₦airaland Forum

There was no such thing as balanced budget under Clinton, that's just a Democrat talking point to fool their dummy base. Despite Clinton burrowing from the social security to fund part of the govt so he won't have to accrue interest, he still increased the deficit by $1.4 trillion or so.

LordReed:
It is certainly astounding. The last time the budget was balanced was under Clinton but their fucking hypocrisy will conveniently omit that fact. LMFAO!

McConnell and his gang cover up sham in full swing.

Time for a full investigation of the Bidens!!!!!!

wowcatty:
There was no such thing as balanced budget under Clinton, that's just a Democrat talking point to fool their dummy base. Despite Clinton burrowing from the social security to fund part of the govt so he won't have to accrue interest, he still increased the deficit by $1.4 trillion or so.

LMFAO! You don't have your facts straight. From 1998 to 2001 there was surplus no deficit at all. The highest the deficit was in the Clinton years was $255billion.

The media blamed Trump for not sending aid to Puerto Rico & then attacked him for saying they were corrupt.

But now Puerto Rico’s corruption has been exposed, Trump was proven right, & the media won’t apologize or give the story the same attention.

"If I showed up in any court in this country, and I said: ‘Judge, my case is overwhelming, but I’m not ready to go yet. I need more evidence before I can make my case;’ I would get thrown out in two seconds.

And that’s exactly what should happen here." - Pat Cipollone

garetz:
"If I showed up in any court in this country, and I said: ‘Judge, my case is overwhelming, but I’m not ready to go yet. I need more evidence before I can make my case;’ I would get thrown out in two seconds.

And that’s exactly what should happen here." - Pat Cipollone

that guy is in beast mode. he had the dems in tears

CTPlayer:
Time for a full investigation of the Bidens!!!!!!

Sure, but it should never be Trump making the call, 'cause they're said to be political opponents.
Rudi Guilliani is one "witness" who should not be allowed near this trial, he will gaffe Trump deeper into trouble.
He rushed Trump into Ukraine trouble just when we were beginning to celebrate the routing of Russia Collusion.
Trump should stop gifting ammunition to the hunters after him.

garetz:
"If I showed up in any court in this country, and I said: ‘Judge, my case is overwhelming, but I’m not ready to go yet. I need more evidence before I can make my case;’ I would get thrown out in two seconds.

And that’s exactly what should happen here." - Pat Cipollone

Continuance
In American procedural law, a continuance is the postponement of a hearing, trial, or other scheduled court proceeding at the request of either or both parties in the dispute, or by the judge sua sponte. In response to delays in bringing cases to trial, some states have adopted "fast-track" rules that sharply limit the ability of judges to grant continuances. However, a motion for continuance may be granted when necessitated by unforeseeable events, or for other reasonable cause articulated by the movant (the person seeking the continuance), especially when the court deems it necessary and prudent in the "interest of justice."

wowcatty:
The fact remains that Obama doubled all previous presidents combined by spending about $10 trillion with nothing to show for it. I don't see Trump wasting money like that despite having to rebuild the military from the ground up and launch new military arm Space Force.

Note that Trump's numbers are PROJECTED to 2021 when we are just starting 2020 because the liberals always know what Trump is thinking as evident in this their site. We manage liberal sites for some information, hoping and praying that don't spin everything out of the way since conservatives contents are hard to come back on Google, sometimes after 10 pages of searches.

The picture you included says Obama added 8.59 trillion then you say 10 trillion so you are already lying.

Then its another lie that Obama's policies where for nothing. It was the economic crash that the Bush administration did nothing to prevent that Obama had to deal with and he took the US out recession unto a stable path of recovery, effects of which the US is continuing to see today. So get your facts straight and stop lying koro koro lies.

Good news, all the Nigerian Trump love. How are y'all enjoying the coming travel ban.

“They said in their brief, ‘we have overwhelming evidence,’ & they’re afraid to make their case. Think about it...overwhelming evidence to impeach
@realDonaldTrump
, & then they come here on the first day & they say, ‘You know what, we need some more evidence.’” - Pat Cipollone

stanech:
“They said in their brief, ‘we have overwhelming evidence,’ & they’re afraid to make their case. Think about it...overwhelming evidence to impeach
@realDonaldTrump
, & then they come here on the first day & they say, ‘You know what, we need some more evidence.’” - Pat Cipollone

Lol!!! Pat lie better than Trump, if the evidence are not overwhelming, why the cover up and blocking of witness?

Kopfschmerzens:
Good news, all the Nigerian Trump love. How are y'all enjoying the coming travel ban.

It's not a Muslim ban, its a terrorist ban! LMFAO!

Kopfschmerzens:
Lol!!! Pat lie better than Trump, if the evidence are not overwhelming, why the cover up and blocking of witness?

I thought peolosi said they have all the evidence?

Kopfschmerzens:
McConnell and his gang cover up sham in full swing.

bros na payback time... na so politics dey go over there.. you think say GOP senate go remove trump, hahaha...even if Bolton testify, make Chelsea and arsenal join sef...the votes will never change. Trump ain't going no where o...

stanech:
I thought peolosi said they have all the evidence?

don't mind the dems...that old hag dey confused...

Kopfschmerzens:
Good news, all the Nigerian Trump love. How are y'all enjoying the coming travel ban.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/donald-trump-travel-ban-expansion-101581

Trump weighs travel ban expansion in coming days -The Trump administration is eyeing seven countries for new immigration restrictions three years after its original order, which created an uproar for targeting Muslim-majority nations.

President Donald Trump may expand his controversial travel ban with an announcement expected as early as Monday, the three-year anniversary of the original order, which targeted several majority-Muslim nations.

The list of countries is not yet final and could be changed, but nations under consideration for new restrictions include Belarus, Myanmar (also known as Burma), Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Nigeria, for instance, is a U.S. counter-terrorism partner and there is a large Nigerian diaspora community in the United States. At the same time, Trump has in the past referred to African nations as "shithole" countries whose citizens he did not want coming to the United States.

He also once said that if Nigerians come to the U.S., they will never “go back to their huts” in Africa, according to The New York Times.

Teaser4:
bros na payback time... na so politics dey go over there.. you think say GOP senate go remove trump, hahaha...even if Bolton testify, make Chelsea and arsenal join sef...the votes will never change. Trump ain't going no where o...

Dude i don't speak gibberish, shout me when you can make complete sense in understandable English language.

Kopfschmerzens:
Dude i don't speak gibberish, shout me when you can make complete sense in understandable English language.

English na language not a test of knowledge. I don't do online banters. i hope the likes you seek, feeds you today


Safe kiddo

Teaser4:
bros na payback time... na so politics dey go over there.. you think say GOP senate go remove trump, hahaha...even if Bolton testify, make Chelsea and arsenal join sef...the votes will never change. Trump ain't going no where o...

...Only a third of senators are well known and court national attention - the rest are happy to avoid the spotlight and concentrate on their lobbyists, donors and constituents...this trial puts the senators on the record and the court of public opinion will judge the GOP harshly given Trump's actions and lame defense...Acquittal means that the GOP might lose the senate majority (which will be Trump's nightmare, even if he wins his 2nd term) and they fear an energized Democrat party and disgruntled voters....

....The unfortunate part of this whole fiasco is that we all pretty much know already how it is likely to turn out...the only suspense is how it plays out.... Once all is said-and-done...the rest of the civilized world will almost certainly never view or trust American democracy as they used to...Even if every Republican were voted out in November, the damage has been done, much of it irreparable....

[s][/s]

TheShopKeeper:
...Only a third of senators are well known and court national attention - the rest are happy to avoid the spotlight and concentrate on their lobbyists, donors and constituents...this trial puts the senators on the record and the court of public opinion will judge the GOP harshly given Trump's actions and lame defense...Acquittal means that the GOP might lose the senate majority (which will be Trump's nightmare, even if he wins his 2nd term) and they fear an energized Democrat party and disgruntled voters....

....The unfortunate part of this whole fiasco is that we all pretty much know already how it is likely to turn out...the only suspense is how it plays out.... Once all is said-and-done...the rest of the civilized world will almost certainly never view or trust American democracy as they used to...Even if every Republican were voted out in November, the damage has been done, much of it irreparable....

[s]

TheShopKeeper:
...Only a third of senators are well known and court national attention - the rest are happy to avoid the spotlight and concentrate on their lobbyists, donors and constituents...this trial puts the senators on the record and the court of public opinion will judge the GOP harshly given Trump's actions and lame defense...Acquittal means that the GOP might lose the senate majority (which will be Trump's nightmare, even if he wins his 2nd term) and they fear an energized Democrat party and disgruntled voters....

....The unfortunate part of this whole fiasco is that we all pretty much know already how it is likely to turn out...the only suspense is how it plays out.... Once all is said-and-done...the rest of the civilized world will almost certainly never view or trust American democracy as they used to...Even if every Republican were voted out in November, the damage has been done, much of it irreparable....

[/s][quote author=TheShopKeeper post=86016515]

https://www.tulsi2020.com/press/2020-01-22-rep-tulsi-gabbard-files-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-over-defamatory-statements

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Files Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton Over Defamatory Statements
January 22nd, 2020
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC – Tulsi Gabbard, a United States Congresswoman, Army National Guard Major, and 2020 presidential candidate, today filed a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Rodham Clinton. Gabbard, a U.S. Representative for Hawaii’s 2nd congressional district, asserts in her complaint that Clinton deliberately and maliciously made false statements in an attempt to derail Rep. Gabbard’s campaign, by alleging that Gabbard is a “Russian asset.” The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Brian Dunne and Dan Terzian, Rep. Gabbard’s legal counsel and partners at Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP.

Clinton was the 2016 Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, United States Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, a United States Senator for the State of New York from 2001 to 2009, and the First Lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. On October 17, 2019, she publicly stated in an interview that “somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary … [is a] favorite of the Russians… Yeah, she’s a Russian asset.” The press extensively republished and disseminated these statements, which were interpreted widely as Clinton asserting that Gabbard is a Russian asset.

The complaint seeks compensatory damages and an injunction prohibiting the further publication of Clinton’s defamatory statements.

The case is Tulsi Gabbard and Tulsi Now, Inc. v. Hillary Rodham Clinton. A copy of the full complaint is available here.

Trump says he does not want Bolton to testify because it is national security risk..As in how can one person say something as stupid as that?But when Hilary testified in public over Bengazi and her emails it wasnt national security then despite the fact that Hilary was in a much more recognised position than Bolton..Lol

CTPlayer:
https://www.tulsi2020.com/press/2020-01-22-rep-tulsi-gabbard-files-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-over-defamatory-statements

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Files Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton Over Defamatory Statements
January 22nd, 2020
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC – Tulsi Gabbard, a United States Congresswoman, Army National Guard Major, and 2020 presidential candidate, today filed a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Rodham Clinton. Gabbard, a U.S. Representative for Hawaii’s 2nd congressional district, asserts in her complaint that Clinton deliberately and maliciously made false statements in an attempt to derail Rep. Gabbard’s campaign, by alleging that Gabbard is a “Russian asset.” The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Brian Dunne and Dan Terzian, Rep. Gabbard’s legal counsel and partners at Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP.

Clinton was the 2016 Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, United States Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, a United States Senator for the State of New York from 2001 to 2009, and the First Lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. On October 17, 2019, she publicly stated in an interview that “somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary … [is a] favorite of the Russians… Yeah, she’s a Russian asset.” The press extensively republished and disseminated these statements, which were interpreted widely as Clinton asserting that Gabbard is a Russian asset.

The complaint seeks compensatory damages and an injunction prohibiting the further publication of Clinton’s defamatory statements.

The case is Tulsi Gabbard and Tulsi Now, Inc. v. Hillary Rodham Clinton. A copy of the full complaint is available here.

...Losing to Obama then to Trump has turned Hillary into a bitter and resentful person...the humiliation of losing to a vulgar game show host (Trump) must have been tremendous and she will never recover...She's like a 70 year old Arya Stark (GoT) hell bent on revenge and repeating the names of the people she thinks have wronged her...Bernie...Trump...Tulsi...Comey...Jill Stein...Obama...

...on the other hand...this stunt by Tulsi is aiming for a job at Fox News...after the elections in Nov 2020...because she ain't coming back to congress...

TheShopKeeper:
...Losing to Obama then to Trump has turned Hillary into a bitter and resentful person...the humiliation of losing to a vulgar game show host (Trump) must have been tremendous and she will never recover...She's like a 70 year old Arya Stark (GoT) hell bent on revenge and repeating the names of the people she thinks have wronged her...Bernie...Trump...Tulsi...Comey...Jill Stein...Obama...

...on the other hand...this stunt by Tulsi is aiming for a job at Fox News...after the elections in Nov 2020...because she ain't coming back to congress...

I agree, she is doing herself no favours making all these recriminations upanddan.

Trump Brags About Concealing Impeachment Evidence: ‘We Have All the Material, They Don’t’

In an incredible exchange at Davos, @realdonaldtrump admits he is comfortable with the status of the impeachment trial because the White House is withholding evidence. "Honestly, we have all the material. They don't have the material." As always, he says the quiet part out loud. pic.twitter.com/Gk3h1QZyAi

— Justin Hendrix (@justinhendrix) January 22, 2020

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-impeachment-evidence-we-have-all-the-material-they-dont-941140/

President Trump said he’s happy with the way the impeachment trial is going thus far because his administration has not released “materials” that would hurt his cause.

“When we released that conversation all hell broke out with the Democrats,” Trump said. “Because they said, ‘Wait a minute, this is much different than [what Adam Schiff] told us.’ ”

The president continued, “So, we’re doing very well. I got to watch [the impeachment trial] enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material.”

DC sues Trump inaugural committee, alleging abuse of funds : The District of Columbia is suing President Donald Trump's inaugural committee and two companies that control the Trump International Hotel in the nation's capital

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/dc-sues-trump-inaugural-committee-alleging-abuse-funds-68450566?cid=clicksource_4380645_11_comic_strip_sq_hed

The District of Columbia is suing President Donald Trump's inaugural committee and two companies that control the Trump International Hotel in the nation's capital, accusing them of throwing parties for the Trump family with nonprofit funds, and overpaying for event space at the hotel.

The district's attorney general, Karl Racine, said the inaugural committee had been “blatantly and unlawfully abusing nonprofit funds to enrich the Trump family.” The lawsuit, announced Wednesday, alleges that the committee abused nonprofit funds and coordinated with the Trump family to “grossly overpay for event space” in the hotel.

The committee has maintained that its finances were independently audited, and that all money was spent in accordance with the law.

It was the latest allegation that Trump and his family have used public and nonprofit funds spent at Trump-owned properties to enrich themselves — part of the peril of Trump not fully withdrawing from his businesses while he is president. Trump has maintained ownership but turned the reins over to his adult sons, who have bristled at the charge that they are profiting off their father's presidency.

Teaser4:
bros na payback time... na so politics dey go over there.. you think say GOP senate go remove trump, hahaha...even if Bolton testify, make Chelsea and arsenal join sef...the votes will never change. Trump ain't going no where o...

Libtards love to dream wet dreams to make themselves feel better. The way they b*tch about Trump you would think he was thrown out of office a long time ago

CTPlayer:
https://www.tulsi2020.com/press/2020-01-22-rep-tulsi-gabbard-files-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-over-defamatory-statements

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Files Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton Over Defamatory Statements
January 22nd, 2020
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC – Tulsi Gabbard, a United States Congresswoman, Army National Guard Major, and 2020 presidential candidate, today filed a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Rodham Clinton. Gabbard, a U.S. Representative for Hawaii’s 2nd congressional district, asserts in her complaint that Clinton deliberately and maliciously made false statements in an attempt to derail Rep. Gabbard’s campaign, by alleging that Gabbard is a “Russian asset.” The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Brian Dunne and Dan Terzian, Rep. Gabbard’s legal counsel and partners at Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP.

Clinton was the 2016 Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, United States Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, a United States Senator for the State of New York from 2001 to 2009, and the First Lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. On October 17, 2019, she publicly stated in an interview that “somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary … [is a] favorite of the Russians… Yeah, she’s a Russian asset.” The press extensively republished and disseminated these statements, which were interpreted widely as Clinton asserting that Gabbard is a Russian asset.

The complaint seeks compensatory damages and an injunction prohibiting the further publication of Clinton’s defamatory statements.

The case is Tulsi Gabbard and Tulsi Now, Inc. v. Hillary Rodham Clinton. A copy of the full complaint is available here.

Just hoping Tulsi doesn't end up dead with two bullets at the back of her head. Anyone tied with Hillary somehow mysteriously ends up dead.

zendi:
Harry got woke, Harry got broke !
Who else enjoys melodious high prose that chimes like poetry?
Take a look at this masterpiece by James Delingpole of (where else) Breitbart News.
Warning: People triggered by Breitbart may need to learn to jump over many of my posts.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/19/delingpole-megxit-ex-prince-harry-got-woke-now-hes-broke/

Even if this didn't come from breitbart, it would still be a hedfuq. Talk about being told what to believe as opposed to use your own brain!

Opium, has surely evolved.

Teaser4:
[/s][s]