₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,328,870 members, 8,437,735 topics. Date: Thursday, 02 July 2026 at 11:08 AM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (596) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1170595 Views)

1 2 3 ... 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 8:14pm On Aug 25, 2020
nemesis8u:
Japanese OpenSky M-02 jet plane
where is the fuel stored??
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:55pm On Aug 27, 2020
lionel4power:
where is the fuel stored??
I guess in the body surrounding the engine
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
Kalyani Garuda 105x37 mm artillery gun mounted on a light 4x4 vehicle

The gun weights less than a ton

The gun incorporates soft recoil technology

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 2:24pm On Aug 27, 2020
nemesis8u:
Apache is a heavy weight category attack helicopter. LCH is a little weight category attack helicopter. So both of them cannot be compared.

Apache is optimised for operations at sea levels. LCH is optimised for operations at high altitudes.

LCH is a stealth helicopter while Apache is not . Stealth is a advantage in high altitudes when flying over mountains which has enemy SAM sites placed on it .

The rigid hingless main rotor of LCH together with the bearing less tail rotor allows for extreme snap maneuvers even in the rarified atmosphere found in the high altitudes. Apache doesn't have the same. Ironically the American Raider X stealth helicopter currently under development incorporates rigid main rotor.

LCH can carry 8 ATGMs not 4 as incorrectly written in the article . And it has already been certified to carry Mistral-2 AAMs.
Why didn't HAL give the LCH a 30 mm to give it a true Anti armour role?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 2:35pm On Aug 27, 2020
TayserMahri:
You keep telling me to read books but I can tell from the over confidence that you're the one who desperately needs to. Stalin never trusted Hitler nor the pact. The only thing he wanted was to keep war at bay for as long as possible to properly arm his men, by keeping the Fuhrer jovial and reassured. The deeper intricacies of historical warfare are surely not your forte. Read between the lines when you read.
Don't shoot! Some old info on THE REAL REASON HITLER ATTACKED RUSSIA. Stalin according to defectors had planned to invade not just Germany but W Europe. He attacked Finland in 1939 as a training exercise for his guys but got his arse royally kicked and finally swamped the Finns who handed over 11% of their territory when they signed the peace treaty in early 1940.

The Soviet offensive plans controversy was a debate among historians whether Soviet leader Joseph Stalin planned to attack Axis forces in Eastern Europe prior to Operation Barbarossa. Most historians agree that the geopolitical differences between the Soviet Union and the Axis made war inevitable, and that Stalin had made extensive preparations for war and exploited the military conflict in Europe to his advantage. Viktor Suvorov has argued that Stalin planned to attack Hitler from behind while Germany fought the Allies, and Barbarossa was a preemptive strike by Hitler. Many historians have written in response to Suvorov's views. Gabriel Gorodetsky and David Glantz authored books debunking his claims.[1][2][3] Suvorov received some support from Valeri Danilov, Joachim Hoffmann, Mikhail Meltyukhov, and Vladimir Nevezhin.[4][5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_offensive_plans_controversy
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 2:41pm On Aug 27, 2020
nemesis8u:
Kalyani Garuda V2 105x37 mm artillery gun mounted on a light 4x4 vehicle

The 105x37mm gun weights less than a ton

The gun incorporates soft recoil technology
This is a potential game changer! With its low logistical foot print there's little to stop this system in inf coys for own arty.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
kikuyu1:
Why didn't HAL give the LCH a 30 mm to give it a true Anti armour role?
There are several factors which determines the selection of weapons or the calibre of weapons.

LCH is a light weight category attack helicopter , mounting a 30 mm gun will increase weight , decrease stability , and increase inaccuracy.

20mm with armour piercing rounds is more than enough against light skinned vehicles and armoured IFV , APC , artillery , SPH etc.

If the gun fails to destroy the target , rockets and ATGMs will do the job
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:33pm On Aug 27, 2020
Kalyani Bharat 52 155x52 mm artillery gun

It is equipped with a APU for self propulsion in support of shoot and scoot missions

Equipped with an automated ammo loading system

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
kikuyu1:
Some old info on THE REAL REASON HITLER ATTACKED RUSSIA. Stalin according to defectors had planned to invade not just Germany but W Europe. He attacked Finland in 1939 as a training exercise for his guys but got his arse royally kicked and finally swamped the Finns who handed over 11% of their territory when they signed the peace treaty in early 1940.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_offensive_plans_controversy
Egg vs chicken. Mein Kampf was published in 25-26, which Stalin carefully studied. He knew full well Hitler's state of mind and plans. Upon you to decide for yourself who figured it first and whose actions would be preemptive.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
grin

Low level flight being taken too seriously

So much so Su27 manages to hit a road sign

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:53pm On Aug 28, 2020
F35 EOTS reportedly has range in excess of 1000 km

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:54pm On Aug 28, 2020
INS Vikramaditya

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:55pm On Aug 28, 2020
Pinaka rocket manufacturing line

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:56pm On Aug 28, 2020
Line up of 4 Sindhughosh class and 4 Shishumar class submarines

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:07pm On Aug 28, 2020
Inside the inflatable dome is the LRTR radar which is part of the DRDO BMD .

The entire setup can be relocated to any desired location as per need

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:12pm On Aug 28, 2020
ZU23 upgrade by Punj Lloyd

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:14pm On Aug 28, 2020
ALH Dhruv cockpit display

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:33pm On Aug 28, 2020
Russian KINZHAL

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:34pm On Aug 28, 2020
Different types of Russian exo skeleton

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:36pm On Aug 28, 2020
Hermes precision missile system

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:36pm On Aug 28, 2020
Russian Zu23

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:37pm On Aug 28, 2020
sa18 , not sure

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:38pm On Aug 28, 2020
New version of pantsir

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:30pm On Aug 29, 2020
nemesis8u:
Line up of 4 Sindhughosh class and 4 Shishumar class submarines
I can imagine me being the captain of a fishing boat...gazing at the sea and seeing these fishes come out at once grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by RemoveKebab: 10:58am On Aug 30, 2020
nemesis8u:
grin

Low level flight being taken too seriously

So much so Su27 manages to hit a road sign
What would have happened if that road sign entered the inlet of that engine?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:39pm On Aug 30, 2020
RemoveKebab:
What would have happened if that road sign entered the inlet of that engine?
Engine flameout

In layman's term the engine would have been destroyed completely due to ingestion of the sign post.

Even a small bird if it gets sucked into an engine will destroy the engine .

But since it is a twin engined aircraft , not so much of a problem since the other engine would have kept the aircraft flying
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:43pm On Aug 30, 2020
Kalyani 155x39 mm mounted gun system

The light weight gun is installed on a 4x4 wheeled HMV

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:56pm On Aug 30, 2020
Kalyani ultralight 155x39 mm artillery gun

It has hybrid soft recoil system

It comes in 2 variants

1. Titanium build ( much lighter but expensive )
2. Steel build ( little heavier but cheaper )

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by RemoveKebab: 3:39pm On Aug 30, 2020
nemesis8u:
Engine flameout

In layman's term the engine would have been destroyed completely due to ingestion of the sign post.

Even a small bird if it gets sucked into an engine will destroy the engine .

But since it is a twin engined aircraft , not so much of a problem since the other engine would have kept the aircraft flying
the pilot was pretty lucky then.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:31pm On Aug 30, 2020
RemoveKebab:
the pilot was pretty lucky then.
Twin engined aircraft not a problem more or less.

If it had been a single engined aircraft then very dangerous for the pilot
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:33pm On Aug 30, 2020
Kalyani variant of ATAGS 155X52 mm artillery gun system

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:34pm On Aug 30, 2020
Akash C3 vehicle

1 2 3 ... 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .