₦airaland Forum

Lanretoye:
boyfriend...rape...,I am not understanding. if na to collect money now,dem don send account.everytime buy me iPhone,baby buy me fendi.if na to bring pass once or 2x in a week,you go hear "is it food".

What exactly are you not understanding? That "no" means NO?!
Abegi don't start sounding as if you are a rapist yourself who thinks that boyfriend (even husband) gives you the right to sex without consent.

Meanwhile, quit b*tching as if anyone owes you anything for VOLUNTARILY gifting them money or gifts...
If you can't afford it (or it simply pains you to give), please do NOT give. It is not by force, and if she dumps you it's no loss to both of you!
>

wat else could have led to the bite Tysonsque

Lanretoye:
boyfriend...rape...,I am not understanding.if na to collect money now,dem don send account.everytime buy me iPhone,baby buy me fendi.if na to bring pass once or 2x in a week,you go hear "is it food".

You didn't seem to care about what they guy was trying to do
Instead you're attacking the woman.
It is well

Bigcowhorn:
Lol, What are you doing here?

The reason you were banned is that you tried to stop the submission of what you typed while you device was trying to resubmit. That triggered the anti spam bots

Oh ok noted bro thanks, my ban will expire at 7: 16 pm this evening , amatarasha leave Ms kh... iaa alone o

Where that prepuce lawyer wen de say make babes sign before knack oya bring that your form make she fill

ahnie:
You are so despicable... He wanted raping her and she fought back yet you saw nothing wrong in what he wanted doing to her all you could come up with was the gibberish you spew up there. O ma se o.

Modified...quick recovery to the guy and may the affected ben johnson rise and resurrect again may his man.hood lives on.

una de date then u still bite am , women and lies , if na money de the bed her period do disappear

... Blessing added that he rushed Johnson to a private hospital in Surulere where the doctor requested for the presence of a family member or the police before Johnson could be treated...

Are completely devoid of sense in this country? What was the purpose of family or police being present before the medical staff started administering medical treatment?

Could they not do this after?

lexy2014:
Madam detective, as u read d story na so me I take read d story. According to d lady this is her reason y she bit off d guys dick:

“Johnson insisted on having sex with me and when I refused, he hit me on my back, I was so pained that I bit his manhood. I didn’t mean to harm him,” she said."


So because d guy hit her on her back, she decided to bite off d guys dick. Now in that moment of rage, d guy was still in his boxers.

“He tried taking my clothes off which I refused and he slapped me twice. He took off his clothes and was putting on boxers and singlet while he held on to my breast to pin me down.”

My dear, this lady isn't telling us what actually happened. Her story is so sweet that am trying so hard to believe it

Why is her story so hard to believe? The guy slapped her twice and then went on to hit her on her back, in a bid to intimidate her into having sex with him.

He even attempted to strip her of her clothes but she refused. In a bid to defend herself, she bit him in the groin. So why is that so hard for you to believe?

If their intimacy was meant to be consensual, would he have slapped her in the first place or hit her on the back? Are those kind of actions, a normal prelude to consensual sex?

victorian:
OK, but don't you think hitting her on the back will Make her fall down to the point where his dick is? Then with rage, she bites off his dick!

It's rational like that.

Thank you, o! This angle makes a lot of sense.

lexy2014:
If I hit u on ur back, how are u going to fall? Pls explain d "falling". If I hit u on ur back are u going to fall away from me or fall towards me? What position will d "falling" take?

Remember, d guys boxers is still on. So maybe with her lightening speed, she took off d boxers& bit d dick off. Is that rational enough?

How thick are the boxers? Are you saying she couldn't have bitten him through the boxers?

laudate:
How thick are the boxers? Are you saying she couldn't have bitten him through the boxers?

Yes that's what am saying. Even if she had to bite his dick off with his boxers still on, she would have achieved it with lightening speed considering that her mouth is in d upper part of her body& d guys dick is down below

laudate:
Why is her story so hard to believe? The guy slapped her twice and then went on to hit her on her back, in a bid to intimidate her into having sex with him.

He even attempted to strip her of her clothes but she refused. In a bid to defend herself, she bit him in the groin. So why is that so hard for you to believe?

If their intimacy was meant to be consensual, would he have slapped her in the first place or hit her on the back? Are those kind of actions, a normal prelude to consensual sex?


Thank you, o! This angle makes a lot of sense.

This is d angle that makes a lot of sense to u:

"OK, but don't you think hitting her on the back will Make her fall down to the point where his dick is? Then with rage, she bites off his dick!

It's rational like that."

Can u pls tell me, if someone hits u in d back, how are u going to fall, toward d person that hit u in d back or away from d person that hit u& in what position are u going to fall?


“He tried taking my clothes off which I refused and he slapped me twice. He took off his clothes and was putting on boxers and singlet while he held on to my breast to pin me down.”


“Johnson insisted on having sex with me and when I refused, he hit me on my back, I was so pained that I bit his manhood. I didn’t mean to harm him,” she said."

Pls take note of two things. In d first quote, d lady said d guy "held on to her breast to pin her down"

In d second, she said she was blown in her back. Is a woman's breasts now located in her back? How can a person hold on to ur breasts(which is in front) to pin u down& still b able to blow u in d back at d same time? Can u also pls tell me where d guy pinned d lady to?

GuestLog:
Shut up there mumu! Might your sister is about to be forced into sex, I pray the guy succeed so that you will know what it feels like to be violated. If she were my sister or daughter I'd be proud of her.

I see your sister has been bleeped so hard in your presence,her moaning and the experience made my comment so touching to you.

Lanretoye:
I see your sister has been bleeped so hard in your presence,her moaning and the experience made my comment so touching to you.

Aftervthe weed clear off your eyes, come back and read your comments if it makes any sense to you! Crack head!!

lexy2014:
This is d angle that makes a lot of sense to u:

"OK, but don't you think hitting her on the back will Make her fall down to the point where his dick is? Then with rage, she bites off his dick!

It's rational like that."

Can u pls tell me, if someone hits u in d back, how are u going to fall, toward d person that hit u in d back or away from d person that hit u& in what position are u going to fall?


“He tried taking my clothes off which I refused and he slapped me twice. He took off his clothes and was putting on boxers and singlet while he held on to my breast to pin me down.”

“Johnson insisted on having sex with me and when I refused, he hit me on my back, I was so pained that I bit his manhood. I didn’t mean to harm him,” she said."

Pls take note of two things. In d first quote, d lady said d guy "held on to her breast to pin her down"

In d second, she said she was blown in her back. Is a woman's breasts now located in her back? How can a person hold on to ur breasts(which is in front) to pin u down& still b able to blow u in d back at d same time? Can u also pls tell me where d guy pinned d lady to?

Oga, stop trying to defend the indefensible. You do not know if he grabbed her breast before he hit her on the back, or afterwards. The sequence is not laid out like a plotted graph.

And who says he stood still after hitting her on the back? He could have hit her on the back, then she could have fallen forward like you imagined, and he could also have moved towards her to stand in front of her after hitting her, and she grabbed his crotch.

Anything could have happened. The fact that he used violence on her by slapping her, grabbing her breast and hitting her on the back, showed that he meant to harm her physically. So she defended herself the best way she could. End of story. I salute her bravery.

lexy2014:
Yes that's what am saying. Even if she had to bite his dick off with his boxers still on, she would have achieved it with lightening speed considering that her mouth is in d upper part of her body& d guys dick is down below

It is still possible for her to have bit him through his boxers, if he wasn't expecting that kind of reaction from her. And he was a big fo0l. After slapping a woman twice, grabbing her breast and hitting her on the back, do you expect her to clap for you??

laudate:
Oga, stop trying to defend the indefensible. You do not know if he grabbed her breast before he hit her on the back, or afterwards. The sequence is not laid out like a plotted graph.

And who says he stood still after hitting her on the back? He could have hit her on the back, then she could have fallen forward like you imagined, and he could also have moved towards her to stand in front of her after hitting her, and she grabbed his crotch.

Anything could have happened. The fact that he used violence on her by slapping her, grabbing her breast and hitting her on the back, showed that he meant to harm her physically. So she defended herself the best way she could. End of story. I salute her bravery.

If am defending d indefensible, what are u defending? Talk ur own, I talk my own. If u can't refute what am saying, that's not my fault. If u say d sequence wasn't laid, then which sequence are u laying out below?

laudate:
And who says he stood still after hitting her on the back? He could have hit her on the back, then she could have fallen forward like you imagined, and he could also have moved towards her to stand in front of her after hitting her, and she grabbed his crotch.

Is that d sequence in which it happened or was it laid out as a graph? So u are free to give ur sequence of events as u deem.fit, but am not. I ask u for my imagination about how she fell. I asked u to tell me how u think she fell& in what position did she fall. So far, u havent been to do that. So when u hit someone in d back& d person is falling away from u, u now go to d persons front right?

laudate:
Anything could have happened. The fact that he used violence on her by slapping her, grabbing her breast and hitting her on the back, showed that he meant to harm her physically. So she defended herself the best way she could. End of story. I salute her bravery.

So now "anything could have happened". What does that mean? What is d anything that could have happened?

Since u are talking about d guy grabbing her breasts& hitting her in d back which prompted d bitting off, d question u have failed to answer is this:

lexy2014:
Is a woman's breasts now located in her back? How can a person hold on to ur breasts(which is in front) to pin u down& still b able to blow u in d back at d same time? Can u also pls tell me where d guy pinned d lady to?

U have already given a sequence in ur previous post so u shouldn't have any problems giving another sequence

laudate:
It is still possible for her to have bit him through his boxers, if he wasn't expecting that kind of reaction from her. And he was a big fo0l. After slapping a woman twice, grabbing her breast and hitting her on the back, do you expect her to clap for you??

That's good. Which brings us to d question, at what speed was she able to do this? Was it at lightening speed when u consider that her mouth is up& d guys dick down below& that d guy was behind her? She was pinned down with d guy grabbing her breast (u still haven't told me were she was pinned down& in what position) & she was blown in her back.

laudate:
And who says he stood still after hitting her on the back? He could have hit her on the back, then she could have fallen forward like you imagined, and he could also have moved towards her to stand in front of her after hitting her, and she grabbed his crotch.

This is what d lady said below. Compare it with what u said.

“Johnson insisted on having sex with me and when I refused, he hit me on my back, I was so pained that I bit his manhood. I didn’t mean to harm him,” she said."

Did u c anywhere she said that d guy magically appeared in her front making his dick available for her to bite off? Cos if I were to hit someone in d back, I believe d safest place for me to remain is behind d person not in front of d person until d person decides to turn& face me

lexy2014:
That's good. Which brings us to d question, at what speed was she able to do this? Was it at lightening speed when u consider that her mouth is up& d guys dick down below& that d guy was behind her? She was pinned down with d guy grabbing her breast (u still haven't told me were she was pinned down& in what position) & she was blown in her back.

This is what d lady said below. Compare it with what u said.

“Johnson insisted on having sex with me and when I refused, he hit me on my back, I was so pained that I bit his manhood. I didn’t mean to harm him,” she said."

Did u c anywhere she said that d guy magically appeared in her front making his dick available for her to bite off? Cos if I were to hit someone in d back, I believe d safest place for me to remain is behind d person not in front of d person until d person decides to turn& face me

You are writing all these long epistles because you are so determined to support Johnson the rapist, and castigate the lady who is his victim.

The accounts of how he assaulted the girl are clearly spelt out, yet you are ignoring it, in order to paint the lady black, for defending herself... continue. The thunder that will fire rape supporters like you is doing press up at Bar beach.

laudate:
You are writing all these long epistles because you are so determined to support Johnson the rapist, and castigate the lady who is his victim.

The accounts of how he assaulted the girl are clearly spelt out, yet you are ignoring it, in order to paint the lady black, for defending herself... continue. The thunder that will fire rape supporters like you is doing press up at Bar beach.

If u are able to answer d questions I asked u, then u will b enlightened. Unfortunately, u can't answer d questions I asked. Its all about facts, not sentiments. All I can c in ur comment is emotions & no ounce of rational thinking.

If u say am supporting d Johnson guy, what are u doing for d lady who said she was raped? So it is OK 4u to support d lady & it is wrong 4 me to support d guy even when her story doesn't gel? Even though u have no facts& that u can't plug d loopholes in her story, u still feel its OK 4u to support d lady& its wrong 4 me to support d guy. So its ok 4u to paint d guy black without hearing his side of d story but its wrong 4 me to ask how can u b pinned down with a hand on ur breast & still b blown in d back at d same time. Now u c ur subjectivity & ur double standards?

I haven't supported d guy in any way. All I have done is to look at d lady's story& analyse it critically. I laid out everything she said& obviously there are a lot of missing pieces. Many things she said aren't practically possible & u haven't been able to refute my analysis.

laudate:
The accounts of how he assaulted the girl are clearly spelt out, yet you are ignoring it, in order to paint the lady black, for defending herself... continue. The thunder that will fire rape supporters like you is doing press up at Bar beach.

U are basing ur judgement on one person's side of d story when u haven't heard from d other person. So ur thunder will not fire anybody cos even u can't prove that d lady is actually telling d truth. So if u can't prove she is telling d truth, what will ur thunder do to u for supporting someone who accused another falsely of rape? So keep ur emotions to urself & present superior argument not emotional outburst

lexy2014:
If u are able to answer d questions I asked u, then u will b enlightened. Unfortunately, u can't answer d questions I asked. Its all about facts, not sentiments. All I can c in ur comment is emotions & no ounce of rational thinking.

If u say am supporting d Johnson guy, what are u doing for d lady who said she was raped? So it is OK 4u to support d lady & it is wrong 4 me to support d guy even when her story doesn't gel? Even though u have no facts& that u can't plug d loopholes in her story, u still feel its OK 4u to support d lady& its wrong 4 me to support d guy. So its ok 4u to paint d guy black without hearing his side of d story but its wrong 4 me to ask how can u b pinned down with a hand on ur breast & still b blown in d back at d same time. Now u c ur subjectivity & ur double standards?

I haven't supported d guy in any way. All I have done is to look at d lady's story& analyse it critically. I laid out everything she said& obviously there are a lot of missing pieces. Many things she said aren't practically possible & u haven't been able to refute my analysis.

U are basing ur judgement on one person's side of d story when u haven't heard from d other person. So ur thunder will not fire anybody cos even u can't prove that d lady is actually telling d truth. So if u can't prove she is telling d truth, what will ur thunder do to u for supporting someone who accused another falsely of rape? So keep ur emotions to urself & present superior argument not emotional outburst

You have written another long unecessary epistle to justify Johnson the attempted rapist! Ok, o! Me, I cannot pity any joker who assaults a woman. He got served the kind of punishment he deserved. Next time, he will think twice before embarking on that kind of salacious adventure.

Oya, I am waiting for you to write another long epistle to defend your brother Johnson, who attempted to rape a helpless woman, after assaulting her .....

laudate:
You have written another long unecessary epistle to justify Johnson the attempted rapist! Ok, o! Me, I cannot pity any joker who assaults a woman. He got served the kind of punishment he deserved. Next time, he will think twice before embarking on that kind of salacious adventure.

Oya, I am waiting for you to write another long epistle to defend your brother Johnson, who attempted to rape a helpless woman, after assaulting her .....

Whether d epistle is long or short isn't d issue. D issue is that u read it& u understand it but u weren't able to refute anything I said with any facts or superior argument. Like I said b4

lexy2014:
If u say am supporting d Johnson guy, what are u doing for d lady who said she was raped? So it is OK 4u to support d lady & it is wrong 4 me to support d guy even when her story doesn't gel? Even though u have no facts& that u can't plug d loopholes in her story, u still feel its OK 4u to support d lady& its wrong 4 me to support d guy. So its ok 4u to paint d guy black without hearing his side of d story but its wrong 4 me to ask how can u b pinned down with a hand on ur breast & still b blown in d back at d same time. Now u c ur subjectivity & ur double standards?

I haven't supported d guy in any way. All I have done is to look at d lady's story& analyse it critically. I laid out everything she said& obviously there are a lot of missing pieces. Many things she said aren't practically possible & u haven't been able to refute my analysis.

U are basing ur judgement on one person's side of d story when u haven't heard from d other person. So ur thunder will not fire anybody cos even u can't prove that d lady is actually telling d truth. So if u can't prove she is telling d truth, what will ur thunder do to u for supporting someone who accused another falsely of rape? So keep ur emotions to urself & present superior argument not emotional outburst

lexy2014:
Whether d epistle is long or short isn't d issue. D issue is that u read it& u understand it but u weren't able to refute anything I said with any facts or superior argument. Like I said b4

Oga, your epistles do not move me. Stop defending hopeless men who assault women. Johnson got what he deserved. Period.

laudate:
Oga, your epistles do not move me. Stop defending hopeless men who assault women. Johnson got what he deserved. Period.

Initially, u were very vocal with ur comments, even writing ur own epistle cos u thought emotions trump facts. But on getting my rebuttals filled with facts, u have become calm& singing d same refrain like a broken record without being able to muster any form of intellectual argument to refute anything I said. So I agree with u, my epistles don't move u. They have actually frozen u that u have run out of things to say. They have left u with nothing else to use to defend d lady's testimony. U are now speechless

lexy2014:
Initially, u were very vocal with ur comments, even writing ur own epistle cos u thought emotions trump facts. But on getting my rebuttals filled with facts, u have become calm& singing d same refrain like a broken record without being able to muster any form of intellectual argument to refute any I said. So I agree with u, my epistles don't move u. They have actually frozen u that u have run out of things to say. They have left u with nothing else to use to defend d lady's testimony. U are now speechless

I have seen through your antics, that is why I have been laughing secretly at the long epistles you have been churning out.

You are just trying to paint the victim black, by casting aspersions on her report of the events that took place, between her and Johnson.

You are trying to give your friend Johnson an easy way out. Well done. It is so easy to spot rape apologists like you, and those who spend lots of energy to castigate victims who have been assaulted, like the lady in this story.

The thunder that will fire you rape apologists and defenders of sexual assaulters, is doing press up at Ilasan beach! Just wait....

It is clear as daylight that the guy assaulted her, but you are keeping quiet about his assault and trying to sweep it under the carpet as if it doesn't matter. It was his actions that caused the lady to defend herself. I salute her courage!

laudate:
I have seen through your antics, that is why I have been laughing secretly at the long epistles you have been churning out.

You are just trying to paint the victim black, by casting aspersions on her report of the events that took place, between her and Johnson.

You are trying to give your friend Johnson an easy way out. Well done. It is so easy to spot rape apologists like you, and those who spend lots of energy to castigate victims who have been assaulted, like the lady in this story.

The thunder that will fire you rape apologists and defenders of sexual assaulters, is doing press up at Ilasan beach! Just wait....

It is clear as daylight that the guy assaulted her, but you are keeping quiet about his assault and trying to sweep it under the carpet as if it doesn't matter. It was his actions that caused the lady to defend herself. I salute her courage!

laudate:
I have seen through your antics, that is why I have been laughing secretly at the long epistles you have been churning out.

I only asked u simple questions. So when did questions become antics? If u lost& u dont no what to say, u simply say so. There's no shame in that. D long epistles are filled with questions which u couldn't answer. So u actually d one playing antics by trying to avoid answering d questions I asked u cos u no that d truth is in d questions I asked.

laudate:
You are just trying to paint the victim black, by casting aspersions on her report of the events that took place, between her and Johnson.

Aren't u trying to paint Johnson black without even hearing his side of d story? Once again ur double standards& subjectivity on display. If u can show where i casted aspersions, i would b most glad. There's a difference between "casting aspersions" & doing an analysis. What I did was analysis like its done in football. And my analysis were filled more with questions than comments so as to stir ur reasoning. But because ur emotions has beclouded ur sense of judgement, u aren't able to distinguishe between "casting aspersions" & analysis.

laudate:
You are trying to give your friend Johnson an easy way out. Well done. It is so easy to spot rape apologists like you, and those who spend lots of energy to castigate victims who have been assaulted, like the lady in this story.

Its not in my power to give Johnson "an easy way out" so I dont no how u came about that. Thats 4d criminal justice system. U can't base ur judgement on such an issue on d testimony of just one person. That's being subjective & subjectivity isn't a part of law& science. D problem u are having is that u cant match d facts I have put forward. If u feel analysis I put forward is faulty, then counter it with superior arguments not all this whining u have been engaging in.

laudate:
The thunder that will fire you rape apologists and defenders of sexual assaulters, is doing press up at Ilasan beach! Just wait....

It is clear as daylight that the guy assaulted her, but you are keeping quiet about his assault and trying to sweep it under the carpet as if it doesn't matter. It was his actions that caused the lady to defend herself. I salute her courage!

So what will happen to those who latch unto stories& conclude without hearing d other party& without looking at d facts? What type of thunder will strike them?

Nothing is clear in d lady's story. So far u haven't been able to tell me how u can grab a woman's breast in other to pin her down & still b able to blow her in d back at d same time. U still haven't been able to tell me were she was pinned to. U still haven't been able to tell how d lady fell after she was blown in d back. So where's d clarity there? Answer these questions then u will get clarity

lexy2014:
I only asked u simple questions. So when did questions become antics? If u lost& u dont no what to say, u simply say so. There's no shame in that. D long epistles are filled with questions which u couldn't answer. So u actually d one playing antics by trying to avoid answering d questions I asked u cos u no that d truth is in d questions I asked.

Aren't u trying to paint Johnson black without even hearing his side of d story? Once again ur double standards& subjectivity on display. If u can show where i casted aspersions, i would b most glad. There's a difference between "casting aspersions" & doing an analysis. What I did was analysis like its done in football. And my analysis were filled more with questions than comments so as to stir ur reasoning. But because ur emotions has beclouded ur sense of judgement, u aren't able to distinguishe between "casting aspersions" & analysis.

Its not in my power to give Johnson "an easy way out" so I dont no how u came about that. Thats 4d criminal justice system. U can't base ur judgement on such an issue on d testimony of just one person. That's being subjective & subjectivity isn't a part of law& science. D problem u are having is that u cant match d facts I have put forward. If u feel analysis I put forward is faulty, then counter it with superior arguments not all this whining u have been engaging in.

So what will happen to those who latch unto stories& conclude without hearing d other party& without looking at d facts? What type of thunder will strike them?

Nothing is clear in d lady's story. So far u haven't been able to tell me how u can grab a woman's breast in other to pin her down & still b able to blow her in d back at d same time. U still haven't been able to tell me were she was pinned to. U still haven't been able to tell how d lady fell after she was blown in d back. So where's d clarity there? Answer these questions then u will get clarity

Hehehe....all these long stories in order to whitewash Johnson's actions and cover-up the way he assaulted the lady? This is the 5th long epistle you have posted on this topic. It is hilarious!

So continue castigating the lady, in order to paint her as a villain. You are trivialising the way she was assaulted, and ignoring the reason she had to defend herself, by focusing on the irrelevant aspects of the story.

What you are doing is not "analysis," but victim shaming.

Continue, you rape apologist. All your efforts at victim shaming just shows you are someone that supports rape enablers. Everyone knows your type.

Oya, we are waiting for your 6th long epistle...in defence of Johnson.

laudate:
Hehehe....all these long stories in order to whitewash Johnson's actions and cover-up the way he assaulted the lady? This is the 5th long epistle you have posted on this topic. It is hilarious!

So continue castigating the lady, in order to paint her as a villain. You are trivialising the way she was assaulted, and ignoring the reason she had to defend herself, by focusing on the irrelevant aspects of the story.

What you are doing is not "analysis," but victim shaming.

Continue, you rape apologist. All your efforts at victim shaming just shows you are someone that supports rape enablers. Everyone knows your type.

Oya, we are waiting for your 6th long epistle...in defence of Johnson.

I haven't told u stories. I only asked u simple questions. Asking u questions & telling stories are two different things. Am sure by now u should no that. But ur emotions aren't allowing to make rational distinctions. So if u can call my questions stories, then that means u can call an innocent man a rapist. If u can call analysis aspersions, then it won't b difficult 4u to call anyone a rapist or an apologist of a rapist.

All these ur personal attacks are just a pointer 2d fact that u just can't believe that d lady's story can b taken apart piece by piece. Thats emotion not reason. But I can't understand y u feel so bad that I was able to expose d loopholes in her story.

laudate:
So continue castigating the lady, in order to paint her as a villain. You are trivialising the way she was assaulted, and ignoring the reason she had to defend herself, by focusing on the irrelevant aspects of the story.


What you are doing is not "analysis," but victim shaming.

Once again, ur emotions are getting d better of u. Like I told u earlier to produce d "aspersions". Uptill now u couldn't. Now, pls define "victim shaming" & provide d exact comment I made that constitute "victim shaming". Am certain u can't.

Is it like d meaning of d word castigate has been changed in d dictionary or u are using a dictionary from planet Mars? Can u produce d comment I made were I "castigated" d lady?

I have never seen were someone has been so troubled by ordinary questions that he looses his grip on d meaning of words& how to use them in sentences.

"You are trivialising the way she was assaulted, and ignoring the reason she had to defend herself, by focusing on the irrelevant aspects of the story."

How do u no d actual reason she did what she when u don't have facts to ascertain if she is telling d truth or not? How do u no d actual reason she did what she did when u haven't heard from d Johnson guy? How do u no d actual reason she did what she did when u can't answer questions that will shed more light on d issue? U are avoiding answering d questions I asked cos if u do, they will expose d truth & u don't want d truth. U only want ur subjectivity & prejudice to b reinforced. And since am not doing that 4u, am an enemy, a rape apologist. Sorry dude, I can't pamper ur sentiments. D world doesn't work that way.

laudate:
Oya, we are waiting for your 6th long epistle...in defence of Johnson.

D epistle u wrote up there is which number

lexy2014:
I haven't told u stories. I only asked u simple questions. Asking u questions & telling stories are two different things. Am sure by now u should no that. But ur emotions aren't allowing to make rational distinctions. So if u can call my questions stories, then that means u can call an innocent man a rapist. If u can call analysis aspersions, then it won't b difficult 4u to call anyone a rapist or an apologist of a rapist.

All these ur personal attacks are just a pointer 2d fact that u just can't believe that d lady's story can b taken apart piece by piece. Thats emotion not reason. But I can't understand y u feel so bad that I was able to expose d loopholes in her story.

Once again, ur emotions are getting d better of u. Like I told u earlier to produce d "aspersions". Uptill now u couldn't. Now, pls define "victim shaming" & provide d exact comment I made that constitute "victim shaming". Am certain u can't.

Is it like d meaning of d word castigate has been changed in d dictionary or u are using a dictionary from planet Mars? Can u produce d comment I made were I "castigated" d lady?

I have never seen were someone has been so troubled by ordinary questions that he looses his grip on d meaning of words& how to use them in sentences.

"You are trivialising the way she was assaulted, and ignoring the reason she had to defend herself, by focusing on the irrelevant aspects of the story."

How do u no d actual reason she did what she when u don't have facts to ascertain if she is telling d truth or not? How do u no d actual reason she did what she did when u haven't heard from d Johnson guy? How do u no d actual reason she did what she did when u can't answer questions that will shed more light on d issue? U are avoiding answering d questions I asked cos if u do, they will expose d truth & u don't want d truth. U only want ur subjectivity & prejudice to b reinforced. And since am not doing that 4u, am an enemy, a rape apologist. Sorry dude, I can't pamper ur sentiments. D world doesn't work that way.

D epistle u wrote up there is which number

You have copied and pasted another of your meaningless epistles, which you had posted previously. This is part of your victim shaming antics.

You think if you keep repeating your epistles, people will take you seriously? For where?

laudate:
You have copied and pasted another of your meaningless epistles, which you had posted previously. This is part of your victim shaming antics.

You think if you keep repeating your epistles, people will take you seriously? For where?

Where's d copy & paste? This guy u are really loosing it ooh. My epistles really unsettled u. I thought it was only words & meanings that u have lost grip of. Now u have even lost grip of "epistles".

Its funny u call my comments "meaningless". But these meaningless comments put ur cerebral cortex in a cryogenic state.

Its obvious that u have run out of things to say. So like a drowning man, u have latched unto insults to try to save face. When I encounter folks who do that, I just no they have run dry. Nothing else to offer

lexy2014:
Where's d copy & paste? This guy u are really loosing it ooh. My epistles really unsettled u. I thought it was only words & meanings that u have lost grip of. Now u have even lost grip of "epistles".

Its funny u call my comments "meaningless". But these meaningless comments put ur cerebral cortex in a cryogenic state.

Its obvious that u have run out of things to say. So like a drowning man, u have latched unto insults to try to save face. When I encounter folks who do that, I just no they have run dry. Nothing else to offer

Go back and read the last two posts that you made. And you will see all the copy-and-paste, you did.

And there were no insults in my post, just facts. Oya, continue with your victim shaming and your defence of attempted rape...

laudate:
Go back and read the last two posts that you made. And you will see all the copy-and-paste, you did.

And there were no insults in my post, just facts. Oya, continue with your victim shaming and your defence of attempted rape...

This thing really shook u ooh. I don't need to go back& read anything. I made d comment so I no what I said. U are d one who has been wobbling & fumbling with words& meanings so am not surprised that d process of wobbling & fumbling has grown to a much larger scale.

U haven't made one single fact since u decided to get into d discussion. Its been ur emotions having d better of ur intellect. D screenshot u added to ur last post was what? If u were engaged in an intellectual discussion, there was no need 4 that cos it in no way adds to d discussion. Obviously, u have run out of anything meaningful to say. U have run of words& u are frozen up there.

When u have completely recovered, maybe u will have d wherewithal to attempt d questions I asked. I hope they don't put ur cerebrum into another cryogenic setback

lexy2014:
So in my last two posts, there was copy& paste? This thing really shook u ooh. I don't need to go back& read anything. I made d comment so I no what I said. U are d one who has been wobbling & fumbling with words& meanings so am not surprised that d process of wobbling & fumbling has grown to a much larger scale.

U haven't made one single fact since u decided to get into d discussion. Its been ur emotions having d better of ur intellect. D screenshot u added to ur last post was what? If u were engaged in an intellectual discussion, there was no need 4 that cos it in no way adds to d discussion. Obviously, u have run out of anything meaningful to say. U have run of words& u are frozen up there.

When u have completely recovered, maybe u will have d wherewithal to attempt d questions I asked. I hope they don't put ur cerebrum into another cryogenic setback

Ehen....another long epistle. You are trying so hard to justify the indefensible, but you just keep sounding incomprehensible.

Your lack of concern for the victim, and your persistent attempts to paint her black shows the kind of values you hold. Keep holding brief for Johnson, since you are a rape apologist....