₦airaland Forum

igbesachick:
you can tell a scumbag black guy from an upright black guy easily.

you just think all chinese are the same.

You're wrong.

igbesachick:
illegal emigrants of chinese on their way to america , modern self-voluntary slavery.

a fifth class citizen of usa is way better than a second class citizen in china

嗨，低等下贱的臭港贱蛆。你祖宗我又来逗你玩来了。我拉的屎就他妈喜欢你这么下贱的香港贱蛆。
你这贱蛆就是喜欢吃我的屎。

你看你们这帮贱蛆有多下贱，不愧是世界最下贱最低等的香港贱蛆。黑人都比你们贱蛆高级。

igbesachick:
illegal emigrants of chinese on their way to america , modern self-voluntary slavery.

a fifth class citizen of usa is way better than a second class citizen in china

低等下贱的臭港贱蛆快看看你们吃屎同胞有多下贱，就是黑人也比你们高级。你们就是吃黑人的屎的香港贱蛆。
快特么别笑死我了，就你们香港这帮未开化的低等贱蛆也配跟我说话？ 你特么快张嘴啊，老子要拉屎在你嘴里。

aadoiza:
Yes, we all eat, but how we eat does not have to be the same

well, even democracy has different types, constitutional monarchy , democratic republicanism, parliamental democracy, presidential democracy....

but, they are all democracy. one of the human nature is loving freedom, and after experiences in the whites for several hindred years, it proves that to them democracy is the best way to guarantee the freedom for most people in a country. and human nature is the same for anyone, so , the way to achieve it should be the same.

if not, how can that be?

igbesachick:
i dont understand

'What' means the government, the food, etc and 'how' is the style/method of governing or eating. They're 2 different things. Every people needs governance but they go about it need not be the same.

aadoiza:
You're wrong.

ok, but that is my feeling

i can tell a chinese scoundrel by a look and the few words he says.

igbesachick:
well, even democracy has different types, constitutional monarchy , democratic republicanism, parliamental democracy, presidential democracy....

but, they are all democracy. one of the human nature is loving freedom, and after experiences in the whites for several hindred years, it proves that to them democracy is the best way to guarantee the freedom for most people in a country. and human nature is the same for anyone, so , the way to achieve it should be the same.

if not, how can that be?

Every form of government does not have to be democracy. Some people will be better governed militarily.

igbesachick:
ok, but that is my feeling

i can tell a chinese scoundrel by a look and the few words he says.

Never judge a book by its cover except, of course, you're a psychic.

igbesachick:
yoruba hong konger police escort illegal gold-digger chinaman back to their fulani chinaland.


chinaman are hypocrites.

chinaman abuse hong kongers in the vilest way on internet, but they worship HK and die to steal a way into HK for a green pasture.

我操你妈屄的，你真鸡巴不要屄脸，你们香港贱蛆有多少人在我们中国乞讨，你心里没点屄数是吧？

Hi, Hong Kong maggots. Do you know how many Hong Kong people pray to live in China? I tell you. 200000 Hong Kong maggots live and beg in China!

你个劣等下贱的香港贱蛆，能别笑死世界了吗？ 现在我就在这，你看有人搭理你个贱蛆吗？？

aadoiza:
'What' means the government, the food, etc and 'how' is the style/method of governing or eating. They're 2 different things. Every people needs governance but they go about it need not be the same.

that is exactly our divergent point.

but the way as to how to rule is too big to be choices that can be chosen from. it should be considered to be "eating food or not " , not "what kind of food".

as to what kind of democracy, that is nuance which can be shifted like different foods.

anyway, my logic is very simple and clear, we are all the same human, lessons can be copied directly.

aadoiza:
Never judge a book by its cover except, of course, you're a psychic.

u are off the point, i mean, a man can not tell a person from another color whether he is a good guy or a bad guy as easily as he tells among his own color people.

at least that is my experience.

aadoiza:
Every form of government does not have to be democracy. Some people will be better governed militarily.

but whites in the successful democratic countries dont choose the military system. they have tried , maybe in some german or italian feudal principalities in 18th century, but they finally found out democracy is the best to them.

principle applied to whites should be the same to other people. human nature is the same.

if a people find out military system more suitable to them, i can not help wondering why? what makes them different? genes? temperature?food intake?

igbesachick:
u are off the point, i mean, a man can not tell a person from another color whether he is a good guy or a bad guy as easily as he tells among his own color people.

at least that is my experience.

Since you claim it's your experience, meaning it's subjective, I'll leave it at that.

igbesachick:
that is exactly our divergent point.

but the way as to how to rule is too big to be choices that can be chosen from. it should be considered to be "eating food or not " , not "what kind of food".

as to what kind of democracy, that is nuance which can be shifted like different foods.

anyway, my logic is very simple and clear, we are all the same human, lessons can be copied directly.

Your logic may be clear but it does not mean its acceptable.

aadoiza:
Your logic may be clear but it does not mean its acceptable.

ok.

igbesachick:
but whites in the successful democratic countries dont choose the military system. they have tried , maybe in some german or italian feudal principalities in 18th century, but they finally found out democracy is the best to them.

principle applied to whites should be the same to other people. human nature is the same.

if a people find out military system more suitable to them, i can not help wondering why? what makes them different? genes? temperature?food intake?

Yes, the whites found what worked for them. So why should they foist what works for them on others, going as far as destabilising their economies. Would it be so wrong if other people discover what works for them on their own? I don't care about any style of government country chooses as long as it works for her people.

aadoiza:
Yes, the whites found what worked for them. So why should they foist what works for them on others, going as far as destabilising their economies. Would it be so wrong if other people discover what works for them on their own? I don't care about any style of government country chooses as long as it works for her people.

ok, tell me, what makes democracy not suitable to black man countries?

and of course some east europe white man countries n asian ones too.

igbesachick:
ok, tell me, what makes democracy not suitable to black man countries?

and of course some east europe white man countries n asian ones too.

I never said democracy does not suit the blacks. My stand is if a people decides to try something else they should be free to do so, not criticised for not adopting democracy.

aadoiza:
I never said democracy does not suit the blacks. My stand is if a people decides to try something else they should be free to do so, not criticised for not adopting democracy.

but another person has already tried every experiences and proved to u what is suitable to him. and you and he are the same.

igbesachick:
but another person has already tried every experiences and proved to u what is suitable to him. and you and he are the same.

Because you played every sport and none worked out you doesn't mean I should assume no sport would work out for me if tried.
Never let anyone discourage you from trying something just because they fail at it.

aadoiza:
Because you played every sport and none worked out you doesn't mean I should assume no sport would work out for me if tried.
Never let anyone discourage you from trying something just because they fail at it.

but that people is exactly like u. only difference is skin color.

igbesachick:
but that people is exactly like u. only difference is skin color.

Our biological make-up may be same but mentally we are not.

MycroftHolmes:
Of course, China is a working nation(we can't deny that). A very lawful state where everything is accounted for. Only a few 'democratic' nations are as effective as China today. I know all these facts. Despite the citizens of many other nations deciding to choose China as their destination for both studies and tourism(like you stated), the hong-kongers have good reason to protest against 'being a full part of China'


Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997, after which it was returned to China under the "one country, two systems" arrangement.
Under the agreement, Hong Kong is expected to have a high degree of autonomy from mainland China, and residents enjoy more freedoms than those on the mainland.


So, its not a question of if China has a working economy or not. It's rather a fact that hong-kongers will not be comfortable being under the 'useful' restrictions placed by the government to 'protect their internal politics', among other things.

Maybe the hong-kongers just like the freedom of visiting social media platforms like FB and twitter without having to use VPNs, or news websites like BBC.
Or maybe they loathe the idea of using your national ID card to sign up for an email, or open a social media profile.

OK you've seen the violence and vandalism that has been following the protests, tell me is it justifiable to destroy and vandalize public property because of that.
Hong Kong's economy while being a strong one is facing rising inequality and a surge in housing rent. Is it part of freedom fighting to attack unarmed civilians and the police too?

aadoiza:
I don't know for these people. Must the whole world runs their affairs in a manner that suit the West?

China that has civilization dating to 2000 years is being told what to do by a country of about 200 years.

Slimpotter:
OK you've seen the violence and vandalism that has been following the protests, tell me is it justifiable to destroy and vandalize public property because of that.
Hong Kong's economy while being a strong one is facing rising inequality and a surge in housing rent. Is it part of freedom fighting to attack unarmed civilians and the police too?

in american civil war, 200 000 white soldiers and 100 000 black orderlies died , for the freedom of the black people and a new political system.

is this "vandalism" worthwhile?

a revolution without casualty? a free lunch?

Slimpotter:
China that has civilization dating to 2000 years is being told what to do by a country of about 200 years.

a shiet race existing for 5000 years ending poor and violating all sorts of human rights, this indicates this race is a subhuman race. it is NOT human race.

oh, i m not talking about black race.

a race of 5000 years "history " need to steal every invention (telephone, toilet paper, tube, air conditioner, dish, nylon, tweezers......) from a country of 200 years of history.

what a shame! please dont humiliate china!

what the fvck have chinese done during that long history but playing their own dicks whiling away their time !

ps: china has invented nothing , totally nothing for human race. 90% of all the things you use were invented by english speaking whites.and the rest were by japs and french and german.

china, with its 1400million maggots, eat away all resources in this planet, while contributing zero to human race. go love china!

Slimpotter:
OK you've seen the violence and vandalism that has been following the protests, tell me is it justifiable to destroy and vandalize public property because of that.
Hong Kong's economy while being a strong one is facing rising inequality and a surge in housing rent. Is it part of freedom fighting to attack unarmed civilians and the police too?

hong kong income inequality?


gini index. the gini index of china is 50% higher than nigeria, which means 10 destitute chinese contribute a "middle class" chinese who has a japanese car , while 7 or 8 destitute nigerian supporting a better off one with a maybe second hand japanese car. the more rich people in china, means tons of more painful poor ones. it is nothing to be pround of which of these two countries possessing more rich people .

Slimpotter:
China that has civilization dating to 2000 years is being told what to do by a country of about 200 years.

E tire me o. China has survived and succeeded without basing development on some caucasian blueprint for governance.
I just love people who don't do the 'band wagon'

aadoiza:
E tire me o. China has survived and succeeded without basing development on some caucasian blueprint for governance.
I just love people who don't do the 'band wagon'

because chinese have lived too far away, tucked in east asia, from whites.

and they were beaten the shiet out of them once they encountered whites in 19th century.

no savages can keep being backward. see how smartly and quickly nowadays chinks learn to steal from whites . chinks no longer "without basing on caucasian"


no, today chink steal from whites directly. today chinks love whites to crazy, they unscrupulously take anything whitey from whites.

they bleach, they steal white technology, they crazy for english, they follow white example to colonize africa, they marry to whites willingly, they love whites today.