Abuheekmat:
Laughing...



She was 6 when she was given to him as wife..


By 9, he consummated their marriage..


.
Believe it or not.. that's your problem
Call it whatever name you want.. that's your problem..

..
It's SUNNAH of Islam..

Who cares if you like it or not or who cares whatever name you called it..



She is his wife..

....
Unlike your Catholic with gay marriage and molesting nuns and female youngsters


..

CoolUsername:


I'm not a Christian, dude. And this thread is to address pedophilia in Islam. Funny how you resort to taking potshots at Christianity when your religion is being criticized. Don't you have your own standards?

Also, what moral authority do you have to condemn homosexuality when the founder of your religion diddled a 9 year old when he was 54?

CAPSLOCKED:


AND HIS FOLLOWERS IN THIS DAY DIDDLE UNDER 12'S, ALL IN THE NAME OF EMULATING THE PROPHET, AS IF SÈX WITH CHILDREN WAS THE ONLY FEAT HE ACHIEVED THAT QUALIFIES FOR EMULATION.

CoolUsername:

[s]

I'm not a Christian, dude. And this thread is to address pedophilia in Islam. Funny how you resort to taking potshots at Christianity when your religion is being criticized. Don't you have your own standards?

Also, what moral authority do you have to condemn homosexuality when the founder of your religion diddled a 9 year old when he was 54?[/s]

rekinomtla:
How are atheists criticizing aisha marriage when they believe society is the source of morality? If the marriage was normal and accepted by the society back then, then the atheist has no valid objections. You can't have your cake and eat it too, either morality is relative/subjective or it is not.

tartar9:

There is nothing wrong in their marriage.Not a single soul complained even from amongst his enemies who were ever in search of any excuse to discredit Him.Just in the 19th century in your so-called "advanced countries",the legal age of marriage was 12 for women.

rekinomtla:
How are atheists criticizing aisha marriage when they believe society is the source of morality? If the marriage was normal and accepted by the society back then, then the atheist has no valid objections. You can't have your cake and eat it too, either morality is relative/subjective or it is not.

malvisguy212:
cc johnydon22 come and answer this question.

CoolUsername:


Simple, if Mohammed was not a perfect man - which he wasn't, since he was a paedophile - Islam is a baseless belief.

In addition, his sexual perversion is used in the Islamic world to justify their own sexual perversion. Making Islam an actively dangerous belief.

rekinomtla:
How are atheists criticizing aisha marriage when they believe society is the source of morality? If the marriage was normal and accepted by the society back then, then the atheist has no valid objections. You can't have your cake and eat it too, either morality is relative/subjective or it is not.

johnydon22:
I actually agree with him. An atheist or someone with secular moral background has no basis to morally condemn that

malvisguy212:
so there is nothing wrong if a 90 years old man get marry to a 9 years old girl just because some community say its okay ? the Holocaust is good because the Nazi German benefit from it, at least they reduce the population of the Jews. smh

rekinomtla:
How are atheists criticizing aisha marriage when they believe society is the source of morality? If the marriage was normal and accepted by the society back then, then the atheist has no valid objections. You can't have your cake and eat it too, either morality is relative/subjective or it is not.

johnydon22:
You did not really answer his question bro.

READ IT AGAIN

Rilwayne001:


Your mumu never do?

You've totally veered off the main point as usual.
5years on, you still lack comprehension. SMH

johnydon22:
You did not really answer his question bro.

READ IT AGAIN

malvisguy212:
so there is nothing wrong if a 90 years old man get marry to a 9 years old girl just because some community say its okay ? the Holocaust is good because the Nazi German benefit from it, at least they reduce the population of the Jews. smh

rekinomtla:
How are atheists criticizing aisha marriage when they believe society is the source of morality? If the marriage was normal and accepted by the society back then, then the atheist has no valid objections. You can't have your cake and eat it too, either morality is relative/subjective or it is not.

CoolUsername:


While I believe that morality is indeed subjective, we all still make judgements based on it, no matter how socially libertarian you may be, you still make mortal decisions based on your personal view.

Or else, there's really no other way for anyone to make judgements.

Also, I don't think that supporters of paedophilia outnumber people who are against. So, even going by that standard, Mohammed is still in the wrong.

malvisguy212:
so atheists cannot condemn a society were the people eat human flesh just because there culture support it ?

johnydon22:
Read what i said again.

malvisguy212:
I understand you bro. but what the Muslim guy wrote is another excuse to justify under age marriage .

malvisguy212:
would you give your daughter hand in marriage to a 90 years old man just because Muhammad did same ?

Rilwayne001:


I would not do that because we are no longer in the 6th century. Lots of things have changed over time and there's a change in the societal rules and norms, which automatically has been imprinted in our DNA.

You quite know such marriage of 54 year old man marrying a 9year old girl was the order of the day back then and no one sees any wrong in it. The major reason why someone said earlier on on this thread that had it been it was worse back then as you're trying to paint it now, those his haters would have come hard on him with great criticism that will be attached to history books for eternity, but because it was the norms and culture back then, no one saw Amy wrong and everything went by. You know quite well these is a fact but you still out of your hatred for anything that has to do with Islam, feign ignorance and painting it so dark when actually we have similar scenario between Mary and Joseph too.

johnydon22:
DNA really? Common bro.

You are theist right? I do not think you should find anything morally wrong with this action since in theism morality isn't defined by the society but by a transcendent authority.

Rilwayne001:


That was a mistake, I've corrected it.

The Quran did not specify the age of marriage for either party, so what transcendental authority are you referring to in this regard

CoolUsername:

Simple, if Mohammed was not a perfect man - which he wasn't, since he was a paedophile - Islam is a baseless belief.

In addition, his sexual perversion is used in the Islamic world to justify their own sexual perversion. Making Islam an actively dangerous belief.