Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . - Foreign Affairs (1164) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . (3660892 Views)
1 2 3 ... 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 ... 2282 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Juchii(m): 6:37pm On Apr 30, 2020*. Modified: 8:21pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
keep2silent:This is exactly my point bro. You have said everything that I have nothing else to say. Problems with Nigerian researchers and engineers is mainly lack of patience and dedication. They want to blow as soon as possible through their shabby and unproved works. They so much believe in certificate that so many of them obtain it through false means, cheating themselves along the way. I would have condemned you for bringing federal university in Nigeria so low but unfortunately, that is what it is having schooled in so called best university in the South East as well. After much research about this self claimed company or firm called Arone, I can't point out exactly what they have to offer NAF in terms of practical and technical knowledge. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by AskiaHarem(m): 6:45pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
keep2silent:Sigh as usual.......
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 7:05pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
Guys checkout this Serbian LRSVM M18 122mm MLRS. An MLRS system on a wheeled platform, I must say I love it and the front view looks like the just acquired NA SH5 105 mm self-propelled artillery.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 7:09pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
Libya Conflicts; photo purportedly showing guided artillery projectile (looks like GP1 to me) fired by LNA that missed Mitiga Airport, Tripoli.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nicheey(m): 7:27pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
kabe1: |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 7:39pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
#iREPORT ISWA released a picture of an improvised launcher and 4x 9M22U-pattern 122mm "Grad" rockets used to hit Buni Yadi a few days ago. Rockets possibly captured in the large Goniri ambush a month before. Launcher is quite sensible, much more transportable than NA BM-21 for IS.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 7:44pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
bidexiii:these ones na low budget ISIS.. Ragtag and highly unkempt ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 7:50pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
seankafor:Hmmmm.... Me I no Dey underestimate Jarvis this guys can rec ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 7:55pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
bidexiii:anyone with a gun can wreck havoc and unrest. These guys looks starved and deranged with suicide,illiteracy and 72 virgins only thing ringing bell in their ears. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 8:07pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
bidexiii:you're sure they captured this from us |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 8:27pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
Toju200:Like I said: “possibly captured from us....” And probably from our neighbors but we are the one who deploys this GRAD rockets the most, so the probability it’s from us his high |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Jimmy17(m): 8:53pm On Apr 30, 2020 |
bidexiii:What's the range? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by davefurn: 4:08am On May 01, 2020 |
keep2silent:Hard truth....... |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 4:29am On May 01, 2020 |
Observing ISWAP attack videos & photos is uniforms worn by fighters around Lake Chad tends to be slicker than those worn by fighters around Buni Yadi-Damboa-Alagarno axis, perhaps reflecting more JAS-like and lesser sophisticated and resourced fighters in the latter.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by komekn(m): 10:06pm On May 01, 2020 |
Toju200:This a double edged sword of a question. How do you know, he knows what he is doing In order to appraise competence there should be experiential understanding and or knowledge to make that conclusion. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by komekn(m): 10:06pm On May 01, 2020 |
jpphilips:You are fixated with your view not with facts, substance and or rational, you really come across like a politician who evades all substance in favour of misrepresentation mixed with conjecture , to call it an opinion implies substance it is simply a view. Like a typical politician, you avoid the substance and highlight the suggestive, you adopt argument over appraisal and conclude with the whimsical. Your personal self-birthed perception does not create the definition of a word, you have used the word disinformation and gloating to describe my write up. Let me remind you, disinformation refers to false or misleading information and to gloat is to derive malignant pleasure. I do neither. You delight in arguement and rancour that is the DNA of a politician and proving yourself as the winner even if it is deluded your singular quest. That is not the purpose of this forum and this particular discourse you have deviated so far from the core critical question in your personal quest to prove, I do not know what You are derailing matters and murdering balanced discussion. Lets take quite a few steps back to the critical core question, i reiterate, "Best value and the most efficient use of resources for the greatest impact in the NE" Now hopefully you would have had cool ice cold drink of coca cola to cool your hot head down, and hopefully a smile now ask yourself have you addressed any of the items, questions and or issues in that core subject question ![]() In the bold you allude to the core question albeit very slightly but do not address it directly or with a substantive approach . Now once again I implore you to look at what you have written with a cool head. Consider what you have written, "NATO said it's role doesn't fit their battlefield doctrine" So if an air frame does not meet the particular requirements of my air force delivery strategy, that air craft is not fit for my purposes, i.e. not fit for purpose According to you i quote you verbatim, "thats a concocted rubbish you made up" Do you know you are effectively confirming my substansive view. You claim that I am confusing myself, now with your head bowed down look in the mirror, and ask yourself, Who is confused Everything else you have said is befuddled delusion in your misguided quest to prove, I do not know It is ignominious deviation from the core subject question, nonetheless I will indulge you.For instance if NATO thought the A10 was so good why did nobody not one NATO procure this aircraft You introduced the comparison of the $115k USA missile creating a unit of comparable measurement for cost benefit analysis but you have decided to completely avoid this in considering short and long term sustainability for the A29 in comparison to the Wing Loong II UAV and other alternative options with regards to the $600 million total package procurement price . I wonder why I was specific, measured, with a structured methodology of cost and substantively rational under the heading of Best value and the most efficient use of resources for the greatest impact in the NE. You have not reciprocated but rather have chosen to be insultingly dismissive. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Xbee007(m): 10:28pm On May 01, 2020 |
I wonder the kind of human that reads the kinds of long epistles above. Don't you get tired Komekn? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 11:05pm On May 01, 2020 |
Please who knows about the Nigerian frigate program? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by AskiaHarem(m): 12:08am On May 02, 2020 |
Xbee007:This is what he lives for. Without the ability to vent threw writing an elementary level Anti-Nigerian thesis on this thread his life has no meaning. ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by blacKDalia: 9:41am On May 02, 2020 |
komekn:The A10 is a venerable CAS platform. And why are other airforce not using it might be due to concept of operation and order of battle. The troubled and wildly over-budget F-35 Lightning is supposed to replace the A-10 in the close air support role and this technologically advanced platform is not suitable for low tech job. For CAS you need low and slow platforms which can loiter for long hours. Given the F-35’s shortcomings, the Air Force is considering supplementing the plane with a relatively inexpensive light attack aircraft. The 3 aircrafts that are in the competition to provide a low tech, low cost platforms are ; Embraer A 29 super tucano, Beechcraft A26 wolverine and Textron airland scorpion. In comparing the A29 and F-35, one of the major advantage is the operating cost, 500 dollars an hour as compared to 40,000 dollars an hour for the F-35. My take is that for a 3rd World country, the A29 is a better platform for CAS in an "uncontested air battle space". The F-35 is equipped with a 25mm GAU rotary gun and you get to wonder what that gun will be used for in an age where dogfights are beyond visual range. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 10:09am On May 02, 2020 |
Pls has anyone been hearing from that Terrorist Group that got their arse Whooped Ansaru Dogs Dem... e don tey o |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by lionel4power(m): 10:27am On May 02, 2020 |
keep2silent:At least they are doing something... what are you doing? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Xbee007(m): 11:58am On May 02, 2020 |
lionel4power:Making false claims about their certifications and capabilities is not going to benefit anyone. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by SamuelAnyawu(m): 12:44pm On May 02, 2020 |
Is Buratai still in the Northeast? ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:52pm On May 02, 2020 |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:55pm On May 02, 2020 |
SamuelAnyawu:Yeap his still good n the N.E The sudden silence of the ongoing onslaught right? ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by SamuelAnyawu(m): 2:35pm On May 02, 2020 |
bidexiii:Yeaa kinda ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 2:46pm On May 02, 2020 |
I'm glad my page is reaching people across the world.. Here's what a Pakistani commented https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=857724608069495&id=563565107485448 From Nigeria to the world... |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by QuietMynd: 3:02pm On May 02, 2020 |
Toju200:Nawa 4 u |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 3:14pm On May 02, 2020 |
QuietMynd:wetin ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 3:29pm On May 02, 2020 |
Toju200:Nice work bro |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by komekn(m): 3:32pm On May 02, 2020 |
blacKDalia:In all honesty l have zero interest in the rational of the USA's over priced arms industry cost benefit analysis. And the comparison benefits of the F35, A29 & A10. It's a deviation from the core discussion, which is essentially what's best for Nigeria. In that context is it best value to buy 12 turboprop A29 Tucano for $600 million that will not be delivered until 2024 for supposedly poorer partner countries. It's an absolute waste of money IMO. Consider how much the over priced precision ordinances and missiles that the A29 will require to be effective. Do you think it's sustainable in the long term❓ It essentially it makes a nonsense of the claimed operating cost of $500 an hour when you are paying $600 million to procure just 12 aircraft. But back to the original discourse which was to look at alternative options and consider best value for the greatest delivery outcome. A consideration of other platforms which l did with the immediately available Wing Loong II UAV. And its much cheaper precision ordinances and missiles and 30 hour endurance for ISTAR. As well as the SU25 which has a comparable operating cost to the A29 and far more adapt to the CAS role which people feel, not me is intrinsic for succes in the NE. But a quite a few consider the discussion to be antagonistic and contentious. Which it really should not be. |
“If Mugabe Dies, We Will Field His Corpse As A Candidate For Election” - Wife • Photos: What Some Countries Gives Their Soldiers To Eat On The Battle Field. • Video Of Frightened Black Man Forced Into A Coffin By White Man Sparks Outrage • 2 • 3 • 4
Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? • African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos Thread • Kenya Is Ahead of Nigeria In All Aspect (Facts Don't Lie)
Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)



