The reason cited by onnoghen for been absent in court yesterday includes an unheard before blood pressure of 410/121mmHg.

Is this medically possible? Shouldn't he be unconscious by now?
I need all your thoughts on this please because it poses a medical dilemma.

peacettw:
The reason cited by onnoghen for been absent in court yesterday includes a blood pressure of 410/121mmHg.

Is this medically possible?
I need your thoughts on this please because I am simply bewildered

it is

Most likely an error.

Stroke bound

PrecisionFx:
it is

Interesting. I ask this question because I am very much aware that the highest value in a standard sphygmomanometer (a device which measures blood pressure) is 300mmHg.
Hence my question, on whether it is indeed possible for a blood pressure of a human being to be above 400mHg. Which device was used to measure this?

yerilistik:
Most likely an error.

I can assure you that this is unlikely to be an error. It was signed by a medical doctor and most importantly for a high profile case. Clearly, they knew the import of that value.

It's very possible if you have enough money to buy crooked and corrupt doctors and fraudulent medical report, same way the crooked CJ was bought to issue fraudulence court judgement...



Btw, with that kind of BP numbers, the crooked and corrupt CJ should be dead by now..

in my years of prectice ive never seen that. looks more like an error to me. If not, its a hypertensive emergency

PrecisionFx:
it is

how sir.he would hv bn bleeding with that bp and stroke would hv set in.

hypertension:
in my years of prectice ive never seen that. looks more like an error to me. If not, its a hypertensive emergency

Can't help but notice your name.
My dear, how can we be certain it is an error? What then is the true value? It is indeed careless for someone to vet this without cross checking appropriately especially for a high profile case such as this.

This is a man being accused for corruption. He should be extremely careful not to add perjury to the list.

I, for one, would very much love to know the doctor who signed this medical report. I need to know the device he used to determine this value and most importantly to encourage him (if indeed the blood pressure was not falsified) to write this up as a research topic.

peacettw:


Can't help but notice your name.
My dear, how can we be certain it is an error? What then is the true value? It is indeed careless for someone to vet this without cross checking appropriately especially for a high profile case such as this.

This is a man being accused for corruption. He should be extremely careful not to add perjury to the list?

And how can we be certain it’s not an error. Why don’t we give the benefit of doubt knowing that by those values a human would be probably dead.

Careless indeed but not impossible

TB28:


And how can we be certain it’s not an error. Why don’t we give the benefit of doubt knowing that by those values a human would be probably dead.

Careless indeed but not impossible

Not impossible for it to be an error? Kk then. Let's go with that. An error made by a medical doctor for the sole purpose to justify the absence of an accused in trial

peacettw:


Not impossible for it to be an error? Kk then. Let's go with that then.

They are things at play here that most of the folks commenting here don’t have any idea of.

Let me ask you, are you aware that the NJC panel started last week and was adjourned to tomorrow.

peacettw:


Not impossible for it to be an error? Kk then. Let's go with that. An error made by a medical doctor for the sole purpose to justify the absence of an accused in trial

I’m sure it was an error. More grave mistakes have been made before nothing new.

If it has to be corrected to reflect the correct values, so be it. Doesn’t invalidate it.

TB28:


They are things at play here that most of the folks commenting here don’t have any idea of.

Let me ask you, are you aware that the NJC panel started last week and was adjourned to tomorrow.

And what does that have to do with a wrong blood pressure?

peacettw:


And what does that have to do with a wrong lood pressure?

Correction wrong blood pressure reading! That isn’t his fault.

The reports aren’t generated at the point it was taken even you can see that.

If whoever is responsible makes a typo error it and it’s sent to his lawyers in court to present how is it his fault. It can be corrected.

TB28:


Correction wrong blood pressure reading! That isn’t his fault.

The reports aren’t generated at the point it was taken even you can see that.

I deliberately used the word 'wrong' and you jumped at it. Another person used 'an error' to describe this. I wonder what new words will crop up to explain this 'anomaly'.
Let's not forget that the only reason he is on trial today wad that he 'forgot' declare his assets.

The one lesson to learn from this is that we should be very careful in matters of law. There is no room for error

Nigeria and all round quackery.