does it not make the action illegal

yanabasee:



Oga, we have a standing rule of the Nigerian Senate..... The rule covers conducts and appropriate punishment for any lawmaker.... Very different from the constitution.... The presidency doesn't.... The presidency follows the country's constitutional order.....

The constitution says remove, while the dullard used the word "suspend"... Just to reinstate him after rigging election in his favor!!!

erosimo:


If you are truly a lawyer, what does the constitution say about the appointment of CJN?

Vrengkat:
First of all, the word removal is not synonymous to suspension, unless there is precedent for this, buhari has not gone contrary to law, it is left for the court to use the mischief rule to adjudicate this matter... The word removal is not defined
.

Secondly, Walter for fear that the NJC would suspend him, adjourned the NJC seating indefinitely... That just reaffirms his guilt.


Thirdly, why are you putting out your neck for someone you are sure is guilty, do you know how many supreme Court cases has suffered due to this struggle, today was suppose to be the hearing of the APC portharcourt case, but nothing... Cause of one man


The fight against corruption in Nigeria is a hard one, I commend Buhari for this, I am a lawyer, part of the judiciary, I do not see this as an attack on the judiciary, but a cleansing, after all, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands...


I won't use Sanusi as a precedent, try to reconcile this with GEJ and Ayo salami