For those who have comma somewhere, like myself, I don't interfere in their (the imperfect ones) matter if I know about it, because I feel they face a lot of challenges and odds or they have faced it already.

However, if someone who says people should pity them, now starts to act in ways that are clearly intended to malign, insult, harass or harm others, how is everyone else supposed to react? Especially if they've been politely supporting the person or at least previously refraining from hurting their feelings.

Are they (the imperfect people) justified in using the advantage conferred on them by societal forgiveness of their imperfections as a means of attacking others?

Note: I might also have been in this situation before, I don't know. Probably just one of those ways humans behave.

isn’t addressing them as “imperfect” enough justification for their supposed wrong doings?

chyckxx:
isn’t addressing them as “imperfect” enough justification for their supposed wrong doings?

No, it's not.

The imperfection is not perjorative, it simply describes a reality.

Regardless, are they justified in using whatever you want to call it, to perform their agendas on others and does it mean they should also be working for those who want to use them for unsavory purposes?

The idea that they're imperfect is enough reason to overlook their transgressions, but then some supposed imperfect people just choose to he deliberately dunce in nature and act stupidly. That is what I can't allow to slide.

Life is unfair oo

nairalandposter:


No, it's not.

The imperfection is not perjorative, it simply describes a reality.

Regardless, are they justified in using whatever you want to call it, to perform their agendas on others and does it mean they should also be working for those who want to use them for unsavory purposes?

well, i think we should consider consent before coming to a conclusion. like you pointed out, you might have emitted such unsavory character without being aware.
you should understand that as humans, we’re likely to put ourselves and feelings first; sometimes, not minding the way other people perceive our behaviors or how it affects them.
my point is, they may not be aware of the effects the characters you pointed out may have on the people around them.

chyckxx:


well, i think we should consider consent before coming to a conclusion. like you pointed out, you might have emitted such unsavory character without being aware.
you should understand that as humans, we’re likely to put ourselves and feelings first; sometimes, not minding the way other people perceive our behaviors or how it affects them.
my point is, they may not be aware of the effects the characters you pointed out may have on the people around them.

What about when they're quite aware and using the vantage point they were given, to deliberately inflict harm?

nairalandposter:


What about when they're quite aware and using the vantage point they were given, to deliberately inflict harm?

then, they’re in the best position to give their reasons. however, if you’re on the receiving end; it’s best you take back the said advantage.

chyckxx:

then, they’re in the best position to give their reasons. however, if you’re on the receiving end; it’s best you take back the said advantage.

Most times they are really sneaky and wait until they have that vantage point before showing their agenda.

It's not always possible to take back the advantage, what you know you should do is make them aware of what is acceptable in their agenda and what is not.

I have seen it all

nauto5:
I have seen it all

Seen what?